Supreme Court Reporter

Jackson v. Wauchula Mfg. Co., 230 Fed. 409, 411, 144 C. C. A. 551..

Kimberly v. Arms, 129 U. S. 512, 523, 9 Sup. Ct. 355, 32 L. Ed. 764..

547

138

Jacksonville v. Southern Bell & Telephone Co., 57 Fla. 374, 49 South. 509...

123

Jacobs v. Prichard, 223 U. S. 200, 32 Sup. Ct. 289, 56 L. Ed. 405..

239

Jacobs v. Southern R. Co., 241 U. S. 229, 36 Sup.
Ct. 588, 60 L. Ed. 970..

276

James Gray, The, v. John Fraser, The, 21 How. 184, 16 L. Ed. 106..

Kindred v. Union Pac. R. Co., 225 U. S. 582, 596. 597, 32 Sup. Ct. 780, 56 L. Ed. 1216.. King's County Savings Institution v. Blair, 116 U. S. 200, 6 Sup. Ct. 353, 29 L. Ed. 657.. Kinney v. Plymouth Rock Squab Co., 236 U. S. 43, 49, 35 Sup. Ct. 236, 59 L. Ed. 457. Kinzell v. Chicago, M. & St. P. R. Co., 250 U. S. 130, 133, 39 Sup. Ct. 412, 63 L. Ed. 893.. Kirk v. Olson, 245 U. S. 225, 228, 38 Sup. Ct. 114, 66

..571, 572

159

484

131

Jarrolt v. Moberly, 103 U. S. 580, 585, 587,
L. Ed. 492.

62 L. Ed. 256..

514

Jennings v. Philadelphia, B. & W. R. Co., 218
U. S. 255, 257, 31 Sup. Ct. 1, 54 L. Ed. 1031...
Jetts Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 178 Ky.
561, 566, 199 S. W. 37, 39.

Klages v. Terminal Co., 160 Pa. 386, 28 Atl. 862

521

Klotz v. Angle, 220 N. Y. 347, 116 N. E. 24.. 256 Knapp v. Milwaukee Trust Co., 216 U. S. 545, 553, 30 Sup. Ct. 412, 54 L. Ed. 610.. Knapp, Stone & Co. v. McCaffrey, 177 U. S. 638, 645, 646, 20 Sup. Ct. 824, 44 L. Ed. 921.. Kneeland v. American Loan & Trust Co., 138 U. S. 509, 11 Sup. Ct. 426, 34 L. Ed. 1052... Knight v. United Land Ass'n, 142 U. S. 161, 177, 181, 12 Sup. Ct. 258, 35 L. Ed. 974... Knowlton v. Moore, 178 U. S. 41, 92, 95, 106, 20 Sup. Ct. 747, 768, 44 L. Ed. 969......368, 554, 555, 589 Knoxville Water Co. v. Knoxville, 200 U. S. 22, 34, 26 Sup. Ct. 224, 50 L. Ed. 353... Kohl v. U. S., 91 U. S. 367, 23 L. Ed. 449. Krippendorf v. Hyde, 110 U. S. 276, 287, 4 Sup. Ct. 27, 28 L. Ed. 145.

404

536

443

250

412

454

150

241

502

Jones v. Rutherford, 26 App. D. C. 114...
Jones v. U. S., 250 Fed. 104.

370

364

Jones Nat. Bank v. Yates, 240 U. S. 541, 555, 36
Sup. Ct 429, 60 L. Ed. 788..

Kansas City, F. S. & M. R. Co. v. Kansas, 240
U. S. 227, 235, 36 Sup. Ct. 261, 60 L. Ed. 617....
Kansas City, M. & O. R. Co. of Texas v. U. S.,
53 Ct. Cl. 258, 308, 315, 318, 319...
Kansas City R. Co. v. Kansas, 240 U. S. 227, 232,
233, 234, 36 Sup. Ct. 261, 60 L. Ed. 617...... .6, 278
Kansas City Southern Co. v. Albers Commission
Co., 223 U. S. 573, 591-593, 32 Sup. Ct. 316, 320,
56 L. Ed. 556.
Keeney v. Comptroller of State of New York,
222 U. S. 525, 535, 32 Sup. Ct. 105, 107, 56 L.
Ed. 299, 38 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1139..
..7, 562
Keim v. U. S., 177 U. S. 290, 293, 294, 20 Sup. Ct.
574, 44 L. Ed. 774..

