The Federal Reporter, Volum 146Includes cases argued and determined in the District Courts of the United States and, Mar./May 1880-Oct./Nov. 1912, the Circuit Courts of the United States; Sept./Dec. 1891-Sept./Nov. 1924, the Circuit Courts of Appeals of the United States; Aug./Oct. 1911-Jan./Feb. 1914, the Commerce Court of the United States; Sept./Oct. 1919-Sept./Nov. 1924, the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia. |
Inni boken
Resultat 1-5 av 100
Side 2
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of
Tennessee . Action in assumpsit to recover the sum of $ 12,000 , claimed to be
due the plaintiff , A. M. Love , for his services in bringing about a sale of a tract of
land ...
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of
Tennessee . Action in assumpsit to recover the sum of $ 12,000 , claimed to be
due the plaintiff , A. M. Love , for his services in bringing about a sale of a tract of
land ...
Side 16
The United States objected that the claim was invalid because not reverified after
an error in computation , discovered by a deputy collector , had been corrected
as required by the regulations , such objection involved in this case a finding of ...
The United States objected that the claim was invalid because not reverified after
an error in computation , discovered by a deputy collector , had been corrected
as required by the regulations , such objection involved in this case a finding of ...
Side 20
5. SAME_TAXES ILLEGALLY EXACTED — INTEREST . Where an internal
revenue tax on certain legacies was illegally exacted , interest was properly
allowed on the principal of the tax in a suit to recover the same . In Error to the
Circuit Court ...
5. SAME_TAXES ILLEGALLY EXACTED — INTEREST . Where an internal
revenue tax on certain legacies was illegally exacted , interest was properly
allowed on the principal of the tax in a suit to recover the same . In Error to the
Circuit Court ...
Side 22
The defendant in error contends on this question : First , that these are technically
contingent legacies , and as such are not taxable under the act of June 27 , 1902
, because they are not absolutely vested in possession or enjoyment ; and ...
The defendant in error contends on this question : First , that these are technically
contingent legacies , and as such are not taxable under the act of June 27 , 1902
, because they are not absolutely vested in possession or enjoyment ; and ...
Side 25
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania . For opinion below , see 142 Fed . 911 . Wm . B. Linn , for plaintiff
in error . Thomas Raeburn White , for defendant in error . Before DALLAS and
GRAY ...
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania . For opinion below , see 142 Fed . 911 . Wm . B. Linn , for plaintiff
in error . Thomas Raeburn White , for defendant in error . Before DALLAS and
GRAY ...
Hva folk mener - Skriv en omtale
Vi har ikke funnet noen omtaler på noen av de vanlige stedene.
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
action agreed agreement alleged amount answer appears applied authority bank bankrupt bankruptcy bill cause Cent charge Circuit Court claim complainant condition consideration constitute construction contract corporation counsel creditors damages decision decree defendant delivered determine direct District District Judge duty effect entitled equity error evidence fact filed follows further give given ground held hold important indictment intent interest issued Judge judgment jurisdiction jury land liability matter means negligence notice objection officers opinion original owner paid parties patent payment performance person plaintiff possession present proceedings purchase question Railroad reason received record referred rule says secured statute sufficient suit testimony thereof tion trial trust U. S. Comp United York