For cases in Dec.Dig. & Am.Dig. Key-No.Series & Indexes see same topic and KEY-NUMBER
(G) Injuries to Persons on or near Tracks.
52 [New, vol. 6A Key-No. Series]
(Mass.) Director General properly sub-355(1) (Ind.) More than lawful presence
stituted by amendment.-Weiss v. Davis, 144 by permission necessary to protection against
52 [New, vol. 6A Key-No. Series]
(Ohio) Federal Transportation Act held
not to supplant state law as to jurisdiction.-
Jamieson v. Davis, 144 N. E. 291.
Wrongful detention of personalty by Director
General held "injury" to property within
negligence.-Harmon v. Speer, 144 N. E. 241.
358(1) (Ind.) Modification of instruction
on precautions as to licensee held not prejudi-
cial-Harmon v. Speer, 144 N. E. 241.
368 (Ind.) Ringing of bell did not negative
negligence in backing cars without watchman.
venue-Harmon v. Speer, 144 N. E. 241.
Ordinance requiring watchman on backing
car held violated.-Id.
385 (Ind.) One may rely on railroad's obe-
dience to ordinance.-Harmon v. Speer, 144 N.
E. 241.
99(4) (N.Y.) Commission's order, requir-
ing construction of street over railroad, not 396 (I) (Ind.) Burden of proof of contrib-
res judicata of party to bear expense.-Mc-utory negligence on defense.-Harmon v. Speer,
Aneny v. New York Cent. R. Co., 144 N. E. 144 N. E. 241.
Commission's orders valid only when within
legislative authority.-Id.
Commission may not order construction of
entire bridge when only portion carries street
over tracks.-Id.
99 (5) (Ind.) Section of Grade Crossing
Act held repealed.-McCardle v. Board of
Com'rs of Marion County, 144 N. E. 877.
VII. SALES, LEASES, TRAFFIC CON-
TRACTS, AND CONSOLIDATION.
143 (Ohio) Consolidation held to merge
constituent corporations into single organiza-
tion.-Marfield v. Cincinnati, D. & T. Traction
Co., 144 N. E. 689.
VIII. INDEBTEDNESS, SECURITIES,
LIENS, AND MORTGAGES.
(A) Nature and Extent of Liabilities.
145 (Mass.) Power to sue and be sued car-
ries power to compromise.--Codman v. Du-
maine, 144 N. E. 408.
147 (Mass.) Loan by railroad to another
held not ultra vires.-Codman v. Dumaine, 144
N. E. 408.
398(4) (Ind.) Evidence held to support
finding deceased was rightfully in switchyard.
-Harmon v. Speer, 144 N. E. 241.
400 (10) (Ind.) Pedestrian in switchyard
held not negligent as matter of law.-Harmon
v. Speer, 144 N. E. 241.
402 (Ind.) Answers to interrogatories held
not to establish contributory negligence.-Har-
mon v. Speer, 144 N. E. 241.
453 (Mass.) No absolute liability for fires.
New York Cent. R. Co. v. Wm. Culkeen &
Sons Co., 144 N. E. 96.
469 (III.) Assignee of elevator on right of
way held to take subject to assignor's lease.--
Atwood v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co., 144
N. E. 351.
Covenant in lease releasing railroad from lia-
bility for fire held not to run with land.-Id.
469 (Mass.) Covenant by warehouse com-
pany held to indemnify railroad operating on
side tracks against damages by negligent fire.
-New York Cent. R. Co. v. Wm. Culkeen &
Sons Co., 144 N. E. 96.
Contract indemnifying railroad against lia-
bility for fire held valid.-Id.
sup-481 (3) (Ind. App.) Evidence locomotives
generally emitted sparks held admissible.-Chi-
cago & E. R. Co. v. Barger, 144 N. E. 646.
Relinquishment of right to sue held to
port loan by railroad to another.-Id.
Bill against directors to recover loan held
not to state cause of action.-Id.
163 (Mass.) Security from borrowing rail-
road should be as broad as mortgage.-Codman
v. Dumaine, 144 N. E. 408.
(B) Statutory, Municipal, and Official
Regulations.
482(2) (1.) Cause of fire held for jury.-
Atwood v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co., 144
N. E. 351.
482(2) (Ind.App.) Circumstantial evidence
as to cause of fire sufficient.-Chicago & E. R.
