Sidebilder
PDF
ePub

words of the clause agree with the intention of the Committee.

MR. SCLATER-BOOTH failed to see how that was so.

MR. DODSON said, the hon. Member evidently had a wrong copy of the Amendment.

Amendment agreed to.

Amendment proposed,

In page 4, line 19, after "gas," insert" and in the case of cement works of any noxious or offensive gas."-(Sir Sidney Waterlow.) Amendment agreed to.

Amendment proposed,

unusual exhibition they had had of MR. DODSON said, the hon. Memsympathy and agreement between the ber's Amendment was to insert cement hon. Members for Meath and Louth (Mr. works in Clause 9. That had been subA. M. Sullivan and Mr. Callan), he was stantially agreed to in an Amendment not disposed to interfere with the con- already adopted, and the present protinuance of those feelings. Unques-posal was only a formal one to make the tionably, there was a disadvantage in proceeding with measures at this hour of the morning, when their Business was conducted in whispers. Yesterday an hon. Member sitting on the Treasury Bench, distinctly and intentionally placing his hand before his mouth, had conducted a portion of the Business in a low whisper, in order that the course he desired the House to take should meet with no opposition. In the lowest tone that he could contrive, he had proposed that the House should sit at 2 o'clock to-morrow; and it was not until the Speaker had refused to recognize such an unusual proceeding, and had called upon the hon. Member to state his proposal clearly, that the proposal was made known to the House. That was one example of the dangers they would have to face if they allowed the Business to be conducted in whispers ; and it had taught him that it was always desirable, when they could not hear what was going on, to propose an adjournment of the discussion. The first short speech of the right hon Gentleman (Mr. Dodson) he had been unable to hear, and he had said so to the Committee; but after the manifestation the right hon. Member had since given of the excellence of his physical powers--which he hoped he might long continue to enjoy he (Mr. O'Connor) was ready to admit that the President of the Local Government Board was in a position to conduct the Business of the Committee. As it was the feeling of the Committee that they should go on with the Bill he

would withdraw the Motion.

Motion, by leave, withdrawn.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
Amendment proposed,

[ocr errors][merged small]

In page 4, line 28, at end, add, "The Board shall take such steps as they may think fit for giving notice to persons interested of the provisions of any order made by them under this section before any Bill for confirming the same is introduced into Parliament.”—Mr. Dodson.) Amendment agreed to.

Clause, as amended, agreed to.

PART III.

(i.) Registration of Works. Clause 10 (Registration of works, and stamp duty).

MR. DODSON said, he now rose to move an Amendment which had been

put down by the hon. Member behind him (Sir Sydney Waterlow).

MR. ARTHUR O'CONNOR rose to Order. He wished to ask the Chairman whether it was competent for the right hon. Gentleman to move the Amendment of another Member without giving Notice? The Speaker had ruled that it

could not be done.

SIR SYDNEY WATERLOW said, the Amendments were put down very late last night, and they appeared in his name by a mistake.

THE CHAIRMAN: The hon. Member (Mr. Arthur O'Connor) refers to a Rule of the House which is not a Rule of the Committee. There is no previous Notice necessary.

Amendment proposed, in page 4, line 34, leave out "scheduled." (Mr.

Question proposed, "That those words Dodson.) be there inserted."

Mr. Arthur O'Connor

Amendment agreed to.

--

insert ܂

Amendment proposed, in page 4, line | jesty's Treasury may sanction, shall be paid out 34, after "work, "to which of money provided by Parliament.” Part II. of this Act applies."-(Mr. Amendment agreed to.

Dodson.)

Amendment agreed to.

Amendments proposed,

In page 5, line 1, leave out "scheduled," and page 5, line 1, line 8, and line 17, after "work," insert" required to be registered."-(Mr. Dodson.)

Amendments agreed to.

Amendment proposed, in page 5, line 17, after "work," insert "not being an alkali work."-(Mr. Stevenson.)

Amendment agreed to.

Clause, as amended, agreed to.

Clause 11 (Certificate of inspector prior to registration of new works).

MR. STEVENSON moved, in page 5, line 34, to leave out "an," and insert "the chief." His object was to lay the responsibility upon the Chief In

spector.

