Mr. W. W. Scott for appellant. Assistant Attorney General Davis for appellee.

November 8, 1920. Per Curiam: Affirmed upon the authority of Jackson v. United States, 230 U. S. 1, 57 L. ed. 1363, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1011; Hughes v. United States, 230 U. S. 24, 57 L. ed. 1374, 46 L.R.A. (N.S.) 624, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1019; Cubbins v. Mississippi River Commission, 241 U. S. 351, 60 L. ed. 1041, 36 Sup. Ct. Rep. 671.

AUGLAIZE BOX BOARD COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. BESSIE HINTON, etc., et al. [No. 217.] Error to state court-Federal question.

In Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Ohio.

See same case below, 100 Ohio St. 505, 126 N. E. 881.

Mr. Earl H. Turner for plaintiff in

error.

Messrs. J. H. Goeke and T. T. Ansberry for defendants in error.

November 8, 1920. Per Curiam: Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of

(1) California Powder Works v. Davis, 151 U. S. 389, 393, 38 L. ed. 206, 207, 14 Sup. Ct. Rep. 350; Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co. 244 U. S. 303, 61 L. ed. 1157, 37 Sup. Ct. Rep. 643; [611] Bilby v. Stewart. 246 U. S. 255, 257, 62 L. ed. 701, 702, 38 Sup. Ct. Rep. 264; Farson, Son & Co. v. Bird, 248 U. S. 268, 271, 63 L. ed. 233, 235, 39 Sup. Ct. Rep. 111.

November 8, 1920. Per Curiam: Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of

(1) Reetz v. Michigan, 188 U. S. 505, 508, 47 L. ed. 563, 566, 23 Sup. Ct. Rep. 390; United States v. Heinze, 218 U. S. 532, 545, 546, 54 L. ed. 1139, 1145, 31 Sup. Ct. Rep. 98, 21 Ann. Cas. 884; Lott v. Pittman, 243 U. S. 588, 591, 61 L. ed. 915, 916, 37 Sup. Ct. Rep. 473; Ex parte Abdu, 247 U. S. 27, 30, 62 L. ed. 966, 967, 38 Sup. Ct. Rep. 447.

(2) Castillo v. McConnico, 168 U. S. 674, 683, 42 L. ed. 622, 625, 18 Sup. Ct. Rep. 229; Standard Oil Co. v. Missouri, 224 U. S. 270, 281, 56 L. ed. 760, 767, 32 Sup. Ct. Rep. 406, Ann. Cas. 1913D, 936; McDonald v. Oregon R. & Nav. Co. 233 U. S. 665, 669, 670, 58 L. ed. 1145, 1148, 1149, 34 Sup. Ct. Rep. 772; Gasquet v. Lapeyre, 242 U. S. 367, 369, 370, 61 L. ed. 367, 370, 37 Sup. Ct. Rep. 165.

JESSE O. STARR et al., Plaintiffs in Er-
ror, v. STATE OF NEW MEXICO. [No.
80.]
Error to state court-Federal question.

State of New Mexico.
In Error to the Supreme Court of the

See same case below, 24 N. M.180, 173 Pac. 674.

[612] Mr. H. B. Holt for plaintiffs in

error.

Messrs. H. S. Bowman and A. B. Ren

ehan for defendant in error.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon November 15, 1920. Per Curiam: the authority of Spencer v. Duplan Silk Co. 191 U. S. 526, 530, 48 L. ed. 287, 290, S. 712, 720, 58 L. ed. 1557, 1561, 34 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 174; Hull v. Burr, 234 Sup. Ct. Rep. 892; Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569, 56 L. ed. 1205, Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144, 147, 60 L. ed. 1210, 32 Sup. Ct. Rep. 704; Norton v. 186, 36 Sup. Ct. Rep. 97.

SHELDON DOLE LEMAN et al., Executors, etc., Plaintiffs in Error, v. SIDNEY C. EASTMAN, Trustee, etc., et al. [No. 306.]

Error to state court-Federal question. In Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Illinois.

Mr. Henry W. Leman for plaintiffs in

error.

Messrs. Salmon O. Levinson, Sidney C. Eastman, Benjamin V. Becker, and Carl V. Wisner for defendants in error.

