Sidebilder
PDF
ePub

ISADORE WORKIN et al., Plaintiffs in Er- See same case below, 168 C. C. A. 358,

ror, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. 257 Fed. 274. [No. 115.]

Messrs. Charles C. Day and E. A. WatError to circuit court of appeals-crimi- son for appellant. nal case.

Messrs. William W. Ray, George FranIn Error to the United States Circuit cis Williams, A. C. Ellis, Jr., and L. F. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Adamson for appellees.

See same case below, 171 C. C. A. 173, December 13, 1920. Per Curiam: Dis260 Fed. 137.

missed for want of jurisdiction upon the Messrs. Lawrence B. Cohen and I. authority of Maurice Wormser for plaintiffs in error. (1) Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561,

Solicitor General Frierson for defend- 568, 56 L. ed. 1205, 1210, 32 Sup. Ct. Rep. ants in error.

704; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720, December 13, 1920. Per Curiam: Dis- 58 L. ed. 1557, 1561, 34 Sup. Ct. Rep. 892; missed for want of jurisdiction, upon the Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Western U. authority of Macfadden v. United States, Teleg. Co. 237 U. S. 300, 302, 59 L. ed. 213 U. S. 288, 53 L. ed. 801, 29 Sup. Ct. 965, 966, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 598; Delaware, Rep. 490. And see Boise Artesian Hot & L. & W. R. Co. v. Yurkonis, 238 U. S. Cold Water Co. v. Boise City, 230 U. S. 439, 444, 59 L. ed. 1397, 1400, 35 Sup. 98, 100, 57 L. ed. 1409, 1410, 33 Sup. Ct. Ct. Rep. 902. Rep. 1003; United States ex rel. Chott v. (2) Spencer v. Duplan Silk Co. 191 Ewing, 237 U. S. 197, 59 L. ed. 913, 35 U. S. 526, 530, 48 L. ed. 287, 290, 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 571; Alaska Pacific Fish- Sup. Ct. Rep. 174; Devine v. Los Angeles, eries v. Alaska, 249 U. S. 53, 60, 61, 63 202 U. S. 313, 333, 50 L. ed. 1046, 1053, L. ed. 474, 477, 478, 39 Sup. Ct. Rep. 26 Sup. Ct. Rep. 652; St. Anthony's 208.

Church v. Pennsylvania R. Co. 237 U. S. 575, 577, 578, 59 L. ed. 1119, 1122, 1123, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 729; Norton v. White

side, 239 U. S. 144, 147, 60 L. ed. 186, [616) DAVID LAMAR et al., Plaintiffs in 187, 36 Sup. Ct. Rep. 97.

Error, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

[No. 140.] Error to circuit court of appeals-crimi- BENJAMIN Horowitz et al., Plaintiffs in nal case.

Error, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. In Error to the United States Circuit

[No. 232.] Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Error to circuit court of appeals-crimiSee same case below, 260 Fed. 561.

nal case. Mr. Elijah N. Zoline for plaintiffs in

In Error to the United States Circuit

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Solicitor General Frierson and Mr.

See same case below, C. C. A. —, Henry S. Mitchell for defendant in error. 262 Fed. 48. December 13, 1920. Per Curiam: Dis

Messrs. John J. Fitzgerald and Elijah missed for want of jurisdiction upon the n. Zoline for plaintiffs in error. authority of Macfadden v. United States,

Solicitor General Frierson for defend213 U. Š. 288, 53 L. ed. 801, 29 Sup. Ct. ant in error. Rep. 490. And see Boise Artesian Hot &

December 13, 1920.' Per Curiam: DisCold Water Co. v. Boise City, 230 U. S. missed for want of jurisdiction upon the 98, 100, 57 L. ed. 1409, 1410, 33 Sup. Ct. authority of Macfadden v. [617] United Rep. 1003; United States ex rel. Chott States, 213 U. S. 288, 53 l. ed. 801, 29 v. Ewing, 237_U. S. 197, 59 L. ed. 913, Sup. Ct. Rep. 490. And see Boise Arte35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 571; Alaska Pacific sian Hot or Cold Water Co. v. Boise City, Fisheries v. Alaska, 249 U. S. 53, 60, 230 U. S. 98, 100, 57 L. ed. 1409, 1410, 61, 63 L. ed. 474, 477, 478, 39 Sup. Ct. 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1003; United States ex Rep. 208.

rel. Chott v. Ewing, 237 U. S. 197, 59 L. ed. 913, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 571; Alaska

Pacific Fisheries v. Alaska, 249 U. S. 53, TRUMAN A. KETCHUM, Appellant, v. 60, 61, 63 L. ed. 474, 477, 478, 39 Sur .

