Sidebilder
PDF
ePub

HAEBLER et al., Appellants, v. BERNHARTHGOODWIN, Respondent, v. O'BRIEN, Appelet al., Respondents.

lant. (Court of Appeals of New York. Oct. 29, 1889.) (Court of Appeals of New York. Oct. 29, 1889.)

Marshall P. Stafford, for appellants. M. No opinion. Motion to correct calendar H. Cardozo and E. J. Nathan, for respond- granted. ents.

No opinion. Motion for reargument denied; $10 costs. See 22 N. E. Rep. 167.

CROMWELL, County Treasurer, Respondent,

v. MACLEAN, impleaded, Appellant.

(Court of Appeals of New York. Oct. 29, 1889.) CRYDER, Respondent, v. DAVIS, Appellant. No opinion. Motion to correct calendar (Court of Appeals of New York. Oct. 29, 1889.) granted.

Joseph H. Choate, for respondent. Wm. Man, for appellant.

GOODRICH, Respondent, v. CLUTE, AppelNo opinion. Motion to dismiss granted,

lant. on payment of costs of the appeal, and $10 (Court of Appeals of New York. Nov. 1, 1889.) costs of motion.

Jno. W. Boothby, for appellant. A. P.

Strong, for respondent. In re Petition of ZINK et al., to Remove No opinion. Judgment affirmed, on opinBOHN et al.

ion below, with costs. All concur. See 3 N.

Y. Supp. 102. (Court of Appeals of New York. Oct. 29, 1889.)

No opinion. Motion to dismiss granted, with costs. See 3 N. Y. Supp. 4.

McKANE, Respondent, v. BROOKLYN CITI

ZEN, Appellant.

(Court of Appeals of New York. Nov. 1, 1889.) PHELPS, Appellant, 0. ERHARDT, Respond

N. C. Moak, for appellant. Morris & ent.

Whitehouse, for respondent. (Court of Appeals of New York. Oct. 29, 1889.)

No opinion. Order affirmed, with costs. T'hos. E. Rochfort, for appellant.

All concur. See 6 N. Y. Supp. 171. No opinion. Motion to dismiss granted, with costs. See 5 N. Y. Supp. 540.

HAUSELT, Appellant, v. BONNER, impleaded,

Respondent. HOAR et al., Appellants, v. HOAR, Respond-(Court of Appeals of New York. Nov. 1, 1889.) ent.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with costs. (Court of Appeals of New York. Oct. 29, 1889.) All concur. See 6 N. Y. Supp. 473.

No opinion. Motion to dismiss granted, with costs, unless attorney for appellants, within 10 days, give attorney for respondent CHAS. G. STEVENS et al. v. MELCHER et al., proper notice of justification of sureties, and, (MARIETTA R. STEVENS, Appellant.) if sureties are rejected, furnish others, as (Court of Appeals of New York. Nov. 1, 1889.) provided by law, in which case motion is de

George Hoadly, for appellant. Geo. Zabrisnied, without costs.

kie, for respondents.

No opinion. Appeal dismissed, with costs.

All concur. See 6 N. Y. Supp. 811. DODGE et al., Appellants, v. GALLATIN et

al., Respondents. (Court of Appeals of New York. Oct. 29, 1889.) CROWELL v. WELLS et al., (DOODY, AppelNo opinion. Motion to put on calendar

lant. BIERDS, Respondent.) denied.

(Court of Appeals of New York. Nov. 1, 1889.)

N. C. Moak, for appellant. J.'. Marean, STERLING, Respondent, v. METROPOLITAN

for respondent. LIFE INS. Co., Appellant.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with costs,

All concur. See 6 N. Y. Supp. 950. (Court of Appeals of New York. Oct. 29, 1889.)

No opinion. Motion to put on calendar denied.

BOARDMAN et al., Appellants, v. TROTTER,

impleaded, Respondent. STATEN ISLAND R. T. R. Co., Respondent, v. (Court of Appeals of New York. Nov. 1, 1889.) MAYOR, ETC., OF NEW YORK, Appellant.

Wm. 8. Beaman, for appellants. A. P. (Court of Appeals of New York. Oct. 29, 1889.) Whitehead, for respondent.

No opinion. Motion to put on calendar No opinion. Appeal dismissed, with costs. granted.

