Supreme Court Reporter

St. Louis v. United Rvs. Co., 210 U. S. 266, 276, 28 Sup. Ct. 630, 52 L. Ed. 1054. St. Louis v. Western Union Tel. Co., 148 U. S. 92, 13 Sup. Ct. 485, 37 L. Ed. 380; 149 U. S. 465, 13 Sup. Ct. 990, 37 L. Ed. 810..201, 266, 267, 430 St. Louis, etc., R. Co. v. Hesterly, 228 U. S. 702, 33 Sup. Ct. 703, 57 L. Ed. 1031... St. Louis, etc., R. Co. v. Seale, 229 U. S, 156, 33 Sup. Ct. 651, 57 L. Ed. 1129, Ann. Cas. 1914C, 156..

523

146

St. Louis, I. M. & S. R. Co. v. McKnight, 244
U. S. 368, 373, 37 Sup.
St. Louis, I. M. & S.
U. S. 592, 37 Sup. Ct.

.333, 334

243

560

362

421

Ct. 611, 61 L. Ed. 1200.. 241
R. Co. v. Starbird, 243
462, 61 L. Ed. 917..

140, 255, 519 St. Louis, I. M. & S. R. Co. v. Taylor, 210 U. S. 281, 295, 28 Sup. Ct. 616, 52 L. Ed. 1061... 357, 370, 560 St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. v. Vickers, 122 U. S. 360, 363, 7 Sup. Ct. 1216, 30 L. Ed. 1161... 541 St. Louis Independent Packing Co. v. Houston (D. C.) 204 Fed. 120; 215 Fed. 553, 132 C. C. A. 65; (D. C.) 231 Fed. 779; 242 Fed. 337, 155 C. C. A. 113..

St. Louis Southwestern R. Co. v. Arkansas, 235 U. S. 350, 362, 369, 35 Sup. Ct. 99, 59 L. Ed. 265 .18, 156, 328, 523, 559 St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. Gill, 156 U. S. 649, 659, 666, 15 Sup. Ct. 484, 39 L. Ed. 567. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. Mathews, 165 U. S. 1, 22, 17 Sup. Ct. 243, 41 L. Ed. 611... St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. Shepherd, 240 U. S. 240, 241, 36 Sup. Ct. 274, 60 L. Ed. 622.. 391 San Jose-Los Gatos Interurban R. Co. v. San Jose R. Co., 156 Fed. 455, 458, 84 C. C. A. 265, 13 Ann. Cas. 571. Santa Fé, P. & P. R. Co. v. Grant Bros. Const. Co., 228 U. S. 177, 33 Sup. Ct. 474, 57 L. Ed. 787 ..108, 163 Santos v. Roman Catholic Church, 212 U. S. 463, 29 Sup. Ct. 338, 53 L. Ed. 599. Savage v. Jones, 225 U. S. 501, 504, 524, 525, 528, 529, 531, 533, 539, 32 Sup. Ct. 715, 724, 727, 728, 56 L. Ed. 1182. .37, 126, 321, 327, 329, 404 Sawyer, In re, 124 U. S. 200, 210, 8 Sup. Ct. 482, 31 L. Ed. 402...

Shapiro v. U. S., 235 U. S. 412, 35 Sup. 59 L. Ed. 291.

480

.263, 264

Shaw v. Quincy Mining Co., 145 U. S. 444, 12
Sup. Ct. 935, 36 L. Ed. 768..
Shawham v. Wherritt, 7 How. 627, 643, 12 L. Ed.
847
Sheridan Chamber of Commerce v. Chicago, B.
& Q. R. Co., 26 Interst. Com. R. 638, 647...... 378
Shields v. Barrow, 17 How. 130, 15 L. Ed. 158.. 481
Shively v. Bowlby, 152 U. S. 1, 27, 47-48, 58, 14
Sup. Ct. 548, 38 L. Ed. 331...
.41, 47
Shiver v. U. S., 159 U. S. 491, 16 Sup. Ct. 54, 40
L. Ed. 231.