..18, 87 Lane v. Hoglund, 244 U. S. 174, 37 Sup. Ct. 558, 61 L. Ed. 1066.

413

127

(40 Sup. Ct.) Page

Page

421

Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Western Union Tel. Co., 234 U. S. 369, 371-372, 34 Sup. Ct. 810, 58 L. Ed. 1356; 237 U. S. 300, 302, 303, 35 Sup. Ct. 598, 59 L. Ed. 965.... .180, 443, 485 Low Wah Suey v. Backus, 225 U. S. 460, 469, 472, 32 Sup. Ct. 734, 56 L. Ed. 1165.. Lutcher & Moore Lumber Co. v. Knight, 217 U. S. 257, 267, 30 Sup. Ct. 505, 54 L. Ed. 757.. Luther v. State, 83 Neb. 455, 120 N. W. 125, 20 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1146.

567

466

..144, 146

Lewisville Natural Gas Co. v. State, 135 Ind. 49,
34 N. E. 702, 21 L. R. A. 734..
Lincoln v. Claflin, 7 Wall. 132, 19 L. Ed. 106.. 250
Lincoln Gas & Electric Light Co. v. Lincoln, 250

201

U. S. 256, 269, 39 Sup. Ct. 454, 63 L. Ed. 968..103, 110
Linn v. U. S., 251 Fed. 476, 480, 163 C. C. A. 470.. 183
Linn Timber Co. v. U. S., 236 U. S. 574, 35 Sup.
Ct. 440, 59 L. Ed. 725.
Lithograph Co. v. Sarony, 111 U. S. 53, 58, 4 Sup.
Ct. 279, 28 L. Ed. 349.
Littlefield v. Perry, 21 Wall. 205, 22 L. Ed. 577,.. 457
Liverpool, Brazil & R. Plate Steam Nav. Co. v.
Brooklyn Eastern Dist. Terminal, 250 Fed. 1021,
162 C. C. A. 664....

Liverpool, etc., Ins. Co. v. Orleans Assessors, 221
U. S. 346, 354, 31 Sup. Ct. 550, 55 L. Ed. 762, L.
R. A. 1915C, 903...

199

McCowan v. Maclay, 16 Mont. 234, 40 Pac. 602... 330 McCray v. U. S., 195 U. S. 27, 53-59, 61, 24 Sup. Ct. 769, 49 L. Ed. 78, 1 Ann. Cas. 561..108, 110, 554 McCulloch v. Maryland, 4 Wheat. 316, 402, 407, 415, 421, 425, 426, 428, 430, 431, 4 L. Ed. 579..110, 199, 204, 225, 493, 497, 554 McCullough v. Groff, 2 Mackey (D.C.) 361, 366.. 546 McCullough v. Virginia, 172 U. S. 102, 116, 19 Sup. Ct. 134, 43 L. Ed. 382.. McCurdy v. U. S., 246 U. S. 263, 38 Sup. Ct. 289, 62 L. Ed. 706..

583

200

McCaull-Dinsmore Co. v. Chicago, M. & St. P.
R. Co. (D.C.) 252 Fed. 664; (O.C.A.) 260 Fed.
835
McClellan v. Carland, 217 U. S. 268, 277, 30 Sup.
Ct. 501, 54 L. Ed. 762..

504

468

123

McCloskey v. San Antonio Traction Co. (Tex. Civ.App.) 192 S. W. 1116...

306

..185, 369

161

Lee v. Johnson, 116 U. S. 48, 52, 6 Sup. Ct. 249, 29 L. Ed. 570.. .412, 480 Leeds & Catlin Co. v. Victor Talking Mach. Co., 213 U. S. 301, 311, 29 Sup. Ct. 495, 53 L. Ed. 805.. 466 Legal Tender Cases, 12 Wall. 457, 531, 20 L. Ed. 287; 110 U. S. 421, 444, 4 Sup. Ct. 122, 28 L. Ed. 204

Leland v. Hayden, 102 Mass. 542.

..199, 204

McAdoo v. Ormes, 47 App. D. C. 364.. McCall v. Herring, 116 Ga. 235, 243, 42 S. E. 468 .59, 61 McCarthy v. First Nat. Bank, 223 U. S. 493, 499, 32 Sup. Ct. 240, 56 L. Ed. 523.. McCaskill Co. v. U. S., 216 U. S. 504, 30 Sup. Ct. 386, 54 L. Ed. 590..

