The Federal ReporterIncludes cases argued and determined in the District Courts of the United States and, Mar./May 1880-Oct./Nov. 1912, the Circuit Courts of the United States; Sept./Dec. 1891-Sept./Nov. 1924, the Circuit Courts of Appeals of the United States; Aug./Oct. 1911-Jan./Feb. 1914, the Commerce Court of the United States; Sept./Oct. 1919-Sept./Nov. 1924, the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia. |
Inni boken
Resultat 1-5 av 100
Side 191
The specification states as follows: “The object of our invention is to do away with
the rattling of the band wheel and to reduce the friction, also to simplify and
condense the parts, lessening the cost and avoiding the complications of the ...
The specification states as follows: “The object of our invention is to do away with
the rattling of the band wheel and to reduce the friction, also to simplify and
condense the parts, lessening the cost and avoiding the complications of the ...
Side 193
COXE, District Judge (after stating the facts). The important question in this cause
is whether or not the invention is anticipated by the Burdge structure alleged to
have been made about 30 years ago. This was the principal question discussed
...
COXE, District Judge (after stating the facts). The important question in this cause
is whether or not the invention is anticipated by the Burdge structure alleged to
have been made about 30 years ago. This was the principal question discussed
...
Side 197
That invention was described as follows: “The aim and intent of the improvements
herein described are to provide a chair furnished with a spring which will afford
an elastic or yielding support for the seat, and which will at the same time permit ...
That invention was described as follows: “The aim and intent of the improvements
herein described are to provide a chair furnished with a spring which will afford
an elastic or yielding support for the seat, and which will at the same time permit ...
Side 198
pert conclusively shows that said patent contains nothing new, and does not
describe an invention, and is not intended for, nor is it applicable to, a platform
rocking chair, but is restricted by the claims, specifications, and drawings to a
tilting ...
pert conclusively shows that said patent contains nothing new, and does not
describe an invention, and is not intended for, nor is it applicable to, a platform
rocking chair, but is restricted by the claims, specifications, and drawings to a
tilting ...
Side 199
In reply to this, however, the applicants expressly refused to do so, and said: “The
intentional and deliberate omission of these Words from the claims Will, of course
, prevent any construction limiting the use of the invention to a chair having the ...
In reply to this, however, the applicants expressly refused to do so, and said: “The
intentional and deliberate omission of these Words from the claims Will, of course
, prevent any construction limiting the use of the invention to a chair having the ...
Hva folk mener - Skriv en omtale
Vi har ikke funnet noen omtaler på noen av de vanlige stedene.
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
action agreed alleged amount appeal application assignment attachment authority Bank bill bonds brought cause charge charter circuit court claim clause complainant condition construction contract corporation cover debt decision decree defendant described direct district duty effect electric entitled equity error evidence executed fact filed follows furnished further give given grant ground held Indiana interest invention issued Judge judgment jurisdiction land lien limits loss machine March material means Michigan mortgage necessary objection Ohio operation opinion original owner paid parties passed patent payment person plaintiff possession present proceedings purchaser question railroad railroad company Railway Company reason received reference respect road rule secured sold statute suit survey taken thereof tion Trust United