STATE OF LOUISIANA EX REL. THOMAS J. DUGGAN, etc., Plaintiff in Error, v. A. W. CRANDELL, Register of the State Land Office. [No. 81.]

Error to state court-Federal question. In Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana.

See same case below, 144 La. 22, 80 So. 185.

Mr. Henry H. Glassie for plaintiff in

error.

Mr. Paul A. Sompayrac for defendant in error.

November 15, 1920. Per Curiam: Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of

(1) Spencer v. Duplan Silk Co. 191 U. S. 526, 530, 48 L. ed. 287, 290, 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 174; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720, 58 L. ed. 1557, 1561, 34 Sup. Ct. Rep. 892; Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569, 56 L. ed. 1205, 1210, 32 Sup. Ct. Rep. 704; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144, 147, 60 L. ed. 186, 187, 36 Sup. Ct. Rep. 97.

(2) California Powder Works v. Davis, 151 U. S. 389, 393, 38 L. ed. 206, 207, 14 Sup. Ct. Rep. 350; Gaar, S. & Co. v. Shannon, 223 U. S. 468, 470, 56 L. ed. 510, 512, 32 Sup. Ct. Rep. 236; Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co. 244 U. S. 300, 303, 61 L. ed. 1153, 1157, 37 Sup. Ct. Rep. 643; Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 255, 257, 62 L. ed. 701, 702, 38 Sup. Ct. Rep. 264; Farson, Son & Co. v. Bird, 248 U. S. 268, 271, 63 L. ed. 233, 235, 39 Sup. Ct. Rep. 111.

BENJAMIN BOND, Plaintiff in Error, v. AUGUSTA E. WALTERS.. [No. 83.] Error to state court-Federal question.

In Error to the Court of Appeals for the First Appellate District, Division One, State of California.

See same case below, 38 Cal. App. 245, 175 Pac. 909.

Messrs. Daniel N. Clark and Harry A. Hegarty for plaintiff in error.

Messrs. John W. Preston and John C. Brooke for defendant in error.

November 15, 1920. Per Curiam: Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of the Act of Congress of September 6, 1916 (39 Stat. at L. 726, chap. 448, Comp. Stat. § 1207, Fed. Stat. Anno. Supp. 1918, p. 411).

[613] W. H. HUMPHREYS, as Administrator, etc., Plaintiff in Error, v. BATES & ROGERS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY. [No. 349.]

Error to state court-Federal question.

In Error to the Court of Appeals of the State of Kentucky.

See same case below, 187 Ky. 538, 219 S. W. 806.

Mr. Allan D. Cole for plaintiff in er

ror.

Messrs. E. L. Worthington, LeWright Browning, and Edwin A. Swingle for defendant in error.

November 15, 1920. Per Curiam: Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of

(1) California Powder Works v. Davis, 151 U. S. 389, 393, 38 L. ed. 206, 207, 14 Sup. Ct. Rep. 350; Gaar, S. & Co. v. Shannon, 223 U. S. 468, 470, 56 L. ed. 510, 512, 32 Sup. Ct. Rep. 236; Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co. 244 U. S. 300, 303, 61 L. ed. 1153, 1157, 37 Sup. Ct. Rep. 643; Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 255, 257, 62 L. ed. 701, 702, 38 Sup. Ct. Rep. 264; Farson, Son & Co. v. Bird, 248 U. S. 268, 271, 63 L. ed. 233, 235, 39 Sup. Ct. Rep. 111 (and see Northern P. R. Co. v. Meese, 239 U. S. 614, 619, 60 L. ed. 467, 468, 36 Sup. Ct. Rep. 223, 10 N. C. C. A. 939).

(2) Equitable Life Assur. Soc. v. Brown, 187 U. S. 308, 314, 47 L. ed. 190, 193, 23 Sup. Ct. Rep. 123; Consolidated Turnp. Co. v. Norfolk & O. V. R. Co. 228 U. S. 596, 600, 57 L. ed. 982, 983, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 605; G. & C. Merriam Co. v. Syndicate Pub. Co. 237 U. S. 618, 621, 59 L. ed. 1148, 1149, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 708; Pennsylvania Hospital v. Philadelphia, 245 U. S. 20, 24, 62 L. ed. 124, 128, 38 Sup. Ct. Rep. 35.