All concur. See 6 N. Y. Supp. 519.

In re RAMSDELL'S WILL.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with (Court of Appeals of New York. Nov. 1, 1889.) costs. All concur, except FOLLETT, C. J.,

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, without dissenting. See 42 Hun, 657. costs to either party, on stipulation. See 3 N. Y. Supp. 499.

KROTEL, Respondent, v. WILLIAMS et al.,

Appellants. STREETER et al., Appellants, v. VILLAGE (Court of Appeals of New York. Oct. 29, 1889.) OF JOHNSTOWN, Respondent.

Thos. Darlington, for appellants. Wm. E.

Millard, for respondent. (Court of Appeals of New York, Second Division. Oct. 8, 1889.)

No opinion. Appeal from order dismissed,

and judgment affirmed, with costs. All conEsek Cowen, for appellants.

John M.

cur.

See 42 Hun, 658. Carroll, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur. See 10 Hun, 637.

LASEROWITSCH, Respondent, v. REIMAN, Ap

pellant.

(Court of Appeals of New York. Oct. 29, 1889.) BLAIN, Appellant, v. PooL et al., Respond

Stephen G. Clarke, for appellant. Jno. W. ents.

Fiske, for respondent. (Court of Appeals of New York, Second Divis

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with ion. Oct. 8, 1889.)

costs. All concur. E. P. Wilder, for appellant. Thos. F. Wentworth, Harwood R. Pool, and E. J. Myers, for respondents.

SWENSON, Respondent, v. MAHOPAC IRON No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with

ORE Co., Appellant. costs, upon opinion of DANIELS, J., delivered (Court of Appeals of New York. Nov. 28, 1889.) at general term. All concur. See 47 Hun, 633.

Wm. C. Holbrook, for appellant. J. Edward Swanstrom, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with FOSTER, Appellant, v. CITY OF BUFFALO, costs. All concur. See 6 N. Y. Supp. 520.

Respondent. (Court of Appeals of New York. Oct. 22, 1889.) | In re Judicial Settlement of Account of

E. J. Plumley, for appellant. Frank C. MORRISON, Public Administrator, etc. Laughlin, for respondent.

(Court of Appeals of New York. Nov. 26, 1889.) Judgment affirmed, with costs.

All con

0. D. M. Baker and James L. Williams, cur, except BRADLEY and HAIGHT, JJ., not sitting. See 42 Hun, 651.

for appellants. David Willcox, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with

costs. All concur. NEWELL, Respondent, v. RYAN et al., Ap

pellants. (Court of Appeals of New York. Oct. 22, 1889.) ENDERS, Respondent, v. LAKE SHORE & M.

S. Ry. Co., Appellant.
W. 8. Andrews, for appellants. M. E.
Driscoll, for respondent.

(Court of Appeals of New York. Nov. 26, 1889.) No opinion. Order affirmed, and judg Jas. Fraser Gluck, for appellant. Tracy ment absolute directed for plaintiff on stip- C. Becker, for respondent. ulation, with costs. All concur, except No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with FOLLETT, C. J., not sitting. See 40 Hun, 286. costs. All concur.

All concur. See 2 N. Y. Supp. 719.

BALESTIER, Appellant, o. MECHANICS' NAT. HEALY, Respondent, o. RYAN et al., Appel. BANK OF NEW YORK, Respondent. lants.

(Court of Appeals of New York. Nov, 26, 1889.) (Court of Appeals of New York. Oct. 22, 1889.)

Wm. Holt Secor, for appellant. E. B. W. S. Andrews, for appellants. M. E. Crowell, for respondent. Driscoll, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with No opinion. Judgment_affirmed, with costs. All concur. costs. All concur, except FOLLETT, C. J., not sitting, and BRADLEY, J., not voting. See 41 Hun, 640.

VANDERBECK, Respondent, o. TAYLOR et

al., Appellants.

(Court of Appeals of New York. Nov. 26, 1889.) WHITE, Respondent, V. GAINES, Appellant.

Wm. A. Hewson, for appellant. Eugene (Court of Appeals of New York. Oct. 29, 1889.) H. Pomeroy, for respondent.

0. D. M. Baker, for appellant. Henry M. No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with Taylor, for respondent.

costs. All concur. See 47 Hun, 636.

