Sidebilder
PDF
ePub

Page Indianapolis & St. L. R. Co. v. Horst, 93

U. S. 291 ............................ 829 Indianapolis & St. L. R. Co. v. Vance, 96

U. S. 450 ............................ 694 Ingersoll v. Knights of the Golden Rule,

47 Fed. 272 ......................... 826 Inglis v. Trustees, 3 Pet. 100 ...... . .. .. . 802 Inman v. Mead, 97 Mass. 310 .......... . . 300 Insurance Co. v. Gridley, 100 U. S. 614. . . 463 Insurance Co. v. Tweed, 7 Wall. 51 ...... 435 Insurance Co. v. Wilkinson, 13 Wall. 222,

234 235 .............................. 876 Insurance Co. v. Young’s Adm’r, 23 Wall.

86 .................................. 241 Iron Silver Min. Co. v. Cheesman, 116 U.

8.535, 536, 6 Sup. Ct. 481 .......... 813, 816 Iron Silver Min. Co. v. Mining C0., 143 U.

S. 394, 402, 404, 430, 12 Sup. Ct. 543 .5. Irwin v. McKechnie, 59 N. W. 987 .......

Jackson v. Insurance C0., 99 N. Y. 129, 1

[ocr errors]

N. E. 539 ....... ‘. .................... 701

' Jackson v. Wheat, 18 Johns. 40 .......... 451 Jarchow v. Pickens, 51 Iowa, 381, 1 N. \V.

598 ................................. 74

Jarvis v. Rogers. 15 Mass. 389 ........... 321

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors]

Kalamazoo Novelty Manuf’g Works v.
Macalister, 40 Mich. 84 ................
Kane v. City of Brooklyn, 114 N. Y. 586,
594, 21 N. E. 1053 ................... 783
Kane v. People, 8 Wend. 211 ......... . . . 537
Kansas Indians, The, 5 Wall. 737 ..... ,. . 582
Kansas Pac. R. Co. v. Dunmeyer, 113 U.

S. 629, 644, 5 Sup. Ct. 566 ............. 1000 Kansas Pac. R. Co. v. Railroad Co., 112 U.

S. 414, 421, 5 Sup. Ct. 208 ............. 998 Kean v. Davis, 21 N. J. Law, 683. . . . . . . . . 740 Keator v. People, 32 Mich. 484, 487 ...... 881 Kelley-Goodfellow Shoe Co. v. Insurance

C0., 28 S. W. 1027 ............... ' ..... 714 Kellogg v. Littell, 1 Wash. St. 408, 25 Pac.

461000000000 00000000000000000 00000.0 Kelly v. Pittsburgh, 104 U. S. 78. . . . . . . . . 777 Kelly v. State, 3 Smedes & M. 518. . . . . . . . 538

242

[blocks in formation]

650 ..... - ......................... 625, 626 Keyes v. Mining C0., 15 Sup. Ct. 772 ..... 494 Keystone Bridge Co. v. Iron 00., 95 U. S. p

274, 278 ...................... . . . .212, 226 Kidd v. Wilson, 23 Iowa, 464. . . . . ...... . "80 Kiersted v. Avery, 4 Paige 9 ............ 785 Kilbourn v. Sunderland, 130 U. S. 505, 9

Sup. Ct. 594 .......................... 456

Kimball v. Mobile C0., 3 Woods, 555, 565,

Fed. Cas. No. 7,774 ................... 21 Kimberly v. Arms, 129 U. S. 512, 523, 9 '

Sup. Ct. 355 ................ . . . . . . .68, 72 King V. 6 TPrm R. 294. no 00 no 00 e Kirk' V. Hamilton, 102 U. S. 68. . . . . . . . . . . 651 Kirtland v. Hotchkiss. 100 U. S. 491. ... . 689 Kittle v. Hall, 29 Fed. 511. . ....... . . . .. 493 Knapp v. Morss, 150 U. S. 221—230, 14 Sup.

Ct. 81..'............ 000000 00......... Knatchoull v. Hallett, 13 Ch. Div. 696. . . . 981 Kneeland v. Trust C0., 136 U. S. 89. 97, 10

Sup. Ct. 950; 138 U. S. 509. 11 Sup. Ct.

7426 .................. 38, 40, 305, 626, 864 Knight v. Ass’n 142 U. S. 161, 178, 181, 12 Sup. Ct. 258 .................... 165-169

Koalatype Engraving Co. v. Hoke, 30 Fed. 444 .................... . . . . . . ....... 353 Kong Frode, The,'6 C. C. A. 313, 57 Fed. 224 .................... .........928, 929 Kraft, In re, 53 Fed. 1016 .............. 424

Krippendorf v. Hyde, 110 U. S. 276. 4 Su .
Ct. 27 ............. . ..... 279, 280, 283, 736

La Champagne, 53 Fed. 398 ............. 934 Lachance v. State, 4 Land Dec. Dep. Int.

