Hva folk mener - Skriv en omtale
Vi har ikke funnet noen omtaler på noen av de vanlige stedene.
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
Reports of Cases in Law and Equity, Determined in the Supreme ..., Volum 56
Iowa. Supreme Court
Uten tilgangsbegrensning - 1882
Reports of Cases in Law and Equity, Determined in the Supreme ..., Volum 58
Iowa. Supreme Court
Uten tilgangsbegrensning - 1883
Reports of Cases in Law and Equity, Determined in the Supreme ..., Volum 20
Iowa. Supreme Court
Uten tilgangsbegrensning - 1880
14 Iowa Affirmed Alexander Wright alleged amount answer appeal appellee applied assigned authorities Bank Bergen bond Brazleton Buell cause of action Cedar county chose in action cited City of Davenport claim contract Cook & Sargent corporation court of equity Craton creditor debt debtor declared decree deed defendant defendant's demurrer District Court dollars Dubuque Elkader entitled equity error evidence execution facts filed foreclosure fraud ground habeas corpus held homestead interest issue Jefferson County judge judgment jurisdiction jury land levy liable lien ment mortgage motion notice opinion overruled paid parties payment person petition plaintiff pleadings premises prior proceeding promissory note purchaser question Railroad Company real estate record recover reference rendered Revision of 1860 rule sheriff sold statute sufficient suit Supreme Court sureties testimony thereof tion Traer trial Vannice verdict Wend witness writ
Side 167 - That the constitution and all laws of the United States which are not locally inapplicable, shall have the s*ame force and effect within the said territory of Nebraska as elsewhere within the United States...
Side 537 - The court may determine any controversy between parties before it, when it can be done without prejudice to the rights of others, or by saving their rights ; but when a complete determination of the controversy cannot be had without the presence of other parties, the court must order them to be brought in.
Side 167 - That the legislative power of the Territory shall extend to all rightful subjects of legislation consistent with the constitution of the United States and the provisions of this act ; but no law shall be passed interfering with the primary disposal of the soil ; no tax shall be imposed upon the property of the United States...
Side 602 - ... endeavors to deliver over such accused person or persons to the civil magistrate, and likewise to be aiding and assisting to the officers of justice in apprehending and securing the person or persons so accused, in order to bring him or them to trial.
Side 9 - ... or damage caused, unless the same was occasioned by the wilful act of the owner or his agent. And, in order to recover, it shall only be necessary for the owner to prove the injury or destruction of...
Side 433 - Every action must be prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest, except that an executor or administrator, a trustee of an express trust, or a person expressly authorized by statute, may sue, without joining with him the person for whose benefit the action is prosecuted. A person, with whom or in whose name, a contract is made for the benefit of another, is a trustee of an express trust, within the meaning of this section.
Side 495 - In the case of an assignment of a thing in action, the action by the assignee shall be without prejudice to any setoff or other defense, existing at the time of, or before notice of the assignment; but this Section shall not apply to a negotiable promissory note or bill of exchange, transferred in good faith, and upon good consideration, before due.
Side 115 - ... or for vacating, modifying, or otherwise disturbing a judgment or order, unless refusal to take such action appears to the court inconsistent with substantial justice. The court at every stage of the proceeding must disregard any error or defect in the proceeding which does not affect the substantial rights of the parties.
Side 527 - Every bidding is nothing more than an offer on one side, which is not binding on either side till it is assented to. But. according to what is now contended for, one party would be bound by the offer, and the other not, which can never be allowed.