Times Law Reports, Volum 16William Frederick Barry G.E. Wright, 1900 |
Innhold
338 | |
346 | |
348 | |
374 | |
385 | |
393 | |
400 | |
401 | |
60 | |
66 | |
69 | |
71 | |
109 | |
114 | |
116 | |
130 | |
131 | |
141 | |
142 | |
156 | |
167 | |
172 | |
181 | |
182 | |
190 | |
193 | |
199 | |
202 | |
213 | |
218 | |
219 | |
224 | |
226 | |
231 | |
247 | |
248 | |
270 | |
279 | |
292 | |
300 | |
311 | |
312 | |
329 | |
404 | |
410 | |
412 | |
418 | |
428 | |
429 | |
435 | |
445 | |
452 | |
456 | |
460 | |
465 | |
489 | |
503 | |
521 | |
523 | |
533 | |
558 | |
562 | |
565 | |
571 | |
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
action agreed agreement alleged amount Appeal A. L. Smith applied assigns authority Barrister-at-Law bill of lading Board building charge charter-party claim clause compensation contended contract costs County Court Judge County of London Court of Appeal covenant damages decision defendant dismissed the appeal Divisional Court duty entitled evidence fact factory Govan held House of Lords Inland Revenue judgment jurisdiction jury JUSTICE A. L. SMITH Justice Byrne L.JJ land learned Judge lease liability Limited London County Council LORD JUSTICE A. L. LORD JUSTICE COLLINS Lordship marriage matter meaning ment notice opinion owners paid parties payable payment person plaintiffs premises proceedings purchase purpose Q.B. Div quarter sessions question railway company reason received referred rent Reported respect respondent Romer sewer shareholders shares ship solicitor statute tenant testator tion trustees Vaughan Williams vessel words
Populære avsnitt
Side 244 - vessel, or the owner, or master, or crew thereof, from the consequences of any neglect to carry lights or signals, or of any neglect to keep a proper look-out, or of the neglect of any precaution which may be required by the ordinary practice of seamen,
Side 151 - also shall take such action as will best aid to avert collision. " Article 22 :—" Every vessel which is directed by these rules to keep out of the way of another vessel shall, if the circumstances of the case admit, avoid crossing ahead of the other." Article 23 :—
Side 253 - week not exceeding 50 per cent, of his average weekly earnings during the previous 12 months, if he has been so long employed, but if not then for any less period during which he has been in the employment of the same employer, such weekly payment not to exceed £1.
Side 128 - far as material to this case. It then reads as follows :—" Property passing on the death of the deceased shall be deemed to include property which would be required on the death of the deceased to be included in an account under section 38 of the Customs and Inland Revenue Act, 1881,
Side 244 - Article 19.—When two steam vessels are crossing, so as to involve risk of collision, the vessel which has the other on her own starboard side shall keep out of the way of the other."
Side 151 - When two steam vessels are meeting end on, or nearly end on, so as to involve risk of collision, each shall alter her course to starboard, so that each may pas« on the port side of the other.
Side 74 - expressly directed to the sheriff in these words : — ' ' And in what manner you shall have executed this our writ make appear to us in our Court aforesaid immediately after the execution thereof under your seal and the seals of those by whose oath you shall make the said extent and appraisement, and have there then
Side 244 - provides that nothing in the rules shall exonerate any vessel, or the owner, or master, or crew thereof, from the consequences of any neglect to observe certain proper precautions, this contention was not really pressed. The objections to the argument
Side 83 - a single annuity not exceeding £25 purchased or provided by the deceased, either by himself alone or in concert or arrangement with any other person, for the life of himself and of some other person and the survivor of them, or to arise on his own death in favour of some other person.
Side 63 - as follows :—" Where a banker in good faith and without negligence receives payment for a customer of a cheque crossed generally or specially to himself, and the customer has no title or a defective title thereto, the banker shall not incur any liability to the true owner of the cheque by reason only of having received such payment.