Courts. After judgment by Court of Claims for proceeds of cotton under abandoned property act, secretary of treasury had no power to retain sum for cotton taxes before paying claim, it should have been pleaded as set-off or counterclaim, pp. 647, 648.
Cited with approval in United States v. Waters, 133 U. S. 213, 33 L. 595, 10 S. Ct. 250, holding attorney-general could not reduce counsel fees of district attorney, allowed by court; Buchanan v. Knoxville, etc., R. Co., 71 Fed. 831, 37 U. S. App. 499, holding State estopped by decision of State Chancery Court from levying taxes es complainant.
the following Reports and all preceding them in each State or series:
264 3. Where the duty of the collection of an account is imposed upon a party by a contract, he cannot recover from the other party for services for its
sufficient, may be removed here for re-examination by writ of error or appeal. Coit v. Robinson,
152 7. Suits in equity and cases at law, under the jurisdiction created by the Bankrupt Act, may be removed to the Circuit Court for re-examination, under section 8 of the Act. Idem,
8. An appeal does not lie to this court from a de- cree of the Circuit Court rendered in the exercise of the supervisory jurisdiction conferred upon that court by the first clause of section 2 of the Bankrupt Act. Idem, 152
9. This court will on appeal presume that the court below construed correctly its own rules where the rule is not set out in the record. 203- ADMINISTRATORS AND EXECUTORS. Packet Co. v. Sickles, 10. From the order of the District Court disbar- 1. The several States of the Union have full coa-ring an attorney, neither an appeal nor a writ of trol over the estates of deceased persons within error will lie. their respective limits.
2. The United States courts cannot execute judg- ment against the estates of deceased persons in the course of administration in the States, contrary to the declared law of the State on the subject. Idem,
3. The administration laws of a State will be ob- served by the Federal Courts in the enforcement of individual rights. Idem,
4. On a judgment in a Federal Court against an administrator, the real estate of the intestate can- not be sold, contrary to the laws of the State upon that subject.
1. Where a writ of error is prosecuted for delay, ten per cent. damages in addition to interest will be given on affirmance.
47 2. Where a jury is waived and the trial is by the court and the finding is general, nothing can be re- viewed on a writ of error except the rulings of the court made in the progress of the trial.
Cooper v. Omohundro, Crews v. Brewer, Insurance Co. v. Sea,
3. An appeal in admiralty from the district to the Circuit Court vacates the decree of the district court, and a new trial and a new decree are to be had in the Circuit Court. The latter must execute its own decree, and the district court has nothing more to do with the case.
61 4. An order of the Circuit Court merely affirming the decree of the District Court and nothing more, is not a final decree from which an appeal lies to this court.
64 5. A writ of error lies from this court to the Su- preme Court of the District of Columbia, by virtue of the Act of 1801, although the proceedings are governed by a statute of Maryland, which does not provide for an appeal or writ of error.
6. Cases arising under the third clause of sec- tion 2 of the Bankrupt Act, where the amount is
205 Ex parte Robinson, 11. Where an appeal is taken from the decree of the District Court, to the Circuit Court, in a pro- ceeding in rem, the property or proceeds thereof follows the cause into the Circuit Court.
259 12. Where a referee finds generally in favor of the plaintiff, no error can be assigned upon such a finding. Tioga R. R. Co. v. B. & C. R. R. Co., 13. Where questions of fact only are presented by an appeal and there is no dispute as to the law. and the two courts below have already found against the appellant, the burden is on him to show error. Every presumption is in favor of the de- crees below, and this court ought not to reverse unless the error is clear.
Rogers v. The S. B. Wheeler,
R. R. Co. v. Pratt, 33. Where a bill is dismissed for misjoinder of parties, the dismissal should be without prejudice to another suit or should state the ground of dis- missal, and if it is dismissed generally the decree will be reversed.
1. Where one assigned to another certain judg- ments upon his paying $5,000 and gave him a pow- er of attorney to dispose of the judgments for him and in his name, the judgments do not pass to such other without the payment of said sum. French v. Hay.
799 2. Where judgments are collected by the assignor and he holds the money for the assignee, the as- APPEAL AND ERROR, PRACTICE ON. signee has a complete remedy at law for it, and a
bill in equity for it cannot be sustained. Idcm, ATTACHMENTS.
SEE BANKRUPTCY, 11. BANKS, 1. JURISDICTION, 21.
1. The power to disbar an attorney is possessed
by all courts which have authority to admit at- ring him can be rendered, he should have notice of But before judgment disbar- the grounds of complaint against him and ample opportunity of explanation and defense.
2. One who allowed an attorney to proceed in the Court of Claims to collect a claim and allowed a settlement of the claim to be made by him, is estopped from disputing the validity of the settle- ment. 144
4. From such facts the execution creditor had no reasonable cause to believe that the debtor was in- solvent, and that the proceedings were in fraud of the Bankrupt Act, where the case shows affirma- tively that no fraud or collusion was intended. 576
Idem, 5. Where the discharge of a debt is procured by misrepresentation and fraud, the discharge is void and such debt may be made the basis of a petition to declare and adjudge the debtor a bankrupt. Michaels v. Post.
520 6. Assignees of the bankrupt's estate may recov- er back money or other property paid, conveyed, sold, assigned or transferred contrary to the pro- visions or in fraud of the Bankrupt Act.
First Nat'l Bank v. Jones, Michaels v. Post, Fox v. Gardner,
7. It is immateriál under the Bankrupt Act, whether the debtor gave the preference without solicitation from the creditor, if the evidence showed that he gave it when insolvent, and in fraud of the Act, to the knowledge of the creditor.
22. Where the assignee in bankruptcy voluntarily submitted himself and his rights to the jurisdiction of the state court, it is too late to object in this judgment. court to the power of the state court to render Scott v. Kelly, 729
23. A decree in bankruptcy, without more, will not, under section 11 of the Bankrupt Act, have the effect to devest the bankrupt of the title to his real or personal estate.
24. Prior to the assignment and conveyance au- thorized and directed by section 14 of that Act, the title of the estate belonging to the bankrupt, both real and personal, remains unchanged, and such bankrupt may redeem his lands from a tax sale, under a state statute authorizing the owner of lands to redeem from a sale for taxes.
25. Although section 14 of the Bankrupt Act pro- vides that such assignment or conveyance shall re- late back to the commencement of the proceed- ings, the instrument of assignment cannot operate either retrospectively or prospectively before it is
26. The assignee of the estate of an individual partner of a debtor copartnership, cannot maintain a suit to recover back money previously paid to a creditor of the copartnership. Such money can only be recovered by an assignee of the partner- ship. Amsinck v. Bean, 801
« ForrigeFortsett » |