PLEASANT VALLEY COAL COMPANY et al. Ct. Rep. 208.

[No. 164.] Appeal—from circuit court of appeals

jurisdiction below-Federal question. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellant,

Appeal from the United States Circuit v. LEHIGH VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. et al. (No. 1.)

error.

Motion to modify the decree of this Error-to District of Columbia court of court.

appeals-Federal authority. Solicitor General Frierson for appel- In Error to the Court of Appeals of lant.

the District of Columbia. Mr. Edgar H. Boles for appellees. See same case below, 49 App. D. C. 48, December 20, 1920. Denied.

258 Fed. 520.

Messrs. Francis W. Clements, H. A. Ledbetter, and Alexander Britton for

plaintiff in error. New ORLEANS Dry Dock & SHIPBUILD

Solicitor General Frierson, Assistant ING COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. Attorneys General Nebeker and Garnett,

JOHN A. S. GRAY. [No. 301.] and Mr. H. L. Underwood for defendant Error to state court-Federal question.

in error. In Error to the Supreme Court of the January 17, 1921. Per Curiam: DisState of Louisiana.

missed for want of jurisdiction upon auSee same case below, 146 La. 826, 84 thority of subdivision 5 of $ 250 of the So. 109.

Judicial Code; United States ex rel. Messrs. Frederic D. McKenney and Champion Lumber Co. v. Fisher, 227 U. John Spalding Flannery for plaintiff in S. 445, 57 L. ed. 591, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. error.

329. Mr. Percy S. Benedict for defendant in error.

January 3, 1921. Per Curiam; Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the FITCH, CORNELL, & COMPANY, Plaintiff authority of § 237 of the Judicial Code, in Error, V. ATCHISON, TOPEKA, & as amended by the Act of September 6, SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY. [No. 1916 (39 Stat. at L. 726, chap. 448, 137.] Comp. Stat. § 1214, Fed. Stat. Anno. Error to state court-Federal question. Supp. 1918, p. 411), $ 2.

In Error to the Supreme Court of the State of New York.

See same case below, in supreme court,

170 App. Div. 222, 155 N. Y. Supp. 1079; HENRY RALPH and Mary Thoms, Plain- in court of appeals, 226 N. Y. 597, 123

tiffs in Error, v. HARRY W. HOWARTH, N. E. 864. Administrator, etc. [No. 132.]

Messrs. Harold G. Aron and Henry Error_to state court-Federal question. M, Wise for plaintiff in error.

In Error to the Supreme Court of the Messrs. Gardiner Lathrop, S. T. BledState of Nebraska.

soe, and A. S. H. Bristow for defendant Mr. Byron G. Burbank for plaintiffs in error. in error.

January 17, 1921. Per Curiam: DisMr. Otto H. Zacek for defendant in er- missed for want of jurisdiction upon the ror.

authority of § 237 of the Judicial Code, January 17, 1921. Per Curiam: Dis- as amended by the Act of September 6. missed for want of jurisdiction upon the 1916 (39 Stat. at L. _726, chap. 448, authority of § 237 of the Judicial Code, Comp. Stat. § 1214, Fed. Stat. Anno. as amended by the Act of September 6, Supp. 1918, p. 411), § 2; Jett Bros. Dis1916 (39 Stat. at L. 726, chap. 448, tilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 64 Comp. Stat. § 1214, Fed. Stat. Anno. L. ed. 421, 40 Sup. Ct. Rep. 255. Supp. 1918, p. 411), $ 2; [618] Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 64 L. ed. 421, 40 Sup. Ct. Rep. 255.

Louis H. DENEE, Plaintiff in Error, v.

PETER MORRISON. [No. 168.]

Error to state court-Federal question. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL. C. In Error to the Supreme Court of the

E. SYKES, Plaintiff in Error, v. JOHN State of Washington. BARTON PAYNE, Secretary of the In- See same case below, 95 Wash. 76, 163 terior. [No. 135.)

Pac. 382.

