Reports of Cases Decided in the Court of Chancery, the Prerogative Court, And, on Appeal, in the Court of Errors and Appeals of the State of New Jersey, Volum 5
MacCrellish & Quigley, 1880
Hva folk mener - Skriv en omtale
Vi har ikke funnet noen omtaler på noen av de vanlige stedene.
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
Reports of Cases Decided in the Court of Chancery, the Prerogative ..., Volum 6
John Hoff Stewart
Uten tilgangsbegrensning - 1881
Reports of Cases Decided in the Court of Chancery, the Prerogative ..., Volum 8
John Hoff Stewart
Uten tilgangsbegrensning - 1882
Reports of Cases Decided in the Court of Chancery, the Prerogative ..., Volum 9
John Hoff Stewart
Uten tilgangsbegrensning - 1883
acres agreement alleged amount annuity answer appears assessment assignment Bank bill bond and mortgage C. E. Gr Chancellor claim Colt complainant complainant's consideration contract conveyance conveyed court court of chancery court of equity creditors Dayton death debt deceased declared decree deed defendant defendant's deposit divorce East Jersey encumbrance entitled equity evidence executed executors fact filed final hearing foreclosure fraud gage given Graham granted ground hearing on pleadings heirs held husband injunction insolvency intended interest invested Jersey City John judgment land legacy legatee Lehigh Valley liable lien marriage matter mechanics lien Melick ment Morgan G mort mortgage mortgaged premises mortgagor Newark owner paid parties payment person plainant purchase question railroad real estate received relief respondent Roswell L says Schenck share sold statute Stew suit testator's testatrix testimony thereof tion trust Vail Vreeland wife Williams
Side 407 - fraud in the sense of a court of equity properly includes all acts, omissions, and concealments which involve a breach of legal or equitable duty, trust, or confidence, justly reposed, and are injurious to another, or by which an undue and unconscientious advantage is taken of another.
Side 37 - And also, all the estate, right, title, interest, dower, and right of dower, property, possession, claim, and demand whatsoever, as well in law as in equity, of the said parties of the first part, of, in, and to the same, and every part and parcel thereof, with the appurtenances...
Side 36 - Together with all and singular the tenements, hereditaments, and appurtenances thereunto belonging, or in anywise appertaining, and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, rents, issues, and profits thereof; and also all the estate, right, title, interest, property, possession, claim, and demand whatsoever, as well in law as in equity, of the said party of the first part, of, in, and to the same, and every part and parcel thereof with the appurtenances...
Side 172 - A seal upon an executory instrument, hereafter executed, is only presumptive evidence of a sufficient consideration, which may be rebutted, as if the instrument was not sealed.
Side 433 - An act to compel the determination of claims to real estate in certain cases, and to quiet the title to the same.
Side 31 - It is clear that a person who seeks to rectify a deed upon the ground of mistake must be required to establish, in the clearest and most satisfactory manner, that the alleged intention to which he desires it to be made conformable continued concurrently in the minds of all parties down to the time of its execution, and also must be able to show exactly and precisely the form to which the deed ought to be brought.
Side 223 - When parties have deliberately put their engagements into writing, in such terms as import a legal obligation, without any uncertainty as to the object or extent of such engagement, it is conclusively presumed that the whole engagement of the parties, and the extent and manner of their undertaking, was reduced to writing...
Side iii - IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY, THE PREROGATIVE COURT, AND, ON APPEAL, IN The Court of Errors and Appeals, OF THE — STATE OF NEW JERSEY.
Side 406 - Whether the party thus misrepresenting a fact knew it to be false, or made the assertion without knowing whether it were true or false, is wholly immaterial; for the affirmation of what one does not know, or believe to be true, is equally, in morals and law, as unjustifiable as the affirmation of what is known to be positively false.