Saxlehner v. Eisner & Mendelson Co., 179 U. S.
19, 39, 21 Sup. Ct. 7, 45 L. Ed. 60..
Saxlehner v. Siegel-Cooper Co., 179 U. S. 42, 21
Sup. Ct. 16, 45 L. Ed. 77..

.52, 50

..50, 52

Saxlehner v. Wagner, 216 U. S. 375, 30 Sup. Ct. 298, 54 L. Ed. 525.

Sayles v. Foley, 38 R. I. 484, 490-492, 493, 96 Atl. 340

80 .229, 230 Schenck v. U. S., 249 U. S. 47, 39 Sup. Ct. 247, 63 L. Ed. 470.. ..250, 253 Schick, In re, 2 Ben. 5, Fed. Cas. No. 12,455... 263 Schillinger v. U. S., 155 U. S. 163, 15 Sup. Ct. 85, 39 L. Ed. 108..

Smith v. Hitchcock, 226 U. S. 53, 33 Sup. Ct. 6, 57 L. Ed. 119.

334

Schmidinger v. Chicago, 226 U. S. 578, 588, 33 Sup. Ct. 182, 57 L. Ed. 364, Ann. Cas. 1914B, 284

327

.480, 481 Smith v. Union Oil Co., 166 Cal. 217, 135 Pac. 966

Smith v. Jennings, 67 S. C. 324, 45 S. E. 821... 95
Smith v. Lyon, 133 U. S. 315, 10 Sup. Ct. 303, 33
L. Ed. 635.....

309 Snyder v. Deeds, 91 Ohio St. 407, 110 N. E. 1068 24 Snyder v. Marks, 109 U. S. 189, 3 Sup. Ct. 157, 27 L. Ed. 901.. 82

School Dist. v. Wood, 13 Mass. 193, 198.

185

Schuchardt v. Allen, 1 Wall. 359, 370, 17 L. Ed. 642

542

Scottish Union & Nat. Ins. Co. v. Bowland, 196 U. S. 611, 25 Sup. Ct. 345, 49 L. Ed. 619. Seaboard Air Line v. Padgett, 236 U. S. 668, 673, 35 Sup. Ct. 481, 59 L. Ed. 777.. Seaboard Air Line v. Horton, 233 U. S. 492, 504, 505, 34 Sup. Ct. 635, 58 L. Ed. 1062, L. R. A. 1915C, 1, Ann. Cas. 1915B, 475; 239 U. S. 595, 598, 599, 36 Sup. Ct. 180, 60 L. Ed. 458..146, 369, 556 Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Moore, 228 U. S. 433, 435, 33 Sup. Ct. 580, 57 L. Ed. 907. 368

Southern Pac. Co. v. Jensen, 244 U. S. 205, 216, 37 Sup. Ct. 524, 529, 61 L. Ed. 1086, L. R. A. 1918C, 451, Ann. Cas. 1917E, 900.............113, 147

South Covington R. Co. v. Covington, 235 U. S. 537, 540, 35 Sup. Ct. 158, 59 L. Ed. 350, L. R. A. 1915F, 792..

Southern Illinois & Missouri Bridge Co. V. Stone, 174 Mo. 1, 33, 73 S. W. 453, 63 L. R. A. 301

452

337

Southern Pac. Co. v. Lowe, 247 U. S. 330, 38 Sup. Ct. 540, 62 L. Ed. 1142. Southern Pac. Co. v. Schuyler, 227 U. S. 601, 613, 33 Sup. Ct. 277, 57 L. Ed. 662, 43 L. R. A. (N. S.) 901... Southern Pac. Co. v. Stewart, 233 Fed. 956, 147 C. C. A. 630; 245 U. S. 359, 562, 38 Sup. Ct. 130, 203, 62 L. Ed. 345, 472; 248 U. S. 446, 39 Sup. Ct. 139, 63 L. Ed. 350... Southern Pac. R. Co. v. Bell, 183 U. S. 675, 22 Sup. Ct. 232, 46 L. Ed. 383.. Southern Pac. Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission, 219 U. S. 498, 31 Sup. Ct. 279, 55 L. Ed. 310..

