Sidebilder
PDF
ePub

Mr. Charles W. Bunn for defendant | St. Anthony's Church v. Pennsylvania R. in error. Co. 237 U. S. 575, 577, 59 L. ed. 1119, February 28, 1921. Per Curiam: 1122, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 729; Delaware, L. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon & W. R. Co. v. Yurkonis, 238 U. S. 439, the authority of § 237 of the Judicial 444, 59 L. ed. 1397, 1400, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. Code, as amended by the Act of Sep- 902. tember 6, 1916 (39 Stat. at L. 726, chap. 448, Comp. Stat. § 1214, Fed. Stat. Anno. Supp. 1918, p. 411), § 2.

CITY OF HILLSBORO, Oregon, Plaintiff in Error, v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF OREGON, etc., et al. [No. 618.] Error to state court-Federal question -error or certiorari.

In Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Oregon.

See same case below, 97 Or. 320, 187 Pac. 617, on rehearing 97 Or. 332, 192 Pac. 390.

Mr. Martin L. Pipes for plaintiff in

error.

Mr. Charles A. Hart for defendants in error.

February 28, 1921. Per Curiam: Dismissed for want of jurisdiction on authority of

(1) Section 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of September 6, 1916 (39 Stat. at L. 726, chap. 448, Comp. Stat. § 1214, Fed. Stat. Anno. Supp. 1918, p. 411), § 2.

(2) Union Dry Goods Co. v. Georgia Pub. Service Corp. 248 U. S. 372, 63 L. ed. 309, 9 A.L.R. 1420, P.U.R.1919C, 60, 39 Sup. Ct. Rep. 117.

(3) Hunter v. Pittsburgh, 207 U. S. 161, 178, 52 L. ed. 151, 159, 28 Sup. Ct. Rep. 40; Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil & Gas Co. 250 U. S. 394, 397, 63 L. ed. 1054, 1056, P.U.R.1919E, 178, 39 Sup. Ct. Rep. 526.

HENRI EUNICE MONCRAVIE VAN TINE, now Harrison, et al., Appellants, v. LUELLA MONCRAVIE. [No. 422.] Appeal from circuit court of appeals -Federal question.

Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. See same case below, 264 Fed. 776. Messrs. T. J. Leahy and C. S. Macdonald for appellants.

Mr. Alfred M. Jackson for appellee. [563] March 7, 1921. Per Curiam: Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of

(1) Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720, 58 L. ed. 1557, 1561, 34 Sup. Ct. Rep. 892;

(2) Spencer v. Duplan Silk Co. 191 U. S. 526, 530, 48 L. ed. 287, 290, 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 174; Devine v. Los Angeles, 202 U. S. 313, 333, 50 E. ed. 1046, 1053, 26 Sup. Ct. Rep. 652; Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569, 56 L. ed. 1205, 1211, 32 Sup. Ct. Rep. 704; G. & C. Merriam Co. v. Syndicate Pub. Co. 237 U. S. 618, 59 L. ed. 1148, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 708.

[blocks in formation]

UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY COMPANY et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. TRAVELERS INSURANCE MACHINE COMPANY. [No. 612.]

Error to state court-Federal question -error or certiorari.

In Error to the Court of Appeals of the State of Kentucky.

See same case below, 188 Ky. 841, 224 S. W. 496.

Mr. William Marshall Bullitt for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. David R. Castleman for defendant in error.

March 7, 1921. Per Curiam: Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of § 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of September 6, 1916 (39 Stat. at L. 726, chap. 448, Comp. Stat. § 1214, Fed. Stat. Anno. Supp. 1918, p. 411), § 2.

[564] ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD [565] SOUTHERN PAPER COMPANY, COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. C.) B. JOHNSON. [No. 620.]

Error to state court-Federal question -error or certiorari.

In Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Alabama.

See same case below, 205 Ala. 1, 87 So. 866.

Messrs. Augustus Benners, W. S. Horton, and R. V. Fletcher for plaintiff in

[blocks in formation]

Plaintiff in Error, v. STOKES V. ROBERTSON, State Revenue Agent. [No. 551.] Error to state court-Federal question -error or certiorari.

In Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Mississippi.

See same case below, on first appeal, 119 Miss. 113, 80 So. 384, on second appeal, Miss., 85 So. 139.

Mr. W. A. White for plaintiff in er

[blocks in formation]

CORNELIUS C. WATTS et al., Petitioners, V. ELY REAL ESTATE & INVESTMENT COMPANY. [No. 389.]

Motion to dismiss the petition for Writ of Certiorari in this case, for want of prosecution.

WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY, Petitioner, v. EUGENE E. SOUTHWICK. [No. 210.]

Commerce conflicting state and Federal regulations-interstate telegrams.

On a Writ of Certiorari to the Court

of Civil Appeals for the Seventh Supreme Judicial District of the State of Tex. Civ. App.

Texas.

See same case below, 262 Fed. 721.
See same case below,
Messrs. S. L. Kingan, Herbert Noble,, 214 S. W. 987.
Hartwell P. Heath, and Conrad H. Syms
for petitioners.

Messrs. Rush Taggart, Francis Raymond Stark, and Joseph L. Egan for

Mr. Selim M. Franklin for respondent. petitioner.
March 7, 1921. Granted.

No appearance for respondent.

March 21, 1921. Per Curiam: Re- (2) Act of February 8, 1899 (30 Stat. versed with costs, and cause remanded for at L. 822, chap. 121, Comp. Stat. § 1594, further proceedings, upon the authority 8 Fed. Stat. Anno. 2d ed. p. 953); Le of Postal Teleg.-Cable Co. v. Warren- Crone v. McAdoo, 253 U. S. 217, 219, 64 Godwin Lumber Co. 251 U. S. 27, 64 L. L. ed. 869, 870, 40 Sup. Ct. Rep. 510. ed. 118, 40 Sup. Ct. Rep. 69; Western U. Teleg. Co. v. Boegli, 251 U. S. 315, 64 L. ed. 281, 40 Sup. Ct. Rep. 167.

[blocks in formation]

FRANK M. HOY, Appellant, v. FRANKLIN K. LANE, Secretary of the Interior. [No. 212]; and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL. EDMUND O. WATTIS, Plaintiff in Error, v. FRANKLIN K. LANE, Secretary of the Interior [No. 213].

Appeal abatement - termination of office.

Appeal from and In Error to the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia. See same case below in No. 212, 49 App. D. C. 388, 266 Fed. 1008, in No. 213, 49 App. D. C. 385, 266 Fed. 1005.

Messrs. Harry A. Hegarty and S. S. Ashbaugh for appellants.

Messrs. Assistant Attorney General Garnett and Mr. H. L. Underwood for appellee.

March 28, 1921. Per Curiam: Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of

(1) United States v. Boutwell, 17 Wall. 604, 607, 21 L. ed. 721, 722; Pullman v. Knott, 243 U. S. 447, 449, 61 L. ed. 841, 842, 37 Sup. Ct. Rep. 428; Shaffer v. Howard, 249 U. S. 200, 201, 63 L. ed. 559, 39 Sup. Ct. Rep. 255.

HULETT C. MERRITT, Petitioner, v. UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA. [No. 519.]
Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the
United States Circuit Court of Appeals
for the Ninth Circuit.

See same case below, 264 Fed. 870.

Messrs. W. H. Anderson, James A. Anderson, Howard S. Lewis, Edwin A. Meserve, and F. B. Crosthwaite for petitioner.

Mr. Solicitor General Frierson for respondent.

March 7, 1921. Granted, the transcript of record heretofore filed as an exhibit to the petition to stand as a return to the writ.

INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT COMMISSION OF
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Petitioner,
V. JOHN BARTON PAYNE, as Agent, etc.
(Los Angeles & Salt Lake Railway
Company). [No. 737.]

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the
District Court of Appeal, Second Appel-
late District, Division 2, of the State of
California.

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]
« ForrigeFortsett »