Sidebilder
PDF
ePub

§ 4. Remand or dismissal of cause.

ROADS.
*A cause removed into a federal court on the
ground of diversity of citizenship will be re:nand- See "Highways."
ed unless the jurisdiction of such court appears
from the record, which includes for the purposes
of such motion the petition of removal and all

RULES OF COURT.
pleadings and other papers previously properly
filed in the suit in the state court. - Helena See “Courts," § 2.
Power Transmission Co. v. Spratt (C. C.) 310.
§ 5. Proceedings in cause after re

SALES.
moval.
*The removal of a cause does not preclude See "Judicial Sales."
the defendant from challenging the jurisdiction on foreclosure of mortgage, see “Mortgages,"
of either the state or federal court over his

§ 1.
person or from claiming exemption from being Real property in general, see "Vendor and Pur-
sued in a state other than that of his residence.

chaser.'
-Davis v. Cleveland, C., C. & St. L. R. Co.
(C. C.) 403.

§ 1. Construction of contract.

A contract for the sale and delivery of lum-
REPORTS.

ber construed and held not one for the sale

of a certain quantity, but of the lumber then
By interstate commerce commission, see "Com-cut by them during the ensuing year regardless

on hand by the sellers, and such as should be
merce," $ 1.

of the quantity.-Inman Bros. v. Dudley &

Daniels Lumber Co. (C. C. A.) 449.
RESCISSION.

A contract for the sale of a patented prod-
Cancellation of written instrument, see "Cancel- uct held not to obligate defendant to accept
lation of Instruments."

any part of the product specified in the con-

tract, and that no such obligation could be im-
Of contract, see "Contracts," $ 3.
Of contract for sale of land, see “Vendor and of America (C. C. 900.

plied.-Amalgamated Gum Co. v. Casein Co.
Purchaser," 2.

§ 2. Warranties.
RES GESTÆ.

A contract for the manufacture and sale of
machinery construed with reference to the terms

of the warranties therein.-F. D. Cummer &
In civil actions, see "Evidence," $ 3.

Sons Co. v. Marine Sugar Co. (C. C. A.) 240.

§ 3. Remedies of buyer.
RESIDENCE.

Evidence held material and admissible on the

question of damages in an action for breach of a
See "Domicile."

contract for the sale of lumber.-Inman Bros.
v. Dudley & Daniels Lumber Co. (C. C. A.)

119.
RES JUDICATA.
See "Judgment,” s 1.

SALVAGE.

§ 1. Right to compensation.
RETROSPECTIVE LAWS.

*A tug which failed to perform a contract for

the floating and delivery in port of a stranded
See "Statutes," $ 1.

schooner cannot recover as salvage compensation

for services rendered in attempting performance
REVENUE.

which did not benefit the schooner.-The Myrtle

Tunnel (D. C.) 324.
See “Customs Duties" ; "Internal Revenue";

The raising of a scow sunk in its home port,
"Taxation."

under a contract, and where the work involved

no element of danger and nothing out of the
REVIEW.

usual, is not a salvage service which creates a

lien on the vessel.–The Paul L. Bleakley (D.
See “Appeal and Error”; "Criminal Law," § 4. C.) 570.
RIPARIAN RIGHTS.

$ 2. Amount and apportionment.

*The ancient rule for the allowance of a
Soe "Waters and Water Courses," $ 2.

moiety of the value saved in the salving of a
derelict to the salvors while somewhat flexible

and subject to change in extraordinary cases
RISKS.

is a safe and salutary limit upon judicial dis-

cretion and not to be lightly disregarded.The
Within insurance policy, see "Insurance," § 3. Myrtle Tunnel (D. C.) 324.

*Point annotated. See syllabus.

Tugs which rescued a schooner after she had

SHIPPING. become a derelict held entitled to an award for the salvage of one-half the proceeds of the ves

“Admiralty'' ; “Collision”; "Maritime sel and cargo saved.—The Myrtle Tunnel (D. C.) Liens"; "Salvage"; "Seamen." 324.

$ 1. Charters. SATISFACTION.