Mr. Fred B. Morrill for plaintiff in 1 Leave granted May 17, 1920, to substitute as defendant in error John Barton

Messrs. Reese H. Voorhees and F. T. Payne, present Secretary of the Interior, in the place of Franklin K. Lane, former Post for defendant in error. Secretary thereof, on motion of counsel for January 17, 1921. Per Curiam: Disthe defendant in error.

missed for want of jurisdiction upon the

error.

error.

authority (619) of § 237 of the Judicial | Error to state court-Federal question. Code, as amended by the Act of Septem- In Error to the Supreme Court of the ber 6, 1916 (39 Stat. at L. 726, chap. State of Iowa. 448, Comp. Stat. $ 1214, Fed. Stat. Anno. See same case below, 185 Iowa, 1038, Supp. 1918, p. 411), § 2; Jett Bros. Dis-170 N. W. 289. tilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 64 Mr. W. D. Milligan for plaintiff in L. ed. 421, 40 Sup. Ct. Rep. 255.

Messrs. Horace M. Havner, Freeman

C. Davidson, and Charles W. Lyon for Ex PARTE: IN THE MATTER OF THE CITY defendant in error. OF DALLAS, Petitioner. [No.

, Orig

January 24, 1921. Per Curiam: Disinal.]

missed for want of jurisdiction upon auMotion for leave to file a petition for thority of § 237 of the Judicial Code, as a Writ of Mandamus herein.

amended by the Act of September 6, Messrs. James J. Collins, Joseph Man-1916 (39 Stat. at L. 726, chap. 448, son McCormick, and Francis Marion Comp. Stat. § 1214, Fed. Stat. Anno. Etheridge for petitioner.

Supp. 1918, p. 411), S 2; Jett Bros. DisNo appearance for respondent.

tilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 64 January 17, 1921. Denied.

L. ed. 421, 40 Sup. Ct. Rep. 255.

Ex PARTE: IN THE MATTER OF HUSSEIN MAGGIE HARJO, Appellant, v. W. A.

LUTFI BEY, Master, etc., Petitioner. KUNKLE, Prairie Oil & Gas Company, No. - Original.]

et al. (No. 160.] Motion for leave to file a petition for Appeal—from circuit court of appeals Writs of Prohibition and/or Mandamus frivolous Federal question. herein.

Appeal from the United States Circuit Messrs. William A. Purrington, Frank Court of Appeals for the Eighth CirJ. McConnell, and John M. Woolsey for cuit. petitioner.

See same case below, 168 C. C. A. 38, No appearance for respondent.

256 Fed. 644. January 17, 1921. Denied.

Mr. Lewis C. Lawson for appellant.

Messrs. Preston C. West and A. A.

Davidson for appellees. CHARLES S. SICKEL, Plaintiff in Error,

January 24, 1921. Per Curiam: Disv. THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA? missed for want of jurisdiction upon [No. 145.]

authority of Farrell v. O'Brien (O'CalError to state court-Federal question.

laghan v. O'Brien) 199 U. S. 89, 100, 50 In Error to the Supreme Court of Ap- L. ed. 101, 107, 25 Sap. Ct. Rep: 727; peals of the State of Virginia.

Empire State-Idaho Min. & Developing See same case below, 124 Va. 821, 97 Co. v. Hanley, 205 U. S. 225, 232, 51 S. E. 783, 99 S. E. 678.

L. ed. 779, 782, 27 Sup. Ct. Rep. 476; Messrs. David H. Leake and Walter Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 79, 53 Leake for plaintiff (620) in error.

L. ed. 914, 917, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 580; Messrs. John R. Saunders and J. D. Toop v. Ulysses Land Co. 237 U. S. 580, Hank, Jr., for defendant in error.