Luxton v. North River Bridge Co., 147 U. S. 337, 341, 13 Sup. Ct. 356, 37 L. Ed. 194.. Lynch v. Hornby, 247 U. S. 339, 38 Sup. Ct. 543, 62 L. Ed. 1149. .192, 202, 392

468

370

225

Lockman, In re, 18 Idaho, 465, 110 Pac. 253, 46 144 L. R. A. (N. S.) 759... Logan County v. U. S., 169 U. S. 255, 261, 18 Sup. Ct. 361, 42 L. Ed. 737.. Loganville Banking Co. v. Forrester, 143 Ga. 302, 305, 84 S. E. 961, 962, L. R. A. 1915D, 1195..59, 61, 62 Londoner v. Denver, 210 U. S. 373, 379, 28 Sup. Ct. 708, 711, 52 L. Ed. 1103.. .271, 272, 273 Long Sault Development Co. v. Call, 242 U. S. 272, 277, 37 Sup. Ct. 79, 61 L. Ed. 294.. 106 Looney v. Attorney General, 245 U. S. 178, 38 Sup. Ct. 85, 62 L. Ed. 230...

Louisiana v. Texas, 176 U. S. 1, 16, 20 Sup. Ct. 251, 256, 44 L. Ed. 347. Louisiana Nav. Co. v. Oyster Commission of Louisiana, 226 U. S. 99, 101, 33 Sup. Ct. 78, 57 L. Ed. 138.. ....218, 343, 349, 484 Louisville Trust Co. v. Comingor, 184 U. S. 18, 26, 22 Sup. Ct. 293, 46 L. Ed. 413. Louisville & J. Ferry Co. v. Kentucky, 188 U. S. 385, 23 Sup. Ct. 463, 47 L. Ed. 513.. Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Barber, 197 U. S. 430, 25 Sup. Ct. 466, 49 L. Ed. 819...

Main, The, v. Williams, 152 U. S. 122, 126, 127, 131, 14 Sup. Ct. 486, 488, 38 L. Ed. 381.. 66 Malcolm v. U. S., 256 Fed. 363, 167 C. C. A. 533.. 361 Male v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co., 240 U. S. 97, 99, 36 Sup. Ct. 351, 60 L. Ed. 544.. Malstrom v. People's Ditch Co., 32 Nev. 246, 260, 107 Pac. 98..

180

325

254

Manhattan Medicine Co. v. Wood, 108 U. S. 218, 222, 2 Sup. Ct. 436, 27 L. Ed. 706.

416

Manning's Case, 13 Wall. 578, 20 L. Ed. 706... Manners v. Morosco (D. C.) 254 Fed. 737, 258 Fed. 557, 169 C. C. A. 497.

376

335

133

Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Rice, 247 U. S. 201, 38
Sup. Ct. 429, 62 L. Ed. 1071..
Louisville & N. R. Co. v. U. S., 53 Ct. Cl. 238.. 258
Louisville & N. R. Co. v. West Coast Naval
Stores Co., 198 U. S. 483, 495, 25 Sup. Ct. 745,
49 L. Ed. 1135.

Market Co. v. Hoffman, 101 U. S. 112, 115, 25 L. Ed. 182.

140

132

199

Marshall v. Baltimore & O. B. Co., 16 How. 314, 316, 336, 14 L. Ed. 953. .475, 478

Page

Marshall v. Vicksburg, 15 Wall. 146, 149, 21 L. Ed. 121..

244

Missouri v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. R., 241 U. S. 533, 538, 36 Sup. Ct. 715, 60 L. Ed. 1148......40, 340, 628 Missouri, K. & T. Ry. v. Buck (L. D. unreported) 35

Missouri Pac. R. Co. v. Humes, 115 U. S. 512, 523, 6 Sup. Ct. 110, 114, 29 L. Ed. 463.. Missouri Pac. R. Co. v. Kansas, 216 U. S. 262, 276, 278, 30 Sup. Ct. 330, 54 L. Ed. 472; 248 U. S. 276, 39 Sup. Ct. 93, 63 L. Ed. 239, 2 A. L. R. 1589 .184, 309, 488 Missouri Pac. R. Co. v. Nebraska, 217 U. S. 196, 207, 208, 30 Sup. Ct. 461, 54 L. Ed. 727, 18 Ann. Cas. 989.

521

214

Missouri Pac. R. Co. v. Taber, 244 U. S. 200, 37 Sup. Ct. 522, 61 L. Ed. 1082..