479 ...................... . ....... . . . 168 Lacy v. State, 15 Wis. 13. ............... 538 Lady Pike, The, U. S. 461. .0000... 000 Laertes, The, 12 Prob. Div. 187. . . . . . . . . . 255 Lafayette v. Blanc, 3 La. Ann. 59. . . . . . . . 645 Lafayette Ins. Co. v. French, 18 How. 404 444 Lake Superior Ship Canal, Railway & Iron

Co. v. Cunningham, 155 U. S. 354, 15

Sup. 00000000000000000 .0...0... Lamont V. CheShire, 65 N. Y. 30, 400 o e 0 e 0 Landes v. Brant. 10 How. 348 ....... . . . . Lane v. Atlantic \Vorks, 111 Mass. 136. . . . Lane & Bodley Co. v. Locke, 150 U. S. 193,

14 Sup. Ct. 78 ................ 493, 494, Lange, In re. 18 Wall. 163 169 ......... . Lansdale v. Smith, 106 U. S. 391, 392, 394,

1 Sup. Ct. 350 ................... . .768, Larned v. Gritlin, 12 Fed. 590. _. . . . . . . . . . Lathrop v. Bank, 8 Dana, 114 ...... . . . . . . Latta v. Granger, 67 Fed. 69 ............. Lawrence Manuf’g Co. v. Cotton Mills, 138

U. S. 552. 554, 11 Sup. Ct. 402 ...... 294, Leatherwood v. Sullivan, 81 Ala. 458, 1

South. 718 ............................ Leavenworth, L. & G. R. Co. v. U. S., 92

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

998

U. S. 000000000000000000 0......000 Lecompte v. U. S., 11 How. 125. . . . . . . . . . 644 Ledoux v. Black. 18 How. 473. . . . . . . .. . . 644 Lee v. Stone, 5 Gill & J. 22. . . ........... 325 Lee Kan v. U. S., 10 C. C. A. 669, 62 Fed.

00 0000000000000 0000. 000000000 .... Leflingwell v. Warren. 2 Black. 599 ...... 969 Leggett v. Oil Co., 149 U. S. 288-294, 13

Sup. Ct. 902. .

00.00000000000000000000

[graphic]

Page

Lehigh Zinc & Iron 00. v. Zinc & Iron ‘ Co., 43 Fed. 545 ...................... 945 Lehnbeuter v. Holthaus, 105 U. S. 94 ..... 354 Lelar v'. Hartranft. 33 Fed. 242. . . . . . . . . 53o Lepanto, The, 21 Fed. 651, 656—658 ...... 1023 Lewis v. Allred, 57 Ala. 628 ............. 40 Lewis v. Chapman, 3 Beav. 133 ......... 493 Lewis v. Hawkins, 23 Wall. 119, 126. .. . 989 Lewis v. Marshall, 5 Pet. 470 ........... 450

Linman v. Riggins, 40 La. Ann. 761, 5
South. 49 ............................
Linn v. Alexander. 59 Pa. St. 43, 46. .514,
hiu'hfield v. Webster 00., .101 U. S. 773. .
Little v. Chadwick, 151 Mass. 109, 23 N.
E. 1005 .............................. 982
Live Stock 00. v. Booth, 102 Cal. 151, 36
Pac. 431 ............................. 957
Livingston v. Story, 9 Pet. 632 .......... 722
Loan Ass’n v. Topeka, 20 Wall. 655 ...... 958
Lobach’s Case, 6 Watts. 167, 171 ........ 515
Lord Kensington v. Phillips, 5 Dow, 61. . . 40.)
Louise, The, 3 C. C. A. 330, 52 Fed. 885. 399
Louisiana v. J umel, 107 U. S. 711, 2 Sup.
Ct. 128 ...................... 593. 595, 597
Louisville, C. & C. R. Co. v. Letson, 2

[ocr errors]

How. 497, 551 ........................ 592 Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Com., 85 Ky. 199,

3 S. W. 139 .......... ' ................ 345 Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Dooley, 78 Ala.

524 ................................. 689 Luckenbach, The, v. The Georgia, 1 C. C.

A. 489, 50 Fed. 129 ................... 575 Lurline, The, 5 C. C. A. 166, 55 Fed. 422. . 720

Luther v. Borden, 7 How. 40.. . . . . . . . . . _. 969
Lux v. Haggin. 69 Cal. 442, 10 Pac. 674. . 957
L. W. Eaton, The, 9 Ben. 289, 301, 302,
Fed. Cas. No. 8.612 ................... 828
7

Lyon v. Pollock, 99 U. S.

Mabey, The, 10 Wall. 419 ............... 720 McAllister v. U. S., 141 U. S. 182—184, 11

Sup. Ct. 949 ......................... 901 McCants v. Land 00. (No. 233) 68 Fed. 66. 65 McClain v. Ortmayer, 141 U. S. 419, 425,

12 Sup. Ct. 76 .................... 226, 574 McClung v. Sneed, 3 Head, 221 .......... 449 McClurg v. Kingsland, 1 How. 202. 205. . .