JONASCH, Respondent, o. STANDARD GAS WEIL V. DRY DOCK, E. B. & B. R. Co.

LIGHT Co. OF NEW YORK, Appellant. (Court of Appeals of New York. Dec. 3, 1889.) (Court of Appeals of New York. Nov. 26, 1889.)

No opinion. Motion to correct calendar J. W. Hawes, for appellant. Geo. H. Yea- granted, without costs. man, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur. See 4 N. Y. Supp, 542. DORMAN, Respondent, v. BROADWAY R. Co.

OF BROOKLYN, Appellant.

(Court of Appeals of New York. Dec. 3, 1889.) ELLIS, Appellant, v. HOUSTON et al., Respondents.

No opinion. Motion to correct calendar

granted, without costs. (Court of Appeals of New York. Nov. 26, 1889.)

E. Countryman, for appellant. Hamilton Harris, for respondents.

MARINE BANK OF BUFFALO V. BUTLER Judgment affirmed, with costs. All con

COLLIERY Co. cur. See 4 N. Y. Supp. 732.

(Court of Appeals of New York. Dec. 3, 1889.)

No opinion. Motion to correct calendar SWEENEY, Respondent, v. NEW YORK STEAM denied, without costs.

Co., Appellant. (Court of Appeals of New York. Nov. 26, 1889.)

J. W. Hawes, for appellant. Henry SLOCUM, Appellant, v.DomoL et al., RespondSchmitt, for respondent.

ents. No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with

SAME V. VEGHTE. costs. All concur. See 6 N. Y. Supp. 528. (Court of Appeals of New York. Dec. 3, 1889.)

No opinion. Motions to dismiss granted, HEALD, Respondent, v. MACGOWAN, Ap

with costs. See 3 N. Y. Supp. 953, 2 N. Y. pellant.

Supp. 350. (Court of Appeals of New York. Nov. 26, 1889.) G. A. Clement, for appellant. Henry P.

Post et al. v. WEIL. Starbuck, for respondent.

SAME V. BERNHEIMER. No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur. See 5 N. Y. Supp. 450. (Court of Appeals of New York. Dec. 3, 1889.)

No opinion. Motion for reargument de

nied; $10 costs. See 22 N. E. Rep. 145, 149. MCCLEAN, Respondent, v. SCHUYLER STEAM

Tow-Boat LINE, Appellant. (Court of Appeals of New York. Nov. 26, 1889.) V ETTERLEIN et al., Appellants, 0. DEWEY E. A. Brewster, for respondent. W. Froth

et al., Respondents. ingham, for appellant.

(Court of Appeals of New York. Dec. 3, 1889.) Ņo opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur. See 4 N. Y. Supp. 790.

Motion to open default.

No opinion. Ordered that, on the return

to this court of the remittitur in this case, BULKLEY, Respondent, v. PORT HENRY IRON the default be set aside on payment of $20 to

ORE CO. OF LAKE CHAMPLAIN, Appellant. the attorneys for the respondents, and the (Court of Appeals of New York. Nov. 26, 1889.) case placed on the present calendar for argu

Chester B. McLaughlin, for appellant. ment; printed copies of cases to be served Richard L. Hand, for respondent.

within 10 days from December 5th, inst. The No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with court below is requested to return the remitcosts. All concur. See 2 N. Y. Supp. 133. titur to this court.

NICHOLS, Respondent, v. BUSH & DENSLOW
MANUF'G Co., Appellant.

DOLE et al., Appellants, v. BELDEN, Re

spondent. (Court of Appeals of New York. Nov. 26, 1889.) | (Court of Appeals of New York. Dec. 3, 1889.)

Alex. T. Carpenter, for respondent. John Procter Clarke, for appellant.

No opinion. Motion to allow sureties to No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with justify denied; $10 costs. costs. All concur. See 6 N. Y. Supp. 601.

DELAMATER et al. v. HEPWORTH et al. GILLEN, Appellant, v. TUCKER & CARTER

(Court of Appeals of New York. Dec. 3, 1889.) CORDAGE Co., Respondent.

Jos. H. Choate, for motion. R. E. Prime (Court of Appeals of New York. Dec. 3, 1889.) and W. B. Ellison, opposed.

