The Federal Reporter

Murphy v. United States (0. 0.). . . . . . . . . 908

Muse v. Arlington Hotel 00. (C. 0.). . . . . . 637

Page

Philadelphia & R. R. 00., Union Switch & Signal 00. v. (C. C.) .................. 913

Philadelphia & R. R. 00., Union Switch & Signal 00. v. (0. 0.) .................. 914 Pi(t3t)sburg Plate-Glass 00., Haslem v. (0. 479

Pittsburgh, 0. & St. L. R. Co. v. Keokuk & H. Bridge 00. (0. 0. A.) ............ 19 Plymothean, The (C. C. A.) .............. 395

Polk County Nat. Bank v. Foote Commer

cial Phosphate 00. C. C. A.). . . . . . . . . . . 845 Pomeroy Duplicator . Edison v. (0. 0.) 487 Porter v. Davidson A.). . . . . . . . . . . . 257 v. (0. O)...’.......I..I.OO 421 Proceeds of The Seguranca, Guimaraes v.

(D. C.) .......................... . . .1014 Proceeds of the Vigilancia, Atlantic Trust

Co. v. (D. 0.) ........................ 781 Providence-Washington Ins. 00., Chapman

Derrick & Wrecking Co. v. (D. 0.). . . . . . 932 Putnam, Illinois Steel Co. v. (0. 0. A.). .. 515

Quicksilver Min. 00., Gray v. (0. C.) ..... Quigley, The Thomas (D. 0.). . . . . . . . . . . .

Raymond Rubber 00., Chemical Rubber

Co. v. (C. C.) ........................ 570 Red Cross Line, Franklin Sugar Refining

Co. v. (0. C. A.) ............ . ......... 230 Redding, Western Assur. Co. v. (0. 0. A. 708

Reynolds v. Standard Paint 00. (0. 0. A. 483 Richmond, N., I. & B. R. 00., Central

Trust Co. v. C. C. A.) .............. 90 Richmond, N., . & B. R. 00., Richmond &

I. Const. Co. v. (0. C. A.) ............. 105 Richmond & I. Const. Co. v. Richmond, N.,

I. & B. R. Co. (0. C. A.) .............. 105

Musser Sauntry Land. Logging & Manqu
00., Northern Pac. R. Co. v. (C. C. A.). . 993

Myers, Dininny v. (D. C.) .............. 943
Myers, Oakes v. (C. 0.) ......... . . . . . . . . . 807
National 00. v. Belcher (0. C.) ...... . 665
National 00. v. Morse (C. C.) ............ 665
National Foundry & Pipe Works v. Oconto
Water 00. (D. C.) ..................... 1006
Neineber, Voss v. (C. C.) .......... . .. . . . 947
Neubert, Latta v. (C. C. A.). .. .- ......... 72
New Home Sewing-Mach. Co. v. Singer
Manuf’g 00. (C. C.) ............. . . . . . . 224
Newman. The Mattie (D. 0.) ............ 1017

New York Life Ins. 00., Bowers v. (C. 0.; 785
New York & Bermudez 00., Hine v. (D. C. 920
Noonan v. Delaware, L. & W. R. Co. (0.

C.) ................................. 1
Norfolk & 0. R. Co. v. The City of Chester

(D. C.) .............................. 574 Norma, The, (C. 0. A.) .................. 509

Northern Pac. R. Co. v. Musser Sauntry

Land. Logging 8: Manuf’g Co. (0. 0. A.) 993 Northern Pac. R. 00., Farmers’ Loan & Trust Co. v. (C. C.) ................... 36

North German Lloyd, Law v. (C. C. A.). . . 390

Oakes v. Myers (0. C.) .............. 807
O’Connell v. The C. R. Stone (D. 0.) ..... 934
Oconto \Vater 00. National Foundry &

Pipe WVorks v. (D. C.) ................ 1006
O’Donnell, Dugan v. (C. C.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 983
Oolagah Coal Co. v. McCaleb (C. C. A.). . 86
Owl Cigar Co., Cuervo v. ('0. C.) ......... 541
Pack, Michigan Land & Lumber Co. v. (C.