492, 505—507 McCollum v. Eager, 2 How. 61 .......... 24 McConihay v. Wright, 121 U. S. 205, 7

Sup. Ct. 940 .......................... 21 McCormick v. Sullivant. 10 Wheat. 202. . . 801 McDonald v. Johns, 4 Yerg. 257 ......... 450

McGahan v. Bank, 156 U. S. 218, 15 Sup.

Ct. 347 .............................. 736 McGillin v. Claflin, 52 Fed. 657 ......... 439 McGoldrick v. McGoldrick, 2 Coop. Ch.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[graphic]
[graphic]

543 ................................. 325 Machine Co. v. Gage, 100 U. S. 676. . .755, 757 McKcever v. Ball, 71 Ind. 398 .......... 47 McKernan v. Neff, 43 Ind. 503 .......... 311 McLaughlin v. Curts, 27 Wis. 644 ........ 299 McLaughlin v. Railway 00., 21 Fed. 574.-.

493. 494) McLean v. Fleming. 96 U. S. 245 ........ 796 McLeod v. Evans, 66 Wis. 401, 28 N. W.

173. 214 ............................. 981 McMicken v. Perrin, 18 How. 507 ....... 68 McMurray v. Brown, 91 U. S. 257, 266. .

94, 95, 110

McMurray v. Taylor, 30 Mo. 263. . . . . . . . 781

Page McNitt v. Turner. 16 Wall. 366. . . . . . . . . 61 Mactier v. Frith. 6 Wend. 103 ........... 749 Madden v. Lancaster 00., 12 C. C. A.-566,

65 Fed. 188. 192 ...................... 172 Maddock v. Magone, 152 U. S. 368. 371, 14

Sun. Ct. 588 .......................... 910 Madera Irr. Dist, In re, 92 Cal. 296, 322,

323, 28 Pac. 272, 675 ...... 956, 958, 961, 964 Magone v. King, 2 C. C. A. 363, 51 Fed.

525 ................................. 188 Maguire v. Tyler, 1 Black, 195, 8 Wall.

650. 661 ............................. 166 Mahn v. Harwood, 112 U. S. 354, 5 Sup.

Ct. 174, and 6 Sup. Ct. 451 ............ 222 Maine v. Railroad Co., 142 U. S. 217, 12

Sup. Ct. 121, 163 ..... . ................ 600 Manchester v. Massachusetts, 139 U. S.

262, 11 Sup. Ct. 559 .................. 899 _ Manhattan Medicine 00. v. Wood, 108 U.

S. 218, 2 Sup. Ct. 436 ................. 541 Manning v. Glue 00., 108 U. S. 462, 2

Sup. Ct. 860 ......................... 558 Mansfield, 0. & L. M. R. Co. v. Swan, 111

U. S. 379, 388. 4 Sup. Ct. 510 ......... 730 Manufacturers’ Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v.

Assurance 00., 145 Mass. 424, 14 N. E.

632 ............................. 700, 701 Marble Co. v. Ripley, 10 Wall. 339. 359. . . 749 . Margrave v. Le Hooke, 2 Vern. 207 ...... 322 Maria Martin. The, 12 Wall. 31 .......... 399 Marine Ins. Co. of Alexandria v. Hodgson,

7 Cranch, 336 ........................ 403 Marr’s Heirs v. Gilliam. 1 Cold. 510 ...... 449 Marsh v. Lee, 2 Vent. 337 .......... . . . . . 322 Martin v. Noble, 29 Ind. 216 ............ 312 Martin v. Pryor, 12 Heisk. 668 .......... 449 Marye v. Parsons. 114 U. S. 335, 336, 5

Sup. Ct. 932, 962 ..................... 595 Mason v. Beebee, 44 Fed. 556 ............ 692 Mason v. Messenger, 17 Iowa, 261, 272. . . 36 Mason v. Piggott, 11 Ill. 88 .............. 725 Massachusetts Ben. Ass’n v. Miles, 137 U.

S. 689, 11 Sup. Ct. 234 ................ 863 Massey v. Fisher, 62 Fed. 958. . . . . . . . . 982 Matthews v. Davis, 39 Ohio St. 55 ....... 286 Matthews v. Tufts, 87 N. Y. 568 ......... 440 Max Morris, The, 137 U. S. 1, 11 Sup. Ct.

29 .................................. 400 Maxwell, Ex parte, 37 Ala. 362 .......... 46

Maxwell v. Kennedy. 8 How. 221, 222. .493. 494

Maxwell v. Railroad Co.. 34 Fed. 286. . . . . 445
Maxwell v. Stewart. 22 Wall. 77. 81 ..... 35
Maxwell Land Grant Case, 121 U. S. 365—
381, 7 Sup. Ct. 1029 .................. 812
Mayor v. Cooper, 6 Wall. 247 ........... 10
Mayor of Gallatin v. Alexander, 10 Lea.
475 ................................. 689