140, 255

Stone v. U. S., 164 U. S. 380, 17 Sup. Ct. 71, 41
L. Ed. 477; 167 U. S. 178, 17 Sup. Ct. 778, 42
L. Ed. 127.
.347, 398, 428
Storti v. Massachusetts, 183 U. S. 138, 142, 22
Sup. Ct. 72, 46 L. Ed. 120.
Strathairly, The, 124 U. S. 558, 8 Sup. Ct. 609,
31 L. Ed. 580.

315

453

176

285

Stratton's Independence v. Howbert, 231 U. S. 399, 422, 34 Sup. Ct. 136, 58 L. Ed. 285.. Strawbridge v. Curtiss, 3 Cranch, 267, 2 L. Ed. 435

480

Southern Pine Co. v. Ward, 208 U. S. 126, 137, 28 Sup. Ct. 239, 52 L. Ed. 420.. Southern R. Co. v. King, 217 U. S. 524, 30 Sup. Ct. 594, 54 L. Ed. 868. Southern R. Co. v. Prescott, 240 U. S. 36 Sup. Ct. 469, 60 L. Ed. 836.. Southern R. Co. v. Puckett, 244 U. S. 571, 573, 574, 37 Sup. Ct. 703, 61 L. Ed. 1321, Ann. Cas. 1918B, 69 ..21, 22, 188, 229, 414 Southworth v. Railroad, 2 Mich. 287. Sparks v. Pierce, 115 U. S. 408, 413, 6 Sup. Ct. 102 105, 29 L. Ed. 428.. ..124, 548 Sparrow v. E. Bement & Sons, 142 Mich. 441, 105 N. W. 881, 10 L. R. A. (N. S.) 725.. Spencer v. Duplan Silk Co., 191 U. S. 526, 24 Sup. Ct. 174, 48 L. Ed. 287.

383

534, 535,

.172, 228

632, 638,

.402, 520

Sundstrom v. State, 213 N. Y. 68, 106 N. E. 924.. 61 Sun Printing & Pub. Ass'n v. Moore, 183 U. S. 642, 22 Sup. Ct. 240, 46 L. Ed. 366.. Superior & Pittsburg Copper Co. v. Tomich, 19 Ariz. 182, 165 Pac. 1101, 1185. ..555, 566

304

Svor v. Morris, 227 U. S. 524, 529, 530, 33 Sup. Ct. 385, 57 L. Ed. 623.

548

Swafford v. Templeton, 185 U. S. 487, 22 Sup. Ct. 783, 46 L. Ed. 1005..

Sweeney v. Carter Oil Co., 199 U. S. 252, 26 Sup. Ct. 55, 50 L. Ed. 178..

479

Standard Oil Co. v. Hawkins, 74 Fed. 395, 20 C. C. A. 468, 33 L. R. A. 739.. Standard Oil Co. v. U. S., 221 U. S. 1, 56, 31 Sup. Ct. 502, 55 L. Ed. 619, 34 L. R. A. (N. S.) 834, Ann. Cas. 1912D, 734... Standard Stock Food Co. v. Wright, 225 U. S. 540, 548, 549, 550, 22 Sup. Ct. 784, 56 L. Ed. 1197 .228, 327 State v. Carey, 39 S. D. 524, 165 N. W. 539. 404 State v. Chicago, M. & St. P. R. Co., 115 Minn. 51, 131 N. W. 859.

Talley v. Burgess, 246 U. S. 104, 108, 38 Sup. Ct. 287, 62 L. Ed. 600.. ...135, 419 Talus, The (D. C.) 242 Fed. 954; 248 Fed. 670, 160 C. C. A. 570; 248 U. S. 185, 39 Sup. Ct. 84, 63 L. Ed. 97..

...85, 90

536

Tang Tun v. Edsell, 223 U. S. 673, 32 Sup. Ct. 359, 56 L. Ed. 606.

334

468

Tap Line Cases, 234 U. S. 1, 25, 34 Sup. Ct. 741, 58 L. Ed. 1185...