(3) New York C. R. Co. v. White, 243 U. S. 188, 198, 61 L. ed. 667, 672, L.R.A. 1917D, 1, 37 Sup. Ct. Rep. 247, Ann. Cas. 1917D, 629, 13 N. C. C. A. 943; Mountain Timber Co. v. Washington, 243 U. S. 219, 234, 61 L. ed. 685, 694, 37 Sup. Ct. Rep. 260, Ann. Cas. 1917D, 642, 13 N. C. C. A. 927; Middleton v. Texas Power & Light Co. 249 U. S. 152. 163, 63 L. ed. 527, 534, 39 Sup. Ct. Rep. 227; Arizona Employers' Liability Cases (Arizona Copper Co. v. Hammer) 250 U. S. 400, 63 L. ed. 1058, 6 A.L.R. 1537, 39 Sup. Ct. Rep. 553.

(4) Palmer v. Ohio, 248 U. S. 32, 34, 63 L. ed. 108, 109, 39 Sup. Ct. Rep. 16.

FRANK R. LOPEZ, Appellant, v. FREDERICK C. HOWE, as Commissioner of Immigration at the Port of New York. [No. 146.]

Appeal-from circuit court of appealshabeas corpus case.

Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

See same case below, 12 A.L.R. 192, 170 C. C. A. 377, 259 Fed. 401.

[614] Mr. Charles Recht for appellant.

Solicitor General Frierson and Mr. Harry S. Ridgely for appellee.

November 22, 1920. Per Curiam: Dismissed for want of jurisdiction, upon the authority of Kurtz v. Moffitt, 115 U. S. 487, 498, 29 L. ed. 458, 460, 6 Sup. Ct. Rep. 148; Lau Ow Bew v. United

States, 144 U. S. 47, 58, 36 L. ed. 340, 344, 12 Sup. Ct. Rep. 517; Cross v. Burke, 146 U. S. 82, 88, 36 L. ed. 896, 898, 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 22; Whitney v. Dick, 202 U. S. 132, 135, 50 L. ed. 963, 964, 26 Sup. Ct. Rep. 584; Horn v. Mitchell, 243 U. S. 247, 61 L. ed. 700, 37 Sup. Ct. Rep. 293. Petition for writ of certiorari herein denied.

CITY OF NEWPORT, Appellant, v. HowARD HECKERMAN et al., etc. [No. 98.] Commerce licenses and taxes-peddlers and drummers.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Kentucky.

Mr. Brent Spence for appellant. No appearance for appellees. November 22, 1920. Per Curiam: Reversed with costs, and remanded for further proceedings upon the authority of Wagner v. Covington, 251 U. S. 95, 64 L. ed. 157, 40 Sup. Ct. Rep. 93.

Messrs. Harry L. Patton and Frank Faircloth for plaintiff in error. Messrs. S. B. Davis, Jr., E. R. Wright, W. W. Spalding, and Guy Mason for defendants in error.

November 22, 1920. Per Curiam: Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of

(1) Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 568, 56 L. ed. 1205, 1210, 32 Sup. Ct. Rep. 704; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720, 58 L. ed. 1557, 1561, 34 Sup. Ct. Rep. 892; Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Western U. Teleg. Co. 237 U. S. 300, 302, 59 L. ed. 965, 966, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 598; Delaware, L. & W. R. Co. Yurkonis, 238 Ú. S. 439, 444, 59 L. ed. 1397, 1400, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 902.

V.

(2) Spencer v. Duplan Silk Co. 191 U. S. 526, 530, 48 L. ed. 287, 290, 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 174; Devine v. Los Angeles, 202 U. S. 313, 333, 50 L. ed. 1046, 1053, 26 Sup. Ct. Rep. 652; Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569, 56 L. ed. 1205, 1210, 32 Sup. Ct. Rep. 704; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720, 58 L. ed.

LOUIS WUNDER, Plaintiff in Error, v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. [No. 197.] Constitutional law-war-time prohibition. In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Maryland.

Messrs. George Lewis Eppler and Fuller Barnard, Jr., for plaintiff in error. Solicitor General Frierson for defendant in error.

