The Federal ReporterIncludes cases argued and determined in the District Courts of the United States and, Mar./May 1880-Oct./Nov. 1912, the Circuit Courts of the United States; Sept./Dec. 1891-Sept./Nov. 1924, the Circuit Courts of Appeals of the United States; Aug./Oct. 1911-Jan./Feb. 1914, the Commerce Court of the United States; Sept./Oct. 1919-Sept./Nov. 1924, the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia. |
Inni boken
Resultat 1-5 av 100
Side 155
No patent, however, Was issued until 1857, when, the resurvey having been
completed, and the lands in question ascertained not to be swamp lands, a
patent WaS issued for Sundry parcels of land, not including the lands in question.
In 1858 ...
No patent, however, Was issued until 1857, when, the resurvey having been
completed, and the lands in question ascertained not to be swamp lands, a
patent WaS issued for Sundry parcels of land, not including the lands in question.
In 1858 ...
Side 160
The governor acknowledged the receipt of this list on May 31, 1866, by letter in
which he says: “I have the honor to request that the patents for said lands may
issue to the State of Michigan as soon as practicable conveying the feesimple
title ...
The governor acknowledged the receipt of this list on May 31, 1866, by letter in
which he says: “I have the honor to request that the patents for said lands may
issue to the State of Michigan as soon as practicable conveying the feesimple
title ...
Side 164
1883, upon which Sparrow obtained his patents for the lands here claimed by the
plaintiff, seems to indicate that the lands ... and authorized to be patented, were
lands which were subject to sale, and as these were not, because no patent had
...
1883, upon which Sparrow obtained his patents for the lands here claimed by the
plaintiff, seems to indicate that the lands ... and authorized to be patented, were
lands which were subject to sale, and as these were not, because no patent had
...
Side 165
... secretary, on discov. ering the error at any time before issuing the patent, to
correct the wrong by recalling his certifications; not upon “mere error of judgment,
but that character of mistake which affords a ground of relief in a court of equity.
... secretary, on discov. ering the error at any time before issuing the patent, to
correct the wrong by recalling his certifications; not upon “mere error of judgment,
but that character of mistake which affords a ground of relief in a court of equity.
Side 166
stitute proceedings for its annulment, it would hardly be seriously contended that
the secretary might not interfere and prevent the execution of the patent. He could
not be obliged to sit quietly and allow a proceeding to be consummated, which ...
stitute proceedings for its annulment, it would hardly be seriously contended that
the secretary might not interfere and prevent the execution of the patent. He could
not be obliged to sit quietly and allow a proceeding to be consummated, which ...
Hva folk mener - Skriv en omtale
Vi har ikke funnet noen omtaler på noen av de vanlige stedene.
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
action agreed alleged amount appeal application assignment attachment authority Bank bill bonds brought cause charge charter circuit court claim clause complainant condition construction contract corporation cover debt decision decree defendant described direct district duty effect electric entitled equity error evidence executed fact filed follows furnished further give given grant ground held Indiana interest invention issued Judge judgment jurisdiction land lien limits loss machine March material means Michigan mortgage necessary objection Ohio operation opinion original owner paid parties passed patent payment person plaintiff possession present proceedings purchaser question railroad railroad company Railway Company reason received reference respect road rule secured sold statute suit survey taken thereof tion Trust United