A ship held liable under a charter party re

quiring it to provide men to work the winches See "Payment"; "Release.”

for the expense of hiring outside winchmen in ports where the stevedores refused to work with

winchmen from the crew, without fault of the SCHOOLS AND SCHOOL DISTRICTS. charterer, although she had competent winch

men in her crew.–Golcar S. S. Co. v. Tweedie $ 1. Public schools.

Trading Co. (D. C.) 563. Under Iowa Code 1873, § 1715, which provides that upon the division of an independent school of the ship with respect to the cargo under

A charter party construed and held a demise district the assets and liabilities of the old which the charterer was not entitled to recover district shall be equitably divided between the from the owner for a shortage in cargo delivernew districts a suit by a bondholder of a dis- ed.-Golcar s. s. Co. v. Tweedie Trading Co. trict which has ceased to exist by reason of the (D. C.) 563. subdivision of its territory into new districts to enforce payment by the new districts is with The provision of section 2 of the Harter in the equity jurisdiction of a federal court. Act Feb. 13, 1893, c. 105, 27 Stat. 445 [U. S. Gamble v. Rural Independent School Dist. of Comp. St. 1901, p. 2946], making it unlawful for Allison (C. C. A.) 113; Rural Independent the owner of a ship “to insert in any bill of ladSchool Dist. of Allison v. Gamble, Id.

ing or shipping document any covenant or agreement * * * whereby the obligations of the

master, officers, agents, or servants to carefully SEAMEN.

handle and stow her cargo and to care for *A seaman who shipped on a whaling voyage wise be lessened, weakened, or avoided," re

and properly deliver the same shall in any under a lay contract, but to whom no account-lates to contracts between carrier and shipper ing was made by the owner of the vessel on and does not apply to a charter party by which the completion of the voyage, will not be held a ship is demised.—Golcar S. S. Co. v. Tweedie bound by a release given by him some time Trading Co. (D. C.) 563. afterward, when greatly intoxicated, on the payment to him of an inadequate sum in set

A charterer held entitled to a deduction of tlement for his share of the catch.-The Bar- charter hire during the time the vessel was debara Hernster (C. C. A.) 732.

tained in quarantine owing to the illness of the *Where the owner of a whaling vessel on owner to furnish the crew to efficiently man the

crew under a charter party which required tha her return from a voyage on which libelant vessel. Tweedie Trading Co. v. George D. Emserved as a seaman under a lay contract shipped ery Co. (D. C.) 618. away the product taken without making a division, it thereby became liable to libelant for

A provision of a charter party mutually exthe reasonable value of his share. -The Barbara empting "restraints of princes, rulers, and peoHernster (C. C. A.) 732.

ple” covers a detention of the vessel in quaran

tine, and exempts the charterer from the payThe advance payment of wages to a seaman, 1 ment of hire during the time of such detention. in violation of Act Dec. 21, 1898, c. 28, § 24, -Tweedie Trading Co. v. George D. Emery Co. 30 Stat. 763 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3079] (D. C.) 618. does not render the contract for service made by the shipping articles void under Rev. St. $ 2. Liabilities of vessels and owners 4523 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3075] where it is

in general. not shown that the unlawful payment entered *The owner of a steamer held liable for into the contract as one of the things agreed on injuries to scows in tow in New York Bay and by the parties.--The Bound Brook (D. C.) 160. harbor caused by her swell which might have

been avoided by a reasonable reduction of speed.

-Ross v. Central R. R. of New Jersey (D. C.) SEPARABLE CONTROVERSY.

608. Removal from state court, see "Removal of

Evidence considered and held to sufficiently Causes," $$ 2, 4.

identify the respondent's steamer as the one causing a swell by which libelant's tows were

injured.-Ross v. Central R. R. of New Jersey SERVICES.

(D. C.) 608. See “Work and Labor."

§ 3. Carriage of goods.