Meader v. Norton, 11 Wall. 442. 458. . . .63, 64
Mechanics’ Mill & Lumber Co. v. Hotel
r 00.. 32 Pac. 1073 ..................... 119
Meehan v. Valentine, 145 U. S. 611, 12
Sup. Ct. 972 .......................... 411
Mellen v. Iron Works, 131 U. S. 352. 9
Sup. Ct. 781. . . .' .................. 282, 289
Memphis & C. R. Co. v. Alabama, 107 U.
S. 581, 2 Sup. Ct. 432 ................. 69
i Menard v. Massey, 8 How, 293 .......... 644
Mendenhall v. Cassells. 3 Dev. & B. 51. . . . 337
Menendez v. Holt, 128 U. S. 514, 9 Sup.
1 Ct. 143 ............................. 796

[blocks in formation]

S. 194, 209, 13 Sup. Ct. 859. . .144, 439, 444

[graphic]

Page

Morrell v. Insurance 00.. 57 Am. Dec. 103, and note .......................... .. . 826

Morrill v. Cone; 22 How. 75 .......... .. .. 746 Morris, Ex arte. 9 \Vall. 605 ........ . u . 861

Morris v. enderson. 37 Miss. 492. . . . .. . 800 Moses v. Mayor, 15 W all. 387, 390 ....... 24 Moulor v. Insurance 00., 111 U. S. 341. 4

466

Sup. Ct. 466 ...................... 463, M. R. Bohannon, The 64 Fed. 883. . . . . . . . 920 330

Muller v. Dows, 94 S. 444—449 ........

304, 327, 329, Muller v. Ehlers 91 U. S. 249 ........... 403 Mulligan v. Smith, 59 051. 206 ........ 961, 964 Multnomah Co. v. Bank, 61 Fed. 912 ..... 982 Murdock v. City of Memphis, 20 Wall. 617.. 899 Murdock v. Ford, 17 Ind. 52 ...... . . . . . . . 3(8 Muser v. Magone, 155 U. S. 240, 15 Sup.

Cte OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO 0.......... W Musham v. Musham, 87 Ill. 80 ........... 607 Mutual Ben. Life Ins. Co. v. Robison, 7

C. C. A. 444, 58 Fed. 723 .............. 876 Myers v. Board, 51 Kan. 87, 32 Pac. 658. 981 Nacoochee, The, 137 U. S. 330, 11 Sup. Ct.

122 ................................. 391 Nashua & L. R. Corp. v. Corporation 136

U. s. 356, 373. 375, 10 Sup. Ct. 1004. . .. 694

Meyer v. Johnston, 53 Ala. 237, 345 ...... 40
Michigan Land & Lumber Co. v. Rust, 68

Fed. 155 ............................. 170

Michoud v. Girod, 4 How. 503, 560, 561. .
989, 990, 992

Miles v. McCullough, 1 Bin. 77 .......... 441

Milford & Chillicothe Turnpike Co. v.

Brush, 10 Ohio, 111 ............. . . . . . . 421 Miller v. Brass 00., 104 U. S. 250 ........ 222 Miller v. Kennedy, 3 Rand. (Va.) 2 ...... 175 Miller v. Manqu 00., 151 U. S. 186—208,

14 Sup. Ct. 310 ......... 211, 487, 544, 565 Miller v. Moore, 1 E. D. Smith, 739 ...... 781 Miller’s Ex’rs v. Swann, 150 U. S. 132,

14Sup.Ct.52.. ............. 13 LIills v. Jennings, 13 Ch. Div. 639 ..... 322—324 Milner v. Bowman, 21 N. E. 1094 ....... 826 Miltenberger v. Railroad 00., 106 U. S.

286, 1 Sup. Ct. 140 ................ 308, 624 Milwaukee, The, 1 Brown, Adm. 313, Fed.

Gas. No. 9,626 ........................ 942 Milwaukie & M. R. Co. v. Soutter, 2 \Vall.

510 . .- ............................... 861 Miner v. Markham, 28 Fed. 387 .......... 439 Minnea olis & St. L. R. Co. v. Rolling

Mill 0., 119 U. S. 151, 7 Sup. Ct. 168. . . 241 Minnesota 00. v. St. Paul 00., 2 \Vall. 609—

633 ................................. 279 Minnesota Linseed Oil Co. v. \Vhite-Lead

00., 4 Dill. 431, Fed. Gas. No. 9,635 ..... 746 Minor v. Bank, 1 Pet. 73 ................ 463 Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. v. Railway 00.,

97 U. S. 491 .................... - ...... 998 Missouri Pac. R. Co. v. Sharitt, 23 Pac.

430, 19 Am. St. Rep. 145. and note ...... 689 Mitchel v. U. S., 15 Pet. 52 .............. 861 Mitchell v. Harmony, 13 How. 115 ....... 863 Mitchell v. Judge, 53 Mich. 542, 19 N. W.

176 ................................. 440 Mobberly v. J ohnson’s Ex’r, 78 Ky. 273. . 46 Mobile & O. R. Co. v. Barnhill, 91 Tenn.