0. A.) ............................... 170 Pacific Graphite 00., United States Graph

ite Co. v. (C. C.) ..................... 442 Pacific Rollin Mills 00. v. James Street

Const. Co. ( . C. A.) .................. 966 Palmer, The Hattie (C. 0. A.) ......... .. 380 Palms,Hodgev.(C.0. 61 Palms, Morancy v. (0. C. A.) ............ 64 Pauly Jail-Building & Manufacturing 00.

v. Board of Com’rs of Kearney County (0. 0. A.) ............................ 171 Peach Bottom Slate 00., McConkey v. (0.

0. A.) .......................... 830

Pearsol v. Maxwell (0. C.) ......... . .. . . 513
Peters. The Mary L. (D. 0.). .. . 919
Petersburg, The, Weyant v. (D. 0.). . . . .. 387

Peninsular Iron 00. v. Eells (C. C. A.). . 24
Pilinsular Land 00., McCants v. (0. C.

. 66
Pennsylvania Steel 00., Johnson 00. v.
(C. 0.). .... ........... . .............. 212

R. J. Moran, Thc. Applegate v. (D. 0.). .. 938
Roanoke Iron 00., Fidelity Insurance.

Trust 8: Safe-Deposit Co. v. (C. 0.). .. . 623
Robert Hadden, The, City of New York v.

(D. C.) .............................. 1017 Roberts. Saranac Land & Timber Co. v.

(C. C.) ............................. 521 Robertson v. Scottish Union & National Ins.

(To. (C. C.) ........................... 1""? Robinson v. Dewhurst (C. C. A.) ......... 336 Robinson v. United States Mut. Acc. Ass’n

of City of New York (0. 0.) ....... . . . . 825 Robinson & Cary 00., Wisconsin Trust Co.

v. (C. 0. A.) .......................... 778 Rocker Spring 00. v. Thomas (0. 0.). . . .. . 196 Roggenkamp v. Roggenkamp (C. C. A.). .. 605 Rothschild’s Sons’ 00. v. Mentel (C. C. . . 716

Royal Ins. Co. of Liver 001 v. Home ns.

00. of New Orleans ( . C. A.) ......... 698 R. Rothschild’s Sons’ 00. v. Mentel (0. 0.) 716 Rugg, Latta v., two cases (0. 0. A.) ..... 72 Rust, Michigan Land & Lumber Co. v. (0.

C. A.) ............................... 155 St. Augustine Steamship Co. v. Henderson

(0. C. A.) ........................... 393 St. Paul M. & M. R. Co. v. St. Paul & N.

P. Re). (0. o. A.) ......... ..... .. 2 St. Paul & N. P. R. Co. v. St. Paul, M. &

M. R. 00. (C. C. A.) .................. 2

Salisbury v. Seventy Thousand Feet of
(D0 0.)....QIOOOOOQOOOOOOOOOO
Salmon v. Mills (0. C. A.). ....... 180

Spokane County v. First Nat. Bank of Spokane (C. C. A.) ....................... 979 Standard Paint 00., Reynolds v. (0. 0. A.) 483

Standard Plate-Glass Co. Haslem v. (C. 0.; 479 Starr & 00. v. Galgate Ship 00. (c. 0. A. 234 State of Georgia ,Kelly v. (D. 0.). 652 State Trust 00. Hobbs v. (0. 0. A.) ...... 618 Stevens v. McKibbin (C. C. A.) ........... 406 Stone, The 0. R. (D. C.) ................ 934 Stuart v. Smith (C. 0.) .............. . . . . 189 Sullivan, Merrill v. (C. C. A.) ........ . .. . 509 Sumpter, Latta v. (0. 0. A. ....... .. .. . 72 Thomas Quigley, The (D. 0.) ............ 936 Thomas, Rocker Spring 00. v. (0. 0.). .. 196 Thompson, The (D. C.) ................. 939 Tice v. The Hudson (D. 0.) .............. 936

Tinsley, United States v. (0. 0. A.).. .. .. 433 Town of Darlington v. Atlantic Trust 00.