Damage to the cargo of a schooner from sea

water during a voyage on which she encountered SETTLEMENT.

heavy seas of unusual violence adequate to

strain her seams, and cause her to take in an See "Payment"; "Release."

unusual quantity of water, where she was *Point annotated. See syllabus.

shown to have been seaworthy at the inception continuous considering the time, place, cir-
of the voyage, properly stowed and handled, is cumstances, and the nature of the cargo.-
within an exception of "dangers of the sea” in United States Shipping Co. v. United States
the bill of lading and she is not liable therefor. (c. C.) 914.
-Cook v. Southeastern Lime & Cement Co. (D.
C.) 101.

A contract for transporting naval stores

and ammunition to the naval station at Cavite,
§ 4. Carriage of passengers.

Philippine Islands, during the time of war in
Where a steamship passenger had not retired the Islands, construed with respect to a claim
for the night, and a light was burning in her for demurrage for

delay in discharging.- United
stateroom, she was not chargeable with con- States Shipping Co. v. United States (C. C.)
tributory negligence for a theft therefrom be- 914.
cause of leaving the door partially open for *In the absence of contract, the charter
ventilation and fastened only by a hook pro- price per day of a vessel under a time charter
vided by the vessel for the purpose.—The Min- is not the measure of demurrage recoverable
netonka (C. C. A.) 509.

for delay in discharging cargo taken by the
*A shipowner is liable to a passenger for the charterer for another, but rather the probable
value of jewelry stolen during the voyage by net earnings of the vessel during the time lost
a steward employed to perform duties which in the usual course of its employment.-United
the carrier owed to the passenger under the States Shipping Co. v. United States (C. C.)
contract of carriage.-The Minnetonka (C. c. 914.
A.) 509.

A shipper held liable for demurrage on ac-
Notice of a claim by a passenger against a count of detention of the vessel in discharging
steamship for loss of effects held to have been under the provisions of the contract notwith-
given in substantial compliance with the con- standing the failure of the shipowner to collect
ditions of the ticket.—The Minnetonka (C. C. such demurrage at the port of discharge from
A.) 509.

the consignee or by enforcing its lien on the
Rev. St. $ 4281 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 2912), cargo, both of which rights it also had.-Tweedie
does not relieve a shipowner from liability for Trading Co. v. Pitch Pine Lumber Co. (D. C.)
jewelry worn and carried on board in person by

612.
à passenger and stolen by an employé of the $ 6. Limitation of owner's liability.
ship before the passenger could deposit it with

Personal representatives of passengers and
the purser as intended and permitted by the crew of two vessels who died as the result of
rules.-The Minnetonka (C. C. A.) 509.

a collision due to the fault of both vessels
Conditions printed inconspicuously upon a held entitled to maintain a claim against their
steamship ticket providing that the shipowner owners in proceedings to limit the owners'
shall not be liable for any loss of the pas- liability.-The Hamilton (C. C. A.) 724; The
senger's baggage through theft or any act, neg. Saginaw, Id.
lect, or default of the shipowner's servants or

Under a statute authorizing a recovery for
others, which were not known to the passenger wrongful death by the widow of the deceased
nor called to his attention, are invalid and con- person, a claim in proceedings by the owners
stitute no defense to an action by the passenger of certain vessels to limit their liability for
to recover for the loss of jewelry stolen by damages resulting from a collision, filed by
one of the ship's employés. - The Minnetonka claimant as widow and executrix of one of the
(C. C. A.) 509.

persons killed in the collision, held sufficient.
Evidence held to sustain a finding that jewelry The Hamilton (C. C. A.) 724; The Saginaw,
belonging to libelant was stolen from her state- Id.
room while she was a passenger on a trans Where claim for death of a person in a col-
atlantic steamship by an employé of the ship.- lision between vessels was filed by decedent's
The Minnetonka (C. C. A.) 509.

widow and executrix, an order permitting its
Proof that a passenger's baggage was delivered amendment so as to recite that she claimed
to a vessel in good condition, and was dam- as widow held not objectionable as pleading
aged by sea water at the end of the voyage, is a new cause of action.—The Hamilton (C. c.
sufficient to establish the negligence of the car- A.) 724; The Saginaw, Id.
rier.-Weinberger v. Compagnie Generale Trans-
atlantique (D. C.) 516.