Co. v. Barger, 144 N. E. 646.
223 (Ind.) Regulation of operation within See Partition; Quieting Title.
police power.-Harmon v. Speer, 144 N. E.
241.
Ordinance requiring watchman on backing
cars held not ambiguous.-Id.
(F) Accidents at Crossings.
I. NATURE AND GROUNDS OF RECEIVER-
(A) Nature and Subjects of Remedy.
330 (4) (Ohio) Reliance on lawful speed of 9 (Ind.) Mere showing of threatened in-
interurban car held not negligence.-Norris v.
Jones, 144 N. E. 274.
331 (3) (Ind.App.) Automobile driver may
rely on signal of flagman.-Pittsburgh, C., C. &
St. L. R. Co. v. Cook, 144 N. E. 478.
solvency does not authorize appointment of
receiver for individual.-State
V. Superior
Court of Marion County, 144 N. E. 747.
344 (8) (Ind.App.) Complaint for injuries II. APPOINTMENT, QUALIFICATION, AND
from crossing collision held not demurrable as
showing contributory negligence.-Pittsburgh,
C., C. & St. L. R. Co. v. Cook, 144 N. E. 478.35(1) (Ind.) Appointment of receiver to
Complaint for injuries from collision held take charge of property without notice to per-
sufficient on demurrer, though not alleging sons in possession held unwarranted. State v.
driver saw and acted on signals to cross.-Id. Superior Court of Marion County, 144 N. E.
747.
348 (10) (Ind.App.) Evidence flagman sig-
naled automobile driver held sufficient.-Pitts-
burgh, C., C. & St. L. R. Co. v. Cook, 144 N.
E. 478.
189 (III.) No costs taxed against receiver
350(19) (N.Y.) Contributory negligence of who recovered decree on its cross-bill.-Chica-
truck driver held for jury.-Chamberlain v. Le-go Title & Trust Co. v. Central Trust Co. of
high Valley R. Co., 144 N. E. 512.
Illinois, 144 N. E. 165.
RECEIVING STOLEN GOODS.
9(3) (11.) Verdict must find value of
goods received.-People v. Jackson, 144 N. E.
314.
Verdict held insufficient to sustain conviction.
-Id.
See Appeal and Error, 501-694; Criminal
Law, 1120.
III. REPORT AND FINDINGS.
97 (Mass.) Court erred in not striking out
part of report not conforming to pleadings.-
Boston Box Co. v. Shapiro, 144 N. E. 233.
41 (Mass.) Whether suit against state de-
termined from entire record.-Commonwealth
v. Norman, 144 N. E. 66.
Action by commissioner of corporations and
taxation to recover income tax suit by state.
-Id.
99 (2) (Mass.) Inferences of fact reasona-47 (Mass.) State is not citizen as regards
bly drawn from evidence, presumed to have been diversity.-Commonwealth v. Norman, 144 N.
drawn by auditor.-Grow v. Prudential Trust
Co., 144 N. E. 93.
99 (6) (Mass.) Auditor's report prima fa-
cie evidence, warranting judgment.-Grow v.
Prudential Trust Co., 144 N. E. 93.
99 (6) (Mass.) Findings of auditor for
plaintiff on account annexed held admissible on
trial before jury.-Boston Box Co. v. Shapiro,
144 N. E. 233.
101(2) (Mass.) Motion to recommit report
to auditor matter of discretion.-Boston Box
Co. v. Shapiro, 144 N. E. 233.
REFORMATION OF INSTRUMENTS.
VI. PROCEEDINGS TO PROCURE AND EF.
FECT OF REMOVAL.
89 (2) (Mass.) Duty of state court in pass-
ing on petition for removal stated.-Common-
wealth v. Norman, 144 N. E. 66.
Issues of fact cannot be tried in state court.
-Id.
Allegation of fact in petition must be accepted
as true by state court.-Id.
Whether cause for removal made out on face
of record question of law to be decided by state
court.-Id.
Allegations of law, inserted in petition for
removal, not accepted as sound or binding by
1. RIGHT OF ACTION AND DEFENSES.
25 (Ohio) Reformation of contract for pur-state court.-Id.
chase of coal lands properly refused, mistake
having been corrected by deed.-Mattucci v.
Sutliff, 144 N. E. 441.