(C. C. A.) oooooooooo o 000000000000 00).. Trave, The (0. C. A.) ............ ...... . 390

Page United States v. Boyd (0. 0.). . . . . . . . . . . . 577 United States v. Dana (D. 0.) ....... . .. . 886 United States v. Frankel (0. 0.) ..... . . . . . 186 United States v. Harden (C. C. A.) ....... 182 United States v. Harman (D. 0.). . . . . . . . 472 United States v. Harris (D. 0.) .......... 347 United States v. Kenworthy (C. C. A.). . . . 904 United States v. Long (D. C.) ............ 348 United States v. Loo Way (D. 0.). . . . . . . . 475 United States v. McAleer (C. 0. A.). . . . . . . 146 United States v. Matthews (D. 0.). . . . . . . 880 United States v. Tinsley (0. C. A. ...... . 433 United States v. Woodrufi (D. 0.) ..... . . . 536 United States, American Bell Tel. 00. v.

(C. C. A.) OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO Q Q I Q United States, Dickson v. (C. 0.) . . . . . . . . . 534 United States, Kent v. (0. 0.) ...... . . .. . 536 United States, Murphy v. (C. 0.) ......... 908 United States, Wertheimer v. (C. C.) ...... 186 United States Graphite Co. v. Pacific

Graphite Co. (0. 0.) .................. 442 United States Mut. Acc. Ass’n of City of

New York, Robinson v. (C. 0.). . . . . . . . . 825 United States Sugar Refinery, Watson v.

(C. CO A.).0...‘.........00......0000 Victory, The (C. C. 395 Vigilancia, The (D. C.) ................. 781 Village of Celina v. Eastport Sav. Bank

(0. 0. A.) ............................ 401 Village of Maumee, Cornell University v.

(C. 0.) .............................. 418 Voss v. Neineber (0. C.) ................ 947 Wagner, Griswold v. (0. C. A.). . . . . . . . . . 494 Wakelee, Davis v. (C. C. A.) ............ 522

Wilker, Denver & R. G. R. Co. v. (C. 0. 03 Walsh. %1 'Biédlil'iii 'a' if. 'iréi-r'i '06: '(0'. " 0. A.) ............................... 507 Walters v. Western dz A. R. Co. (0. 0.). . .1002 Watson v. United States Sugar Refinery

(C. 0. A.) ........................... 769 Watson, Society of Shakers at Pleasant

Hill v. (0. 0. A.) ............ 730 Webster v. Bell (0. C. A.) .............. 183 Wedderin, Frank v. (C. 0. A.). . . . . . . . . . . 818 \Vertheimer v. United States (0. C.) ...... 186

Western Assur. Co. v. Bedding (0. 0. A.). . 708 Western Assur. 00. v. Southern Cotton Oil

00. (C. C. A.) ........................ 924 Western Assur. 00. v. Southwestern Transp. Co. (0. 0. A.) ................ 923

Wisiern Union Tel. 00. v. Coggin (0. C. 137 wéétei-a' 'U'ni'o'n' 'TélI 'v'f 'I-iéndéiéoh' '(C'. 588 Western cilia; T751100... 'b'iiéh'éi (CI 0.): I 630 Western & A. R. 00., Walters v. (C. C.). .1002

Weyant v. The Petersburg (D. C.) ....... 387 Wheeler v. City of Chicago (0. C.) ........ 526‘ Wheeling Bridge & Terminal R. Co. v.

Cochran (C. C. A.) ................... 141 White v. Keller (0. 0. A.) ..... . . . . . . . . . 796 Whitehall. The. Briggs v. (D. C.) ......... 1022 Wiggin, East Tennessee Iron & Coal Co.

v.(0.0. ..... 446 Williams, The John T. (D. C.) ........... 938 Williams, Woodmanse & Hewitt Manuf’g

