Sidebilder
PDF
ePub
[graphic][merged small][merged small]

CO., 45 Fed. 582 ...................... 191

Caledonia, The, 157 U. S. 124, 15 Sup. Ct.

Cincinnati v. Deikmeier. 31 Ohio St. 242. 300
City and County of San Francisco v. Flood,

64 Cal. 509, 2 Pac. 264 ............... 345

City of Clinton v. Railway CO., 37 Iowa. 61 84

City of Logansport v. Seybold, 59 Ind. 225 777

City of Macon, The, 2 C. C. A. 564, 51

Fed. 949 ............................ 924

City of Macon v. Packing CO., 60 Fed. 781,

537 .............................. 233, 255

Campbell v. Insurance CO., 98 Mass. 381. . 826

Candee v. Lord, 2 N. Y. 269 ............. 300

Cannon v. A person, 14 Lea. 555 ........ 689

Cantrell v. \1 allick, 117 U. S. 689, 690, 6

Sup. Ct. 970 ...................... 224, 354

Capital Bank of St. Paul v. School Dist.,

11 C. C. A. 514, 63 Fed. 938 ........... 179

Carey v. Railway CO., 52 Fed. 671 ....... 282

Carondelet v. St. Louis. 1 Black, 179. . . . 646

Carpenter v. Strange, 141 U. S. 87, 106,

11 Sup. Ct. 960 ....................... 304

Carr v. Duval, 14 Pet. 77 ............... 749
Carr v. Gale, 1 Curt. 384, Fed. C218. No.

2,433 ................................ 829

Carroll v. Johnston, 2 Jones, Eq._120 ..... 325

Carroll Co. v. Smith, 111 U. S. 562, 4 Sup.

Ct. 539 .............................. 969

Carson v. Railroad CO., 88 Tenn. 646, 13

S. W. 588 ........................... 697

Case v. Beauregard, 101 U. S. 688 ....... 724

Cassidy v. Hall, 97 N. Y. 165 ........... 411

Catholic Bishop of Nesqually v. Gibbon,

158 U. S. 155, 15 Sup. Ct. 779 ......... 569

Catterlin v. Armstrong, 79 Ind. 514. . .308, 332
Cavin v. Gleason, 105 N. Y. 256, 11 N. E.

504 ................................. 982
Cayzer v. Taylor, 10 Gray, 274 .......... 153
Central Irr. Dist. v. De Lappe, 79 Cal.

352, 21 Pac. 825 ..................... 956

Central Trust Co. v. Bridges, 6 C. C. A.

539, 57 Fed. 753 .................. 108, 282

Central Trust CO. v. Condon, 67 Fed. 84. . 116
Central Trust Co.- v. Locomotive Works, _

135 U. S. 207, 10 Sup. Ct. 736 ......... 30;)

Central Trust Co. v. Railway CO., 59 Fed.

523; 68 Fed. 90 ................... 107, 687

' Centurion, The, 68 Fed. 382 ............. 919

Chaffee v. Hayward, 20 How. 208 ...... 695

Cléfifsfin v. Taylor, 116 U. S. 567, 6 Sup. Ct. 861

Chamberlain v. Preble, 11 Allen. 370 ...... 822

Chamberlain v. Thompson, 10 Conn. 251. . 325
Chapman v. Publishing CO., 128 Mass. 478 381
Chapman Valve Manuf’g Co. v. Water CO.,

60 N. W. 1004 ...................... _.1008

Chappell v. Waterworth, 155 U. S. 102, 15

Sup. Ct. 34 .......................... 9

Charles River Bridge v. Bridge, 11 Pet.

419, 571, 585 ......................... 591

Charlotte. C. & A. R. Co. v. Gibbes, 142

U. S. 386, 12 Sug. Ct. 255 ............. 600

Chase v. McDonal , 7 Ear. & J. 196, 197. 325

Chateaugay Ore & Iron Co.. Petition of,

128 U. S. 554, 9 Sup. Ct. 150.......... 829

9 C. C. A. 262 ....................... 728

City of Minneapolis v. Reum, 56 Fed. 576,

6 C. C. A. 31 ......................... 579

City of New York v. Railroad Co.. 9 C. C.

A. 336, 66 Fed. 1016; 102 N. Y. 572, 7

N. E. 905 ......................... 227.

City of Philadelphia v. Railway CO., 102

Pa. St. 190, 196 ...................... -

City of St. Louis v. Lane, 110 Mo. 254,

258. 19 S. \V. 533 ..................... 790

Claiborne Co. v. Brooks, 111 U. S. 400,

410, 4 Sup. Ct. 489 ...................

Clark, In re, 2 Ben. 540, Fed. Gas. No.