I. REQUISITES AND VALIDITY.
89 (3) (Mass.) Whether cause for removal
made out on face of record question of law to
be decided by state court subject to review by
U. S. Supreme Court.-Commonwealth v. Nor-
man, 144 N. E. 66.
RETROSPECTIVE LAWS.
12(1) (Mass.) Of rights under contract See Constitutional Law, 190.
must be supported by consideration.-Brown v.
Grow, 144 N. E. 403.
16 (Mass.) What injured party thought
claim agent meant by statements immaterial. See Taxation.
-Costello v. Hayes, 144 N. E. 368.
Evidence as to intention, and whether plain-
tiff would have signed if she had known char- See Appeal and Error; Certiorari.
acter of instrument, inadmissible.-Id.
Immaterial that signer understood she was
precluded "from any further action."-Id.
That signer could not read or comprehend
release immaterial.-Id.
RIPARIAN RIGHTS.
See Waters and Water Courses, ~42–61.
17(2) (Mass.) Essentials to impeachment
of release by showing of false representations See Highways.
stated.-Costello v. Hayes, 144 N. E. 368.
Statement made to induce release held mere
expression of opinion.-Id.
19 (Mass.) Procuring by undue influence
imports constructive fraud.-Costello v. Hayes,
144 N. E. 368.
III. PLEADING, EVIDENCE, TRIAL, AND
REVIEW.
55 (Mass.) Burden of proof to show inva-
lidity of release stated.-Costello v. Hayes, 144
N. E. 368.
58(6) (Mass.) Whether there is any evi-4(1) (Mass.) Moving picture contract held
dence of fraud in obtaining for court.-Cos- neither sale nor lease, but license and bailment.
-Vitagraph, Inc., v. Park Theatre Co., 144 N.
tello v. Hayes, 144 N. E. 368.
E. 85.
RELIGIOUS SOCIETIES.
9 (Mass.) Board of Directors of First
Church of Christ, of five members, may ad-
minister trust under deed providing for board
of four directors.-Dittemore v. Dickey, 144 N.
E. 57.
Directors of First Church of Christ, Scien-
tist, may be removed by majority vote.-Id.
Director could be removed by vote, without
hearing or notice.-Id.
Removal of director held not malicious, whim-
sical, or capricious.-Id.
32 (Mass.) Writings held not to show ac-
ceptance of order for goods.-Larkin v. Chand-
ler & Farquhar Co., 144 N. E. 405.
II. CONSTRUCTION OF CONTRACT.
66 (Mass.) Contract selling business held
joint.-Armstrong Knitting Mills v. Oakes, 144
N. E. 81.
confirmed
79 (Ind.App.) Contracts
and
consummated in city of buyer's domicile through
its agents therein held to require delivery in
such city.-Indianapolis Abattoir Co. v. Penn
Beef Co., 144 N. E. 573,
For cases in Dec.Dig. & Am.Dig. Key-No.Series & Indexes see same topic and KEY-NUMBER
81(2) (Mass.) Delivery to be within rea- | Nephews & Co. (Old Staten Island Dyeing Es-
sonable time, if none specified.-Pope v. Brooks, tablishmment), 144 N. E. 503.
144 N. E. 214.
81(4) (N.Y.) If strike clause is merely to
delay delivery, contract must clearly so pro-
vide.-Normandie Shirt Co. v. J. H. & C. K.
Eagle, 144 N. E. 507.
85(2) (N.Y.) Right of manufacturer to
cancel under strike clause held not waived by
delivery and acceptance of part of goods.
Normandie Shirt Co. v. J. H. & C. K. Eagle,
Strike clause held to permit cancellation of
contract, and not merely postponement of de-
livery. Id.
Buyer could not require delivery of different
pattern, where agreed pattern could not be de-
livered because of strike.-Id.
87 (3) (Mass.) Finding of two contracts
warranted by evidence.-Pope v. Brooks, 144
N. E. 214.
IV. PERFORMANCE OF CONTRACT.
(C) Delivery and Acceptance of Goods.
172 (Ind.App.) Seller undertaking to deliv-
er without condition not relieved from perform-
ance by strike of railroad employees.-Indian-
apolis Abattoir Co. v. Penn Beef Co., 144 N. E.
573.
177 (Mass.) Absolute statement by pur-
chasers of intent not to perform constitutes
repudiation.-Pope v. Brooks, 144 N. E. 214.
