Sidebilder
PDF
ePub

made February 17, 1893, which modified, and affirmed as modified, judgments in favor of defendants entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.

Geo. W. Cotterill for plaintiff.

Dennis McMahon and Frederick Gillee for defendants.

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur, except EARL, J., dissenting.
Judgment affirmed.

EDGAR L. PIERSON, Appellant, v. NORMAN L. MUNRO, Respondent.

(Argued December 7, 1894; decided December 21, 1894.)

APPEAL from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered upon an order made February 15, 1893, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a verdict directed by the court.

Edward W. S. Johnston for appellant.

Joseph G. Gay for respondent.

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.

CHARLES ERICKSON, Respondent, v. THE TWENTY-THIRD STREET RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellant.

(Argued December 7, 1894; decided December 21, 1894.)

APPEAL from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered upon an order made July 28, 1893, which affirmed a judg ment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and also affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial.

Edmund Randolph Robinson for appellant.

J. Edward Swanstrom for respondent.

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.

WILLIAM W. TAYLOR, Appellant, v. FRANKLIN B. BERNARD et al., Respondents.

(Argued December 7, 1894; decided December 21, 1894.)

APPEAL from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered upon an order made July 28, 1893, which affirmed so far as appealed from a judgment entered upon a decision of the court on trial at. Special Term.

Albert Bach for appellant.

I. Newton Williams for respondents.

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.

MARGARET PALMER, Respondent, v. JOHN A. PIRSON, Appellant.

(Argued December 7, 1894; decided December 21, 1894.)

APPEAL from judgment of the General Term of the Superior Court of Buffalo, entered upon an order made July 14, 1893, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict.

Arthur W. Hickman for appellant.

Wallace Thayer for respondent.

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.

SOLOMON GALINGER, Appellant, v. IOWA CENTRAL RAILWAY COMPANY et al., Respondents.

THIS case was argued and decided with Dow v. Iowa Central Railway Co. (ante, p. 426).

AARON R. STEVENS et al., Respondents, v. THE UNION TRUST COMPANY of New York et al., Appellants.

(Argued December 10, 1894; decided January 15, 1895.)

APPEAL from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered upon an order made September 29, 1894, which affirmed an interlocutory judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon an order of Special Term overruling a demurrer to the complaint.

Wheeler H. Peckham for appellants.

Edward Winslow Paige for respondents.

Agree to affirm on authority of Harrison v. Same Defendant (ante, p. 326), but with leave to answer on payment of costs of demurrer within twenty days after notice of entry of judgment; no opinion.

All concur, except PECKHAM, J., not voting, and HAIGHT, J., not sitting.

Judgment accordingly.

LILIAN CAUCHOIs, Appellant, v. WILLIAM B. PROCTOR, Respondent.

(Submitted December 10, 1894; decided January 15, 1895.)

APPEAL from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, made May 14, 1894, which affirmed an order of Special Term requiring plaintiff to reply separately to the matters set forth in the second and third defenses in the answer.

Roger M. Sherman for appellant.

Theron G. Strong for respondent.

Agree to dismiss appeal; no opinion.

All concur.

Appeal dismissed.

LEONORA S. GRAY, Respondent, v. WILLIAM T. BAKER et al., Appellants.

(Submitted December 10, 1894; decided January 15, 1895.)

APPEAL from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, made June 18, 1894, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion by defendant to change the place of trial.

Henry F. & James Coupe for appellants.

David J. Newland for respondent.

Agree to dismiss appeal; no opinion.

All concur.

Appeal dismissed.

JACOB A. ZIMMERMANN et al., Appellants, v. v. CHRISTIAN JOURGENSEN, Respondent.

(Argued December 11, 1894; decided January 15, 1895.)

APPEAL from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made August 28, 1893, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon the report of a referee.

Isaac II. Maynard for appellants.

Frank Rudd for respondent.

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur, except EARL, GRAY and O'BRIEN, JJ., dissenting. Judgment affirmed.

PAULINA COLBURN, Respondent, v. ADAM MARSH et al.,

[blocks in formation]

(Argued December 11, 1894; decided January 15, 1895.)

APPEAL from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered upon an order made March 28, 1893, which reversed a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon the report of a referee and granted a new trial.

J. I. Fowler for appellants.

William H. Henderson for respondent.

Agree to affirm on opinion below.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.

LOUIS KNELL et al., Respondents, v. WILLIAM STEPHAN et al., Appellants.

(Argued December 11, 1894; decided January 15, 1895.)

APPEAL from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered upon an order made October 4, 1892, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon the report of a referee.

Wm. H. Henderson for appellants.

C. S. Cary for respondents.

Agree to affirm on opinion of General Term.
All concur.

Judgment affirmed.

* Reported below, 68 Hun 269.

SICKELS-VOL. XCIX.

83

« ForrigeFortsett »