SLANDER.
A provision printed on a steamship ticket for
the carriage of six passengers limiting the lia- See “Libel and Slander.”
bility of the carrier for loss or damage to bag-
gage to $100 not read by nor called to the at-

SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE.
tention of the passengers is unreasonable and
void.-Weinberger v. Compagnie Generale Trans- $ 1. Nature and grounds of remedy in
atlantique (D. C.) 516.

general.

*Where a city has refused to perform its con-
§ 5. Demurrage.

tract to purchase the waterworks of a company
A provision of a bill of lading that the dis- at a price named on their productive worth to
charge of cargo by the consignee shall be "con be determined by appraisers, the water company
tinuous” means only that it shall be reasonably 'has no remedy at law as complete as specific

*Point annotated. See syllabus.

[ocr errors]

performance in equity.-Castle Creek Water Co.

STATUTES AT LARGE. v. City of Aspen (C. C. A.) 8.

1874, June 18, ch. 301, 18 Stat. 78 (U. S. § 2. Contracts enforceable.

Comp. St. 1901, p. 3411]....

375 Where, in a contract of sale of real estate at 1874, June 22, ch. 391, $ 21, 18 Stat. 190 a price to be fixed by appraisers, the stipula [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1986]... 146 tion for the appraisers is auxiliary to the main 1887, Feb. 4, ch. 104, 24 Stat. 379 [U. S. purpose of the contract, equity may determine Comp. St. 1901, p. 3154].....

298 the price itself, or by appraisers of its own se- 1887, Feb. 4, ch. 104, 24 Stat. 379 [U. S. lection, and enforce specific performance. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3154]. Amended by Castle Creek Water Co. v. City of Aspen (C. C. Act 1903, Feb. 19, ch. 708, 32 Stat. 847 A.) 8.

[U. S. Comp. St. Supp: 1905, p. 599].;:; 298 Evidence held, to show an equity in complain- 1887, Feb. 4, ch. 104, § 14, 24 Stat. 384 ant, entitling it to a specific performance of

[U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3164]...... 559 the contract. – Castle Creek Water Co. v. City 1887, March 3, ch. 359, 24 Stat. 505 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 752]....

914 of Aspen (C. C. A.) 8.

1887, March 3, ch. 379, SS 1, 2, 7, 24 Stat.

505 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, pp. 752, 753, STARE DECISIS. 755]

15

1887, March 3, ch. 373, § 2, cl. 4, 24 Stat. See "Courts," $ 2.

553 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 509]...... 972 1888, Aug. 13, ch. 866, § 2, 25 Stat. 434.... 972

1890, June 10, ch. 407, § 13, 26 Stat. 136 STATES.

[U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1932].... 45

1890, June 10, ch. 407, § 14, 26 Stat. 137 See “United States."

[U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1933]......84, 484 Courts, see "Courts."

1890, June 10, ch. 407, § 15, 26 Stat. 138 Legislative power, see "Constitutional Law,"

[U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1933]...... 78 $ 1.

1890, June 10, ch. 407, § 20, 26 Stat. 140 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1950). Amended

by Act 1890, Oct. 1, ch. 1244, $ 54, 26 STATUTES.

Stat. 624 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901,

p. 1950] 484

1890, Oct. i. ch. 1244, $ 54, 26 Stat. 624 Adoption by United States courts of state laws [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1950]...... 484

as rules of decision, see "Courts," $ 3. 1891, March 3, ch. 517, § 5, 26 Stat. 827 Laws impairing obligation of contracts, see [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 549]..

743 "Constitutional Law," $ 2.

1891, March 3, ch. 565, 26 Stat. 1106 [U.

375 Provisions relating to particular subjects.

S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3106]..

1892, May 5, ch. 60, 27 Stat. 25 (U. S. See "Carriers," $ 1; "Customs Duties" ; "Post Comp. St. 1901, p. 1319]...

670 Office," $ 1; "Railroads,” § 1; "Removal of 1892, July 27, ch. 272, 81, 27 Stat. 277 Causes," $ 3; "Schools and School Districts,"

[U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 947]..... 202 $ 1; "Shipping," $$ 1, 4.