274 (N.Y.) Receiving, eating, and paying
for food delivered to restaurant customer on his
order is purchase of goods.-Temple v. Keeler,
144 N. E. 635.
Implied warranty that food delivered to res-
taurant customer is reasonably fit for consump-
tion.-Id.
285(3) (Mass.) Essentials of notice of
breach of warranty stated.-Nashua River Pa-
per Co. v. Lindsay, 144 N. E. 224.
VII. REMEDIES OF SELLER.
(E) Actions for Price or Value.
355(4) (Mass.) No recovery for goods
sold and delivered, where contracts were to
sell rugs to be manufactured.-Pope v. Brooks,
(D) Actions and Counterclaims for Breach
439 (Mass.) Burden of proving waiver of
warranty held on defendant seller.-Nashua
River Paper Co. v. Lindsay, 144 N. E. 224.
445 (5) (Mass.) Whether proper notice of
breach of warranty given held question of fact.
Nashua River Paper Co. v. Lindsay, 144 N.
E. 224.
IX. CONDITIONAL SALES.
470 (Mass.) Contract of repurchase held
enforceable, though conditional bill of sale stat-
ed it included entire undertaking.-Brown v.
Grow, 144 N. E. 403.
SAVINGS BANKS.
See Banks and Banking, 309.
SCHOOLS AND SCHOOL DISTRICTS.
II. PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
(A) Establishment, School Lands and
Funds, and Regulation in
(Ind.) Legislature may determine agen-
cies to carry out provisions for public school
system and division of burden among them.-
Follett v. Sheldon, 144 N. E. 867.
Legislature may change school plans without
liability to courts for mistakes or abuses.-Id.
20 (Ind.) Court cannot decide whether
emergency exists to issue bonds for new school-
house.-Follett v. Sheldon, 144 N. E. 867.
(B) Creation, Alteration, Existence, and
Dissolution of Districts.
21 (III.) School districts are "quasi munici
pal corporations."-Melin v. Community Consol.
School Dist. No. 76, 144 N. E. 13.
School district's powers limited to those ex-
pressly granted or necessarily implied.-Id.
~24 (2) (III.) Every reasonable presumption
indulged in favor of validity of school district.
-People v. Standley, 144 N. E. 355.
42(2) (III.) District held sufficiently com
pact. People v. Standley, 144 N. E. 355.
Evidence held not to establish that district
comprises more than one community for high
school purposes:-Id.
District will not be held invalid unless evi-
dence clearly shows that children cannot rea-
sonably avail themselves of school privileges.
-Id.
42(2) (III.) Record of ex officio county
board proceedings held to bring same within
act validating changes in district boundaries;
"legal voter."-Wiswell v. Simpson, 144 N. E.
463.
Record held to sufficiently show proceedings
for detachment of territory was had before ex
officio board.-Id.
Record of ex officio board proceedings chang-
ing district boundaries entitled to weight.-Id.
Record on certiorari held to sufficiently show
land included within petition for detachment
Acquiescence in proceeding complained of
immaterial.-Id.
397 (N.Y.) Proof of tender of purchase
money unnecessary where one suing for return
of earnest money and money expended.-Greene
v. Barrett, Nephews & Co. (Old Staten Island 44 (Ind.) School town ceases to exist, on
Dyeing Establishment), 144 N. E. 503.
Showing of readiness on closing day to com-compliance with statute for discontinuance,
plete contract held not essential to buyer's ac-
though it does not so state.-Follett v. Sheldon,
tion to enforce return of purchase money.-Id. 144 N. E. 867.
Territory included in abolished school town
becomes part of school township, for school
purposes.-Id.
(C) Government, Officers, and District
Meetings.
(C) Actions for Breach of Contract.
405 (Ind.App.) Finding of buyer's readi-
ness and willingness to receive and pay for
goods essential in action for nondelivery.-In-
dianapolis Abattoir Co. v. Penn Beef Co., 14448 (2) (Ohio) Oath taken at any time dur
N. E. 573.
ing day compliance with statute.-State v. Tur-
ner, 144 N. E. 599.
415 (N.Y.) No recovery of damages by
buyer in absence of showing that he did what
he was required to do.-Greene v. Barrett,
48(3) (Ohio) Members of board begin term
from time of taking oath; office not vacant even
though majority of board meet and organize be- | School Tp. of Washington County, 144 N. E.
fore new members qualify.-State v. Turner, 526.