2,797 ............................... 890

Clark v. Belknap, 13 S. \V. 212 ......... 3115

Clark v. Brockway, *42 N. Y. 13 ......... 144

Clark v. Keith, 106 U. S. 464, 1 Sup. Ct.

......... 00 ooooooo o ooooo 0.00.0000

Clark v. Masters, 1 Bosw. 17 7 . 185 ...... 381

Clark v. Trust CO., 100 U. S. 149 ..... 682, 683

Clark v. Wooster, 119 U. S. 325, 7 Sup.

Ct. 217 ............................. 493

Clarke v. Lyon CO., 7 Nev. 75 .......... 243

Clayton v. Shoemaker, 67 Md. 216, 9 Atl.

635 ................................. 89
Cleveland, C.. C. & St. L. R. Co. v. Brown,

6 C. C. A. 142, 56 Fed. 804 ............ 828

ClgvellasIéd & P. R. Co. v. Kelley, 5 Ohio

11.

I0..COOOOOOOOOOOOOOCOOOOIIOQOO

[blocks in formation]

Atl. 1083 .................... . ....... Consolidated Electric Light CO. v. Light

241.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

CO., 20 Fed. 502 ...................... 913 Continental Life Ins. CO. v. Chamberlain,

132 U. S. 304, 10 Sup. Ct. 87 ........... 786 Continental Life Ins. CO. v. Rhoads, 119

U. S. 237, 7 Sup. Ct. 193 ............... 735 Conwell v. Canal CO., 4 Biss. 195, Fed.

Gas. No. 3,148 ........................ 282 Cook v. Tullis, 18 Wall. 332, 338 ........ 1010 Cool v. Cunningham, 25 S. C. 136 ..... . . . 794 Coombs v. Jordan, 3 Bland, 284 ....... . . . 325 Coon v. Wilson, 113 U. S. 268—277, 5 Sup.

Ct. 537 ............................. 222 Cooper v. Reynolds, 10 “'all. 318 ..... 687, 695 Coppins v. Railroad CO., 122 N. '. 557, 25

N. E. 915 ............................ 153 Corbin Cabinet Lock CO. v. Lock CO., 150

U. S. 38, 14 Sup. Ct. 28 ............... 222 Corbleys v. Ripley, 22 W. Va. 154 ...... . . 338 Corning, In re, 51 Fed. 205, 206 ...... 891, 892 Cornish v. Abington, 4 Earl. & N. 549. . . .

135, 749 Cotten v. Casualty CO., 41 Fed. 506 ....... 463 Coupe v. Royer, 155 U. S. 565-576, 15 Sup.

Ct. 199 ............................. 211 Courthope v. Mapplesden, 10 Ves. 290. . . . 89 Covell v. Heyman, 111 U. S. 76, 4 Sup.

Ct. 355 ............................. 279 Covington & C. Bridge 00. v. Com., 154 U.

S. 204, 14 Sup. Ct. 1087 ............... 471 Cowdre v. Railroad CO., 1 Woods, 331,

Fed. as. NO. 3,293 ...... . ............ 68 Cox v. Troy, 5 Barn. & Ald. 474. .. .. .. . . 749

Crafts v. Crafts, 13 Gray, 260. . . . . . . . . . . 299

Page Cragin v. Powell, 128 U. S. 691, 9 Sup. Ct. 203 ............................. 167 Crall v. Irrigation Dist., 87 Cal. 140, 26 Pac. 797 ...................... 956 Crim v. Handley, 94 U. S. 652 .......... 403 Crocker Nat. Bank v. Pagenstecher, 44 Fed. 706 ............................ 696 Cromwell v. County Of Sac, 94 U. S. 351. . 296, 822 Cropper v. Coburn, 2 Curt. 465, 472, Fed. Gas. No. 3,416 ........................ 21 Crusoe v. Butler, 36 Miss. 150 ........ 800, 801 Crutcher v. Kentucky, 141 U. S. 47, 11 Sup. Ct. 851 ....................... . . . 471 Ci'utsinger v. Catron, 10 Humph. 24. . . . . . 449 Cumberland Telegraph & Telephone CO. v. Loomis, 87 Term. 504, 11 S. W. 356. .. . 633

Cummings v. Peters, 56 Cal. 593. . . . . . . . . 959

Cummins v. Fletcher, 14 Ch. Div. 699. .. 322 Cunningham v. Railroad CO., 109 U. S.

446, 3 Sup. Ct. 292, 609 ............ 594, 597 Cunningham v. Thomas, 59 Ala. 158 ..... 46 Currin v. Spraull, 10 Grat. 145 .......... 722 Curtis v. Broadwell, 24 N. W. 265, 266. . . 780 Curtis v. Leavitt, 15 N. Y. 9, 51, 85, 154,

229 .............................. 300, 782 Curtner v. U. S., 149 U. S. 676, 13 Sup.