117 Missouri Pac. R. Co. v. Tucker, 230 U. S. 340, 33 Sup. Ct. 961, 57 L. Ed. 1507... 40, 72, 340, 341, 528 Missouri Rate Cases, 230 U. S. 474, 508, 33 Sup.

.40, 110

521

Monongahela Navigation Co. v. U. S., 148 U.
S. 312, 336, 13 Sup. Ct. 622, 37 L. Ed. 463.. 108
Monson v. Simonson, 231 U. S. 341, 347, 34 Sup.
Ct. 71, 58 L. Ed. 260..
33

Meccano v. John Wanamaker, New York, 250 U. S. 250, 450, 162 C. C. A. 386, 520.. Medley, In re, 134 U. S. 160, 10 Sup. Ct. 384, 33 L. Ed. 835... Meeker v. Lehigh Valley R. Co., 234 U. S. 749, 34 Sup. Ct. 674, 15 L. Ed. 1576; 236 U. S. 412, 417, 430, 434, 35 Sup. Ct. 328, 337, 59 L. Ed. 644, 659, Ann. Cas. 1916B, 691. ..468, 546, 547 Meisukas v. Greenough Red Ash Coal Co., 244 U. S. 54, 37 Sup. Ct. 593, 61 L. Ed. 987.. Memphis, etc., R. Co. v. Commissioner, 112 U. S. 609, 619, 5 Sup. Ct. 299, 28 L. Ed. 837. Merchants' Bank v. Pennsylvania, 167 U. S. 461, 463, 464, 17 Sup. Ct. 829, 42 L. Ed. 236. Mergenthaler Linotype Co. v. Hays (Mo. 181 S. W. 1183.

223 U. S. 519, 522, 32 Sup. 533 Meyer v. Wells, Fargo & Co., 223 U. S. 298, 301, 32 Sup. Ct. 218, 56 L. Ed. 445.. Michigan Aluminum Foundry Co. v. Aluminum Co. of American (C. C.) 190 Fed. 903, 904.. Michigan Cent. R. R. v. Powers, 201 U. S. 245, 292, 293, 26 Sup. Ct. 459, 462, 50 L. Ed. 744..225, 562 Michigan Ins. Bank v. Eldred, 143 U. S. 293, 298, 12 Sup. Ct. 450, 452, 36 L. Ed. 162.... Michigan Land & Lumber Co. v. Rust, 168 U. S. 589, 593, 18 Sup. Ct. 208, 209, 42 L. Ed. 591.. 412 Michigan Trust Co. v. Ferry, 228 U. S. 346, 353, 33 Sup. Ct. 550, 57 L. Ed. 867..

Moore v. Missouri, 159 U. S. 673, 679, 16 Sup. Ct. 179, 40 L. Ed. 301..

274

Morgan v. Louisiana, 93 U. S. 217, 223, 23 L. Ed. 860

114

Morrison, In re, 147 U. S. 14, 26, 13 Sup. Ct. 246, 37 L. Ed. 60..

549

Mountain Timber Co. v. Washington, 243 U. S. 219, 237, 37 Sup. Ct. 260, 61 L. Ed. 685, Ann. Cas. 1917D, 642

.45, 226 Mt. Konocti Light & Power Co. v. Thelen, 170 Cal. 468, 150 Pac. 359..

176

Mugler v. Kansas, 123 U. S. 623, 625, 627, 657, 668, 8 Sup. Ct. 273, 31 L. Ed. 205. ...108, 109, 150 Muhlker v. New York, 197 U. S. 544, 25 Sup. Ct.

522, 49 L. Ed. 872..

309

516

536

549

329 Mutual Ben. Life Ins. Co. v. Herold (D. C.) 198 Fed. 199, 204.... .397, 398, 399 Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. McGrew, 188 U. S. 291, 308, 23 Sup. Ct. 375, 47 L. Ed. 480, 63 L. R. A. 33 117 Myers v. Pittsburgh Coal Co., 233 U. S. 184, 189, 34 Sup. Ct. 559, 58 L. Ed. 906.. 515 Myles Salt Co. v. Iberia Drainage Dist., 239 U. S. 478, 36 Sup. Ct. 204, 60 L. Ed. 392, L. R. A. 1918E, 190...