144 N. E. 599.
(D) District Property, Contracts, and
Liabilities.
146 (Ohio) Statute as to teachers' retire-
ment system held valid.-State v. Kurtz, 144 N.
E. 120.
65 (Ind.) Validity of transfer of school
town's property to school township not affected
by absence of formal written agreement.-Fol-7 (Ind.) Capture of liquor in automobile
lett v. Sheldon, 144 N. E. 867.
without search warrant violates constitutional
Validity of transfer of school town's prop-rights.-Batts v. State, 144 N. E. 23.
erty to school township not affected by execu-
tion of deed by town board of trustees, in-
stead of school trustees.-Id.
See Criminal Law, 996–1001.
SEPARATE PROPERTY.
Transfer of town school property to school
township not invalidated by delivery of orig-
inal instead of copy of record of town's in- See Husband and Wife, 138.
debtedness to township trustee.-Id.
68 (11) School district not empowered to
construct school building in public park.-Melin
v. Community Consol. School Dist. No. 76, 144
N. E. 13.
(E) District Debt, Securities, and Tax.
90 (Ind.) School and civil townships are
separate corporations, and each can only be-
come indebted to constitutional limit.-Follett
v. Sheldon, 144 N. E. 867.
See Husband and Wife, 299.
SET-OFF AND COUNTERCLAIM.
I. NATURE AND GROUNDS OF REMEDY.
8(1) (Mass.) Set-off may be established in
equitable action, though not strictly within let-
ter of statute.-Cunningham v. Commissioner
of Banks, 144 N. E. 447.
Whether law permitting bond issue by both
civil and school district enables Legislature to See Drains.
evade constitutional debt limit immaterial.-Id.
Act authorizing bond issue by civil township
to help pay cost of school building held not
unconstitutional.-Id.
SHERIFFS AND CONSTABLES.
II. COMPENSATION.
Facts creating emergency need not be set out 28 (Ind.App.) Sheriff held entitled to com-
in resolution to borrow money for school build-pensation for services in attending session of
ing.-Id.
county board of review.-Board of Com'rs of
91 (Ind.) Act held void, in so far as re-
Boone County v. Lewis, 144 N. E. 623.
quiring civil township to incur debt for school
building in excess of school township's consti- III. POWERS, DUTIES, AND LIABILITIES.
tutional limit.-McCullom v. State, 144 N. E. 78 (Ind.App.) Sheriff required to obey or-
der of county board of review to attend its ses-
sions.-Board of Com'rs of Boone County v.
Lewis, 144 N. E. 623.
91 (Ind.) Objections to amount and rate of
interest on school bonds and defective notice
of application to state tax board held cured by
statute.--Follett v. Sheldon, 144 N. E. 867.
Legislature may cure any omission, irregular-
ity, or act incident to bond issue which it
could originally authorize.-Id.
97(1) (Ind.) Legislature may authorize
both civil and school townships to issue bonds
and pay part of expense of building school-
house. Follett v. Sheldon, 144 N. E. 867.
Legal provisions for use of school buildings
for civic and social purposes would authorize
bond issue by civil township.-Id.
97(6) (Ind.) Resolution authorizing trus-
tee to issue bonds for erection of school build-
ing held sufficient, though not specifically au-
thorizing him to borrow money.-Follett v.
Sheldon, 144 N. E. 867.
Advisory board's record need not be couched
in technical legal language to authorize issu-
ance of bonds.-Id.
99 (Ind.) Township trustee, taking over
school property of town therein, must levy tax
on all taxable property of township to dis-
charge school bonds.-Follett v. Sheldon, 144
N. E. 867.
141(1) (Mass.) Position of assistant prin-
cipal in high school could not be abolished, as a
means of displacing him because of his political
views. Sweeney v. School Committee of City
of Revere, 144 N. E. 377.
141 (5) (Mass.) Assistant principal in high
school could not be dismissed without notice.-
Sweeney V. School Committee of City of
Revere, 144 N. E. 377.
144(4) (Mass.) Vote to lower salary of
high school principal held not contrary to stat-
ute.-Sweeney v. School Committee of City of
Revere, 144 N. E. 377.