Co. v. (C. C. A.) .......... 489

P03. PI]. Wisconsin Trust Co. v. Robinson 8: Gary Woodmanse 8: Hewitt Manufg Co. v. WilCO. (C. C. A.) ooooooooooooo 0.0...0000 (G. C. A.) oooooooooooooo 0000.000 489 Withington-Cooley Manuf’g Co. v. Kinney Woodmfi, United States v. (D. C.). . .. . . . . 536 (C. C. A.). . .............. . ...... . . . . 500 Wuppermann v. The Carib Prince (0. O. CO. A.) ...... O...‘....I.OOOQQQOQOOQOQOQO 2M New York v. (C. C. A.) ............... 529 Woodard v. Ellword Gas Stove 8: Stamp- Yumuri, The, Beebe v. (D. O.)........... 930

in: CO. (0. o.) 00......0000.0.00000.0

Page Abbett 1. Railway 00., 30 Minn. 482, 16 N. W. 266 ........................... 151 Abraham v. Ordway, 15 Sup. Ct. 894. . . . . 768 Adams v. Trust 00., 66 Fed. 617 ........ 517 "Adams Express 00. v. Milton, 11 Bush, 49 115 Aguirre v. Allen, 10 Barb. 74 ............ 243 Alabama G. L. Ins. 00. v. Johnston, 80 Ala. 467 2 South. 125 ................ 715 Alabama 6.. s. R. 00. v. 0humley, 92 Ala. 317, 9 South. 286 ..................... 689 Alabama, The, & The Game 000k, 92 U. S. 695 ........................... 399, 400 Alexander, In re, 1 Low. 530, Fed. 0as. No. 162 . . . . ......................... 890

Allen v. Bank, 120 U. S. 20 7 Sup. Ct. 460 864 Allen v. Deacon, 21 Fed. 667

Allen v. Demarest, 41 N. J. Eq. 162, 2

Atl. 655 .......................... .. 381 Allen v. Insurance 00., 85 N. Y. 475 ..... 533 Allen v. Railroad 00., 114 U. S. 311, 5 Sup.

Ct. 925 962 .......................... 597 Allis v. Jones, 45 Fed. 148 .............. 741 Alvis v. Oglesby, 87 Tenn. 182, 10 S. W.

313 ................................. 450 Alzena, The 14 Fed. 174 ............... 229 Ambler v. 0hoteau, 107 U. s. 586, 590, 591,

1 Sup. Ct. 556 .................... 191, 263 American Cable R. 00. v. City of New

York, 56 Fed. 149 .................... 227 American Cent. Ins. 00. v. Hettler, 37 Neb.

849. 56 N. W. 711 ................. 687, 689 American Ins. 00. v. Canter, 1 Pet. 511,

546 ................................. 901 Ames v. Howard, 1 Sumn. 482, Fed. Gas.

No. 326 ........................... . . 829 Ames v. Quimby, 106 U. S. 342, 1 Sup. 0

116 ................................. 861

Ames v. Railway 00., 64 Fed. 165, 173. .. 728 Anderson v. Anderson, 8 Ohio, 108. .. 35 Anderson v. Shaffer, 10 Fed. 266. . . . . . . . . 696 Andrews v. Hovey, 123 U. S. 267, 8 Sup.

ITCITED.

Page Atchison, T. & S. F. R. 00. v. Myers, 11 0.

Ct. 101 ............................. 558
Anthony v. Anthony, 23 Ark. 479 ......... 325

Antietam Paper 00. v. Publishing 00., 20
S. E. 366........... ................. 762
Antoni v. Greenhow, 107 U. S. 769, 2 Sup.
Ct. 91 ........................... . . .' 597'
Anvil Min. 00. v. Humble, 153 U. S. 540,
14 000000000000000 .QC.....
Arndt v. Grigz, 134 U. S. 316, 10 Sup. Ct.
0000000000 Q.......O..... ..... .00. 6%
Arthur v. Morgan, 112 U. S. 495—501, 5
Sup. Ct. 241 ........ - ................. 4 23
Ashley v. Board, 8 0. 0. A. 455, 60 Fed. 55 421-
As inwall v. Butler, 133 U. S. 595, 607 10
up. or. 417 .................... . .871, 872.
Atchison v. Morris 11 Fed. 582 ......... 441
Atchison, 'r. a s. 9‘. R. 00. v. Maggard 39
Pac.985 692

68 r.