December 6, 1920. Per Curiam: Afv. Kentucky Distilleries & Warehouse Co. firmed upon the authority of Hamilton 251 U. S. 146, 64 L. ed. 194, 40 Sup. Ct. Rep. 106; Jacob Ruppert v. Caffey, 251 U. S. 264, 64 L. ed. 260, 40 Sup. Ct. Rep. 141.

Order.

STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Complainant, v. STATE OF TEXAS. [No. 23, Original.] December 6, 1920. The receiver is hereby authorized and directed to make the following payments, and to charge the same as expenses of the receivership: To Nagel & Kirby the sum of $7,500, as compensation for services heretofore rendered by them as counsel and attorneys for the receiver; to McKenney & Flannery the sum of $15,000, on account of services rendered by them as attorneys for the receiver; and to Frederic A. Delano the sum of $25,000, on account of his services as receiver.

ISADORE WORKIN et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. [No. 115.]

Error to circuit court of appeals-criminal case.

In Error to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. See same case below, 171 C. C. A. 173, 260 Fed. 137.

Messrs. Lawrence B. Cohen and I. Maurice Wormser for plaintiffs in error. Solicitor General Frierson for defendants in error.

December 13, 1920. Per Curiam: Dismissed for want of jurisdiction, upon the authority of Macfadden v. United States, 213 U. S. 288, 53 L. ed. 801, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 490. And see Boise Artesian Hot & Cold Water Co. v. Boise City, 230 U. S. 98, 100, 57 L. ed. 1409, 1410, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1003; United States ex rel. Chott v. Ewing, 237 U. S. 197, 59 L. ed. 913, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 571; Alaska Pacific Fisheries v. Alaska, 249 U. S. 53, 60, 61, 63 L. ed. 474, 477, 478, 39 Sup. Ct. Rep. 208.

[616] DAVID LAMAR et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. [No. 140.]

Error to circuit court of appeals criminal case.

In Error to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. See same case below, 260 Fed. 561. Mr. Elijah N. Zoline for plaintiffs in

error.

Solicitor General Frierson and Mr. Henry S. Mitchell for defendant in error. December 13, 1920. Per Curiam: Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Macfadden v. United States, 213 U. S. 288, 53 L. ed. 801, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 490. And see Boise Artesian Hot & Cold Water Co. v. Boise City, 230 U. S. 98, 100, 57 L. ed. 1409, 1410, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1003; United States ex rel. Chott v. Ewing, 237 U. S. 197, 59 L. ed. 913, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 571; Alaska Pacific Fisheries v. Alaska, 249 U. S. 53, 60, 61, 63 L. ed. 474, 477, 478, 39 Sup. Ct. Rep. 208.

See same case below, 168 C. C. A. 358, 257 Fed. 274.

Messrs. Charles C. Day and E. A. Watson for appellant.

Messrs. William W. Ray, George Francis Williams, A. C. Ellis, Jr., and L. F. Adamson for appellees.

December 13, 1920. Per Curiam: Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of

(1) Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 568, 56 L. ed. 1205, 1210, 32 Sup. Ct. Rep. 704; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720, 58 L. ed. 1557, 1561, 34 Sup. Ct. Rep. 892; Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Western U. Teleg. Co. 237 U. S. 300, 302, 59 L. ed. 965, 966, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 598; Delaware, L. & W. R. Co. v. Yurkonis, 238 U. S. 439, 444, 59 L. ed. 1397, 1400, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 902.

(2) Spencer v. Duplan Silk Co. 191 U. S. 526, 530, 48 L. ed. 287, 290, 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 174; Devine v. Los Angeles, 202 U. S. 313, 333, 50 L. ed. 1046, 1053, 26 Sup. Ct. Rep. 652; St. Anthony's Church v. Pennsylvania R. Co. 237 U. S. 575, 577, 578, 59 L. ed. 1119, 1122, 1123, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 729; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144, 147, 60 L. ed. 186, 187, 36 Sup. Ct. Rep. 97.

262 Fed. 48.

Messrs. John J. Fitzgerald and Elijah N. Zoline for plaintiffs in error.

Solicitor General Frierson for defendant in error.