116

Minneapolis & St. L. R. Co. v. Bombolis, 241 U. S. 211, 36 Sup. Ct. 595, 60 L. Ed. 961, L. R. A. 1917A, 86, Ann. Cas. 1916E, 505.. Minneapolis & St. L. R. Co. v. Minnesota, 193 U. S. 53, 65, 24 Sup. Ct. 396, 48 L. Ed. 614...... 531 Minneapolis & St. L. R. Co. v. Winters, 242 U. S. 353, 37 Sup. Ct. 170, 61 L. Ed. 358, Ann. Cas. 1918B, 54.... Minnesota v. Hitchcock, 185 U. S. 373, 386, 394, 398, 22 Sup. Ct. 650, 655, 46 L. Ed. 954..242, 243, 370

452

National Bank of Genesee v. Whitney, 103 U. S. 103, 104, 26 L. Ed. 443.

National Park Bank v. Fourth Nat. Bank, 46 N. 103, 110, 188, 189, 281

Minnesota Rate Cases, The, 230 U. S. 352, 402, 458461, 473, 33 Sup. Ct. 729, 741, 57 L. Ed. 1511, 48 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1151, Ann. Cas. 1916A, 18..40, 41, Minot v. Paine, 99 Mass. 101, 96 Am. Dec. 705.. 203 Mississippi R. R. Commission v. Mobile & 0. R. Co., 244 U. S. 388, 37 Sup. Ct. 602, 61 L. Ed. 1216

Napa Valley Electric Co. v. Railway Com'rs, 251
U. S. 366, 40 Sup. Ct. 174, 64 L. Ed.
Nash v. U. S., 229 U. S. 373, 377, 33 Sup. Ct.
780, 57 L. Ed. 1232..

530

516

Nashua R. R. v. Lowell R. R., 136 U. S. 356, 372, 373, 375, 10 Sup. Ct. 1004, 34 L. Ed. 363. Nashville, &c., Ry. v. Alabama, 128 U. S. 96, 9 Sup. Ct. 28, 32 L. Ed. 352..

National Baggage Committee v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co., 32 I. C. C. 152..

510

National Bank v. Carpenter, 101 U. S. 567, 25 L. Ed. 815

127

National Bank v. Johnson, 104 U. S. 271, 26 L.

Ed. 742...

447

Y. 77, 80, 7 Am. Rep. 310..

363

Neilson v. Rhine Shipping Co., 248 U. S. 205, 39 Sup. Ct. 89, 63 L. Ed. 208..

351

..131, 513

S. 188,
1917D,

45, 442

U. S.

305

138

New York Cent., etc., R. Co. v. Interstate Com-
merce Commission (C. C.) 168 Fed. 131, 138, 139.. 576
New York Cent. R. Co. v. Porter, 249 U. S. 168, 39
Sup. Ct. 188, 63 L. Ed. 536..

New York Cent. R. Co. v. White, 243 U.
37 Sup. Ct. 247. 61 L. Ed. 667, L. R. A.
1, Ann. Cas. 1917D, 629....
New York Cent. R. Co. v. Winfield, 244
147, 37 Sup. Ct. 546, 57 L. Ed. 1045, L. R. A.
1918C, 439, Ann. Cas. 1917D, 1139.....37, 131, 442, 513
New York Cent. & H. R. R. Co. v. Carr, 238 U.
S. 260, 35 Sup. Ct. 780, 59 L. Ed. 1298..
513
New York Cent. & H. R. R. v. U. S., 212 U. S.
500, 505, 29 Sup. Ct. 309, 311, 53 L. Ed. 624... 26
New York ex rel. New York Clearing House
Bldg. Co. v. Barker, 179 U. S. 279, 283, 21 Sup.
Ct. 121, 45 L. Ed. 190...

New York Life Ins. Co. v. Deer Lodge County,
231 U. S. 495, 34 Sup. Ct. 167, 58 L. Ed. 332.. 387
New York, N. H. & H. R. Co. v. New York, 165
U. S. 628, 17 Sup. Ct. 418, 41 L. Ed. 853..
New York, N. H. & H. R. Co. v. U. S., 251 U.
S. 123, 40 Sup. Ct. 67, 64 L. Ed. --; 53 Ct. Cl.
222
68, 164, 166
New York, N. H. & H. R. Co. v. York & Whitney
Co., 215 Mass. 36, 40, 102 N. E. 366..
New York Tunnel Co., In re, 159 Fed. 688, 690,
86 C. C. A. 556..