[blocks in formation]

MR. STEVENSON said, he had understood no objection was raised to the Amendment. In explanation, he might say that this was a case in which a certificate was required before a new work was allowed to be registered. The certiticate was, by the Amendment just adopted, to be granted by the Chief Inspector; and he (Mr. Stevenson) now proposed that either the Chief Inspector, or a Sub-Inspector, should make the preliminary examination of the works.

Amendment agreed to.

Clause, as amended, agreed to.

(ii) Inspection. Clause 12 (Appointment of Inspec

tors).

MR. DODSON moved to add, after line 20, page 6—

"The salaries and remuneration of the inspectors, and all such expenses of the execution of this Act as the Commissioners of Her Ma

MR. WILBRAHAM EGERTON moved to add at end of the Clause

"A person holding the office of Chief Inspector, other than the person at the commencement of this Act mentioned, shall not be employed in any other work except by the authority appointing him to such office."

Question proposed, "That those words be there added."

MR. SCLATER-BOOTH said, the Amendment was worded quite differently to that of which Notice had been given. He took it for granted that, as it was now put, it referred to the office of Chief Inspector; and he supposed they would have an assurance that the salary of the Chief Inspector would be something very different to that which

he now received.

Amendment which had been proposed MR. DODSON said, the object of the by his hon. Friend, and which he (Mr. Dodson) had accepted, was to give effect to the recommendations of the Royal Commission that all the Inspectors employed by Government should give their undivided services to the public. The only exception was in the case of the very eminent person who now held the office of Chief Inspector, and he had always been in an exceptional position.

MR. SCLATER-BOOTH said, the right hon. Gentleman had not answered him. He said he took it for granted that the Amendment applied only to the hon. Gentleman had now said all the case of the Chief Inspector. The right Assistant Inspectors were to devote their whole time to the public service. They £300; but he had no hesitation in saying now received something like £200 or the expense would be three or four times as large as now if they were to give all their time.

MR. DODSON said, the right hon. Gentleman was labouring under a misAll the Inspectors except the time. Chief Inspector now gave their whole

Amendment agreed to.

Clause, as amended, agreed to.

Clause 13 (Disqualification of certain persons for inspectors).

MR. ERRINGTON moved, in page 6, | report Progress in 10 minutes or a line 39, after" applies," to insert "or quarter of an hour. in any other chemical work for gain." The Amendment was simply intended to extend the definition of disqualification of certain persons holding inspectorships.

Amendment agreed to.

MR. PELL asked at what point it was intended to report Progress?

MR. DODSON proposed to go to the end of the 24th clause. Hon. Members would excuse him for reminding them that that was what he proposed at the onset to do, and in doing so he stated there was no seriously contested Amendment up to that point. Under the circumstances, he trusted the Committee would allow them to proceed.

MR. CHAPLIN would be sorry to interrupt the progress of the Bill; but it was possible they might have to wait half an hour or an hour, or even an hour and a-half, before they got to the end of the 24th clause. He must remind the right hon. Gentleman that, although some of them might not be taking an active part in the consideration of the Bill now before the Committee, there were several Bills on the Paper which they felt obliged to remain for and watch. As they all hoped to be in their places again at 2 o'clock this afternoon, the right hon. Gentleman ought to consent to report Progress at this point.

MR. STEVENSON believed 10 minutes would enable them to complete the work contemplated at the rate of progress they were making.

MR. PELL said, the right hon. Gentleman (Mr. Dodson) did inform them at the commencement that there was no cause for serious disagreement; but since then an Amendment had been moved which his right hon. Friend (Mr. Sclater-Booth) declared would impose an enormous cost on the country.

MR. DODSON said, they would make much better progress with the Bill if they proceeded with the clauses up to the point he had mentioned, than if they stopped to discuss at what precise moment they should report Progress. If it should be found the hour was getting late before they reached the 24th clause, they might then consider whether they would report Progress.

[blocks in formation]

Clause 15 (Facilities for inspection).

MAJOR NOLAN (for Mr. DILLWYN) moved, in page 7, line 22, to leave out all after "shall," to "render," in line 30. It was very proper that the owner of the works should be obliged to give a plan to the Chief Inspector of the furnace in which he carried on his secret process, and the Amendment was to secure that this should be done.

