 | United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - 1896 - 768 sider
...interests of both must, under the terms of the act, be regarded by the Commission. The third section forbids any undue or unreasonable preference or advantage...any person, company, firm, corporation or locality ; and as there is nothing in the act which defines what shall be held to be due or undue, reasonable... | |
 | United States. Interstate Commerce Commission - 1908 - 828 sider
...interests of both must, under the terms of the act, be regarded by the Commission. The third section forbids any undue or unreasonable preference or advantage...any person, company, firm, corporation or locality; and as there is nothing in the act which defines what shall be held to be due or undue, reasonable... | |
 | 1896 - 772 sider
...under the terms of the act, be regarded by the commission. The third section forbids any undue and unreasonable preference or advantage in favor of any person, company, firm, corporation, or locality; and as there is nothing in the act which defines what shall be held to be due or undue, reasonable... | |
 | 1897 - 1088 sider
...under the terms of the act, be regarded by the commission. The third section forbids any undue and unreasonable preference or advantage in favor of any person, company, firm, corporation, or locality; and. as there Is nothing In the act which defines what shall be held to be due or undue, reasonable... | |
 | 1897 - 772 sider
...the act, be regarded by the commission. . Texas Pacific R. Co. v. IC Commission. The third section forbids any undue or unreasonable preference' or advantage in favor of any peri"<n«uonr*™FMt. son, company, firm, corporation, or locality; and as there is nothing in the... | |
 | Thomas Carl Spelling - 1912 - 332 sider
...fact. TEXAS & PACIFIC RY. CO. v. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION (162 US, 219, 220): "The third section forbids any undue or unreasonable preference or advantage...any person, company, firm, corporation or locality; and as there is nothing in the act which defines what shall be held to be due or undue, reasonable... | |
 | South Dakota. Public Utilities Commission - 1912 - 576 sider
...very mischief which it was one of the objects of the act to remedy." Then follows: "The third section forbids any undue or unreasonable preference or advantage...any person, company, firm, corporation, or locality; an'd as there is nothing in the act which defines what stmll be held to be due or undue, reasonable... | |
 | Herbert Confield Lust - 1916 - 1022 sider
...public highways, subject to public control. In constructing and maintaining such a highway under public sanction, the railway company really performs a function...light of the purpose it was intended to subserve and (he history of its origin. US v. L. & NR Co., 35 Sup. Ct.. 363, 368. (c) That the long-and-short-haul... | |
 | Herbert Confield Lust - 1917 - 1102 sider
...localities, or commodities concerned. Consumers Co. v. C. & NW Ry., 36 ICC, 259, 261. (c) Section three of the Act forbids any undue or unreasonable preference...fact. Pennsylvania Co. v. United States, 35 Sup. Ct. 370, 373; 236 US 351; 60 L. ed. 616. (d) The ascertainment of a present undue discrimination does not... | |
| |
The third section forbids any undue or unreasonable preference or advantage in favor of any person, company, firm, corporation or locality; and as there is nothing in the act which defines what shall be held to be due or undue, reasonable or unreasonable,... 