583, 59 L. ed. 1127, 1128, 35 Sup. Ct. January 24, 1921. Per Curiam: Dis- Rep. 739; United Surety Co. v. Amermissed for want of jurisdiction upon ican Fruit Product Co. 238 U. S. 140, authority of Murdock v. Memphis, 20 142, 59 L. ed. 1238, 1239, 35 Sup. Ct. Wall. 590, 22 L. ed. 429; Ross v. *Oregon, Rep. 828; Sugarman v. United States, 227 U. S. 150, 161, 57 L. ed. 458, 461, 33 249 U. S. 182, 184, 63 L. ed. 550, 551, Sup. Ct. Rep. 220, Ann. Cas. 1914C, 39 Sup. Ct. Rep. 191; Berkman v. Unit224; Southern P. Co. v. Schuyler, 227 U. ed States, 250 U. S. 114, 118, 63 L. ed. S. 601, 610, 57 L. ed. 662, 668, 43 L.R.A. 877, 884, 39 Sup. Ct. Pep. 411; Pied(N.S.) 901, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 277; En- mont Power & Light Co. v. Graham, 253 terprise Irrig. Dist. v. Farmers Mut. U. S. 193, 64 L. ed. 855, 40 Sup. Ct. Canal Co. 213 U. S. 157, 164, 61 L. ed. Rep. 453. 644, 648, 37 Sup. Ct. Rep. 318.

Louis F. NAGEL, Plaintiff in Error, v.

THE STATE OF Iowa. (No. 150.]

GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY,

Plaintiff in Error, v. THE CITY OF
MINNEAPOLIS. [No. 163.)

Error to state court--Federal question. 729; Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Western

In Error to the Supreme Court of the U. Teleg. Co. 237 U. S. 300, 302, 59 L. ed. State of Minnesota.

965, 966, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 598; DelSee same case below, 142 Minn. 308, aware, L. & W. R. Co. y. Yurkonis, 238 172 N. W. 135.

U. S. 439, 444, 59 L. ed. 1397, 1400, 35 Messrs. E. C. Lindley, M. L. Country- Sup. Ct. Rep. 902. man, and J. 0. P. Wheelwright for plaintiff in error.

Messrs. Charles D. Gould and Richard HERBERT L. HILDRETH, Petitioner, v. JIM S. Wiggin for defendant in error.

M. MASTORAS. [No. 333.] [621] January 24, 1921. Per Curi

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the Dismissed for want of jurisdiction United States Circuit Court of Appeals upon authority of § 237 of the Judicial for the Ninth Circuit. Code, as amended by the Act of Septem- See same case below, C. C. A. ber 6, 1916 (39 Stat. at L. 726, chap. 263 Fed. 571. 448, Comp. Stat. § 1214, Fed. Stat. Anno.

Messrs. Frederic D. McKenney and Supp. 1918, p. 411), $ 2; Jett Bros. Dis. George P. Dike for petitioner. tilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 64

No appearance for respondent. L. ed. 421, 40 Sup. Ct. Rep. 255.

October 11, 1920. Granted.

am :

OF

a

error.

SANGER BROTHERS, Copartnership,

FIRST NATIONAL BANK JASPER etc., Plaintiffs in Error, v. EMILY

FLORIDA, Petitioner, v. STATE BANK OF HUNSUCKER et al. [No. 170.]

ROME, GEORGIA (No. 371]; and FIRST Error to state court-Federal question.

NATIONAL BANK OF JASPER, FLORIDA, In Error to the Court of Civil Ap

Petitioner, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF peals, Second Supreme Judicial District

ROME, GEORGIA [No. 372]. of the State of Texas.

Petition for Writs of Certiorari to the See same case below, Tex. Civ. App.

United States Circuit Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit. -,212 S. W. 514. Mr. Henry C. Coke for plaintiffs in

See same case below, C. C. A. 264 Fed. 83.

Mr. William Wade Hampton for peNo appearance for defendants in er

titioner. ror.

Mr. Henry C. Clark for respondents. January 24, 1921. Per Curiam: Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon

October 11, 1920. Granted. authority of § 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of September 6, 1916 (39 Stat. at L._726, chap. 448, BANK OF JASPER, Petitioner, v. FIRST NAComp. Stat. § 1214, Fed. Stat. Anno.

TIONAL BANK OF ROME, GEORGIA [No. Supp. 1918, p. 411), $ 2; Jett Bros. Dis

383]; and BANK OF JASPER, Petitioner, tilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 64

v. STATE BANK OF ROME, GEORGIA [No. L. ed. 421, 40 Sup. Ct. Rep. 255.

384).

Petition for Writs of Certiorari to the

United States Circuit Court of Appeals JOHN W. SEAMAN et al., Appellants, v. for the Fifth Circuit. SAMUEL W. ADLER. (No. 647.]

See same case below, C. C. A. Appeal—from circuit court of appeals— 264 Fed. 88. Federal question.

