United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court at ... and Rules Announced at ..., Volum 530United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner Banks & Bros., Law Publishers, 1999 |
Inni boken
Resultat 1-5 av 44
Side 156
... Simmons v . South Carolina , 512 U. S. 154 , that a jury considering imposing death should be told if the defendant is parole ineligible under state law . The court concluded that Ramdass was not parole ineligible when the jury was ...
... Simmons v . South Carolina , 512 U. S. 154 , that a jury considering imposing death should be told if the defendant is parole ineligible under state law . The court concluded that Ramdass was not parole ineligible when the jury was ...
Side 157
... Simmons nor an unreasonable application of its rationale . Pp . 165–166 . ( b ) Simmons created a workable rule . The parole - ineligibility in- struction is required only when , assuming the jury fixes a life sentence , the defendant ...
... Simmons nor an unreasonable application of its rationale . Pp . 165–166 . ( b ) Simmons created a workable rule . The parole - ineligibility in- struction is required only when , assuming the jury fixes a life sentence , the defendant ...
Side 158
... Simmons instruction even where future dangerousness is not at issue ; and since it has also eliminated parole for capital defendants sentenced to life in prison , all capital defendants now receive the instruction . Pp . 177-178 ...
... Simmons instruction even where future dangerousness is not at issue ; and since it has also eliminated parole for capital defendants sentenced to life in prison , all capital defendants now receive the instruction . Pp . 177-178 ...
Side 159
... Simmons v . South Carolina , 512 U. S. 154 ( 1994 ) . He argues the jury should have been instructed of his parole ineligibility based on prior criminal convictions . We reject his claims and conclude Simmons is inapplicable to ...
... Simmons v . South Carolina , 512 U. S. 154 ( 1994 ) . He argues the jury should have been instructed of his parole ineligibility based on prior criminal convictions . We reject his claims and conclude Simmons is inapplicable to ...
Side 164
... Simmons to reverse Ramdass ' sentence . Ramdass filed a petition for a writ of certiorari contending that the Virginia Supreme Court misapplied Simmons , and we denied certiorari . Ramdass v . Virginia , 514 U. S. 1085 ( 1995 ) . After ...
... Simmons to reverse Ramdass ' sentence . Ramdass filed a petition for a writ of certiorari contending that the Virginia Supreme Court misapplied Simmons , and we denied certiorari . Ramdass v . Virginia , 514 U. S. 1085 ( 1995 ) . After ...
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court, Volum 320 United States. Supreme Court Uten tilgangsbegrensning - 1944 |
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
abortion Agostini Almendarez-Torres Amendment amici curiae apply Apprendi argued argument Arizona Attorney blanket primary Boy Scouts BREYER Brief certiorari Circuit claim common-law concurring in judgment Congress constitutional conviction Court of Appeals crime criminal decision defendant defendant's determine dissenting District Court Domino's Pizza due process election ERISA Establishment Clause evidence fact federal fiduciary Fifth Amendment filed Fort Yuma homosexuality Ibid imposed indictment interest issue Jefferson Parish judge jury JUSTICE JUSTICE SOUTER KENNEDY larceny lesser included offense ment Miranda neutral O'CONNOR offense Opinion parole ineligibility party person petitioner plurality procedure prohibition Proposition 198 protection punishment Ramdass reason regulation rejected relevant religion religious schools respondent restrictions robbery rule SCALIA secular sentencing Simmons SOUTER speech Stat State's statement statute statutory STEVENS student Supp supra Supreme Court THOMAS tion trial United verdict violation Virginia Wolman Zobrest