Northeastern Reporter, Volum 78Includes the decisions of the Supreme Courts of Massachusetts, Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois, and Court of Appeals of New York; May/July 1891-Mar./Apr. 1936, Appellate Court of Indiana; Dec. 1926/Feb. 1927-Mar./Apr. 1936, Courts of Appeals of Ohio. |
Inni boken
Resultat 1-5 av 62
Side 37
For cases in point, see vol. 33, Cent. Dig. Mandamus, §§ 1, 37.] 2. MUNICIPAL
CORPORATIONS — LOCAL IMPROVEMENTS—ISSUANCE OF BONDS—
APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT BY COURT. Local Improvement Act, § 83 (
Hurd's Rev.
For cases in point, see vol. 33, Cent. Dig. Mandamus, §§ 1, 37.] 2. MUNICIPAL
CORPORATIONS — LOCAL IMPROVEMENTS—ISSUANCE OF BONDS—
APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT BY COURT. Local Improvement Act, § 83 (
Hurd's Rev.
Side 38
decision in this case is, must the board of local improvements of a city comply
with the provisions of said section 84 as ... and the court enter an Order that the
improvement, as completed, conforms, in substance, to the improvement
Ordinance, ...
decision in this case is, must the board of local improvements of a city comply
with the provisions of said section 84 as ... and the court enter an Order that the
improvement, as completed, conforms, in substance, to the improvement
Ordinance, ...
Side 39
would seem apparent the city ought not to be required to issue improvement
bonds in payment of an improvement until it had been judicially determined, in
the manner pointed out in the statute, that the improvement constructed was ...
would seem apparent the city ought not to be required to issue improvement
bonds in payment of an improvement until it had been judicially determined, in
the manner pointed out in the statute, that the improvement constructed was ...
Side 54
356, § 8, provides that an ordinance for a local improvement shall prescribe the
nature, character, and description of such improvement, etc. Held, that an
ordinance calling for “asphaltum cement” was not insufficient for not showing
definitely ...
356, § 8, provides that an ordinance for a local improvement shall prescribe the
nature, character, and description of such improvement, etc. Held, that an
ordinance calling for “asphaltum cement” was not insufficient for not showing
definitely ...
Side 55
Upon the hearing, evidence was offered for the purpose of ascertaining whether
the description in the ordinance substantially designated the character of the
improvement. Samuel G. Artinstall, a WitneSS On behalf of the objector, testified
that ...
Upon the hearing, evidence was offered for the purpose of ascertaining whether
the description in the ordinance substantially designated the character of the
improvement. Samuel G. Artinstall, a WitneSS On behalf of the objector, testified
that ...
Hva folk mener - Skriv en omtale
Vi har ikke funnet noen omtaler på noen av de vanlige stedene.
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
action affirmed agreed alleged amount answer appellant appellee applied assessment authority Bank bill bonds cause Cent charge circuit claim complaint condition Constitution construction contract corporation court damages death deed defendant determine directed duty easements effect election entered error evidence exceptions execution existing facts filed finding follows further give given grant ground held improvement injury instruction intended interest issue Judge judgment jury land lien limitations Mass matter means ment mortgage motion negligence Ohio operation opinion owner paid parties passed payment person petition plaintiff present proceedings purchase question railroad reason received record reference refused reversed rule statute street sufficient sustained taken thereof tion trial trust witness