Mr. F. P. Fleming for petitioner. Appeal from the United States Circuit Mr. Henry C. Clark for respondents. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. October 11, 1920. Granted.

See same case below, C. C. A. 266 Fed. 828.

Mr. W. J. Hughes for appellants. GERTRUDE M. REED, Administratrix of the Mr. Edw. W. Foristel for appellee. Estate of Leo C. Reed, Deceased, Pe

January 24, 1921. Per Curiam: Dis- titioner, v. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF RAILmissed for want of jurisdiction upon ROADS, United States (623] Railroad the authority of Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. Administration, Operating Philadel712, 720, 58 L. ed. 1557, 1561, 34 Sup. phia & Reading Railroad. (No. 387.] Ct. Rep. 892; St. Anthony's Church v. Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the Pennsylvania R. Co. 237 U. S. 575, 577, Supreme Court of the State of Pennsyl59 L. ed. 1119, 1122, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. Ivania.

See same case below, 267 Pa. 86, 110 Atl. 254.

Mr. Frederick S. Tyler for petitioner.

Mr. William Clarke Mason for respondent.

October 11, 1920. Granted.

Messrs. Maurice C. Spratt and H. Prescott Gatley for petitioner.

Mr. E. Clarence Aiken for respondent.
October 11, 1920. Granted.

WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY,

Petitioner, v. ESTEVE BROTHERS & ComJohn Gooch, JR., Petitioner, v. OREGON PANY. [No. 491.]

SHORT LINE RAILROAD COMPANY. [No Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the 412.)

United States Circuit Court of Appeals Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the for the Fifth Circuit. United States Circuit Court of Appeals See same case below, C. C. A. for the Ninth Circuit.

268 Fed. 22. See same case below, C. C. A. Messrs. Rush Taggart, W. B. Spencer, 264 Fed. 664.

Joseph P. Egan, and Francis R. Stark Mr. J. H. Peterson for petitioner.

for petitioner. Mr. George H. Smith for respondent. No brief was filed for respondent. October 11, 1920. Granted.

October 18, 1920. Granted.

[ocr errors]

UNITED STATES, Petitioner, v. M. RICE &

EDWARD S. ATWATER, Petitioner, v. COMPANY.et al. [No. 462.]

STEPHEN G. GUERNSEY et al., Trustees, Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Customs Appeals.

etc., et al. (No. 511.] The Attorney General for petitioner.

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the

United States Circuit Court of Appeals No appearance for respondents.

for the Second Circuit. October 11, 1920. Granted.

See same case below, C. C. A. 266 Fed. 278.

Mr. Abram J. Rose for petitioner. WHITE OAK TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, Mr. R. Dulaney Whiting for respond

Petitioner, v. Boston, CAPE COD, & New ents.
YORK CANAL COMPANY. [No. 467.] October 18, 1920. Granted.

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.

See same case_below, first appeal,
C. C. A. —, 265 Fed. 538; second appeal,

UNION TOOL COMPANY, Petitioner, v.

ELIHU C. WILSON. (No. 521.] C. C. A. --, 267 Fed. 176.

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the Mr. Edward E. Blodgett for petitioner,

Messrs. William R. Sears and Samuci United States Circuit Court of Appeals Park for respondent.

for the Ninth Circuit. October 11, 1920. Granted.

See same case below, C. C. A. 265 Fed. 669.

Messrs. A. V. Andrews, Frederick S. NORTHERN COAL COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Church for petitioner.

Lyon, William K. White, and Melville Boston, CAPE COD, & NEW YORK CANAL Messrs. A. Benton Wilson and Francis COMPANY. (No. 487.]

W. Clements for respondent.
Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the

October 18, 1920. Granted.
United States Circuit Court of [624]
Appeals for the First Circuit.
Mr. John G. Palfrey for petitioner.
Mr. William R. Sears for respondent.

[625] FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF GULFOctober 11, 1920. Granted.

PORT, MISSISSIPPI, Petitioner, v. WIRT
ADAMS, Revenue Agent, etc. [No.

541.] PULLMAN COMPANY, Petitioner, v. STATE Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the

INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION. [No. 469.] Supreme Court of the State of Missis

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the sippi. Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third See same case below, on various apDepartment, of the State of New York. peals, 108 Miss. 346, 67 So. 407; 116

« ForrigeFortsett »