No opinion. Motion to correct calendar Motion to correct remittitur and motion granted, without costs.

for reargument denied, with $10 costs of mo

sion; but the remittitur shall be so amended PEOPLE ex rel. PERRY, Appellant, v. STARK as to direct costs of the appeal in this court et al., Commissioners of Docks, Respondto be paid by the appellants to the executors ents. and trustees of Joseph Colwell.

(Court of Appeals of New York. Dec. 10, 1989.)

Solon P. Rothschild, for appellant. D.J.

Dean, for respondents. WOODWARD, Appellant, v. JAMES, Respond

No opinion. Appeal dismissed, with costs. ent.

All concur. See 4 N. Y. Supp. 820. (Court of Appeals of New York. Dec. 3, 1889.) Motion to amend remittitur.

VERNUM, Respondent, v. WHEELER, AppelFrank E. Smith and Geo. S. Stevens, for

lant. appellant. John A. Deady, for respondent.

No opinion. Ordered that the remittitur (Court of Appeals of New York. Dec. 10, 1899.) be amended so as to read, “The judgment of: Elon R. Brown, for appellant. John C. the special tcrm is modified by striking out McCartin, for respondent. therefrom the words, the deficiency shall be

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with come a debt of the estate, to be paid by the costs, with leave to the defendant to answer executrix and trustee as other debts of the within 20 days, upon payment of costs. All estate are to be paid;' inserting the words, concur. See 35 Hun, 53. •such deficiency or excess beyond the moiety of income charged with their payment shall be charged upon the moiety of income given PEOPLE, Appellant, v. PROUT et al., Reto the widow;'” and as modified affirmed,

spondents. with costs to all parties who filed briefs on (Court of Appeals of New York. Dec. 10, 1889.) the appeal to this court; one bill only being allowed to each attorney or firm filing such h. Crawford, for respondents.

Benj. F. Dos Passos, for appellant. G. briefs, payable out of the estate. Except as allowed by this order, the other motions made below, with costs.

No opinion. Order affirmed on opinions

All concur. See 6 N. Y. in the case are denied. See 44 Hun, 95.

Supp. 457.

MCKINNEY, Respondent, v. LONG ISLAND

MCKENNA, Respondent, v. BOLGER, Appel

lant. R. Co., Appellant. (Court of Appeals of New York. Dec. 3, 1889.) (Court of Appeals of New York. Dec. 10, 1889.)

John McCrone, for appellant. E. Moore, No opinion. Motion to correct calendar

for respondent. granted, without costs.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur, except PECKHAM, J., not

sitting. See 1 N. Y. Supp. 651. ABBOTT, Appellant, v. THOMAS, Respondent. (Court of Appeals of New York. Dec. 10, 1889.)

Edward B. Whitney, for appellant. Ce-AGNEW, Respondent, v. BROOKLYN CITY R. phas Brainerd, Jr., for respondent.

Co., Appellant. No opinion. Appeal dismissed as of No- (Court of Appeals of New York. Dec. 10, 1889.) vember 25, 1889, with costs. All concur. Saml. D. Morris, for appellant. Chas. J. See 6 N. Y. Supp. 178.

Patterson, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with

costs. All concur. See 5 N. Y. Supp. 756. JAFFRAY et al., Appellants, 0. SAUSMANN, Respondent.

PEOPLE ex rel. STAPLETON et al. v. BELL (Court of Appeals of New York. Dec. 10, 1889.)

et al., Appellants. Isaac L. Miller, for appellants. Blumen-|(Court of Appeals of New York. Dec. 10, 1889.) steil & Hirsch, for respondent.

No opinion. Ordered that this cause be No opinion. Order affirmed, with costs, placed on the present calendar, advanced, on opinion of general term. All concur. See and set down for argument on the merits for 5 N. Y. Supp. 629.

the morning of Tuesday, the second day of

the January session. PAGET, Appellant, v. PEASE et al., impleaded, etc., Respondents.

In re Goods and Chattels of WAACK. (Court of Appeals of New York. Dec. 10, 1889.) (Court of Appeals of New York. Dec. 17, 1889.) D. C. Calvin, for appellant.

Tuhn. s. H. M. Geschneidt, for appellants. Henry Melcher, for respondents.

A. King, for respondent. No opinion. Appeal dismissed, with costs. No opinion. Appeal dismissed, with costs. All concur. See 6 N. Y. Supp. 386.

