To Regulate Interstate Commerce in Bituminous Coal: Hearings Before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Interstate Commerce, United States Senate, Seventy-fifth Congress, First Session, on S. 1, a Bill to Regulated Interstate Commerce in Bituminous Coal, and for Other Purposes, Volum 1U.S. Government Printing Office, 1937 |
Inni boken
Resultat 1-5 av 36
Side 4
... industrial purposes ? Mr. HARDING . I have no first - hand information on that . Senator NEELY . In what States was it sold ? Mr. HARDING . It is a little difficult to be sure in what States it was sold , except that in general I know ...
... industrial purposes ? Mr. HARDING . I have no first - hand information on that . Senator NEELY . In what States was it sold ? Mr. HARDING . It is a little difficult to be sure in what States it was sold , except that in general I know ...
Side 11
... industry at that time almost unanimously opposed the principle of Federal regulation , and expressed its opinions in lengthy hearings . During the same session Congressman Lewis , of Maryland , intro- duced a measure which was based ...
... industry at that time almost unanimously opposed the principle of Federal regulation , and expressed its opinions in lengthy hearings . During the same session Congressman Lewis , of Maryland , intro- duced a measure which was based ...
Side 12
... industry , and the majority of the Justices held that despite the inclusion of a separability clause in the act the price provisions were so closely entwined with the labor provisions that the two could not be sepa- rated and the one ...
... industry , and the majority of the Justices held that despite the inclusion of a separability clause in the act the price provisions were so closely entwined with the labor provisions that the two could not be sepa- rated and the one ...
Side 13
... industry had a Bituminous Coal Code which was , I believe , the most successful code in operation . The administrative organizations set up under N. R. A. constituted what were called code authorites in each of a member of coal ...
... industry had a Bituminous Coal Code which was , I believe , the most successful code in operation . The administrative organizations set up under N. R. A. constituted what were called code authorites in each of a member of coal ...
Side 14
... industry's organizations . That was done for two reasons . When the Carter case was heard , one of the objections made to various provisions of the bill was that under that plan confidential information of individual coal producers was ...
... industry's organizations . That was done for two reasons . When the Carter case was heard , one of the objections made to various provisions of the bill was that under that plan confidential information of individual coal producers was ...
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
administration agency American Bar Association Ansell anthracite anthracite coal apply appointed approval authority believe Bituminous Coal Commission Chairman coal industry coal sold coal-producing counties code member commerce in bituminous Commis Commissioner competition Congress consumers contracts correct cost counsel court determine district 13 district board duty effect employees exemption exports favor the amendment following counties Gauley River Guffey HARDING hearing HOSFORD House Illinois included insert Internal Revenue June 16 Kentucky labor matter McMinn Counties Means Committee ment mines minimum-price area mission National Bituminous Coal necessary objection operators Pennsylvania percent person price area price provisions producer proposed purpose question Railroad reason record REGULATE INTERSTATE COMMERCE rules and regulations Senator AUSTIN Senator DAVIS Senator DIETERICH Senator MINTON Senator MOORE Senator NEELY sion subcommittee subsection suggested thereof tion tonnage tons United violation Virginian Railway vote West Virginia words
Populære avsnitt
Side 40 - Commission shall be final, subject to review by the Supreme Court of the United States upon certiorari or certification as provided in sections 239 and 240 of the Judicial Code, as amended (USC, title 28, sees. 346 and 347).
Side 40 - States, within any circuit where the violation complained of was or is being committed or where such person resides or carries on business, for the enforcement of its order, and shall certify and file with its application a transcript of the entire record in the proceeding, including all the testimony taken and the report and order of the commission or board.
Side 40 - If either party shall apply to the court for leave to adduce additional evidence, and shall show to the satisfaction of the court that such additional evidence is material and that there were reasonable grounds for the failure to adduce such evidence in the proceeding before the Commission, the court may order such additional evidence to be taken before the Commission and to be adduced upon the hearing in such manner and upon such terms and conditions as to the court may seem proper.
Side 41 - ... no individual shall be prosecuted or subjected to any penalty or forfeiture for or on account of any transaction, matter, or thing concerning which he is compelled, after having claimed his privilege against self-incrimination, to testify or produce evidence, except that such individual so testifying shall not be exempt from prosecution and punishment for perjury committed in so testifying.
Side 41 - ... no individual shall be prosecuted or subject to any penalty or forfeiture for or on account of any transaction, matter, or thing concerning which he is compelled, after having claimed his privilege against self-incrimination, to testify or produce evidence, documentary or otherwise, except that such individual so testifying shall not be exempt from prosecution and punishment for perjury committed in so testifying.
Side 42 - That any person that shall knowingly make a false affidavit for such purpose shall be deemed guilty of perjury and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine not exceeding $500 or by imprisonment not exceeding one year, or by both such fine and imprisonment, within the discretion of the court.
Side 39 - ... anything forbidden in the antitrust laws may sue therefor in any district court of the United States in the district in which the defendant resides or is found or has an agent, without respect to the amount in controversy, and shall recover threefold the damages by him sustained, and the cost of suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee.
Side 30 - Any Commissioner may be removed by the President for inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office.
Side 40 - The Commission may modify its findings as to the facts, or make new findings, by reason of the additional...
Side 42 - States the sum of $100 for each and every day of the continuance of such failure, which forfeiture shall be payable into the Treasury of the United States, and shall be recoverable in a civil suit in the name of the United States brought in the district where the corporation has its principal office or in any district in which it shall do business.