Ct. 985, 1041 ................ . .617, 618 Cuyler v. W'ayne, 64 Ga. 88 ........... .. 46 Dale v. Turner, 34 Mich. 405, 416. . . .162, 163 Dalzell v. Manuf’g CO., 149 U. S. 315, 13

Sup. Ct. 886 ......................... 749 Davenport v. City Of Hannibal, 120 M0.

150, 25 S. W. 364 .................... 789 Davenport Plow CO. v. Lamp, 80 Iowa,

722, 45 N. \V. 1049 ............... 981, 982 Davie v. Mining CO., 93 Mich. 491, 53 N.

W. 625 ............................. 794 Davis v. Gray, 16 \Vall. 203, 220 ..... 592, 597 Davis v. Shields, 26 \Vend. 341 .......... 242 Davis v. Wakelee, 15 Sup. Ct. 555 ....... 524 Davis’ Adm’r v. \Veibbold, 139 U. S. 507,

519, 524, 11 Sup. Ct. 628 .............. 815 Dawson v. Black, 148 III. 484, 36 N. E.

413 ................................. 781 Dayton, X, & B. R. CO. v. Lewton, 20

Ohio St. 401 .......................... 327 Deering v. Harvester \Vorks, 155 U. S. 286,

15 Sup. Ct. 118 ........... 200, 211, 212, 224 De Estrada v. \Vater CO., 46 Fed. 280. . . . . 618

Deffeback v. Hawke, 115 U. S. 392, 404, 6
Sup. Ct. 95 ........................ .. . 814
De Hahn v. Hartley, 1 Term R. 343 .....
711, 712, 714
De la Croix v. Chamberlain. 12 Ithat. 601 642
Delano v. Butler, 118 U. S. 634, 649, 7 Sup.

Ct. 39 ............................ 871, 872 Delano v. Scott, Gilp. 489, Fed. Gas No.

3.753 ................................ 206 Delaware, L. & W. R. CO. v. Converse,

139 U. S. 469, 11 Sup. Ct. 569 ......... 151 Delaware Railroad Tax Case, 18 Wall.

206, 226 .............................. 343 Dempsey v. Oswego Tp., 2 C. C. A. 110,

51 Fed. 97 .................... ....... 172

Denise v. Ruggles, 16 How. 243. . . . . . . . . 642
Dennick v. Railroad CO., 103 U. S. 11. .. . 2
Dent v. Emmeger, 14 Wall. 312 ...... 641, 644
De Sollar v. Hanscome, 158 U. S. 216, 15
sup. 81600......0............Q"‘

Page I

Detroit v. Osborne, 135 U. S. 492, 499, 10

Sup. Ct. 1012 ......................... 172 ' Page

Devall v. Burbridge, 4 Watts & S. 305. . . . 243 Dewey v. Coal 00., 123 U. S. 329, 8 Sup.

Ct. 148 .............................. 279 Diehl v. Insurance 00., 58 Pa. St. 443. . . 244 Dimock v. Copper 00., 117 U. S. 559, 560,

6 Sup. Ct. 855 .................... 286, 296 Distilled Spirits, The, 11 Wall. 356, 367. . . 243 Dodge v. Briggs, 27 Fed. 160 ........... 656 Dodge v. Woolsey, 18 How. 331 ....... . . . 773 Doe v. Langlands, 14 East, 370 .......... 800 Doe v. Morgan, 6 Barn. & C. 512, 13 E. C.

L. 235 ............................... 800 Doebler’s Appeal. 64 Pa. St. 9, 15. . . .. . . . 250 Doig, In re, 4 Fed. 193 ................ 882 Donkle v. Milem, 88 Wis. 33, 39, 59 N. W.

586 ............................... . . 864 Donnell v. Insurance 00., 2 Sumn. 371,

Fed. Gas. No. 3,987 ................... 72

Doolan v. Carr, 125 U. S. 632, 8 Sup. Ct.

1228 ................................ 335 Doolittle v. Plenz, 20 N. W. 116 ........ 780 Dorsey v. Packwood, 12 How. 126 ....... 794 Douglass v. County of Pike, 101 U. S. 686 969

Douglass v. Insurance 00., 138 N. Y. 209,

219, 33 N. 'E. 938, 940 ......... 689, 690, 692 Dower v. Richards, 151 U. S. 658—662, 14 Sup. Ct. 452 ......................... 816

Downing v. Palmateer, 1 T. B. Mon. 70. .

