Federal Trade Commission Decisions, Volumer 1-3U.S. Government Printing Office, 1922 |
Inni boken
Resultat 1-5 av 100
Side 5
... competitor's customers .. Of Government . Bribing officers of vessels . 174 74 74 77 80 81 Business methods of competitors . ( See Advertising falsely and misleadingly . ) Buying out competitors . ( See Clayton Act , sec . 7. ) 5 ...
... competitor's customers .. Of Government . Bribing officers of vessels . 174 74 74 77 80 81 Business methods of competitors . ( See Advertising falsely and misleadingly . ) Buying out competitors . ( See Clayton Act , sec . 7. ) 5 ...
Side 6
... competitor's firm name .. Conspiracy .. To cut off supplies of competitors .. To induce less favorable terms to competitors ..... To induce less favorable terms to objectionable competitors of customers .. To maintain prices and ...
... competitor's firm name .. Conspiracy .. To cut off supplies of competitors .. To induce less favorable terms to competitors ..... To induce less favorable terms to objectionable competitors of customers .. To maintain prices and ...
Side 7
... competitor's business . ) Interference with competitor's business .. Intimidation ...... 113 113 Threatening competitors and their customers with infringement suits .... Threatening manufacturers , etc. , to withdraw patronage ... 113 ...
... competitor's business . ) Interference with competitor's business .. Intimidation ...... 113 113 Threatening competitors and their customers with infringement suits .... Threatening manufacturers , etc. , to withdraw patronage ... 113 ...
Side 8
... competitor's goods .. Trade name or trade - mark . Sole agency . ( See Tying or exclusive leases or contracts . ) Source of supply . ( See Advertising falsely and misleadingly . ) Spying on competitor's business . ( See Espionage ...
... competitor's goods .. Trade name or trade - mark . Sole agency . ( See Tying or exclusive leases or contracts . ) Source of supply . ( See Advertising falsely and misleadingly . ) Spying on competitor's business . ( See Espionage ...
Side 35
... competitors , advertised and sold certain mixtures of grass seed in such a manner as to mislead the purchaser into believing that certain high - grade seed predominated ; the fact being that such grass seed mixtures contained large ...
... competitors , advertised and sold certain mixtures of grass seed in such a manner as to mislead the purchaser into believing that certain high - grade seed predominated ; the fact being that such grass seed mixtures contained large ...
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
Federal Trade Commission Decisions, Volum 16 United States. Federal Trade Commission Uten tilgangsbegrensning - 1933 |
Federal Trade Commission Decisions, Volum 10 United States. Federal Trade Commission Uten tilgangsbegrensning - 1929 |
Federal Trade Commission Decisions, Volum 17 United States. Federal Trade Commission Uten tilgangsbegrensning - 1934 |
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
Advertising falsely affirmed agents agreement American antitrust act Assn association brand Bros circumstances set Clayton Act Coca Cola Co combination competitors complainant complainant's consent decree constitute an unfair constituted unfair methods contract corporation engaged Court decree Cudahy Packing Co Decrees and Judgments defendant employees of customers enjoined exclusive fact facture false and misleading falsely and misleadingly Federal Antitrust Federal Trade Commission groceries Harvard Law Review held to constitute induce infringement injunction interstate commerce jobbers Judgments in Federal label leases lumber and building machines mail-order house manu manufac manufacture and sale ment method of competition mislead the public name and style patent petitors plaintiff Price maintenance prices fixed prospective customers purchasing public purpose refuse to sell resale prices restrain restraint of trade retail dealers seed Sherman simulation sold substantially lessen Syllabus tion trade name trade-mark unfair competition United unlawful wholesale Yale Law Journal yeast
Populære avsnitt
Side 204 - Commerce, undoubtedly, is traffic, but it is something more, — it is intercourse. It describes the commercial intercourse between nations, and parts of nations, in all its branches, and is regulated by prescribing rules for carrying on that intercourse.
Side 215 - The power to regulate commerce is the power to prescribe the rule by which commerce shall be governed, and is a power independent of the power to suppress monopoly. But it may operate in repression of monopoly whenever that comes within the rules by which commerce is governed or whenever the transaction itself is a monopoly of commerce.
Side 220 - Whenever the commission shall have reason to believe that any such person, partnership, or corporation has been or is using any unfair method of competition in commerce, and if it shall appear to the commission that a proceeding by it in respect thereof would be to the interest of the public...
Side 215 - No distinction is more popular to the common mind, or more clearly expressed in economic and political literature, than that between manufacture and commerce. Manufacture is transformation — the fashioning of raw materials into a change of form for use. The functions of commerce are different. The buying and selling and the transportation incidental thereto constitute commerce...
Side 212 - Doubtless the power to control the manufacture of a given thing involves in a certain sense the control of its disposition, but this is a secondary and not the primary sense; and although the exercise of that power may result in bringing the operation of commerce into play, it does not control it, and affects it only incidentally and indirectly. Commerce succeeds to manufacture, and is not a part of it.
Side 224 - But we do not think that the purpose in using the word "may" was to prohibit the mere possibility of the consequences described. It was intended to prevent such agreements as would under the circumstances disclosed probably lessen competition, or create an actual tendency to monopoly.
Side 68 - Any person who shall be injured in his business or property by any other person or corporation by reason of anything forbidden or declared to be unlawful by this act, may sue therefor in any circuit court of the United States in the district in which the defendant resides or is found, without respect to the amount in controversy, and shall recover threefold the damages by him sustained, and the costs of suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee.
Side 228 - Where acts are not sufficient in themselves to produce a result which the law seeks to prevent — for instance, the monopoly — but require further acts in addition to the mere forces of nature to bring that result to pass, an intent to bring it to pass is necessary in order to produce a dangerous probability that it will happen.
Side 73 - That the labor of a human being is not a commodity or article of commerce. Nothing contained in the antitrust laws shall be construed to forbid the existence and operation of labor, agricultural, or horticultural organizations, instituted for the purposes of mutual help, and not having capital stock or conducted for profit, or to forbid or restrain individual members of such organizations from lawfully carrying out the legitimate objects thereof...
Side 227 - Again, all the authorities agree that in order to vitiate a contract or combination it is not essential that its result should be a complete monopoly ; it is sufficient if it really tends to that end and to deprive the public of the advantages which flow from free competition.