Old Wayne Mut. Life Ass'n v. McDonough, 204
U. S. 8, 27 Sup. Ct. 236, 51 L. Ed. 345..
Oliver v. Bates, 36 L. D. 423..
Oliver v. Thomas, 5 L. D. 289..

O'Neal v. U. S., 190 U. S. 36, 37-38, 23 Sup. Ct.
776, 47 L. Ed. 945...

Oklahoma R. Co. v. Severns Paving Co. (Okl.) 170 Pac. 216...

Oklahoma Gin Co. v. State (Okl.) 158 Pac. 629; 251 U. S. 339, 40 Sup. Ct. 341, 64 L. Ed. Oklahoma Operating Co. v. Love, 252 U. S. 331, 40 Sup. Ct. 338, 64 L. Ed.

.339, 340

.341, 528

173

........

178

Norfolk Turnpike Co. v. Virginia, 225 U. S. 264, 269, 32 Sup. Ct. 828, 56 L. Ed. 1082.. 561 Norfolk & W. R. Co. v. West Virginia, 236 U. 352 S. 605, 609, 614, 35 Sup. Ct. 437, 59 L. Ed. 745 Paul v. Virginia, 8 Wall. 168, 180, 19 L. Ed. 357 .40. 184, 531 Norris v. Western Union Tel. Co., 174 N. C. 5, 227, 231, 387 92, 93 S. E. 465.. Paulsen v. Portland, 149 U. S. 30, 13 Sup. Ct. 71 North American Storage Co. v. Chicago, 211 U. S. 306, 39 Sup. Ct. 101, 53 L. Ed. 195, 15

370 Parker v. Griffith, 151 N. C. 600, 66 S. E. 565.. 148 Parsons v. Venzke, 164 U. S. 89, 17 Sup. Ct. 27, 41 35 413 Passenger Cases, 7 How. 283, 399, 12 L. Ed. 702.. 492 Patterson v. Bark Eudora, 190 U. S. 169, 23 Sup. Ct. 821, 47 L. Ed. 1002.

750, 37 L. Ed. 637.. Peabody v. Eisner, 247 U. S. 343, 344, 347, 319, 350, 38 Sup. Ct. 543, 545, 546, 547, 62 L. Ed. 1152..192, 196 Pearsall v. Great Northern R. Co., 161 U. S. 646, 676, 677, 16 Sup. Ct. 705, 40 L. Ed. 838.. Peck v. Heurich, 167 U. S. 624, 630, 17 Sup. Ct. 927, 42 L. Ed. 302.

302

306

360

Peck & Co. v. Lowe, 247 U. S. 165, 172, 173, 174-175,
38 Sup. Ct. 432, 434, 62 L. Ed. 1049..193, 227, 556,
557, 558

572

Peckham v. Henkel, 216 U. S. 483, 30 Sup. Ct. 255, 54 L. Ed. 579..

105

572

562

549

Northern Pac. R. Co. v. North Dakota, 236 U.
S. 585, 593, 595, 599, 35 Sup. Ct. 429, 59 L. Ed. 735,
L. R. A. 1917F, 1148, Ann. Cas. 1916A, 1..40, 132,

538 Pedersen v. Delaware, L. & W. R. Co., 229 U. S. 146, 151, 33 Sup. Ct. 648, 57 L. Ed. 1125, 184, 531 Ann. Cas. 1914C, 153..

Northern Pac. R. Co. v. Puget Sound & Willa-
pa Harbor R. Co., 250 U. S. 332, 39 Sup. Ct. 474,
63 L. Ed. 1013..
Northern Pac. R. Co. v. Smith, 171 U. S. 260, 18
Sup. Ct. 794, 43 L. Ed. 157..
Northern Pac. R. Co. v. Townsend, 190 U. S. 267,
23 Sup. Ct. 671, 47 L. Ed. 1044.
Northern Securities Co. v. U. S., 193 U. S. 197,
327, 362, 24 Sup. Ct. 436, 48 L. Ed. 679..302, 429, 432
Northwestern Life Ins. Co. v. Wisconsin, 247 U.
S. 132, 139, 38 Sup. Ct. 444, 62 L. Ed. 1205...
Norton v. Fancher, 92 Hun, 463, 36 N. Y. Supp.
1032

.131, 451 Pell v. McCabe (D. C.) 254 Fed. 356; (C. C. A.) 256 Fed. 512...