All concur See 5 N. Y. Supp. 522.

COUSE, Appellant, o. NEW YORK, L. E. & VALENTINE, Respondent, v. LUNT, AppelW. R. Co., Respondent.

lant. (Court of Appeals of New York. Dec. 17, 1889.) | (Court of Appeals of New York. Dec. 17, 1889.)

Motion to amend remittitur.
John W. Lyon, for appellant. Lewis E.
Carr, for respondent.

No opinion. Ordered that remittitur be No opinion. Judgment atfirmed, with so amended as to give leave to the plaintiff costs. All concur. See 2 N. Y. Supp. 312. to withdraw his demurrer to the second de

fense of defendant, Lunt, on payment to defendant's attorney, within 20 days, of all

costs since the demurrer. GLAVIN, Respondent, v. SAVARESE et al.,

Appellants. (Court of Appeals of New York. Dec. 17, 1889.) | SECOR et al., Respondents, v. CLARK, ApThos. J. Molloy, for appellants. Patrick

pellant. Keady, for respondent."

(Court of Appeals of New York. Dec. 17, 1889.) No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with

G. W. Cotterill, for appellant. Horace Secosts. All concur, except EARL, J., dissent-cor, Jr., for respondent. ing.

No opinion. Motion for reargument de

nied; $10 costs. See 22 N. E. Rep. 754. FITZGERALD, Respondent, v. LONG ISLAND R. Co., Appellant.

HAMLIN, Appellant, v. WHEELOCK, Respond(Court of Appeals of New York. Dec. 17, 1889.)

ent. Edward E. Sprague, for appellant. Mar- (Court of Appeals of New York. Dec. 17, 1889.) tin J. Keogh, for respondent.

No opinion. Motion to dismiss granted. No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with See 42 Hun, 530. costs. All concur. See 3 N. Y. Supp. 230.

COLE 0. Frost et al., Appellants, (METH

ODIST-EPISCOPAL HOSPITAL et al., ReWAIT et al., Respondents, v. CERQUA et al.,

spondents.) Appellants.

(Court of Appeals of New York. Dec. 20, 1889.) (Court of Appeals of New York. Dec. 17, 1889.)

Calvin Frost and James Troy, for appelWm. D. Veeder, for appellants. Howard lants. Geo. G. Reynolds, for respondents, St. C. Wait, for respondents.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

affirmed, with costs. All concur, except EARL, PECKHAM, costs. All concur. See 7 N. Y. Supp. 110. and GRAY, JJ., dissenting. See 4 N. Y.

Supp. 308.

WEST, Respondent, v. REYNOLDS EI al., Ap-LOORAM, Respondent, v. THIRD AVE. R. CO., pellants.

Appellant. (Court of Appeals of New York. Dec. 17, 1889.) (Court of Appeals of New York. Dec. 20, 1889.)

D. C. Stoddard, for appellants. Wm. Ker Wm. H. Page, Jr., for appellant. W. nan, for respondent.

Bourke Cockran, for respondent. No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur. See 5 N. Y. Supp. 942. costs. All concur.

CONTINENTAL NAT. BANK OF NEW YORK, DAVIS SEWING-MACH. Co. OF WATERTOWN,

Respondent, v. KOEHLER, Appellant. Respondent, v. BEST, Appellant.

(Court of Appeals of New York. Dec. 20, 1889.) (Court of Appeals of New York. Dec. 17, 1889.)

Benno Loewy, for appellant. John L. CadDelos McCurdy, for appellant. Chas. D. wilader, for respondent. Wright, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with No opinion. Dismissed on argument. See costs. All concur. See 1 N. Y. Supp. 870. 1 N. Y. Supp. 510.

RUTHERFORD, Respondent, v. SCHATTMAN,

impleaded, etc., Appellant. SCHLUTER, Appellant, v. BOWERY SAV. BANK, Respondent.

(Court of Appeals of New York. Dec. 20, 1889.) (Court of Appeals of New York. Dec. 17, 1889.) Parkhurst, for respondent.

Rudolph Sampter, for appellant. J. F. John McCrone, for appellant.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with No opinion. Motion for reargument de costs. All concur, except RUGER, C. J., disnied; $10 costs. See 22 N. E. Rep. 572. senting. See 1 N. Y. Supp. 741.

« ForrigeFortsett »