395, 19 S. W. 21 .............. 692, 693, 695 hiohr v. Manierre, 101 U. S. 417 .......... 61 b ontgomery v. Hernandez. 12 Wheat. 129.. 649 Montross v. Mabie, 30 Fed. 237 .......... 506 Moore v. Lyttle, 4 Johns. Ch. 183 ........ 381 Moore v. Railroad Co., 12 Barb. 156 ...... 104

Morancy v. Palms (N0. 234)“ 68 Fed. 64. .65-67
Morgan v. Daniels, 153 U. S. 120, 124, 14
Sup. Ct. 772 .......................... 569
Morgan’s L. & T. Railroad & Steamship
00. v. Railway 00., 137 U. S. 171. 201, 11
Sup. Ct. 61 ................... 279, 281, 282
Morley Sewing Mach. Co. v. Lancaster, 129
U. S. 263, 9 Sup. Ct. 299 .............. 219

Nashville. 0. 8: St. L. R. Co. v. Edwards,
16 S. E. 347 ........................ 694

National Ass’n v. Kirgin, 28 Mo. App. 80. . 826
National Bank v. Case, 99 U. S. 631. .. ..1011

National Bank v. Hall. 101 U. S. 50 ...... 749
National Bank v. Insurance 00., 95 U. S.

673 ................................ 463 National Bank v. Wheeler, 60 N. Y. 612;

96 U. S. 268 ................ . ......... 782 National Car-Brake Shoe Co. v. Car &

Manuf’g Co., 19 Fed. 514 ............ ‘. 206

National Cash-Register 00. v. Cash-Regis-
ter 00., 3 C. C. A. 559, 53 Fed. 371. . . . 354
National Foundry & Pipe Works v. ‘Vater
00., '2 Fed. 43, 7 C. C. A. 603; 59 Fed.

19. .................................. 1008
National Furnace Co. v. Manuf’g 00., 110
111. 427 .............................. 794
National Steamship 00. v. Tugman, 106 U.
S. 118, 1 Sup. Ct. 58 .................. 176
Neagle, In re, ]35 U. S. 1, 10 Sup. Ct. 658..
654, 655
Neill v. The Francis. 21 Fed. 921 ........ 928
Neilson v. Railway 00., 44 Iowa, 71, 73. . 780
Nelson v. Munch, 23 Minn. 229 .......... 181
Nelson v. Trigg, 4 Lea, 705, 706. . . . .. . . . . 449
Neve v. Pennell, 2 Hem. & M. 170 ....... 322
Neves v. Scott, 13 How. 271 ............. 722
New Albany v. Burke. 11 Wall. 96, 107. . . 992
Newcomb v. \Vood, 97 U. S. 581 ......... 829
Newell v. Keith, 11 Vt. 214 .............. 115
Newell v. Railway 00., 19 Mich. 336 ...... 443
Newhall v. Sanger. 92 U. S. 761 .......... 335
New Jersey & N. Y. R. 00. v. Young, 1 0.
C. A. 428, 49 Fed. 723 ................ 153
New Kentucky Coal Co. v. Albani, 40 N.
E. 702 ............................... 632
New Orleans v. Water Works, 142 U. S.
79, 12 Sup. Ct. 142 ............ . ..... . . ' 11
Nichols v. Halliday, 27 Wis. 406 ......... 344

Nickelson v. Negley, 71 Iowa, 546, 32 N.
\V. 487 ...... . ........................ 75

Nickerson v. Nickerson, 127 U. S. 668, 8
Sup. Ct. 1355 ........... . ...... . . .. . . . 749

[graphic]
[graphic]

Page Pearce v. Rice, 142 U. S. 28, 12 Sup. Ct. 130 ............................. 451. 452

Pelican Ins. Co. v. \Vilkerson, 13 S. W. 1103 ................................ 714

Peltier v. Collins, 3 Wend. 465. .. 242

31

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

631, 7 Sup. Ct. 1010 ................... P8152 v. Calhoun, 121 U. S. 251, 7 Sup. Ct. Pennock v. Coe, 23 How. 117. .. .74, 286, Pennoyer v. McConnaughy, 140 U. S. 1,

11 Sup. Ct. 699 ................... 521, Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 U. S. 714, 723. 733. .

284, 688, 695, Pennsylvania, The, 19 YVall. 125 ........ Pennsylvania Co. for Insurance on Lives,

egg, v. Bauerle, 143 111. 459, 33 N. E. Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Safety-Truck (30.,

110 U. S. 490, 4 Sup. Ct. 220 .......... People v. Bennett, 29 Mich. 451 ......... People v. Casborus, 13 Johns. 351 ........ People v. Hoag, 2 Parker, Cr. R. 9 ...... Pegfoplleli. Insurance & Annuity Co., 78 N. People v. McIntosh, 5 N. Y. Cr. R. 39 ..... People v. Town of Nevada, 6 Cal. 143. . People’s Bank v. Calhoun, 102 U. S. 25267.9. People’s Ins. Co. v. Kuhn, 12 Heisk. 518. . 463 Pequest River, In re. 41 N. J. Law, 175. . . 959 Peralta v. U. S., 3 \Vall. 440 ............ 642 Perkins v. Fourniquet, 14 How. 328 ..... 863 Perkins v. Hendryx, 23 Fed. 418; 40 Fed.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

258 see 775 280

Page I N. K. Fairbank Co. v. Land 00., 64 Fed. 133 ................................. 539 Noble v. Railroad 00., 147 U. S. 165, 13 Sup. Ct. 271 .......................... 167 Noel v. Temple, 12 Iowa, 276, 281 ........ 780 Nonotuck Silk Co. v. Flanders, 58 N. W. 383 ................................. 982 Norrington v. Wright, 115 U. S. 188, 206, 6 Sup. Ct. 12 ......................... 250

Norris v. Haggin, 136 U. S. 386, 10 Sup.