285

Texas & P. R. Co. v. Mugg, 202 U. S. 242, 26 Sup. Ct. 628, 50 L. Ed. 1011... Thames & Mersey M. I. Co. v. U. S., 237 U. S. 19, 35 Sup. Ct. 496, 59 L. Ed. 821, Ann. Cas. 1915D, 1087.... .159, 446 Theodore Rectanus Co. v. United Drug Co., 226 Fed. 545, 141 C. C. A. 301. Thomas Cusack Co. v. Chicago, 242 U. S. 526, 529, 530, 531, 37 Sup. Ct. 190, 191, 61 L. Ed. 472, L. R. A. 1918A, 136, Ann. Cas. 1917C, 594...274, 276 Thomas Jefferson, The, 10 Wheat. 428, 429, 6 L. Ed. 358.

518

223

Sterrett v. Second Nat. Bank of Cincinnati, Ohio, 246 Fed. 753, 159 C. C. A. 55. 27 Stevenson v. Fain, 195 U. S. 165, 166, 25 Sup. Ct. 6, 49 L. Ed. 142. .132, 256, 289 Stewart v. Kahn, 11 Wall. 493, 20 L. Ed. 176.... 505 Stewart v. Kansas City, 239 U. S. 14, 36 Sup. Ct. 15, 60 L. Ed. 120.. ...19, 20, 22, 134 Stewart v. Tennant, 52 W. Va. 559, 44 S. E. 223 406 Stewart v. Wyoming Ranche Co., 128 U. S. 389, 390, 9 Sup. Ct. 101, 32 L. Ed. 439. Stewart Min. Co. v. Ontario Min. Co., 237 U. S. 350, 35 Sup. Ct. 610, 59 L. Ed. 989......234, 235, 236

Tracy, Ex parte, 249 U. S. 551, 39 Sup. Ct. 63 L. Ed.

Trade-Mark Cases, 100 U. S. 82, 93, 25 L. 550

Transportation Co. v. Chicago, 99 U. S. 635,
25 L. Ed. 336.

Tregea v. Modesto Irr. Dist., 164 U. S. 179,
17 Sup. Ct. 52, 41 L. Ed. 395...
Tribune Co. of Chicago v. Associated Press
C.) 116 Fed. 126...
Trimble v. Seattle, 231 U. S. 683, 34 Sup. Ct. 218,
58 L. Ed. 435.

Truax v. Raich, 239 U. S. 33, 37-38, 41, 36 Sup.
Ct. 7, 10, 60 L. Ed. 131, L. R. A. 1916D, 545,
Ann. Cas. 1917B, 283.
.71, 143, 567
Truesdale v. Grape Sugar Co., 101 Ill. 561, 567.. 346
Tucker v. Alexandrff, 183 U. S. 424, 438, 22 Sup.
Ct. 195, 46 L. Ed. 264..

374,

385

Ed.

642,

.57, 372

185,

(C.

372

U. S. v. Delaware & Hudson Co., 213 U. S. 366, 408, 29 Sup. Ct. 527, 53 L. Ed. 836.. U. S. v. Denver, etc., Ry. (C. C.) 190 Fed. 825, 826; 150 U. S. 1, 14 Sup. Ct. 11, 37 L. Ed. 975 398 U. S. v. Doremus, 249 U. S. 86, 39 Sup. Ct. 214, 63 L. Ed.

U. S. v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co., 237 U. S. 410, 413, 35 Sup. Ct. 634, 636, 59 L. Ed. 1023..

357 U. S. v. Clark, 96 U. S. 37, 24 L. Ed. 696... ... 347 U. S. v. Coca-Cola Co., 241 U. S. 265, 36 Sup. Ot. 573, 60 L. Ed. 995, Ann. Cas. 1917C, 487.... 365 U. S. v. Cook, 19 Wall. 591, 22 L. Ed. 210. U. S. v. Cress, 243 U. S. 316, 37 Sup. Ct. 380, 61 L. Ed. 746... ..58, 159, 160 U. S. v. Davis, 131 U. S. 36, 9 Sup. Ct. 657, 33 L. Ed. 93..

