impious ceremonies. Every art and every trade that was in the least concerned in the framing or adorning of idols was polluted by the stain of idolatry;' a severe sentence, since it devoted to eternal misery the far greater part of the community, which is employed in the exercise of liberal or mechanic professions. If we cast our eyes over the numerous remains of antiquity, we shall perceive, that besides the immediate representations of the gods, and the holy instruments of their worship, the elegant forms and agreeable fictions consecrated by the imagination of the Greeks, were introduced as the richest ornaments of the houses, the dress, and the furniture, of the Pagans." Even the arts of music and painting, of eloquence and poetry, flowed from the same impure origin. In the style of the fathers, Apollo and the Muses were the organs of the infernal spirit, Homer and Virgil were the most eminent of his servants, and the beautiful mythology which pervades and animates the compositions of their genius, is destined to celebrate the glory of the daemons. Even the common language of Greece and Rome abounded with familiar but impious expressions, which the imprudent Christian might too carelessly utter, or too patiently hear." The dangerous temptations which on every side lurked in ambush to surprise the unguarded believer assailed him with redoubled violence on the days of solemn festivals. So artfully were they framed and disposed throughout the year, that superstition always wore the appearance of pleasure, and often of virtue."

* Tertullian de Idololatria, c. 11.
u See every part of Montfaucon's Antiquities. Even the reverses of the Greek

and Roman coins were frequently of an idolatrous nature. Here indeed the
scruples of the Christian were suspended by a stronger passion.
v Tertullian de Idololatria, c. 20, 21, 22. If a Pagan friend (on the occasion
perhaps of sneezing) used the familiar expression of “Jupiter bless you,” the
Christian was obliged to protest against the divinity of Jupiter.
w Consult the most laboured work of Ovid, his imperfect Fasti. He finished
no more than the first six months of the year. The compilation of Macrobius
is called the Saturnalia, but it is only a small part of the first book that bears

any relation to the title.




chAP. Some of the most sacred festivals in the Roman ritual

[ocr errors]

were destined to salute the new calends of January
with vows of public and private felicity, to indulge
the pious remembrance of the dead and living, to
ascertain the inviolable bounds of property, to hail,
on the return of spring, the genial powers of fecundity,
to perpetuate the two memorable aeras of Rome, the
foundation of the city, and that of the republic, and
to restore, during the humane licence of the Satur-
malia, the primitive equality of mankind. Some idea
may be conceived of the abhorrence of the Christians
for such impious ceremonies, by the scrupulous de-
licacy which they displayed on a much less alarming
occasion. On days of general festivity, it was the
custom of the ancients to adorn their doors with
lamps and with branches of laurel, and to crown their
heads with a garland of flowers. This innocent and
elegant practice might perhaps have been tolerated
as a mere civil institution. But it most unluckily
happened that the doors were under the protection
of the household gods, that the laurel was sacred to
the lover of Daphne, and that garlands of flowers,
though frequently worn as a symbol either of joy or
mourning, had been dedicated in their first origin to
the service of superstition. The trembling Christians,
who were persuaded in this instance to comply with
the fashion of their country, and the commands of
the magistrate, laboured under the most gloomy ap-
prehensions, from the reproaches of their own con-
science, the censures of the church, and the denun-
ciations of divine vengeance.”
Such was the anxious diligence which was required

Zeal for


* Tertullian has composed a defence, or rather panegyric, of the rash action of a Christian soldier, who, by throwing away his crown of laurel, had exposed himself and his brethren to the most imminent danger. By the mention of the emperors (Severus and Caracalla) it is evident, notwithstanding the wishes of M. de Tillemont, that Tertullian composed his treatise De Corona, long before he was engaged in the errors of the Montanists. See Memoires Ecclesiastiques, tom. iii. p. 384.

to guard the chastity of the gospel from the infectious cor.

breath of idolatry. The superstitious observances of public or private rites were carelessly practised, from education and habit, by the followers of the established religion. But as often as they occurred, they afforded the Christians an opportunity of declaring and confirming their zealous opposition. By these frequent protestations their attachment to the faith was continually fortified, and in proportion to the increase of zeal, they combated with the more ardour and success in the holy war, which they had undertaken against the empire of the daemons.

II. The writings of Cicero' represent in the most THE

- - SEco ND lively colours the ignorance, the errors, and the un-co.

