Morton Salt Co. v. U. P. R. R. Co. [U. R. A-720]. Page. 723 729 Mount Pleasant Fertilizer Co. v. E. J. & S. R. R. Co. [U. R. 721 Mount Pleasant Fertilizer Co. v. L. & N. R. R. Co. [U. R. 727 Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry., Alabama Red Cedar Co. v. [U. R. 726 Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry., United States v. [U. R, A-691]......... 720 715 714 New York C. & H. R. R. R. Co., Birkett Mills v. (6608).. North Vernon Lumber Co. v. I. C. R. R. Co. [U. R. A-688]... Northern Central Coal Co. v. W. R. R. Co. [U. R. A-707]. Ohio Iron & Metal Co. v. C. B. & Q. R. R. Co. [U. R. A-694]-- 716 714 714 715 723 713 720 713 722 724 723 720 717 [U. R. A-686]. 719 O'Reilly v. N. A. Ry. Co. (4719). 713 Orgill Bros. & Co. v. I. C. R. R. Co. [U. R. A-759] - 728 724 Ozark Fruit Growers' Asso. v. U. S. Exp. Co. [U. R. A-736].- 725 723 Penn Oil & Supply Co., Ltd., v. A. T. & S. F. Ry. Co. [U. R. A-690]... 720 Pennsylvania R. R. Co., Alamo Iron Works v. (6555). Pennsylvania R. R. Co., Catskill & N. Y. S. B. Co., Ltd., v. [U. R. A-756]. 716 728 Pennsylvania R. R. Co., Commercial Coal Mining Co. v. [U. R. A-721].. 724 Pennsylvania T. Ry. Co., Sunny Brook Distillery Co., Inc., v. [U. R. A-717]. ... 723 Perrine Mfg. Co. v. A. T. & S. F. Ry. Co. [U. R. A−730]............. 725 Philadelphia, B. & W. R. R. Co., Allen Bros. Co. v. [U.R.A-709]- Page. 722 725 725 715 Rates on Fertilizer Material from New Orleans, La. [U. R. A-758]. .. 728 Rates on Paper between Stations on Boston & Maine R. R. [U. R. A-767].. 729 Rawleigh Medical Co. v. C. & N. W. Ry. Co. (6150). 714 Rawleigh Medical Co. v. C. & N. W. Ry. Co. (6581). 716 Rawleigh Medical Co. v. C. & N. W. Ry. Co. (6604) 716 716 717 Road Supply & Metal Co. v. C. R. I. & P. Ry. Co. (6554) ---- 716 717 715 Rutland R. R., Norcross-West Marble Co. v. [U. R. A-713]--- 723 717 724 St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co., Pittman & Harrison Co. v. [U. R. A-732] 725 St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co., Sondheimer Co. v. [U. R. A-737]. 726 727 Schaaf-Regelman v. S. Ry. Co. [U. R. A-740]. . 726 Shaffer & Co. v. I. C. R. R. Co. [U. R. A-735]. 725 Sloane v. S. P. Co. (Atlantic S. S. Lines) [U. R. A-699]. 721 717 Sondheimer Co. v. St. L. I. M. & S. Ry. Co. [U. R. A-737]. ...- South Dakota v. A. & V. Ry. Co. [U. R. A-753]....... Southern Ry. Co., Illinois Leather Co. v. (6882) Southern Ry. Co., Jackson Oil & Refining Co. v. [U. R. A−763] 726 723 727 719 721 721 713 717 729 720 723 726 724 Southern Ry. Co., Wood & Skilton v. [U. R. A-747]. [U. R. A-728]--- Squire Dingee Co. v. C. & N. W. Ry. Co. (6548) Page. 727 725 724 716 727 724 724 722 723 727 State of South Dakota v. A. & V. Ry. Co. [U. R. A-753]... Sunderland Bros. Co. v. A. T. & S. F. Ry. Co. [U. R. A−705] .. Texas & P. Ry. Co., Capital City Oil Co. v. [U. R. A–750]. -- Transit Privileges on Carload Shipments of Fish [U. R. A-765]. United States Gypsum Co. v. C. R. I. & P. Ry. Co. [U. R. A-760] Wabash R. R. Co., Moore Motor Truck Co. v. [U. R. A−696] - - 715 720 729 714 723 723 720 725 728 724 724 721 722 719 720 728 727 713 Western A. R. R., Fritts & Wiehl Co. v. [U. R. A-706]... Watson v. K. & T. Ry. [U. R. A-689]. Wells Fargo & Co., Lindsay & Co., Ltd. v. [U. R. A−755]. -- REPARATION GRANTED UNDER SUPPLEMENTAL ORDERS OF THE COMMISSION DURING THE TIME COVERED BY THIS VOLUME. 4940. ALFALFA MEAL Co. v. C., B. & Q. R. R. Co. August 14, 1914. Reparation for $2,342.79 on shipments of alfalfa hay from points in western Nebraska to Council Bluffs, Iowa, on account of excessive rates. 4502. GORDON & FERGUSON ET AL. v. C., ST. P., M. & O. Rr. Co. ET AL. August 14, 1914. Reparation for $7.40 on shipments of furs and skins from eastern cities to Minneapolis and St. Paul, Minn., on account of excessive rates. 4083. CHANUTE REFINING CO. ET AL. v. M., K. & T. RY. Co. ET AL.; 4430. CHANUTE REFINING Co. v. A., T. & S. F. RY. Co. ET AL.; 4430 (Sub-No. 1). MUTUAL OIL Co. v. A., T. & S. F. RY. Co. ET AL. August 14, 1914. Reparation for $559.43 to Chanute Refining Co.; $976.29 to National Refining Co.; and $8,590.67 to Mutual Oil Co., on shipments of petroleum and its products from Kansas refining points to Fremont and other Nebraska points, on account of excessive rates. 3774 and 3774 (Sub-No. 1). HOUSTON PACKING Co. v. T. & N. O. R. R. Co. ET AL. August 14, 1914. Reparation for $3,603.15 on shipments of packing-house products from Houston, Tex., to Lake Charles, La., on account of excessive rates. 5616. BALLOU & WRIGHT v. N. Y., N. H. & H. R. R. Co. ET AL., August 14, 1914. Reparation for $828.13 on shipments of motor cycles from Armory, Mass., to Portland, Oreg., on account of exces sive rates. 5783. RICKARDS v. N. & S. R. R. Co. August 14, 1914. Reparation for $688.51 on shipments of mine prop logs from points in North Carolina to Berkley, Va., on account of excessive rates. NOTE. The amount of reparation awarded in above cases aggregates $17,596.37. 31 I. C. C. 739 |