1893, Feb. 13, ch. 105, $ 2, 27 Stat. 445 (U. Revenue laws, see "Internal Revenue.”

S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 2946)..... .. 563 Statute of frauds, see "Frauds, Statute of." 1893, Nov. 3, ch. 14, 28 Stat. 7 [U. S.

Comp. 1901, p. 1322).

670 § 1. Construction and operation. *While the position of a proviso in a stat- 1894, Aug. 27, ch. 349, § 48, 28 Stat. 563

[U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 2109).

.. 703 ute has a great influence upon the question of its application, the inference from its position 1897, June 4. ch. 2, 30 Stat. 34 [U. S. cannot overrule its plain general intent, es

Comp. St. 1901, p. 1540].

306 pecially in composite structures such as tariff 1897, July 24, ch. 11, § 1, Schedule G, par. and appropriation acts.—United States v. R.

262, 30 Stat. 171 [U. Š. Comp. St. 1901, F. Downing & Co. (C. C. A.) 56; Same v.

p. 1651)..

104 Schoellkopf, Hartford & Hanna Co., Id. 1897, July 24, ch. 11, § 1, Schedule G, par.

264, 30 Stat. 171 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, *A statute is not retrospective in operation p. 1651]......

380 because a part of the requisites for its action 1897, July 24, ch. 11, § 1, Schedule G, par. is drawn from another statute, existing before 272, 30 Stat. 172 [U. s. Comp. St. 1901, the passage of the act in question.-McDougald

p. 1652]

112 v. New York Life Ins. Co. (C. C. A.) 674.

1897, July 24, ch. 11, § 1, Schedule 1, par.

302, 30 Stat. 175 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, STATUTES CONSTRUED. p. 1655]...

61 1897, July 24, ch. 11, § 1, Schedule 1, par. UNITED STATES.

321, 30 Stat. 179 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1661] ..

64 CONSTITUTION.

1897, July 24, ch. 11, § 1, Schedule L, par. Amend. 6

121 384, 30 Stat. 185 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, Amend. 7 476 p. 1668]....

83 *Point annotated. See syllabus.

20

1897, July 24, ch. 11, § 1, Schedule L, par. 1902, March 11, ch. 183, § 7, 32 Stat. 66

385, 30 Stat. 185 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, [U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1905, p. 114]. ... 994 p. 1668)...

61 1902, April 12, ch. 500, $ 4, 52 Stat. 97 [U. 1897, July 24, ch. 11, § 1, Schedule N, par. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1905, p. 415]... 15

408, 30 Stat. 189 [C. S. Comp. St. 1901, 1902, June 27, ch. 1160, 32 Stat. 406 [U. p._1673].

...63, 132

S. Comp. St. Supp. 1903, p. 449]. 1897, July 24, ch. 11, $ 1, Schedule N, par. 1902, Dec. 15, ch. 1, 32 Stat. 753 [U. S. 409, 30 Stat. 189 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, Comp. St. Supp. 1905, p. 420].

484 p. 1673]..

127 | 1903, Feb. 5, ch. 487, § 4, 32 Stat. 797 1897, July 24, ch. 11, § 1, Schedule N, par. [U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1905, p. 684] 383, 623

435, 30 Stat. 192 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, 1903, Feb. 19, ch. 708, § 1, 32 Stat. 847 p. 1676]....

379

[U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1905, p. 599]. ... 298 1897, July 24, ch. 11. $ 1, Schedule N. par. 1903, Feb. 19, ch. 708, § 1, 32 Stat. 847

450, 30 Stat. 193 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, [U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1905, p. 599]. p. 1678].

132 Amended by Act 1906, June 29, ch. 3591, 1897, July 24, ch. 11, § 2, Free List, pars.

34 Stat. 584...

298 626, 633, 30' Stat. 199, 200 [U. S. Comp. 1906, June 29, ch. 3591, 34 Stat. 584.... 298 St. 1901, pp. 1685, 1686]...

56 1897, July 21, ch. 11, § 2, Free List. par.