Drainage of Lands, In re, 35 N. J. Law, I 497 ................................. 959 Dubuque & P. R. 00. v. Litchfield, 23

How. 66 ............................. 99 Duke v. Markham, 105 N. 0. 138, 10 S.

E. 1003 .............................. 762 Dunham v. Manqu 00., 154 U. S. 103, 14

[graphic]
[ocr errors]
[graphic]
[graphic]
[graphic]
[graphic]

Sup. Ct. 986 .......................... 222 Dunlap v. Schofield, 152 U. S. 244, 14 Sup.

Ct. 576 .............................. 667 Durant v. Essex 00., 7 Wall. 107, 110. . . . 773 Duson v. Dupre, 32 La. Ann. 896 ........ 58, 59 Dutcher v. Wright, 94 U. S. 553 ......... 783 Dwight v. Insurance 00., 103 N. Y. 341,

346, 8 N. E. 654 ...................... 714 East Band of Cherokee Indians v. U. S.,

117 U. S. 288, 6 Sup. Ct. 718 .......... 578 East of England Banking 00., In re, 4 0h.

App. 14 .............................. 749 Edwin I. Morrison, The, 153 U. S. 199. 14

Sup. Ct. 823 ................. 233, 255, 920 Eells v. Ross, 64 Fed. 417, 12 0. 0. A.

205 ............................. 583. 585 Eggleston v. Wagner, 46 Llich. 610, 620, 10

N. W. 37 ............................ 749 Eleanora, The, 17 Blatchf. 88, Fed. Gas.

No. 4,335 ............................ 399 Eliason v. Henshaw, 4 Wheat. 25 ....... 241 Elk v. Wilkins, 112 U. S. 100, 5 Sup. Ct. 41 579 Ellege v. Cooke, 5 Lea. 637 .............. 449 Elliott v. Swartwout, 10 Pet. 137 ......... 909 Ellis v. Johnson, 96 Ind. 377 ........... 318 Elmendorf v. Taylor, 10 Wheat. 168 ..... 989 Elmer v. Locke, 135 Mass. 575 ....... . .. 153 El Rio, The, 66 Fed. 360 ................ 942 Emery v. Berry, 28 N. H. 473 ........... 607 Emigrant Industrial Sav. Bank v. Gold

man. 75 N. Y. 127 ................... 312

Energia, The, 61 Fed. 222, 224. . . . . . . . . 922
v.68F.-—b

Page
Equitable L. A. Soc. v. Clements, 140 U. S.
226, 11 Sup. Ct. 822 .................. 786
Erhardt v. Boaro, 113 U. S. 537, 5 Sup.
(Jto .00....IOOOQOIOOOOOOOOOOOOCOO
Erskine v. Van Arsdale, 15 Wall. 75 ..... 115

Erwin v. Lowry, 7 How. 172. . . . . . 651
Erwin v. Turner, 6 Ark. 14. . . . 649

Estes v. Worthington, 30 Fed. 465. .. .. .. 206
Eureka Case. Fed. Gas. No. 4.548 ........ 813
Evans v. Land 00., 92 Tenn. 348, 21 S.

W. 670 ........................ ......325
Evans v. Tripp. 35 Iowa, 371. 372 ........ 780
Everett v. Coflin. 6 Wend. 603 ...... . . . . . 381
Everett v. Walker, 36 Pac. 616 .......... 691
Everhart v. Huntsville College, 120 U. S.

223, 7 Sup. Ct. 555 .................... 735 Eyre v. Everett. 2 Russ. 381 ............ 22 Eyre v. Jacob, 14 Grat. 422 ......... 753, 754 Fagg v. Martin, 53 Ark. 453, 14 S. W. 647 648 Faneuil Hall Ins. Co. v. Insurance 00.,

153 Mass. 70. 26 N. E. 244 ........... 702 Farez, In re, 7 Blatchf. 345, 357, Fed. Gas.

No. 4,645 ............................ 893 Farmers’ Loan 8.: Trust 00. v. Goal 00., 50

Fed. 481 ............................. 626

Farmers’ Loan & Trust 00. v. Gas Light
00., 84 Hun, 373, 32 N. Y. Supp. 385. . . 784

Farmers’ Loan & Trust 00. v. Railroad
00., 44 Fed. 115; 45 Fed. 664; 53 Fed.

182 ........................ . . .37, 39, 285 Farnley, The, 8 Fed. 629 ....... . . . . ..... 1021 Farwell v. Grier, 38 Iowa, 83. . . . ........ 781 Finance 00. of Pennsylvania v. Railroad

00., 61 Fed. 369 ...................... 759 First Nat. Bank v. Francklyn, 120 U. S.

747, 7 Sup. Ct. 757 ................... 79 First Nat. Bank v. Insurance 00., 45 Conn.

