Northeastern Reporter, Volum 78Includes the decisions of the Supreme Courts of Massachusetts, Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois, and Court of Appeals of New York; May/July 1891-Mar./Apr. 1936, Appellate Court of Indiana; Dec. 1926/Feb. 1927-Mar./Apr. 1936, Courts of Appeals of Ohio. |
Inni boken
Resultat 1-5 av 100
Side 56
Held that, where such proposition was submitted at the general municipal
election and did not receive a majority of all the votes cast at such election, as
distinguished from all the votes cast on such proposition, the proposition was lost.
2.
Held that, where such proposition was submitted at the general municipal
election and did not receive a majority of all the votes cast at such election, as
distinguished from all the votes cast on such proposition, the proposition was lost.
2.
Side 58
carry the proposition, and, as those words have not been changed since the
adoption of the Original act, they must now be given their original meaning, and it
be held that a majority vote upon the proposition is sufficient to carry Said ...
carry the proposition, and, as those words have not been changed since the
adoption of the Original act, they must now be given their original meaning, and it
be held that a majority vote upon the proposition is sufficient to carry Said ...
Side 74
We did not pass upon the merits in our decision, but simply held that the
surrogate had no jurisdiction of such a controversy. Matter of Thompson, 184
N. Y. 36, 76 N. E. 870. Outside facts, not appearing in the record but shown only
by the ...
We did not pass upon the merits in our decision, but simply held that the
surrogate had no jurisdiction of such a controversy. Matter of Thompson, 184
N. Y. 36, 76 N. E. 870. Outside facts, not appearing in the record but shown only
by the ...
Side 112
... held” by Morrell “shall be deposited.” The third article is as follows: “It is
understood and agreed that the mortgage securing the said bonds may be
foreclosed when the parties of the Second part may elect, the expense thereof to
be paid out ...
... held” by Morrell “shall be deposited.” The third article is as follows: “It is
understood and agreed that the mortgage securing the said bonds may be
foreclosed when the parties of the Second part may elect, the expense thereof to
be paid out ...
Side 114
foreclosure; and (2) that if the defendants' Construction had been the intention Of
the parties to the contract of August 13, they WCuld have restricted the clause as
to bidding $100,000 on foreclosure to “a sale held in their interest” in place of ...
foreclosure; and (2) that if the defendants' Construction had been the intention Of
the parties to the contract of August 13, they WCuld have restricted the clause as
to bidding $100,000 on foreclosure to “a sale held in their interest” in place of ...
Hva folk mener - Skriv en omtale
Vi har ikke funnet noen omtaler på noen av de vanlige stedene.
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
action affirmed agreed alleged amount answer appellant appellee applied assessment authority Bank bill bonds cause Cent charge circuit claim complaint condition Constitution construction contract corporation court damages death deed defendant determine directed duty easements effect election entered error evidence exceptions execution existing facts filed finding follows further give given grant ground held improvement injury instruction intended interest issue Judge judgment jury land lien limitations Mass matter means ment mortgage motion negligence Ohio operation opinion owner paid parties passed payment person petition plaintiff present proceedings purchase question railroad reason received record reference refused reversed rule statute street sufficient sustained taken thereof tion trial trust witness