Ct. 942 .............................. 618 Northern Indiana R. Co. v. Railroad Co.,

15 How. 233, 242 ..................... 305 Northern Pac. R. Co. v. Barden, 46 Fed.

592 .............................. 808, 809 Northern Pac. R. Co. v. O’Brien, 155 U.

S. 141, 15 Sup. Ct. 30 ................. 37 North Noonday Min. 00. v. Mining Co., 6

Sawy. 308, 1 Fed. 522. .' ............... 813 North Star, The, 106 U. S. 17, 1 Sup. Ct.

41 .................................. 400

Noyes v. \Villard, 1 Woods, 187, Fed. Gas.

No. 10,374 .......................... _. 21 Ohio & M. R. Co. v. Wheeler, 1 Black, 286.. 694 Olcott v. Supervisors, 16 \Vall. 678. . .956, 957 Olmsted v. Clark, 30 Conn. 108 ......... 607 Olmsted v. Keyes, 85 N. Y. 593 ......... 878 Omaha Horse R. Co. v. Cable Tramway

C0., 32 Fed. 727 ...................... 10 One Thousand Two Hundred and Sixty

Five Vitrified Pipes, 14 Blatchf. 274,

Fed. Gas. No. 10,536 .................. 381 Ontario, The, 37 Fed. 222 ............... 922 Opinion of the Justices, 7 Mass. 523 ...... 634 Orchard v. Alexander, 157 U. S. 372, 385.

386, 15 Sup. Ct. 635 ................ 567-569 O’Reilly v. Campbell, 116 U. S. 421, 6 Sup.

Ct. 42] .............................. 434

Osborn v. Bank, 9 Wheat. 738, 824, 846. . .
10. 591, 592, 596—598

Osborne v. Barge, 30 Fed. 805 ........... 7 36
Osborne v. City of Detroit. 32 Fed. 36. . . 828
Osgood v. Mining Co.. 56 Cal. 571 ........ 957
Ould v. Hospital, 95 U. S. 303 ........... 801
Owings v. Hull, 9 Pet. 607, 629 ......... 243
Pacific Express Co. v. Seibert, 142 U. S.

339, 12 Sup. Ct. 250 ................... 185 Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Snowden, 7

C. C. A. 264, 58 Fed. 342 .............. 876 Pacific Nat. Bank v. Eaton, 141 U. S. 227,

11 Sup. Ct. 984 ...................... 871 Pacific R. Co. v. Railway Co., 111 U. S.

505, 4 Sup. Ct. 583 ............... - ..... 279 Paine .v. Jones, 14 Hun, 577 ............. 318 Parker v. Hotchkiss, 1 Wall. Jr. 269, Fed.

Gas. No. 10.739 ...................... 440 Parks v. Com’rs, 61 Fed. 436 ........... 879 Parks v. Marshall, 10 Ind. 21 ............ 104 Parmelee v. Hambleton, 19 III. 614. ...... 971 Parrott v. Insurance Co., 5 Fed. 391 ...... 439 Parsons v. McCracken. 9 Leigh, 495 ...... 451 Paschall v. Hinderer, 28 Ohio St. 568 ..... 990 Patapsco, The, 13 Wall. 329 ............. 929 Patterson v. Lynde, 106 U. S. 519, 1 Sup.

Ct. 432 .............................. 299
Pawson v. Watson, Cowp. 785 ....... 712, 714
Payne v. Hook, 7 Wall. 425, 430 ........ 21

Peak v. Ellicott, 30 Kan. 156. 1 Pac. 499.... 981
Peale v. Phipps, 14 How. 368. . . . . . . . 279

,Peninsular Iron Co. v. Stone,

657 .............................. 439, 723 Perry v. Board, 102 N. Y. 99, 6 N. E. 116. . 739

Perry v. \Naggoner, 68 Iowa, 403, 27 N.

W. 292 .............................. 74 Phelps v. Ellsworth, 3 Day. 397 ......... 325 Phelps v. Oaks, 117 U. S. 236, 239, 6 Sup.

Ct. 714 ...................... 144, 279, 736 Philadelphia Ins. Co. v. Insurance Co., 23

Pa. St. 250 .......................... 700 Philadelphia Trust, Safe-Deposit & Ins. Co.

v. Electric Light Co., 13 C. C. A. 40, 65

Fed. 551 ............................. 718 Phillips v. Negley, 117 U. S. 665, 6 Sup.