22; 95 U. S. 673, 679 .............. 79, 250 First Nat. Bank v. Morgan, 132 U. S. 141,

10 Sup. Ct. 37 ........................ 2

First Nat. Bank of Cleveland v. Shedd, 121
U. S. 74, 87, 7 Sup. Ct. 807. . . .289. 313, 327
Fishburn v. Railway 00., 137 U. S. 60, 11
Sup. 0t. '8 ........................... 829
Fitzgerald & Mallory Const. 00. v. Fitz-
gerald, 137 U. S. 98—106, 11 Sup. 0t. 36. 444
Fitzsimmons v. Johnson, 90 Tenn. 416, 17

S. WV. 100 ........................... 688
Flanagan v. Westcott, 11 N. J. Eq. 264. .

300, 303

Fletcher v. McArthur (No. 235) 68 Fed. 65. 67

Fletcher v. Peck, 6 Granch, 87 ........... 18 blood v. Telegraph 00., 131 N. Y. 603, 30

N. E. 196 ........................... 633

Florentine v. Barton. 2 Wall. 210 ......... 61

Floyd v. Perrin, 30 S. 0. 1, 8 S. E. 14.855, 856
Floyd’s Heirs v. J Ohnson, 2 Litt. (Ky.) 114 451
Fong Yue Ting v. U. S., 149 U. S. 698,

13 Sup. Ct. 1016 ...................... 885 Forsyth v. City of Hammond, 40 N. E. 267 776

Ft. Scott v. Hickman, 112 U. S. 160, 5
Sup. Ct. 56 .......................... 863
Ft. \Vayne. 0. & L. R. 00. v. Grufi, 132
Ind. 13. 31 N. E. 460 ................. 633
Ft. Worth & D. 0. R. 00. v. Mackney, 18
S. W. 949 ................... 153
Fosdick v. Schall, 99 U. S. 235. ....... ..\ 624
Fox v. Doherty, 30 Iowa, 334. . 607

Fraser v. Thrift, 50 Cal. 476. .... ....... 346

[ocr errors]

Freiday v. Transit 00.. 60 N. W. 656. .. . 84
Fremont v. U. S., 17 How. 554. .641, 642, 647
French, Ex parte, 91 U. S. 423 ...... . . . . . 862
Frisbie v. Whitney, 9 Wall. 192. . . . . . . . . . 643
Frische v. Kramer, 16 Ohio, 125 ...... . . . 312
Front St. Cable R. Co. v. Johnson, 2 Wash.

St. 113. 25 Pac. 1084 .............. 968, 970
Frost v. Bank, 70 N. Y. 553—556 ......... 785
Frogszt v. Wenie, 157 U. S. 46, 15 Sup. Ct. 737

5 ................................. Frothingham v. Jenkins. 1 Cal. 42 ....... 427 Fuentes v. U. S., 22 How. 443. 460. . . .645, 649 Fulghum v. Cotton, 3 Tenn. Ch. 299 ..... 312 Fuller v. Bradley, 25 Pa. St. 120. . . . . .. . 427 Gage v. Kaufman, 133 U. S. 473, 10 Sup. _

Ct. 406 .............................. 950 Gaines v. Fuentes, 92 U. S. 10, 21 ........ 35 Gaines v. New Orleans, 1 Woods, 104, Fed.

Cas. No. 5,177 ........................ 68 Gale v. O’Connor, 43 La. Ann. 717, 9 “ - South. 557 ......................... .. 58 Galesburg v. Hawkinson, 75 II]. 152 ..... . 775 Galgate Ship Co. v. Starr & 00., 58 Fed.

894 ........................ _. ........ 235 Gallego’s Ex’rs v. Lambert, 3 Lergh, 450. .

802. 803 Galloway v. Hamilton, 68 Wis. 651. 32 N.

W. 636 ........................... _._. .1010 Galveston R. Co. v. Cowdrey, 11 Wall.459—

482 ........................... 40, 73, 288 Gandy v. Marble, 122 U. S. 432, 7 Sup.

Ct. 1290 ......................... 564, 567 Gardner v. Railroad Co., 150 U. S. 349,

361, 14 Sup. Ct. 140 ................... 859 Garragan v. Iron-Works Co., 158 Mass.

596. 33 N. E. 652 ..................... 633 Garrett v. Boeing (No. 197) 68 Fed. 51. . .

62, 63, 65-67 Gay v. Parpart, 106 U. S. 699, 1 Sup. Ct.

