Supreme Court Reporter, Volumer 39-40West Publishing Company, 1920 |
Inni boken
Resultat 1-5 av 100
Side 13
... question properly before us is whether the statutes as construed run against the Four- teenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States . It is argued that they do , if , * as was held , they preclude an inquiry in these ...
... question properly before us is whether the statutes as construed run against the Four- teenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States . It is argued that they do , if , * as was held , they preclude an inquiry in these ...
Side 16
... QUESTION - JURISDICTION . No federal question being presented by the Mr. Lee Monroe , of Topeka , Kan . , for plain- record , writ of error to state court will be dis- missed by the court sua sponte . tiff in error . Mr. B. I. Litowich ...
... QUESTION - JURISDICTION . No federal question being presented by the Mr. Lee Monroe , of Topeka , Kan . , for plain- record , writ of error to state court will be dis- missed by the court sua sponte . tiff in error . Mr. B. I. Litowich ...
Side 25
... QUESTION - DUE PROCESS . ed this question by holding that the appli- A federal question was presented in pro- cation to the Commission was voluntary and ceeding in a state court by an irrigation dis trict for confirmation of contract ...
... QUESTION - DUE PROCESS . ed this question by holding that the appli- A federal question was presented in pro- cation to the Commission was voluntary and ceeding in a state court by an irrigation dis trict for confirmation of contract ...
Side 26
... question against the plaintiffs in error , nevertheless the court decided against them also upon an independent ground , not involving any federal question and broad enough to support the judgment , and for this reason the federal question ...
... question against the plaintiffs in error , nevertheless the court decided against them also upon an independent ground , not involving any federal question and broad enough to support the judgment , and for this reason the federal question ...
Side 52
... question . But where two parties independ- ently are employing the same mark upon goods of the same class , but in separate markets wholly remote the one from the other , the ques- tion of prior appropriation is legally insignifi- cant ...
... question . But where two parties independ- ently are employing the same mark upon goods of the same class , but in separate markets wholly remote the one from the other , the ques- tion of prior appropriation is legally insignifi- cant ...
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
36 Stat action affirmed alleged amended appellee application April 21 assessment authority bill of lading Board brings error carrier cars cent Circuit Court Circuit denied City Code Act March Commission common carrier Comp Constitution contract corporation Court of Appeals Court of Claims damages Decided decision declared decree defendant in error delivered the opinion Digests and Indexes Dismissed District Court fact federal filed Fourteenth Amendment franchise grant injunction interstate commerce judgment jurisdiction jury Justice Kansas Key-Numbered Digests land ment Messrs Ohio ordinance Orlu pany parties patent payment Petition petitioner plaintiff in error provision purpose question railroad company rates regulations reversed rule Secretary ship shipper statute suit Supreme Court thereof tion topic and KEY-NUMBER trust United States Circuit vessel violation Western Union writ of certiorari writ of error York York City