December 13, 1920. Per Curiam: Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Macfadden v. [617] United States, 213 U. S. 288, 53 L. ed. 801, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 490. And see Boise Artesian Hot or Cold Water Co. v. Boise City, 230 U. S. 98, 100, 57 L. ed. 1409, 1410, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1003; United States ex rel. Chott v. Ewing, 237 U. S. 197, 59 L. ed. 913, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 571; Alaska Pacific Fisheries v. Alaska, 249 U. S. 53,

PLEASANT VALLEY COAL COMPANY et al. [No. 164.] Appeal from circuit court of appealsjurisdiction below-Federal question. Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.

Ct. Rep. 208.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellant, v. LEHIGH VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY et al. [No. 1.]

Motion to modify the decree of this

court.

Solicitor General Frierson for appel

lant.

Mr. Edgar H. Boles for appellees. December 20, 1920. Denied.

NEW ORLEANS DRY DOCK & SHIPBUILD-
ING COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v.
JOHN A. S. GRAY. [No. 301.]
Error to state court-Federal question.
In Error to the Supreme Court of the
State of Louisiana.

See same case below, 146 La. 826, 84 So. 109.

Messrs. Frederic D. McKenney and John Spalding Flannery for plaintiff in

error.

Mr. Percy S. Benedict for defendant in error.

January 3, 1921. Per Curiam: Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of § 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of September 6, 1916 (39 Stat. at L. 726, chap. 448, Comp. Stat. § 1214, Fed. Stat. Anno. Supp. 1918, p. 411), § 2.

HENRY RALPH and Mary Thoms, Plain-
tiffs in Error, v. HARRY W. HOWARTH,
Administrator, etc. [No. 132.]
Error to state court-Federal question.

In Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Nebraska.

Mr. Byron G. Burbank for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. Otto H. Zacek for defendant in er

ror.

January 17, 1921. Per Curiam: Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of § 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of September 6, 1916 (39 Stat. at L. 726, chap. 448, Comp. Stat. § 1214, Fed. Stat. Anno. Supp. 1918, p. 411), § 2; [618] Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 64 L. ed. 421, 40 Sup. Ct. Rep. 255.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL. C. E. SYKES, Plaintiff in Error, v. JOHN BARTON PAYNE,1 Secretary of the Interior. [No. 135.]

1 Leave granted May 17, 1920, to substitute as defendant in error John Barton Payne, present Secretary of the Interior, in the place of Franklin K. Lane, former Secretary thereof, on motion of counsel for the defendant in error.

Error-to District of Columbia court of appeals-Federal authority.

In Error to the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia.

See same case below, 49 App. D. C. 48, 258 Fed. 520.

Messrs. Francis W. Clements, H. A. Ledbetter, and Alexander Britton for plaintiff in error.

Solicitor General Frierson, Assistant Attorneys General Nebeker and Garnett, and Mr. H. L. Underwood for defendant in error.

January 17, 1921. Per Curiam: Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon authority of subdivision 5 of § 250 of the Judicial Code; United States ex rel. Champion Lumber Co. v. Fisher, 227 U. S. 445, 57 L. ed. 591, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep.

329.

FITCH, CORNELL, & COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. ATCHISON, TOPEKA, & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY. [No. 137.1

Error to state court-Federal question.
In Error to the Supreme Court of the
State of New York.

See same case below, in supreme court, 170 App. Div. 222, 155 N. Y. Supp. 1079; in court of appeals, 226 N. Y. 597, 123 N. E. 864.

Messrs. Harold G. Aron and Henry M. Wise for plaintiff in error.

Messrs. Gardiner Lathrop, S. T. Bledsoe, and A. S. H. Bristow for defendant in error.

January 17, 1921. Per Curiam: Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of § 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of September 6. 1916 (39 Stat. at L. 726, chap. 448, Comp. Stat. § 1214, Fed. Stat. Anno. Supp. 1918, p. 411), § 2; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 64 L. ed. 421, 40 Sup. Ct. Rep. 255.

LOUIS H. DENEE, Plaintiff in Error, v.
PETER MORRISON. [No. 168.]
Error to state court-Federal question.
In Error to the Supreme Court of the
State of Washington.

See same case below, 95 Wash. 76, 163 Pac. 382.

Mr. Fred B. Morrill for plaintiff in

error.

Messrs. Reese H. Voorhees and F. T.

Post for defendant in error.

January 17, 1921. Per Curiam: Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the