Amendment proposed, in page 7, line 22, to leave out from the word "shall," to the word "render," in line 30.(Major Nolan.)

Question proposed, "That the words proposed to be left out stand part of the

Clause."

MR. DODSON hoped the hon. and gallant Gentleman would not press the Amendment. If he would look into the matter, he would find that the Bill was a Consolidation Bill of the Acts relating to alkali works, and this provision was in those Acts, and the marginal note showed them where it was to be found.

MR. GORST said, it was quite clear they ought to report Progress. They had come to a very seriously contested point, and, therefore, he moved to report Progress.

Motion made, and Question put, MR. SCLATER-BOOTH hoped his "That the Chairman do report Prohon. Friends would allow the Amend-gress, and ask leave to sit again.”— ments to go on, because really they were most unimportant. The Bill was greatly needed, and, as everyone knew, was originally prepared under his direction.

MR. HEALY asked if the right hon. Gentleman would consent to report Progress at 2 o'clock?

MR. R. POWER said, he would support his hon. Friends, unless the Government would say they would consent to

(Mr. Gorst.)

The Committee divided:-Ayes 20 Noes 108 Majority 88.-(Div. List, No. 214.)

MR. A. J. BALFOUR said, he could not believe that the Government really intended to go on with the Bill; and, in order to give them an opportunity of explaining their position to the House,

he would move that the Chairman leave | gress could be very well made at some the Chair. other time.

Motion made, and Question put, "That the Chairman do now leave the Chair."-(Mr. Arthur Balfour.)

The Committee divided:-Ayes 21; Noes 104 Majority 83.-(Div. List, No. 215.)

Motion made, and Question proposed, "That the Chairman do report Progress, and ask leave to sit again."—(Lord Randolph Churchill.)

MR. OTWAY thought the best answer to the noble Lord would be found in the LORD RANDOLPH CHURCHILL division that had just taken place. Memthought the Government would now be bers of great experience on that side of willing not to insist on making further the House had supported the GovernProgress with the Bill, and he should, ment; but the noble Lord said he had therefore, move that Progress be re- never known a Bill managed in a more ported. He wished the Committee slovenly manner. He (Mr. Otway) had clearly to understand that the reason sat in the House for a great many years, why he and his hon. Friends objected and he had rarely known a Bill to be so to further Progress being then made well managed. This was a Bill of very was, not that they objected to the prin- great interest to the country generally; ciple of the Bill or the purpose of the and it was a Bill of a highly technical Bill, but to the extremely unusual, character not easily to be contemplated irregular, and he thought he might say by hon. Members who were not inslovenly manner in which the right hon. terested in the subject. The right hon. Gentleman in charge of the Bill had Gentleman had followed the extremely carried it on. The Bill affected im- sensible course of coming to an agreeportant and large pecuniary interests; ment with hon. Members who had but it had been perfectly clear that the Amendments on the Paper, and the reright hon. Gentleman had not made up sult was that up to the 23rd clause there his mind as to the particular Amend- had been no Amendment of any imments which he would or would not portance upon which he had not been accept. He had never seen a Committee able to arrive at an understanding. The of that House the proceedings of which noble Lord, and some hon. Members more nearly approached to farce. Hon. who supported him, had chosen to preMembers produced Amendments from vent the prosecution of the Bill to a suctheir pockets; the Chairman of the Comcessful issue; but he would put it to mittee could not understand them; he was assisted by the Parliamentary Secretary to the Local Government Board, who was again assisted by the President of the Local Government Board, who was himself contradicted by the former President of the Local Government Board. Hon. Members on that side of the House had been anxious to take part in the proceedings; but they could not understand what was going on. The right hon. Gentleman had said he would only go as far as the 24th clause, because there were no seriously contested Amendments before that clause; but the hon. MR. SCLATER-BOOTH said, he was and gallant Member for Galway (Major in accord with the feeling that the Bill Nolan) had produced an Amendment should proceed, and he regretted that raising a most important question, and, his hon. Friends had not shown a little therefore the ground on which the right hon. Gentleman thought the Committee should go was altered, and he thought the right hon. Gentleman would see that discretion was the better part of valour, and would not insist upon proceeding. The Bill was not blocked, so that Pro

him and those who supported him-for he felt certain they had no wish to interfere with Business that was not of a Party character, but was of substantial benefit to the country-to allow the Committee to proceed. Two divisions had shown a great majority; and he thought the right hon. Gentleman opposite, representing the action of the late Government, might claim the adhesion. of the noble Lord. He hoped the noble Lord would withdraw his Motion and allow the Committee to proceed in a reasonable manner.

