Northeastern Reporter, Volum 78Includes the decisions of the Supreme Courts of Massachusetts, Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois, and Court of Appeals of New York; May/July 1891-Mar./Apr. 1936, Appellate Court of Indiana; Dec. 1926/Feb. 1927-Mar./Apr. 1936, Courts of Appeals of Ohio. |
Inni boken
Resultat 1-5 av 100
Side 8
... Sewell, made On March 25th, was offered as connecting the two conveyances
by showing heirship, but the affidavit expressly disavowed personal knowledge
of the facts by the affiant, and the same was rejected by JackSon's attorney.
... Sewell, made On March 25th, was offered as connecting the two conveyances
by showing heirship, but the affidavit expressly disavowed personal knowledge
of the facts by the affiant, and the same was rejected by JackSon's attorney.
Side 9
This is the very reason why the Statment of the ultimate fact or conclusion by an
affiant or witness is not permitted. If the Witness is not able to state the evidentiary
facts, he is certainly disqualified from Stating the conclusion. And, lest he may ...
This is the very reason why the Statment of the ultimate fact or conclusion by an
affiant or witness is not permitted. If the Witness is not able to state the evidentiary
facts, he is certainly disqualified from Stating the conclusion. And, lest he may ...
Side 13
188). providing that the supervisors shall pay one-half the cost of constructing or
repairing any bridge, upon a petition showing certain facts, and the necessary
facts are found to exist, the duty of the board to make the appropriation will be ...
188). providing that the supervisors shall pay one-half the cost of constructing or
repairing any bridge, upon a petition showing certain facts, and the necessary
facts are found to exist, the duty of the board to make the appropriation will be ...
Side 60
The fact, therefore, that they were not properly served with process ought not to
work a reversal of the case; and the ... an incompetent witness, as against the
plaintiffs in error, as to facts Which occurred during the lifetime of Samuel H. Giles
, ...
The fact, therefore, that they were not properly served with process ought not to
work a reversal of the case; and the ... an incompetent witness, as against the
plaintiffs in error, as to facts Which occurred during the lifetime of Samuel H. Giles
, ...
Side 66
Submission of controversy on agreed facts by Margaret F. Downey against
George Dan Seib. A judgment was directed in favor of defendant by the Appellate
Division (92 N. Y. Supp. 431), from which plaintiff appeals. Affirmed. The
controversy ...
Submission of controversy on agreed facts by Margaret F. Downey against
George Dan Seib. A judgment was directed in favor of defendant by the Appellate
Division (92 N. Y. Supp. 431), from which plaintiff appeals. Affirmed. The
controversy ...
Hva folk mener - Skriv en omtale
Vi har ikke funnet noen omtaler på noen av de vanlige stedene.
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
action affirmed agreed alleged amount answer appellant appellee applied assessment authority Bank bill bonds cause Cent charge circuit claim complaint condition Constitution construction contract corporation court damages death deed defendant determine directed duty easements effect election entered error evidence exceptions execution existing facts filed finding follows further give given grant ground held improvement injury instruction intended interest issue Judge judgment jury land lien limitations Mass matter means ment mortgage motion negligence Ohio operation opinion owner paid parties passed payment person petition plaintiff present proceedings purchase question railroad reason received record reference refused reversed rule statute street sufficient sustained taken thereof tion trial trust witness