0. A. 439, 63 Fed. 793 ................. 632 Atkinson v. Railwa 00., 15 Ohio St. 21. . 458 Atlantic Works v. rady, 23 O. G. 1330,

107 U. S. 192, 199, 2 Sup. Ct. 225. . .481, 499

Atlas, The, 93 U. S. 302 ................ 399
Auch, Succession of, 39 La. Ann. 1043, 3
South. 227 ........................... 800
Auffmordt v. Hedden, 137 U. S. 310, 11
Sup. Ct. 103 .................... . ..... 908
Aultman’s Appeal, 98 Pa. St. 505. . . . . . . .1013
Averill v. Loucks, 6 Barb. 19,'27 ........ 785
Ayers v. Watson, 113 U. S. 595, 5 Sup. Ct.
641 ................... . ............. 177
Aylesworth v. Gratiot 00., 43 Fed. 350,
355 ................................. 179
Ayres, In re, 123 U. S. 443, 8 Sup. Ct. 164
595, 597
Bacon v. Parker 12 Conn. 213 .......... 607.
Badge Lumber 00. v. Water, etc. 00., 48
Kan. 182, 29 Pac. 476 ................. 971
Badger v. Badger, 2 Wall. 87 ........ 989, 992
Baggarly v. Gaither 2 Jones, Eq. 80 ..... 325
Bailey, Case of, 1 Woolw. 422, 426, Fed.
Gas. No. 730 ......................... 893

Baker v. Bradley, 7 De Gex, M. & G. 597 992
Baldwin v. Telegraph 00., 45 N. Y. 744. . 140

Ballin v. Magone, 41 Fed. 921 ....... 909, 910
Bank of Bellows Falls v. Railroad 00., 28

Vt. 477 ............ . ................. 726
Bank of Commerce v. Tennessee, 104 U. S.

493 ................................. 1006 Bank of Commonwealth of Kentucky v.

Wister, 2 Pet. 319 .................... 591 Bank of South Carolina v. Rose, 1 Strob.

Eq. 257 ............................. 325' Bank of Tennessee v. Horn, 17 How. 157. . 279 Bann v. Dalzell, 3 Car. & P. 276 ......... 115 Bannon v. Warfield, 42 Md. 22 ...... . . . . . 243 Barbed Wire Patent, The 143 U. S. 275, '

292, 12 Sun. Ct. 443. 45 .............. 223 Barber v. Barber, 21 How. 582. . . ....... 738 Barden v. Railroad 00., 154 U. S. 288, 14

Sup. Ct. 1030 ..................... 167 808 Bardon v. Railroad 00., 145 U. S. 535, 12

Sup. Ct. 856. . . . . ..................... 1000
Barnard v. Wheeler, 24 Me. 412. . . . . . . 243

Barney v. Patterson, 6 Bar. & J. 182, 300
Barton v. Barbour, 104 U. S. 126. . . . .279. 624

Bate Refrigerating 00. v. Sulzberger, 15
sup. Cts 508000.. 0 00000000000

Baumer v. Will, 53 Fed. 373............ 226
Baylor’s Lessee v. DeJarnette, 13 Grat. 152 300
Beach v. Machine 00., 63 Fed. 597 ....... 200
Beale \v. 00m. 25 Pa. St. 11, 22 ........ 473
Beatty v. Parker, 141 Mass. 526, 6 N. E.

754.‘..."’............0.0.I...'...O

(xiii)

Page Boyce’s Ex’rs v. Grundy, 3 Pet. 210, 215;

9 Pet. 275, 289 ......... . ..... .20, 738, 863 Boyd v. Blankman, 29 Cal. 19. . . ....... . 682 Boyd v. Hay-Tool Co., 158 U. S. 260, 261,

15 Sup. Ct. 837...... ......... Boyle v. Zacharie, 6 Pet. 648, 658. .. .21, 722 Brace v. Duchess of Marlborough, 2 P.

me. .......... ... 0000000000 COO. Bradlie v. Insurance Co., 12 Pet. 397. .. . 944

Bradshaw v. Insurance Co., 137 N. Y. 137, 32 N. E. 1055 ............. 175 Brand v. U. S.,4Fed.394 ...... ........ 347

Braun v. Saurwein, 10 Wall. 218. . . . . . . . . 649 Breakwater, The, 155 U. S. 252, 15 Su .