Penn Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Austin, 18 U. S. 685, 696-698, 18 Sup. Ct. 223, 42 L. Ed. 626.. 572 Penn Mut, Life Ins. Co. v. Lederer (D. C.) 247 Fed. 559..

127

Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144, 147, 36 Sup.
Ct. 97, 60 L. Ed. 186..
.12, 314

Norwood v. Baker, 172 U. S. 269, 19 Sup. Ct. 187, 43 L. Ed. 443..

397 Pennell v. State, 141 Wis. 35, 123 N. W. 115..144, 145 Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 U. S. 714, 24 L. Ed. 565.... 173 Pennsylvania Co. v. U. S., 236 U. S. 351, 361, 35 Sup. Ct. 370, 59 L. Ed. 616.. .576, 578 Pennsylvania Gas Co., In re, 225 N. Y. 397, 122 N. E. 260.. 280 Pennsylvania Hospital v. Philadelphia, 245 U. S. 20, 24, 38 Sup. Ct. 35, 62 L. Ed. 124.... .484, 485 Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Ewing, 241 Pa. 581, 88 Atl. 775, L. R. A. (N. S.) 977, Ann. Cas. 1915B,

Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Hughes, 191 U. S. 477, 24
Sup. Ct. 132, 48 L. Ed. 268..
Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Kittaning Iron & Steel
Mfg. Co., 249 U. S. 595, 39 Sup. Ct. 260, 63 L. Ed.
794

Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Public Service Commis-
sion of Pennsylvania, 250 U. S. 566, 40 Sup. Ct.
36, 63 L. Ed. 1142...
Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Titus, 216 N. Y. 17, 109
N. E. 857, L. R. A. 1916E, 1127, Ann. Cas. 1917C,
862

People v. Clements, 5 N. Y. Cr. R. 288.

532

People v. Cox, 106 App. Div. 299, 94 N. Y. Supp. 526 .144, 145 People v. Denman (Cal.) 177 Pac. 461.. 391 People v. Dillon, 197 N. Y. 254, 90 N. E. 820, 18 Ann. Cas. 552. 292, 293

185

Railroad v. Commissioners, 98 U. S. 541, 25 L. Ed. 196...

422

292

Railroad Commission of Louisiana v. Texas & P. R. Co. 229 U. S. 336, 341, 33 Sup. Ct. 837, 57 L. Ed. 1215....

People v. Duke, 19 Misc. Rep. 292, 44 N. Y. Supp. 336

513 Railroad Commission of Ohio v. Worthington, 225 U. S. 101, 108, 32 Sup. Ct. 653, 56 L. Ed. 1004.. 513 Railroad Co. v. Baldwin, 103 U. S. 426, 430, 26 L. Ed. 578.. 572 Railroad Co. v. Gill, 54 Ark. 101, 106, 15 S. W. 18, 11 L. R. A. 452.

579

292 People v. O'Reilly, 129 App. Div. 522, 114 N. Y. Supp. 258; 194 N. Y. 592, 88 N. E. 1128....144, 145 People v. Salem, 20 Mich. 452, 4 Am. Rep. 400.. 502 People v. Strickler, 25 Cal. App. 60, 142 Pac. 1121 147 People v. Warren, 109 N. Y. 615, 15 N. E. 880..292, 293 People ex rel. Jefferson v. Smith, 88 N. Y. 576, 585

418

Railroad Tax Cases, 92 U. S. 575, 608, 23 L. Ed. 663 115
Ralph v. Cole, 249 Fed. 81, 161 C. C. A. 133.. 323
Rand v. U. S., 249 U. S. 503, 506, 39 Sup. Ct. 359,
63 L. Ed. 731..

Railroad Land Co. v. Courtright, 21 Wall. 310, 316, 22 L. Ed. 582.

313

People Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co., 246 U. S. 79, 38 Sup. Ct. 233, 62 L. Ed. 587, Ann. Cas. 1918C, 537..

173

Perego v. Dodge, 163 U. S. 160, 167, 16 Sup. Ct. 971, 41 L. Ed. 113..

Perkins, In re (D. C.) 100 Fed. 950, 954.

