Hva folk mener - Skriv en omtale
Vi har ikke funnet noen omtaler på noen av de vanlige stedene.
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
Adams agents Alabama américain American anglais arbitrators armed aurait autorités autre avaient avait été avoir Bahama BANCROFT DAVIS bave belligerent blockade bord Britain britannique British Appendix Captain cargo charbon coal colonies commander confederate considération consul contre crew d'une décision destination deux devoir douanes droit Dudley due diligence duty état États-Unis être évidence fait Florida gouverneur governor Grande-Bretagne guerre hâve hommes insurgent jurisdiction l'autre l'on l'Oreto le vaisseau les devoirs letter lier lier Majesty's Liverpool Long Cay Lord Lord Russell Majesté Majesty's government manière Melbourne ment mesures n'est Nassau nations navire négligence neutral neutralité neutre officers opérations opinion Oreto parties peut port preuves prise proceedings puissance qu'il qu'un question rapport réclamations règles responsabilité Rétribution Sea King semble Shenandoah ship Sir Alexander Cockburn steamer tbat temps thèse tion tlie tout traité treaty of Washington tribunal United vaisseau vessel violation
Side 231 - Secondly, not to permit or suffer either belligerent to make use of its ports or waters as the. base of naval operations against the other, or for the purpose of the renewal or augmentation of military supplies or arms, or the recruitment of men. Thirdly, to exercise due diligence in its own ports and waters, and, as to all persons within its jurisdiction, to prevent any violation of the foregoing obligations and duties.
Side 104 - First, to use due diligence to prevent the fitting out, arming, or equipping, within its jurisdiction, of any vessel which it has reasonable ground to believe is intended to cruise or to carry on war against a Power with which it is at peace ; and also to use like diligence to prevent the departure from its jurisdiction of any vessel intended to cruise or carry on war as above, such vessel having been specially adapted, in whole or in part, within such jurisdiction, to warlike use.
Side 272 - ... it shall be lawful for the President of the United States, or such other person as he shall have empowered for that purpose, to employ such part of the land or naval forces of the United States...
Side 56 - A neutral Government is bound — First, to use due diligence to prevent the fitting out, arming, or equipping, within its jurisdiction, of any vessel which it has reasonable ground to believe is intended to cruise or to carry on war against a Power with which it is at peace...
Side 1 - British flag, in the enhanced payments of insurance, in the prolongation of the war, and in the addition of a large sum to the cost of the war and the suppression of the rebellion...
Side 66 - Government, in order to evince its desire of strengthening the friendly relations between the two countries, and of making satisfactory provision for the future...
Side 53 - VII of the said treaty, by a majority of four voices to one, awards to the United States a sum of $15,500,000 in gold, as the indemnity to be paid by Great Britain to the United States, for the satisfaction of all the claims referred to the consideration of the tribunal, conformably to the provisions contained in Article VII of the aforesaid treaty.
Side 252 - But there is nothing in our laws, or in the law of nations, that forbids our citizens from sending armed vessels, as well as munitions of war, to foreign ports for sale. It is a commercial adventure which no nation is bound to prohibit, and which only exposes the persons engaged in it to the penalty of confiscation.
Side 106 - The said Tribunal shall first determine as to each vessel separately whether Great Britain has, by any act or omission, failed to fulfil any of the duties set forth in the foregoing three rules, or recognized by the principles of international law not inconsistent with such rules, and shall certify such fact as to each of the said vessels.