......O...‘........... ..... Brennan v. Cité of Titusville, 153 U. S.

289, 14 Sup. t. 829 .................. 471 Brewer v. Nash, 16 R. I. 462 17 Atl. 857. 305 Brewer v. Proprietors, 104 Mass. 378. . . . 773 Bridges v. Sheldon, 18 Blatchf. 507, 515,

7 Fed. 17 .......................... .. 440 Brifham v. Fa erweather, 140 Mass. 411,

4 3, 5 N. E. 65 ...................... 300 Brigham v. Luddington, 12 Blatchf. 237,

Fed. Cas. NO. 1,874 ................... 285 Britannia, The, 153 U. S. 130, 14 Sup. Ct.

Q. ........ O ........... ......‘O... Brobst v. Brock, 10 Wall. 519. ......... 305 Brockway v. Alle 17 Wend. 40. ... .. .. . 740 Broderick’s Will ase, 21 Wall. 503, 52119 990 Bronson v. Schulten, 104 U. S. 410. . . .. . .' 403 Brooks v. Delaplaine, 1 Md. Ch. 354. .. . . 726 Brooks v. Farwell, 1 McCrary, 132, 4 Fed.

166 ............................... . . 441 Browder v. McArthur, 7 Wheat. 58 ...... 861 Brown v. Buena Vista Co., 95 U. S. 157,

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO Q C O I . I . O Brown v. Coal Co., 40 Fed. 849. . .. 722 Brown v. Evans, 17 Fed. 912. . . . .. . . . . . 829 Brown v. Houston, 114 U. S. 622, 5 Sup.

Ct. 1091 .................. . ..... . .. . 757 Brown v. Lodge, 45 N. W. 884 ..... . . 826 Brown v. Maryland, 12 Wheat. 444. . .. . . 692 Brown v. Pi er, 91 U. S. 37 ........ . .. . . 499 Browne v. are, 3 Hurl. & N. 495. . . . .. . 749 Brunsdon v. Allard, 2 El. & El. 27. . . . .. . 739 Bryan v. Forsythe, 19 How. 334 ........ 649 Bucher v. Railroad Co., 125 U. S. 555, 8

Sup. Ct. 974 .......................... 969 Buell, In re, 3 Dill. 116, Fed. Gas. No.

2,102 ........................ 891, 901, 902 Buena Vista Co. v. Railroad Co., 112 U. S.

165, 175, 5 Sup. Ct. 84 ............... 166 Bullard v. Railroad Co., 122 U. S. 167, 7

Sup. Ct. 1149 .................... 1000. 1001 Bunce v. West, 62 Iowa 80, 17 N. W. 179 308 Burgess v. Seligman, 107 U. S. 20, 35 2

Sup. Ct. 10 ................ .. . . ...1069, 1012 Burke v. McDonald 29 Pac. 10 . . . . . . . . . 814 Burkhardt, In re, 33 Fed. 25, 26 ....... . . 893 Burlington & M. R. R. CO. v. Hall, 37

Iowa, 620, 622 .......... ..... ..... ... 36 Burnes v. Scott, 117 U. S. 589, 6 Sup. Ct.

-—_—

Page
Bedsworth v. Bowman, 104 Mo. 44, 49, 15

S. W. 990 ........................... 789
Beeche Dene, The, 5 C. C. A. 208, 55 Fed.

526 .......................... 720
Beevor v. Luck L. R. 4 Eq. 537. ... ... . 322
Bell v. Cunningham, 3 Pet. 69. . . . .. ... .. 243
Bellows v. Goodall, 32 N. H. 97. ... .. .. . 607
Belote v. White, 2 Head, 712. . . . . . . . . . . . 449
Benjamin v. Cavaroc, 2 Woods, 168, Fed.

Gas. No. 1 300 ....................... 21
Bennecke v. Insurance Co., 105 U. S. 355,

359 ............................. 243, 244
Bennett v. Butterworth, 11 How. 669 ..... 21
Bennett v. Glenn, 5 C. C. A. 353, 55 Fed.