... 398

158

217

Union Lime Co. v. Chicago & N. W. R. Co., 233 U. S. 211, 222, 34 Sup. Ct. 522, 525, 58 L. Ed. 924 Union Pac. Ry. v. Chicago, etc., R. Co., 163 U. S. 564, 603, 16 Sup. Ct. 1173, 41 L. Ed. 265... 237 Union Pac. R. Co. v. Public Service Commission, 268 Mo. 641, 187 S. W. 827.. Union Planter's Bank v. Memphis, 189 U. S. 71, 73, 23 Sup. Ct. 604, 47 L. Ed. 712.. Union Refrigerator Transit Co. v. Lynch, 177 U. S. 149, 152, 20 Sup. Ct. 631, 44 L. Ed. 708..

U. S. v. Hvoslef, 237 U. S. 1, 10, 12, 13, 35 Sup. Ct. 459, 59 L. Ed. 813, Ann. Cas. 1916A, 286... 159, 341, 360, 416 U. S. v. Illinois Surety Co., 226 Fed. 653, 664, 141 C. C. A. 409... 482 U. S. v. Isham, 17 Wall. 496, 504, 21 L. Ed. 728 271 U. S. v. Jin Fuey Moy, 241 U. S. 394, 402, 36 Sup. Ct. 658, 659, 60 L. Ed. 1061, Ann. Cas. 1917D, 854..

216

.41, 490 U. S. v. Kelly, 243 U. S. 316, 331, 37 Sup. Ct. 380, 61 L. Ed. 746. 159 U. S. v. King, 7 How. 833, 844, 12 L. Ed. 934... 482 U. S. v. Kirkpatrick, 9 Wheat. 720, 6 L. Ed. 199 408 U. S. v. Klein, 13 Wall. 128, 20 L. Ed. 519.. 308 U. S. v. Laughlin, 249 U. S., 39 Sup. Ct. 340, 63 L. Ed.

U. S. v. Jones, 109 U. S. 513, 519, 3 Sup. Ct. 346, 27 L. Ed. 1015; 236 U. S. 106, 35 Sup. Ct. 261, 59 L. Ed. 488, Ann. Cas. 1916A, 316......414, 416, 514 U. S. v. Kagama, 118 U. S. 375, 379, 6 Sup. Ct. 1109, 30 L. Ed. 223..

465

285

178

U. S. v. Behan, 110 U. S. 338, 344, 346, 4 Sup. Ct. 81, 28 L. Ed. 168..

U. S. v. Lombardo, 241 U. S. 73, 76, 36 Sup. Ct. 508, 60 L. Ed. 897..

486

.62, 105, 107, 302 U. S. v. Bell Tel. Co., 167 U. S. 224, 250, 17 Sup. Ct. 809, 42 L. Ed. 144..

U. S. v. Lynah, 188 U. S. 445, 462, 465, 23 Sup. Ct. 349, 47 L. Ed. 539..

..58, 59, 395

U. S. v. Berdan Fire-Arms Co., 156 U. S. 552,
573, 15 Sup. Ct. 420, 39 L. Ed. 530..
U. S. v. Bethlehem Steel Co., 205 U. S. 105, 27
Sup. Ct. 450, 51 L. Ed. 731...
U. S. v. Boutwell, 17 Wall. 604, 609, 21 L. Ed. 721 256
U. S. v. Brooklyn Eastern Dist. Terminal, 243
U. S. 647, 37 Sup. Ct. 475, 61 L. Ed. 945.
U. S. v. Buffalo Pitts Co., 193 Fed. 906, 114 C. C.
A. 110; 234 U. S. 228, 84 Sup. Ct. 840, 58 L.
Ed. 1290.

U. S. v. Lynch, 137 U. S. 280, 285, 11 Sup. Ct. 114, 34 L. Ed. 700..

347

304

U. S. v. McCullagh (D. C.) 221 Fed. 288.
U. S. v. Merchants' & Manufacturers' Traffic
Ass'n, 242 U. S. 178, 37 Sup. Ct. 24, 61 L. Ed.

