Reports of Cases in the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia, Volum 63
D. Bottom, Superintendent of Public Print., 1873
Some vols. also contain reports of cases in the General Court of Virginia.
Hva folk mener - Skriv en omtale
Vi har ikke funnet noen omtaler på noen av de vanlige stedene.
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
Reports of Cases in the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia, Volum 61
Uten tilgangsbegrensning - 1871
Reports of Cases in the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia, Volum 33
Virginia. Supreme Court of Appeals
Uten tilgangsbegrensning - 1867
Reports of Cases in the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia, Volum 68
Virginia. Supreme Court of Appeals
Uten tilgangsbegrensning - 1877
according action aforesaid agreement allowed amount answer appeal appellee applied assignment authority bank bill bonds Campbell cause charged Circuit court claim commissioner condition Confederate consideration considered constitution contract conveyed counsel creditor currency debt debtor decision decree deed defendant directed dollars effect entered entitled error evidence exceptions execution executors express fact filed follows fund further give given grant Gratt ground Hale hands heirs held hundred intended interest James John judge judgment June jury land March ment necessary notes objection obligation opinion paid parties payment person plaintiff possession present principle prisoner proceedings proper proved provision purchase question reason received record reference refused regard rendered rule says sold statute suit taken Term tion tract trial true trust United verdict Virginia whole wife witness
Side 472 - The Constitution of the United States is a law for rulers and people, equally in war and in peace, and covers with the shield of its protection all classes of men, at all times, and under all circumstances. No doctrine involving more pernicious consequences was ever invented by the wit of man than that any of its provisions can be suspended during any of the great exigencies of government.
Side 475 - I repeat the declaration made a year ago, that " while I remain in my present position I shall not attempt to retract or modify the emancipation proclamation, nor shall I return to slavery any person who is free by the terms of that proclamation, or by any of the acts of Congress.
Side 283 - In order to come within the provision of the constitution of the United States which declares that no state shall pass any law impairing the obligation of contracts...
Side 290 - It is competent for the states to change the form of the remedy, or to modify it otherwise, as they may see fit, provided no substantial right secured by the contract is thereby impaired. No attempt has been made to fix definitely the line between alterations of the remedy, which are to be deemed legitimate, and those which, under the form of modifying the remedy, impair substantial rights. Every case must be determined...
Side 648 - No person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property, except by due process of law.
Side 291 - One of the tests that a contract has been impaired is that its value has, by legislation, been diminished. It is not, by the Constitution, to be impaired at all. This is not a question of degree or cause, but of encroaching, in any respect, on its obligation — dispensing with any part of its force.
Side 462 - And it is further ordered, That a copy of this order be served on...
Side 32 - And be it further enacted, that every will shall be construed, with reference to the real estate and personal estate comprised in it, to speak and take effect as if it had been executed immediately before the death of the testator, unless a contrary intention shall appear by the will.
Side 293 - Regulations of this description have always been considered, in every civilized community, as properly belonging to the remedy, to be exercised or not by every sovereignty, according to its own views of policy and humanity.
Side 293 - If the laws of the state passed afterwards had done nothing more than change the remedy upon contracts of this description, they would be liable to no constitutional objection. For, undoubtedly, a state may regulate at pleasure the modes of proceeding in its courts in relation to past contracts as well as future.