956 . . . . . ............................ 1007

Bennett v. Insurance Co., 39 Minn. 254,

39 N. W. 4 ......................... 151
Benson v. McMahon, 127 U. S. 457, 466, 8

Sup. Ct. 1240 ...................... . . . 899
Bentlif v. Finance Corp., 44 Fed. 667. . .. 439
Ber l, The. 9 Prob. Div. 137. . . . .. .. . . . . 399
Be ea v. Byrd, 95 N. C. 309 ........... 339
Bewley v. Society, 61 How. Prac. 344. .258, 262
Bisho v. Globe Co., 135 Mass. 132. .. .. . 79
Bissel v. Penrose, 8 How. 317 ....... . . . . 645
Blackstone v. Insurance Co., 56 N. Y. 107 701
Blair v. Railroad Co. 23 Fed. 523. . . . . .. 41
Blalock v. Manuf’g Co., 110 N. C. 99, 14

S. E. 501 ....................... ..... 762
Blantire v. Whitaker, 11 Humph. 314. . . . . 449
Blatchley v. Osborn 33 Conn. 226 ....... 79
Bleidorn v. Mining Co., 89 Tenn. 188, 189,

15 S. W. 737 ......................... 449

Blessing v. Copper Works, 34 Fed. 753. . . . 353,

Blight v. Fisher, Pet._C. C. 41, Fed. Gas.

No. 1,542 ............................ 440
Blodgett v. Race, 18 Hun, 132 .......... 894
Bloomington Mut. Life Ben. ASS’n v. Blue.

120 Ill. 121, 11 N. E. 331 ............. 826
Blossom v. Railroad Co., 1 Wall. 655 ..... 305
Board of Com’rs of Hamilton CO. v. Sher-

wood, 11 C. C. A. 507, 64 Fed. 103 ..... 179 Board of Com’rs of Osborne Co. v. Honn,

23 Kan. 256 ......................... 172 Board of Com’rs of Wyandotte Co. v. Ab

bott, 52 Kan. 148, 157, 34 Pac. 416 ..... 879
Board of County Com’rs of Harper Co, v.

Rose, 140 U. S. 71, 11 Sup. Ct. 710 ..... 421
Board of Directors v. Tregea, 88 Cal. 334,

26 Pac. 237 .......................... 956
Board of Liquidation v. McComb, 92 U. S.

531, 541 ...................... 592, 594, 597 Bodley v. Ta lor, 5 Cranch, 191 ......... 21 Bogardus v, nsurance Co., 101 N. Y. 328,

4 N. E. 522 .................... . ..... 258
Boggs v. Martin, 13 B. Mon. 239 ........ 427

Bolivia, The, 1 C. C. A. 221, 49 Fed. 169. . 391
Bolles v. Brimfield, 120 U. S. 759, 763, 7

Sup. Ct. 736 ......................... 172
Bollman, Case of, 4 Cranch, 75 ...... 894, 896
Bonner, In re, 151 U. S. 242, 14 Su . Ct.

323 .......................... 47 , 473, 538
Book v. Mining Co., 58 Fed. 120. . . . . . . . . 814
Booth v. Railroad Co., 73 N_. Y._38. . . . . . . 153
Boston Electric Co. v. Gaslighting Co., 23

Fed. 838 ....... . .................... 696
Boston & M. R. Co., In re, 5 Interst. Com-

merce Com. R. (Ofi. Ed.) 69—83 ......... 883

Bound v. Railway Co., 50 Fed. 312. .. .. . . 626
Bowman v. \Vathen, 1 How. 189. . . . . . . . 992
Bowne v. Lynde, 91 N. Y. 92. ........... 318

865 ............................... . . 630 Burnett v. Kensington, 7 Durn. & E. 7

R.) 000000 00.00.000.000024’%2 Burnham v. Bowen, 111 U. S. 776, 4 Sgg.

Ct. 675 . . .......... o ............... , 624 Burns v. Sewell, 48 Minn. 425, 51 N. W.

......O.........OOOOOOQOOO.......

« Forrige Fortsett »

Bøker