Ct. 901 .............................. 403 Phoenix Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Raddin, 120

U. S. 183, 7 Sup. Ct. 500 .............. 466 Piatt v. Vattier, 9 Pet. 416 .............. 493 Pierce v. Society, 145 Mass. 56, 12 N. E.

858 ................................. 262 Pitts v. Beckett. 13 Mees. & W. 743. . . . . . 242

Pittsburgh, C. C. 8: St. L. It. Co. v. Back-
us, 154 U. S. 421. 14 Sup. Ct. 1114. .. . 600
Pittsburgh, C. & St. L. R. Co. v. Bridge

Co., 155 U. S. 156, 15 Sup. Ct. 42 ...... 19
Planing-Machine Co. v. Keith. 101 U. S.

479, 485, 488 ...................... .. . 552 Platt v. Axle Co., 41 Conn. 255 ........... 79 Plimpton v. Winslow, 9 Fed. 365 ........ 441 Poindexter v. Greenhow, 114 U. S. 270, 5

Sup. Ct. 903, 962 ................. 594, 597 Pollard v. Dwight, 4 Cranch, 424 ......... 695 Pollock v. Trust Co., 157 U. S. 583, 15

Sup. Ct. 673 .......................... 692 Pope v. Onslow, 2 Vern. 286 ............ 322 Porter v. Sabin. 149 U. S. 473, 13 Sup.

Ct. 1008 ............................. 279

Post v. Supervisors, 105 U. S. 667. . . . . . . . 969 439, 444 Reiley v. Ward, 4 G. Greene, 22 .......... 94 Remsen v. Beekman, 25 N. Y. 552 ........ 318 Renard v. Brown. 7 Neb. 449 ....... 308, 332 Retzer v. Wood, 109 U. S. 185, 3 Sup. Ct.

Page Postal Tel. Cable 00. v. Alabama, 155 U.

S. 482. 15 Sup. Ct. 194 ................ Postal Tel. Cable Co. v. Council, 153 U. S. _

692, 14 Sup. Ct. 1094 ...... . . . . . .184, 185 Potomac, The, 105 U. S. 630 ...... _._ ..... 400 Potts v. Creag-er, 155 U. S. 597, 1'.) Sup.

Ct. 194 .......................... 498, 916 Potts v. Railroad 00., 131 Mass. 455 ...... 427 Pratt v. Northam, 5 Mason, 95, 105, Fed.

Gas. No. 11,376 ................ . . . . . . . 20 Pray v. Hegeman, 98 N. Y. 351 ..... . .. . . 300 Prevost v. Gratz, 6 Wheat. 481. 497 ..... 989 Primrose v. Telegraph 00., 154 U. S. 1, 14

Sup. Ct. 1098 ...................... 138—141 Pritchard v. Ovey, 1 J ac. & \V. 396 ...... 400 Prosser v. Edmonds, 1 Younge & 0. Exch.

481 ............................ . . . . . 629

Prouty v. Ruggles, 16 Pet. 337. 339. . . . . . 210

Providence Rubber Co. v. Goodyear, 9

00000000000 O ...... I. O. I ..O I O Prudential Assur. 00. v. Insurance 00., 23

Fed. 438. O OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O C O O O O Pryor v. Downey. 50 Cal. 388 ......... .. 47 Pryor v. Ryburn, 16 Ark. 671 ............ 649 Pueblo Case, 5 Land Dec. Dep. Int. 494. . 166 Pulliam v. Osborn, 17 How. 471 .......... 279 Pullman v. Upton, 96 U. S. 328. .. .1011—1013 Pullman’s Palace Car 00. v. Pennsylvania,

141 U. S. 18, 11 Sup. Ct. 876 ........... 600 Purefoy y. Purefoy, 1 Vern. 29 .......... 322 Purtell v. Forge & Bolt 00., 74 W'is. 132,

42 N. W. 265 ......................... 1009

Purvis v. I-Iarmanson, 4 La. Ann. 421. .. . 642

Quincy, M. & P. R. Co. v. Humphreys, 145
U. S. 82, 12 Sup. Ct. 787 ............... 282

Railroad 00., Ex parte. 103 U. S. 794. .695, 696
Railroad Co. v. Baldwin, 103 U. S. 426. . . 998

Railroad Co. v. Heck, 102 U. S. 120 ...... _ . 339
Railroad Co. v. Mississippi, 102 U. S. 135,

141 ............................... . . 10 Railroad Co. v. Pollard, 22 “'all. 341 ..... 151 Railroad Co. v. Swasey, 23 \Vall. 405, 409

296, 297 Railroad Cos. v. Chamberlain, 6 Wall. 748.. 279 Rankin v. Scott, 12 \Vheat. 177 ......... 801 Ratterman v. Telegraph Co., 127 U. S. 411,

8 Sup. Ct. 1127 ...................... 185_ Raymond v. Richmond, 78 N. Y. 351 ....... 300 Reagan v. Trust 00.. 154 U. S. 362. 392,

399, 14 Sup. Ct. 1047 .......... 522, 598, 728 Redfield v. Iron 00., 110 U. S. 174, 176, 3

Sup. Ct. 570 ...................... 113, 115 Reese v. Medlock, 27 Tex. 121 ............ 243 Reiche v. Smythe, 13 Wall. 162, 164 ...... 910 Reifsnider v. Publishing 00., 45 Fed. 433. .