96 404

233

284

..376, 380 U. S. v. Mescall, 215 U. S. 26, 30 Sup. Ct. 19, 54 L. Ed. 77..

122

453 U. S. v. Vitelli & Son, 5 Ct. Cust. App. 151.... 544 U. S. v. Whited & Wheless, 246 U. S. 552, 561, 38 Sup. Ct. 367, 62 L. Ed. 879.. 408 U. S. v. Wildcat, 244 U. S. 111, 37 Sup. Ct. 561, 61 L. Ed. 1024.. ..65, 199 U. S. v. Winans, 198 U. S. 371, 383, 25 Sup. Ct. 662, 49 L. Ed. 1089..

U. S. v. Trans-Missouri Freight Ass'n, 166 U. S.
290, 320, 17 Sup. Ct. 540, 551, 41 L. Ed. 1007.... 468
U. S. v. Tyler, 105 U. S. 244, 26 L. Ed. 985. 296
U. S. v. Union Stockyard, 226 U. S. 286, 33 Sup.
Ct. 83, 57 L. Ed. 226..

285 U. S. v. United States Fidelity Co., 236 U. S. 512, 528, 529, 35 Sup. Ct. 298, 59 L. Ed. 696..107, 437 U. S. v. Various Tugs and Scows (D. C.) 225 Fed. 505.

Waterman Co. v. Modern Pen Co., 235 U. S 88, 35 Sup. Ct. 91, 59 L. Ed. 142..

Watts, Watts & Co., Ex parte, 241 U. S. 655, 36
Sup. Ct. 726, 60 L. Ed. 1224..
Watts, Watts & Co. v. Unione Austriaca Di
Navigazione, 229 Fed. 136, 143 C. C. A. 412; 241
U. S. 677, 36 Sup. Ct. 726, 60 L. Ed. 1232..
Wear v. Kansas, 245 U. S. 154, 157, 38 Sup. Ct.
55, 62 L. Ed. 214, Ann. Cas. 1918B, 586...
Weaver v. Ewers, 195 Fed. 247, 115 C. C. A. 219 361
Weber v. Mick, 131 Ill. 520, 529..
264

212

.41, 205

U. S. ex rel. Bernardin v. Butterworth, 169 U.
S. 600, 609, 18 Sup. Ct. 441, 42 L. Ed. 873.. 256
U. S. ex rel. Dunlap v. Black, 128 U. S. 40,
Sup. Ct. 12, 32 L. Ed. 354..

465

U. S. ex rel. Frohwerk v. Youmans, 248 U. S. -, 39 Sup. Ct. 32, 63 L. Ed.

250

U. S. ex rel. Taylor v. Taft, 203 U. S. 461, 464, 27 Sup. Ct. 148, 51 L. Ed. 269..

U. S. Tel. Co. v. Gildersleve, 29 Md. 232, 246, 96 Am. Dec. 519..

483

U. S. Tobacco Co. v. McGreenery (O. C.) Fed. 531, 532..

144

401

United Surety Co. v. American Fruit Co., 238 U.
S. 140, 142, 35 Sup. Ct. 828, 59 L. Ed. 1238.... 191
Universal Film Mfg. Co. v. Copperman, 218 Fed.
577, 134 C. C. A. 305....

Utah Power & Light Co. v. U. S., 243 U. S. 389, 409, 37 Sup. Ct. 387, 61 L. Ed. 791..

408

Vance v. Vandercook Co., 170 U. S. 438, 451, 18 Sup. Ct. 674, 42 L. Ed. 1100.....

122

Vanderbilt v. Eidman, 196 U. S. 480, 25 Sup. Ct. 331, 49 L. Ed. 563..

415

Veazie Bank v. Fenno, 8 Wall. 533, 541, 19 L. Ed. 482...

