v. Gainsbury, (Hundred Schmanuel, Scuerhop v. 250 Scuerhop v. Schmanuel v. Gravesend (Mayor of) 117 Selby, Doe v. v. Hallow (Inhabitants v. Iddesleigh (Inhabitants Shaw v. Broom 299 Soames v. Lonergan v. Middlesex (County Storer v. Rayson v. Newark-upon-Trent 824 T. ERRATA ET CORRIGENDA. At page 365, line 19, from top, read “lien,” instead of “ general lien.” At page 620, line 4, from top, read that the plaintiff had "a general verdict," instead of "MERRINGTON v. CHARLES BECKETT, Gent. one, &c."- In some of the copies of the Third Volume of these Reports, (p. 231,) this cause was mis-printed "MERRINGTON v. A'BECKETT, Gent. one, &c." a few of which got into circulation, and led to the mistake being copied into the Supplement to Mr. J. B. Moore's Digested Index to the Term Reports.-The Publishers are anxious the error |