164 ................................. 864 Rex v. Coppard. 30ar. &P.59........... 881 Rex v. Eriswell, 3 Term R. 722 .......... 890 Reynolds v. Stockton, 140 U. S. 254, 11

Sup. Ct. 773 ......................... 295

'Reynolds v. U. S., 98 U. S. 145, 168. . .473, 538 Rhode Island v. Massachusetts, 14 Pet, 210 725

Rich v. Bray, 37 Fed. 273 ............... 722

Page

Richards v. Mackall, 124 U. S. 183, 188, 8
Sun. 01:. 437 ......................... 768
Richards v. Todd, 127 Mass. 172 ......... "'2
Rlddle v. Hudgins, 7 0. 0. A. 335, 58 Fed.
490 . . ............................... 739
Riggs v. Frick, Taney, 100, Fed. Cas. No.
11,825 ................ . ............. 909
Rio Grande R. 00. v. Gomila, 132 U. S.
478, 10 Sun. Ct. 155 .......... 279, 821,
Risley v. Bank, 83 N. Y. 318 .............
River Line v. Cheatham, 9 0. 0. A. 124,
60 0000000000000000 ...OOOIOOO
Robbins v. Chicago, 4 Wall. 657. . ........
Robbins v. Taxing Dist., 120 U. S. 489,
498, 7 Sup. Ct. 592...............755,
Robinson v. Campbell, 3 Wheat. 212. . . . . .
Roberts v. State, 11 South. 536. . . -. . . . . . .
Rgbeé'ésgon, The, 8 Biss. 180. Fed. Gas. No.
Robertson v. Cease, 97 U. S. 646. . .. .. .. .
Robinson v. Austin, 2 Gray, 564 ..... . .. .
Robinson v. Campbell, 3 \Vheat. 212. .. ..
Robinson v. Robinson, 2 Ves. Sr. 225. . . . . .
Rocker Spring 00. v. Flinn, 46 Fed. 109. . . ..
Rollins v. Cherokees, 87 N. C. 229. . . .580, 584
Rollstone Nat. Bank v. Carleton, 136
0......OOOOOOQQ0.000......Q
l Roman v. Fry, 5 J. J. Marsh, 634. .. .. ...1013
“ Romie v. Casanova, 91 U. S. 379. . . . . . . . 14
Root v. Railway 00., 105 U. S. 189. . . .262, 493

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[graphic]
[graphic]

MSG V. Page, 2 Sim. 00000000 0000000
Rotllaker, In re, 11 Abb. N. 0. 122...... 894
lRoux v. Salvador, 1 Bing. (N. o.) 252
Rowan v. Rifle 00., 29 Conn. 324. .. .... . 325
Ruckman v. Land 00., 1 Fed. 367. .. .. .. . 948
Rugan v. Sabin, 3 0. 0. A. 578, 53 Fed.
415, 420 ........................... 172
Rule of Court, In re, 3 Woods, 502, Fed.
Cas. No. 12,126 ...................... 894
Rullyan v. Lessee of Coster, 14 Pet. 122. . 802
Russell v. Allen, 107 U. S. 163, 2 Sup. Ct.
327 ................... . . . . ......... 801
Russell v. Southard, 12 How. 139, 153,
, 155 ............................. 308, 332
Ryan v. U. S., 136 U. S. 83, 10 Sup. Ct. 913 746
lllyder v. Flanders, 30 Mich. ....... . . 46
Sabin v. Lodge, 8 N. Y. Supp. 185 ....... 826
I St. Clair v. Cox, 106 U. S. 350, 357, 359, 1
Sup. Ct. 354 ......................... 444
St. John, The, 7 Blatchf. 220, Fed. 00.8.
No. 12,224 .......................... 942
St. Louis, A. & T. H. R. Co. v. Railway
00., 125 US. 659, 674, 8 Sup. Ct. 1011. . 38
St. Louis Brewing Ass’n v. Austin, 13
South. 908 ................ . . ......... 982
St. Louis, C. G. & Ft. S. R. 00. v. State of
Missouri, 15 Sup. Ct. 443. .. .. ....... . . 11
St. Louis, I. M. & S. R. 00. V. B’Shears,
59 SO W0 2......OOQOOOOO
’s't. Paul, M. & M. R. Co. v. Phelps, 137
U. S. 528, 536, 11 Sup. Ct. 168 ........ 789
St. Paul, M. & M. R. 00. v. Railway 00.,68
Fed. 2 ............. . ................ 729
'e't. Paul & P. R. Co. v. Railroad 00., 139
U. S. 1, 5, 17, 18, 11 Sup. Ct. 389 ......
613—615, 617, 998
Salmon v. Mills, 1 0. C. A. 278, 49 Fed.
033 181

[ocr errors]
« ForrigeFortsett »