TREATIES. 638, 30 Stat. 200 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901,

With Germany, Dec. 11, 1871, art. 13, 17 p. 1686)..

144
Stat. 928...

.. 160 1897. July 24, ch. 11, § 2, Free List, par. With Great Britain, March 25, 1890, 26 661, 30 Stat. 201 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, Stat. 1509...

766 p. 1688]..

83 1897, July 24, ch. 11, § 7, 30 Stat. 205 [U.

REVISED STATUTES. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1693]... .61, 148 1897, July 24, ch. 11. $ 33, 30 Stat. 213,

$ 566 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 461]. 343 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1701].... 484

§ 953. Amended by Act 1900, June 5, ch. 1898, June 13, ch. 418, 30 Stat. 464.

717, § 1, 31 Stat. 270 [U. S. Comp. St. Amended by Act 1901, March 2, ch.

1901, p. 696].....

390 806 31 Stat. 948 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901,

$ 956 [Ú. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 697]. 969 pp. 2307; 2308); Act 1902, June 27. ch.

Š 1005 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 714]......969 1160, 32 Stat. 406 [U. S. Comp. St. Supp.

1024 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 720]. .. 781 1907, p. 449).

20 $ 1045 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 726]. 1898, July 1, ch. 541, SS 2, 7. 30 Stat. 545,

§ 2145

975 548 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, pp. 3120,

§ 2983 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1958]. 484 3425] .

89

§ 3334 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 2183]. ... 703 1898, July 1, ch. 541, $ 14, subd. 2. 30 Stat.

$$ 3453, 3159 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, pp. 550 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3428].

2278, 2281]...

130 Amended by Act 1903, Feb. 5, ch. 487, §

3748 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 2527]. ..202 4, 32 Stat. 797 [U. S. Comp. St. Supp.

§ 4281 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 2942] 509 1905, p. 684]....

623 4523 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3075] 160 1898, July 1, ch. 541, § 14b, 30 Stat. 550

4887 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3382]. ... 534 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3428]. Amend

$ 4915 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3392].. 758 ed by Act 1903, Feb. 5, ch. 487, § 4, 32

§ 4952. Amended by Act 1891, March 3, Stat. 797 [U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1903, p.

ch. 565, 26 Stat. 1106 [U. S. Comp. St. 681]

383
1901, p. 3406].....

375 1898, July, 1, ch. 541, 88 20, 21, 30 Stat.

$$ 4956, 4962 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 551 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3430]... 89

3407]

354 1898, July 1, ch. 511, $ 23a, 30 Stat. 552 $ 4963 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3412] 354

[U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3131].... 200 $ 4965 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3414]..375, 377 1898, July 1. ch. 511, SS 29, 38, 57, 30 Stat.

$ 5209 IU. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 34971..280, 289 552, 554, 555, 560 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901,

5258 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901 p. 3564].... 403 pp. 3423, 3435, 3443].

89 Š 5356 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3638]... 975 1898, July 1, ch. 541, § 57g, 30 Stat. 560

5438 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3674]. . 202 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3443].

142 $ 5440 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3676].... 298 1898, July 1, ch. 541, § 63a, 30 Stat. 562 $ 5451 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3680]. 121 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3147]... 923

5180 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3696] 219, 223 1898, July 1, ch. 541, § 70 (5), 30 Stat.

§ 5497 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3707]. ... 778 565 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3151]... 181 1898, Dec. 21, ch. 28, § 24, 30 Stat. 763

COMPILED STATUTES 1901. [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3079]. 160 Page 461....

343 1.200, June 5, ch. 717, § 1, 31 Stat. 270

Page 509.

972 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 696]... 390 Page 519.

743 1900, June 6, 786, subch. 22, $ 204, 31 Page 696.

390 Stat. 522.... 680 Pages 697, 714.

969 1901, March, 2. ch. 806. 31 Stat. 948

Page 720.

781 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, pp. 2307, 2308]. .. 20 Page 726...

803 1901, March 3, ch. 815, § 3, 31 Stat. 1093 Page 752..

.15, 914 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1328].. 343 Pages 753, 755.

15

« ForrigeFortsett »