456 ................................. 315 Gaylord v. Railroad 00., 6 Biss. 286, Fed. _

Gas. No. 5,284 ........................ 720 Georgia, The, v. The Luckenbach, 67 Fed. 5_5

619 ................................. 1 Georgia v. Madrazo, 1 Pet. 110 .......... 590 German Bank v. Schloth, 59 Iowa. 316. 13

N. W. 314, 317 ....................... 781 German Ins. Co. of Freeport, 111., v. Fred

erick, 7 C. C. A. 122, 125, 126, 58 Fed. 149

144 ................................. Gibson v. Mason. 5 Nev. 285 ...... . . . . . . . 343 Giles Loring, The, 48 Fed. 463 ........... 920 Glassey v. Insurance Co., 32 N. Y. Supp.

335 ................................. 826 Glenfruin, The, 10 Prob. Div. 103 ........ 255 Glenlivet, The, Prob. Div. (1893) 164; Prob.

Div. (1894) 48 ........................ 252 Glenn v. Liggett, 135 U. S. 533, 542, 10

Sup. Ct. 867 ......................... 1007 Glenn v. Smith, 2 Gill & J. 493 .......... 607 Glenn v. U. S., 13 How. 250 ............. 642 Glue Co. v. Upton. 97 U. S. 3 ............ 912 Goble v. Gale, 7 Blackf. 218 .......... . . . 781 Godden v. Kimmell, 99 U. S. 211 ......... 992 Godwin v. Francis, L. R. 5 C. P. 295 ..... 746

Golden v. Morning News, 42 Fed. 112.439, 444
Goldey v. Morning News, 156 U. S. 518, 15

Sup. Ct. 559.................439, 443, 688

[graphic]
[graphic]
[graphic]
[ocr errors]

Page
Goode v. Gaine 145 U. S. 141. 154, 12
S Ct 839 a,

up. . ......................... 71 Good Hope 00. v. Railw Barb Fenci

00., 22 Fed. 635 ....... ’7. ........... ’3? 444 Goodman v. Grifliths, 1 Hurl. & N. 577. .. 242 Goom v. Afialo, 6 Barn. & C. 117 ........ 242 Gordon v. Hobart, 2 Sumn. 401. 403, Fed.

Cas. No. 5,609 ....................... 21 Gormley v. Clark, 134 U. S. 338, 10 Sup.

Ct. 554 ............................. . 737 Graham v. Holt, 4 B. Mon. 61 ........... 781 Graham v. Railroad 00., 118 U. S. 161,

177, 6 Sup. Ct. 1009 .................. 1007 Grand Trunk R. Co. v. Cummings, 106 U.

S. 700, 702, 1 Sup. Ct. 493 ........... . 153 Grand Trunk R. Co. v. Ives, 144 U. S. 408,

417, 12 Sup. Ct. 679 ......... .. .. ..151, 859 Granite State, The, 3 Wall. 310....... .. 251 Grant v. Ludlow, 8 Ohio St. 1. . . . . ...... 286 Grant v. Strong, 18 Wall. 623 ........... 94 Graves v. Pinchback, 47 Ark. 470, 1 S.

\V. 682 .............................. 607 Gray v. Nelson, 77 Iowa, 63, 41 N. W. 566

. 308, 332 Gray v. Railroad 00., 24 Fed. 168 ........ 153 Ggieley v. Lowe, 155 U. S. 58, 15 ,Sup. Ct. Green v. Bogue, 15 Sup. Ct. 975 ......... 452 Green v. WVilliams, 92 Tenn. 20, 21 S.

W. 520 ................... . . . . ....... 96 Greene, In re, 52 Fed. 111 ....... . . . . . . . . 899 Greenwich Ins. Co. v. \Vaterman, 4 C. C.

A. 600, 54 Fed. 839 .................. . 748 Greenwood v. The Fletcher, 42 Fed. 504. . 934 Gregerson v. Imlay, 4 Blatchf. 504, Fed.

Gas. No. 5,795 ................ . ...... 629 Gregg v. Forsyth, 24 How. 179 .......... 304) Gresley v. Mousley, 4 De Gex & J. 78. . . . 992 Grevemberg v. Bradford, 44 La. Ann. 400,

4.21, 10 South. 786 .............. 58. 59, 63 Grilfee v. Railroad 00., 2 Interst. Com

merce Com. R. 301 ................... 882 Griffin v. Railroad 00., 124 Ind. 326, 24

N. E. 888; 148 Mass. 143, 145, 19 N.

E. 166 ........................... 153, 633 Grlgnon s Lessee v. Astor, 2 How. 319. . . . 61 Griswold v. Harker, 10 C. C. A. 435, 62

Fed. 389 ............................. 497 Grover v. Llachine 00., 137 U. S. 287, 11

Sup. Ct. 92 .......................... 688 Groves v. Sentell, 13 C. C. A. 386, 66

Fed. 179 ............................. 862 Grusenmeyer v. City of Logansport, 76 Ind.

