Sidebilder
PDF
ePub
[graphic][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][ocr errors][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][ocr errors][subsumed][subsumed]

THE EFFECT THAT BUYERS OR LESSEES CANNOT HANDLE OR USE THE
PRODUCTS OF COMPETITORS.

In favor,

Opposed.

See page 6

ΛΙ

THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT THE FINAL DECREE IN AN EQUITY
SUIT BROUGHT BY THE GOVERNMENT WHICH ESTABLISHES THE EXISTENCE
OR THE NONEXISTENCE OF A RESTRAINT OF TRADE OR OF A MONOPOLY
SHOULD BE CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE AS TO THE SAME GENERAL FACT IN PRI.
VATE ACTIONS BROUGHT AGAINST THE SAME DEFENDANTS UNDER THE
ANTITRUST LAWS.

In favor,

Opposed.

See page 9

V

THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT INTERLOCKING OF DIRECTORS
AMONG COMPETITIVE BUSINESS CORPORATIONS, INCLUDING RAILROAD COR-
PORATIONS, SHOULD BE PROHIBITED REGARDLESS OF THE SIZE OF CORPORA.
TIONS IF ELIMINATION OF COMPETITION AMONG THE CORPORATIONS IN
QUESTION WOULD CONSTITUTE A VIOLATION OF THE SHERMAN ACT.

In favor,

Opposed.

(OVBR)

OR

Opposed.

In favor.

TIONS BE ENTIRELY PROHIBITED?
RAILROADS AND BANKERS WITH WHOM THEY HAVE FINANCIAL TRANSAC.
(A) SHOULD INTERLOCKING OF OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS BETWEEN

(Do not vote in favor of more than one division of this question.)

See page 11

IIA

Opposed,

In favor.

MINE ARE NOT DETRIMENTAL TO THE PUBLIC INTEREST.
SUCH INSTANCES AS THE INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION MAY DETER.
THE RELATION OF BUYER AND SELLER) SHOULD BE PROHIBITED EXCEPT IN
THEY TRANSACT A SUBSTANTIAL VOLUME OF BUSINESS (FOR EXAMPLE, IN
DIRECTORS BETWEEN RAILROADS AND INDUSTRIAL BUSINESSES WITH WHICH

THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT INTERLOCKING OF OFFICERS AND See page 10

VI

« ForrigeFortsett »