 There must be reasonable evidence of negligence. But where the thing is shown to be under the management of the defendant or his servants and the accident is such as in the ordinary course of things does not happen if those who have the management use...  The New York Supplement - Side 881913Uten tilgangsbegrensning - Om denne boken
 | 1869 - 1032 sider
...conclusion : that there must be reasonable evidence of negligence ; that where the thing is solely under the management of the defendant or his servants, and the accident is such as, in the ordinary course of things, does not happen to those who have the management of machinery and use... | |
 | 1866 - 1074 sider
...of the Court of Exchequer), that where tlie thing which causes the accident is shewn to be under the management of the defendant or his servants, and the accident is such as would not happen in the ordinary course of management, the accident itself, if unexplained, is reasonable... | |
 | Great Britain. Privy Council. Judicial Committee, Edmund F. Moore - 1864 - 596 sider
...Scott v. The London and St. Katherine's Docks Company (c), " where the thing is shown to be under the management of the Defendant or his servants, and the...reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation by the Defendants, that the accident arose from want of care," which rule, we submit, is applicable to the... | |
 | Isaac Fletcher Redfield - 1867 - 930 sider
...declared by the Exchequer Chamber, that where the thing which causes the accident is known to be under the management of the defendant or his servants, and the accident is such as would not happen in the ordinary course of management, the accident itself, if unexplained, is reasonable... | |
 | North Carolina. Supreme Court - 1905 - 922 sider
...134,) said: "There must be some evidence of negligence, but when the thing is shown to be under the management of the defendant or his servants and the accident is such that, as in the ordinary course of things, does not happen if those who have the management use the... | |
 | 1881 - 572 sider
...ZX>, "There must be reasonable evidence of negligence. But where the thing is shown to bo under the management of the defendant or his servants, and the accident is such из iu the ordinary course of things does not bap)>eii if those who have the management use proper... | |
 | 1881 - 572 sider
...220, "There must be reasonable evidence of negligence. But where the thing is shown to be under the management of the defendant or his servants, and the accident is such us in the ordinary course of things does not happen if those who have the management use proper care,... | |
 | 1871 - 874 sider
...said, " There must be reasonable evidence of negligence ; tut where the thing is shown to be under the management of the defendant or his servants, and the...explanation by the defendant, that the accident arose from want of care." So in Ourtis v. The Rochester and Syracuse Railroad Company, 18 NY 543, the Court of... | |
 | Victoria. Supreme Court - 1871 - 380 sider
...under the management of the defendant, the accident is such aa in the ordinary course does not happen if ^those who have the management use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation, that the accident arose from want of care. Seoll v. London Dock Company,... | |
 | New York (State). Court of Appeals, Hiram Edward Sickels - 1872 - 788 sider
...management of the defendant, and the accident is such as, in the ordinary course of things, does not happen, if those who have the management use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence that the accident arose from want of care. (Scott v. Lond. Dock Co., 3 Hurlst. & Colt., 596.) It is... | |
| |