216

Vicksburg v. Waterworks Co., 202 U. S. 453, 458, 26 Sup. Ct. 660, 50 L. Ed. 1102... Victor Chemical Works v. Industrial Board, 274 Ill. 11, 113 N. E. 173, Ann. Cas. 1918B, 627.... 230 Vilas v. Manila, 220 U. S. 345, 31 Sup. Ct. 416, 55 L. Ed. 491... Vinegar Bend Lumber Co. v. Oak Grove & Georgetown R. Co., 89 Miss. 84, 105-107, 110, 113, 43 South. 292.

Western Union Tel. Co. v. Andrews, 216 U. S. 165, 166, 167, 30 Sup. Ct. 286, 54 L. Ed. 430.... 143 Western Union Tel. Co. v. Ann Arbor R. Co., 178 U. S. 239, 20 Sup. Ct. 867, 44 L. Ed. 1052... 18, 133, 134, 491 Western Union Tel. Co. v. Foster, 247 U. S. 105, 115, 38 Sup. Ct. 438, 62 L. Ed. 1006.. 264 Western Union Tel. Co. v. Kansas, 216 U. S. 1, 30 Sup. Ct. 190, 54 L. Ed. 355. Western Union Tel. Co. v. Louisville & N. R. Co., 107 Miss. 626, 65 South. 650; (D. C.) 201 Fed. 946; 207 Fed. 1, 11, 12, 124 C. O. A. 573; 244 U. S. 649, 37 Sup. Ot. 743, 61 L. Ed. 1371; 248 U. S. 532, 39 Sup. Ct. 18, 63 L. Ed. 109..... 18, 20, 134, 514, 515 Western Union Tel. Co. v. Massachusetts, 125 U. S. 530, 552, 8 Sup. Ct. 961, 31 L. Ed. 790. 278, 280

267

(39 Sup.Ct.)

Page

Western Union Tel. Co. v. New Hope, 187 U. S. 419, 425, 23 Sup. Ct. 204, 47 L. Ed. 240..37, 266, 430 Western Union Tel. Co. v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 195 U. S. 540, 566, 25 Sup. Ct. 133, 49 L. Ed. 312, 1 Ann. Cas. 517.. ..18, 134, 267, 515 Western Union Tel. Co. v. Richmond, 224 U. S. 160, 32 Sup. Ct. 449, 56 L. Ed. 710........18, 134, 266, 267, 430, 515

Western Union Tel. Co. v. Taggart, 163 U. S. 1, 14, 21, 16 Sup. Ct. 1054, 41 L. Ed. 49........280, 283 Weston v. Charleston, 2 Pet. 449, 7 L. Ed. 481.. 166 Wheeler v. New York, 233 U. S. 434, 34 Sup. Ct. 607, 58 L. Ed. 1030.. .34, 526 Wheeling & Belmont Bridge Co. v. Wheeling Bridge Co., 148 U. S. 287, 292, 11 Sup. Ct. 201, 34 L. Ed. 967....

362

Wisconsin, etc., R. Co. v. Jacobson, 179 U. 287, 302, 21 Sup. Ct. 115, 45 L. Ed. 194.. Wisconsin & M. R. Co. v. Powers, 191 U. 379, 387, 24 Sup. Ct. 107, 48 L. Ed. 229.. Wise v. U. S., 249 U. S. 361, 39 Sup. Ct. 303, 63 L. Ed. 347 Withers v. Buckley, 20 How. 84, 15 L. Ed. 816.. 47 Witkop & Holmes Co. v. Great Atlantic & Pac. Tea Co., 69 Misc. Rep. 90, 124 N. Y. Supp. 956, 958.

345

362

Wood v. Beach, 156 U. S. 548, 15 Sup. Ct. 410, 39 L. Ed. 528.. 179 Wood v. Davis, 7 Cranch, 271, 3 L. Ed. 339.. 263 Worcester v. Worcester St. R. Co., 136 U. S. 539, 548, 25 Sup. Ct. 327, 49 L. Ed. 591.. Workman v. New York City, 179 U. S. 552, 560, 573, 21 Sup. Ct. 212, 45 L. Ed. 314... Wortman v. Griffith, 3 Blatchf. 528, 30 Fed. Cas. 648...

528

.113, 223

224

236 U. S.

Ed. 520,

465

Ct.