326 349

368 Rast v. Van Deman & Lewis, 240 U. S. 342, 357, 36 Sup. Ct. 370, 60 L. Ed. 679, L. R. A. 1917A, 421, Ann. Cas. 1917B, 455.... Raymond v. Chicago Traction Co., 207 U. S. 20, 28 Sup. Ct. 7, 52 L. Ed. 78, 12 Ann. Cas. 757.. 102 Rea v. State, 3 Okl. Cr. 269, 105 Pac. 381, 106 Pac. 982 .292, 293 Reagan v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co., 154 U. S. 362, 390, 14 Sup. Ct. 1047, 38 L. Ed. 1014.... 102 Reagan v. U. S., 182 U. S. 419, 426, 21 Sup. Ct. 842, 45 L. Ed. 1162..

110

376

Reavis v. Fianza, 215 U. S. 16, 30 Sup. Ct. 1, 54 L. Ed. 72...

330

521

..123, 364

102 ..529, 530 547

Pittsburgh, etc., R. Co. v. Backus, 154 U. S. 421,
14 Sup. Ct. 1114, 38 L. Ed. 1031..
Pittsburgh Rys. Co. v. Pittsburgh, 260 Pa. 424,
103 Atl. 959.

Plimpton v. Somerset, 33 Vt. 283..
Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co., 157 U. S.
429, 585, 601, 604-606, 652, 653, 15 Sup. Ct. 673, 39
L. Ed. 759; 158 U. S. 601, 627, 628, 637, 15 Sup.
Ct. 912, 39 L. Ed. 1108... ...191, 192, 197, 553, 555
Pope Mfg. Co. v. Gormully & Jeffery Mfg. Co.,
144 U. S. 224, 248, 12 Sup. Ct. 32, 641, 36 L.
Ed. 414, 423.
Portland Ry. Light & Power Co. v. Oregon
Railroad Commission, 229 U. S. 397, 33 Sup. Ct.
820, 57 L. Ed. 1248.

Respublica v. Arnold, 3 Yeates (Pa.) 263. Rexford v. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co., 228 U. S. 339, 346, 33 Sup. Ct. 515, 57 L. Ed. 864.. 349, 586 Reynolds v. New York Trust Co., 188 Fed. 611, 619, 620, 110 C. C. A. 409, 39 L. R. A. (N. S.) 391 138 Rhode v. Grant Smith Porter Co. (D. C.) 259 Fed. 304

Rhutassel, In re (D. C.) 96 Fed. 597.

Red Jacket, Jr., Coal Co. v. United Thacker Coal Co., 248 U. S. 531, 39 Sup. Ct. 5, 63 L. Ed. 405.. 343 Reduction Co. v. Sanitary Works, 199 U. S. 306, 26 Sup. Ct. 100, 50 L. Ed. 204. 151 Reg. v. Cambrian R. Co., Law Rep. 6 Q. B. 422.. 559 Reisenberg v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 84 S. W. 585 ..144, 148 Reitler v. Harris, 223 U. S. 437, 32 Sup. Ct. 248, 56 L. Ed. 497..

546 539

Riverside Oil Co. v. Hitchcock, 190 U. S. 316, 23 Sup. Ct. 698, 47 L. Ed. 1074... .35, 36, 413 Robbins v. Shelby Taxing Dist., 120 U. S. 489, 497, 7 Sup. Ct. 592, 596, 30 L. Ed. 694. Roberts v. Consaul, 24 App. D. C. 551, 562... 370 Roberts v. U. S., 176 U. S. 221, 231, 20 Sup. Ct. 376, 44 L. Ed. 443..

370

Robertson v. Frank Bros. Co., 132 U. S. 17, 23, 10 Sup. Ct. 5, 33 L. Ed. 236.

422

251

Public Utilities Commission v. Landon, 249 U. S. 236, 39 Sup. Ct. 268, 63 L. Ed. 577..

Robertson v. Gordon, 226 U. S. 311, 317, 33 Sup. Ct. 105, 57 L. Ed. 236..

511

280

Pullman Co. v. Croom, 231 U. S. 571, 577, 34 Sup. Ct. 182, 58 L. Ed. 375..

511

Pullman Co. v. Kansas, 216 U. S. 56, 70, 30 Sup. Ct. 232, 54 L. Ed. 378...

....7, 278

Robinson v. Oceanic Steam Nav. Co., 112 N.
Y. 315, 325, 19 N. E. 625, 627, 2 L. R. A. 636.... 404
Robinson Co. v. American Exp. Co., 38 Interst
Com. R. 733, 735.

474

211

Romano, Ex parte (D. C.) 251 Fed. 762.......... 349

« Forrige Fortsett »

Bøker

Supreme Court Reporter, Volumer 39-40