549 ................................. 776 Guion v. Anderson. 8 Humph. 326 ........ 450 G'ulf, C. & S. F. R. Co. v. Washington, 1

C. C. A. 286. 49 Fed. 347, 353 .......... 154 Gumbel v. Pitkin, 124 U. S. 131. 132. 8

Sup. Ct. 379 ............. 279. 281, 283, 295 Guynn v. McCauley, 32 Ark. 97 ......... 47 Hadley v. Baxendale. 9 Exch. 345. 355. . . 140 Half v. Jenney, 54 Mich. 513. 20 N. W. 563 990 Hagan v. Lucas, 10 Pet. 400 ............ 279 Hagar v. Reclamation Dist. 111 U. S. 708,

4 Sun. Ct. 663 .................... 964, 965 Hagood v. Southern, 117 U. S. 52, 6 Sup.

Ct. 608 ........................... 595, 597 Hall v. Stryker. 27 N. Y. 300

Hall v. Vanness, 49 Pa. St. 457

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

Page Halsey v. Stewart, 4 N. J. Law, 366 ..... 440 Hamblin v. Land Co., 147 U. S. 531, 532,

536, 13 Sup. Ct. 353 ............... 11, 1001 Hamer v. Sharp, L. R. 19 Eq. 108 ....... 746 Hamilton v. Brown, 3 C. C. A. 639, 53 Fed.

753 ................................. 728 Hamilton v. Nutt, 34 Conn. 501 .......... 79 Hammacher v. \Vilson, 26 Fed. 241 ...... 912 Hammerskold v. Rose, 7 Jones (N. C.) 629.. 440 Hammock v. Trust Co., 105 U. S. 77 ..... 327 Hammond v. Hastings, 134 U. S. 404, 10

Sup. Ct. 727 ............... . ......... 79 Hammond v. Hopkins, 143 U. S. 224, 274,

12 Sup. Ct. 418 ................... 768. 993 Hammond v. Winchester, 82 Ala. 470, 2

South. 892 ........................... 89 Handley v. Stutz, 137 U. S. 366, 369, 11

[graphic]

Sup. Ct. 117 .......................... 299 Hanks v. Folsom, 11 Loa, 562. . . . 449 Hanley v. Donoghue, 116 U. S. 1, 6 Sup.

l Ct. 242 .............................. 60 Hannibal & St. J. R. Co. v. Smith, 9 Wall.

95 ............................... 162, 163 Hanson v. Meyer, 6 East, 622 ............ 427 Hapgood v. Hewitt, 119 U. S. 226—233. 7

Sup. Ct. 193 ...................... 502, 506 Harkness v. Hyde, 98 U. S. 476 .......... 439 Harland v. Telegraph Co., 40 Fed. 308. . . . 696 Harman v. U. S., 50 Fed. 922 ........... 472 Harman v. Vaux, 3 Camp. 429 ........ . . . 251 Harriman v. Brown, 8 Leigh. 697. . . . . . . . 338

Harriman v. Railway Co., 45 Ohio St. 11,

32, 12 N. E. 451 ...................... 153 Harrington v. Chambers, 1 Pac. 375, 111

U. S. 350. 4 Sup. Ct. 428 .............. 814 Harris v. Grantham, 1 N. J. Law, 142. . . 440 Harrison v. Smith, 83 Mo. 216 ....... 981, 982 Hart v. Railroad Co., 86 Wis. 483, 57 N.

)V. 91 ............................... 864 Hart v. Sansom, 110 U. S. 151, 3 Sup. Ct.

586 ................................. 688 Hartford L. & A. Ins. Co. v. Unsell, 144

U. S. 439, 12 Sup. Ct. 671 .......... ' . . . 786 Harvesting Mach. Co. v. Walthers, 134 U.

S. 44, 10 Sup. Ct. 485 ................. 946 Harvey v. Railroad Co., 5 Interst. Com

merce Com. R. (011. Ed.) 153 ........... 883

Harwood v. Railroad Co., 17 Wall. 78, 81... 768 Hassall v. Wilcox, 130 U. S. 493, 9 Sup. Ct.

590 ................................. 1008 Hastie v. De Peyster, 3 Caines, 196 ...... 702 Hastings & D. R. Co. v. Whitney, 132 U.