The doctrine of the

certainty of the ancient philosophers with regard to the immortality of the soul. When they are desirous

tality of the

of arming their disciples against the fear of death, or

they inculcate, as an obvious, though melancholy position, that the fatal stroke of our dissolution releases us from the calamities of life; and that those can no longer suffer who no longer exist. Yet there were a few sages of Greece and Rome who had conceived a more exalted, and, in some respects, a juster idea of human nature; though it must be confessed, that, in the sublime inquiry, their reason had been often guided by their imagination, and that their imagination had been prompted by their vanity. When they viewed with complacency the extent of their own mental powers, when they exercised the various faculties of memory, of fancy, and of judgment, in the most profound speculations, or the most important labours, and when they reflected on the desire of fame, which transported them into future

y In particular, the first book of the Tusculan Questions, and the treatise De Senectute, and the Somnium Scipionis, contain, in the most beautiful language, every thing that Grecian philosophy, or Roman good sense, could possibly suggest on this dark but important object.

the philosophers;

CHAP. ages, far beyond the bounds of death and of the

grave; they were unwilling to confound themselves with the beasts of the field, or to suppose, that a being, for whose dignity they entertained the most sincere admiration, could be limited to a spot of earth, and to a few years of duration. With this favourable prepossession they summoned to their aid the science, or rather the language, of metaphysics. They soon discovered, that as none of the properties of matter will apply to the operations of the mind, the human soul must consequently be a substance distinct from the body, pure, simple, and spiritual, incapable of dissolution, and susceptible of a much higher degree of virtue and happiness after the release from its corporeal prison. From these specious and noble principles, the philosophers who trod in the footsteps of

Plato deduced a very unjustifiable conclusion, since

they asserted, not only the future immortality, but the past eternity of the human soul, which they were too apt to consider as a portion of the infinite and self-existing spirit, which pervades and sustains

the universe. A doctrine thus removed beyond the

senses and the experience of mankind, might serve to amuse the leisure of a philosophic mind; or, in the silence of solitude, it might sometimes impart a ray of comfort to desponding virtue; but the faint impression which had been received in the schools was soon obliterated by the commerce and business of active life. We are sufficiently acquainted with the eminent persons who flourished in the age of Cicero, and of the first Caesars, with their actions, their characters, and their motives, to be assured that their conduct in this life was never regulated by any serious conviction of the rewards or punishments of

* The pre-existence of human souls, so far at least as that doctrine is compatible with religion, was adopted by many of the Greek and Latin fathers, See Beausobre, Hist. du Manicheisme, l. vi. c. 4.

a future state. At the bar and in the senate of Rome co.

the ablest orators were not apprehensive of giving
offence to their hearers, by exposing that doctrine as
an idle and extravagant opinion, which was rejected
with contempt by every man of a liberal education and
understanding." -
Since therefore the most sublime efforts of phi-

among the Pagans of

losophy can extend no farther than feebly to point Goce and

out the desire, the hope, or, at most, the probability, of a future state, there is nothing, except a divine revelation, that can ascertain the existence, and describe the condition, of the invisible country which is destined to receive the souls of men after their separation from the body. But we may perceive several defects inherent to the popular religions of Greece and Rome, which rendered them very unequal to so arduous a task. 1. The general system of their mythology was unsupported by any solid proofs; and the wisest among the Pagans had already disclaimed its usurped authority. 2. The description of the infernal regions had been abandoned to the fancy of painters and of poets, who peopled them with so many phantoms and monsters, who dispensed their rewards and punishments with so little equity, that a solemn truth, the most congenial to the human heart, was oppressed and disgraced by the absurd mixture of the wildest fictions." 3. The doctrine of a future state was scarcely considered among the devout polytheists of Greece and Rome as a funda

* See Cicero pro Cluent. c. 61. Caesar ap. Sallust. de bell. Catilin. c. 50. Juvenal. Satir. ii. 149. Esse aliquos manes, et subterranea regna, Nec pueri credunt, nisi quinondum aere lavantur. * The xith book of the Odyssey gives a very dreary and incoherent account of the infernal shades. Pindar and Virgil have embellished the picture; but even those poets, though more correct than their great model, are guilty of very strange inconsistencies. See Bayle, Responses aux Questions d'un Provincial, part iii. c. 22.

« ForrigeFortsett »