more self-restraint, seeing that by that time they could have made fair progress. At the same time, he was not prepared to sit up all night; and he would put it to the right hon. Gentleman opposite (Mr. Dodson) whether he had not already advanced to within a few minutes

of the time which he had expected to | fraught with serious inconvenience to the reach.

MR. CHAPLIN did not wish to enter into a discussion as to whether the Bill had been well or ill managed, nor did he presume for a moment to criticize the mode in which the measure had been conducted by the right hon. Gentleman opposite (Mr. Dodson). The hon. Gentleman (Mr. Otway) had said, very truly, that there was no desire to impede the Bill; but there was a great desire on the part of the Members on that side of the House, of whom he did not hesitate to say he was one, to go to bed, because they would be obliged to be there again at 2 o'clock that day. There were other Notices and Orders still on the Paper which possessed great interest for some hon. Members, and which they were obliged to watch; but until the discussion of that Bill came to an end it was impossible for them to go home to bed. He hoped the Government, at that time in the morning, would not persist. It was all very well to say that the discussion would be over in a few minutes; but Amendments had been introduced raising important questions, and the discussion might last one and a-half hours or longer.

MR. DODSON said, he did not wish to continue this matter unnecessarily, and he would make a proposal to hon. Members opposite, which he hoped they would be willing to accept-namely, that they should dispose of the clause they were then on and then agree to report Progress. He would not enter into a controversy with the noble Lord as to the manner in which he had conducted the Bill. He would not dispute with the noble Lord as to his competency or incompetency; but he wished to say that he had endeavoured in conducting the Bill, whether ill or well, to conduct it with courtesy to hon. Members, and he did not wish to make an exception in that respect, even with regard to the noble Lord.

MR. HEALY remarked, that if halfan-hour ago the right hon. Gentleman had accepted his suggestion to continue until 2 o'clock he would have got the Bill through whole and entire by this time.

MR. ARTHUR O'CONNOR said, that, after all, this was only a question of one or two clauses, and he objected to working at that hour, because he believed that legislation after midnight was

Mr. Sclater-Booth

country. Acts were habitually passed with very little consideration and examination in the small hours of the morning; and it was invariably found, after a Session or two, that they were incomplete, and must be amended. That was his objection to proceeding further with this Bill.

MR. R. N. FOWLER wished to know how it was possible that any measure of a non-contentious character could be passed if such objections were raised. This was a Bill in which there was no disputed principle, and he thought the Committee should proceed with it.

Motion, by leave, withdrawn.

MAJOR NOLAN complained that the Bill proposed to extend the principle of requiring people to give up plans to other than works involving muriatic gas. There were certain processes in regard to sulphur which were very expensive, and he wished to point out that the Bill would increase the force of that provision at least 10 times. It was one thing to give up ordinary plans, but quite another to give up secret and technical plans. He thought the Amendment of the hon. Member for Swansea (Mr. Dillwyn), who spoke with great authority, was a very proper one; and he hoped the right hon. Gentleman (Mr. Dodson) would give a pledge that the provision should only apply to works in which muriatic gas was produced.

MR. STEVENSON said, this was a Consolidation Bill; it included principles which had been the law of the land since the passing of the Alkali Act of 1862, and by the Act of 1874 it was applied to other gases than muriatic gas. He believed there was no real objection to this clause on the part of the manufacturers.

MR. ARTHUR O'CONNOR remarked, that if the words were omitted which were proposed to be left out, all reasonable objects would be attained by the clause. The owners would still be required to render all reasonable facilities for inspection. In the third line of the clause it was provided that plans should be given, but that they should be kept secret. In the second part of the clause, however, it appeared that the plans were to be communicated to the Inspectors, the Assistant Inspectors,

« ForrigeFortsett »