S. 357, 10 Sup. Ct. 112 ............ 168, 1000

Hatch v. Railroad Co., 9 Fed. 856 ....... 68 Hawkins v. Glenn, 131 U. S. 319, 329, 9

Sup. Ct. 739 .......................... 1007 Hayward v. Bank, 96 U. S. 611, 617 ..... 768 eald v. Carey, 11 C. B. 977, 993 ........ 548 efner v. Insurance Co., 123 U. S. 747, 8 Sup. Ct. 337 ......................... 306 eidritter v. Oil-Cloth Co., 112 U. S. 294, 300, 301, 5 Sup. Ct. 135 ........ 279, 283, 284 enderson Cotton Manuf’g Co. v. Machine Shops, 86 Ky. 668, 7 S. W. 142 ........ 115 endrickson v. Railroad Co. 22 Fed. 569. . 439 ennessey v. Woolworth, 128 U. s. 438, 442, 9 Sup. Ct. 109 ................... 746 erndon v. Insurance Co., 14 S. E. 742. . 175 erndon v. Kuykendall’s Heirs, 58 Tex.

...... . ............ 683

[graphic]
[graphic][graphic]
[blocks in formation]

Hill v. Building Co., 60 N. W. 752, 755,

757 ............................. 780, 781 Hill v. Railroad Co., 11 )Vis. 215 ........ 1009 Hill v. Rufiner, 21 W. Va. 152 ........... 340 Hilton v. Merritt, 110 U. S. 97, 3 Sup. Ct.

548 ................................. 908 Hilton v. Woods, L. R. 4 Eq. 432 ......... 630 Himer v. Rose, 5 Cranch, 313 .......... 861 Hinchman v. Kelley, 4 C. C. A. 189, 54

Fed. 63 .............................. 993 Hlnckley v. Morton, 103 U. S. 764. . . .861, 862 Hittinger v. Westford, 135 Mass. 258 ..... 634 Hodge v. Palms (No. 232) 68 Fed. 61. . . .65—67 Hodson v. Treat, 7 \Vis. 263 ........ 300, 303 Hogan v. Kurtz, 94 U. S. 779 ............ 451 Hohorst, In re, 150 U. S. 653, 663, 14 Sup.

Ct. 221 .............................. 444 Holland v. Challen, 110 U. S. 15, 3 Sup. Ct.

495 ................................. 737

Holland v. Railroad Co., 16 Lea, 414. ..692, 693 Hollender v. Magone, 149 U. S. 586, 13

Sup. Ct. 932 ................... . ...... 910 Hollins v. Iron Co., 150 U. S. 371, 14 Sup.

Ct. 127 .............................. 724 Holmes v. Goldsmith, 147 U. S. 150, 156,

13 Sup. Ct. 288 ....................... 179 Hopkins’ Heirs v. Calloway, 7 Cold. 37, 46.. 449 Horn v. Dry-Dock Co., 150 U. S. 610, 14

Sup. Ct. 214 .......................... 452 Hornbuckle v. Toombs, 18 Wall. 648, 655... 901 Hornsby v. U. S., 10 Wall. 224 .......... 642 Hoskins v. Carter, 24 N. W. 249 ........ 780 Hot Springs Cases, 92 U. S. 713 ...... 643, 647 Houston & T. Cent. R. Co. v. Mitchell, 38

Tex. 85 ............................. 794 Hovey v. Elliott, 145 N. Y. 126, 139, 39 N.

E. 841 ............................... 903 Howard v. Manuf’g Co., 139 U. S. 199, 206,

207, 11 Su . Ct. 500 ............... 140, 868 Howard v. low YVorks, 35 Fed. 743 ..... 191 Howell v. Ripley, 10 Paige, 43 .......... 308

Howerton v. Sexton, 104 N. C. 75, 10 S. E.

148 ................................. 46 Howes v. Wire-Works Co., 46 Minn. 44, 48

N. W. 448 ............................ 119 Huber v. Manuf’g Co., 148 U. S. 270, 13

Sup. Ct. 603 ......................... 222 Hubert v. Recknagel. 13 Fed. 912 ........ 920 Hudnit v. Nash, 16 N. J. Eq. 550 ......... 299 Hughes v. Worley, 1 Bibb. 200 ........... 325

Hunnicutt v. Peyton, 102 U. S. 333—364. . . 338. 641, 642, 644

Hunton v. Assurance Co., 45 Fed. 661, 662..
258. 262

Ihrie’s Estate, 162 Pa. St. 369. 29 Atl. 750.. 514
Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. Smith, 12 South.
461 ......................... 689, 691, 692
Imperial Fire Ins. Co. v. Coos Co., 151 U.
S. 452,462, 14 Sup. Ct. 379 ............ 714
Improved Fig-Syrup Co. v. Fig-Syrup Co.,
54 Fed. 175. 4 C. C. A. 264 ............. 796
Independent Dist. of Boyer v. King, 80
Iowa, 497, 45 N. W. 908 .............. 981

[graphic]
[graphic]
« ForrigeFortsett »