145 (Ind.) Complaint in teacher's action
for wages to which entitled, under statute, held
state cause of action.-Hobbs v. Gibson
For cases in Dec.Dig. & Am.Dig. Key-No.Series & Indexes see same topic and KEY-NUMBER
III. GOOD FAITH AND DILIGENCE. not sufficient, if construed as creating new
92(2)(III.) Sufficiency of abstract of title right of action.-Employers' Liability Assur.
determined as of date fixed when vendor was
Co. v. Indianapolis & Cincinnati Traction Co.,
to furnish abstract.-Cobb v. Willrett, 144 N. 144 N. E. 615.
E. 834.
93 (III.) Court must enforce contract ac-
cording to terms.-Cobb v. Willrett, 144 N. E.
834.
Delay defeats right to specific performance.
-Id.
IV. PROCEEDINGS AND RELIEF.
114(7) (Ind.) Amendatory act's title held
not broad enough to comprehend mere posses-
sion of intoxicating liquor.-Smith v. State,
144 N. E. 471.
122(4) (Ind.) Section classifying and fix-
ing qualifications of teachers held void as not
embraced in title.-Hobbs v. Gibson School Tp.
of Washington County, 144 N. E. 526.
126(1) (Mass.) Held to lie as to items of 123(7) (Ind.) Title of amendatory act as
personal property on premises.-Hamilton v.
Coster, 144 Ñ. E. 226.
to registration and regulation of motor vehicles
held to embrace provision penalizing driving
while intoxicated.-White v. State, 144 N. E.
531.
129 (Mass.) Plaintiff held entitled to re-
cover loss of interest, taxes, insurance, and
expenses incurred in care of property.-Hamil-125(6) (Ind.) Provision as to payment of
judge of juvenile court, held within title refer
ton v. Coster, 144 N. E. 226.
ring to "criminal judges."-Oliver v. State, 144
N. E. 612.
IV. AMENDMENT, REVISION, AND CODIFI-
CATION.
191(1) (N.Y.) Supreme Court may grant
leave to sue insurance superintendent in fed-141(1) (III.) Act held not to amend exist-
eral court after liquidation proceedings com- ing law of homicide.-People v. Tokoly, 144 N.
menced. Bean v. Stoddard, 144 N. E. 916.
191 (2) (Mass.) Suit to restrain execution
of unconstitutional statute not suit against
state.-Commonwealth v. Norman, 144 N. E. 66.
STATUTE OF FRAUDS.
See Frauds, Statute of.
See Limitation of Actions.
V. REPEAL, SUSPENSION, EXPIRATION,
AND REVIVAL.
164 (Ind.) An amendment "to read as fol-
lows" repeals all not, embraced in amended
section.-Smith v. State, 144 N. E. 471.
VI. CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION.
(A) General Rules of Construction.
188 (111.) Words given ordinary and ac-
cepted meaning in popular use.-Shedd v. Pat-
terson, 144 N. E. 5.
For statutes relating to particular subjects, see 190 (Ohio) Courts must apply clear stat-
the various specific topics.
III. SUBJECTS AND TITLES OF ACTS.
ute, so as to effect its obvious purpose.-Max-
field v. Brooks, 144 N. E. 725.
225 (Ohio) Road improvement statutes held
pari materia and to be construed together.-
Maxfield v. Brooks, 144 N. E. 725.
107(1) (Ind.) Act regulating motor vehi-in
cles and chauffeurs held not unconstitutional as
covering more than one subject.-White v. 22534 (Ohio) To what extent legislative in-
State, 144 N. E. 531.
terpretation will be adopted by courts stated.
109 (Ind.) Body of act must be confined to-State v. Conn, 144 N. E. 130.
particular subject expressed in title and con-
nected matters.-Hobbs v. Gibson School Tp.
of Washington County, 144 N. E. 526.
109 (Ind.) Only subject of act need be ex-
pressed in title, not matters connected there-
with.-White v. State, 144 N. E. 531.
109 (Ind.) When provisions within title
stated.-Oliver v. State, 144 N. E. 612.
What is considered in determining what is
general subject of statute.-Id.
226 (Mass.) Interpretation of adopted
statute persuasive.-Cunningham v. Commis-
sioner of Banks, 144 N. E. 447.
(B) Particular Classes of Statutes.
238 (Mass.) Grant from sovereign con-
strued strictly against grantee.-Inhabitants of
Town of Stoneham v. Commonwealth, 144 N. E.
83.
245 (Ind.App.) Rule of construction for
1101⁄2(1) (III.) Amendment to Forest Pre-tax law, stated.-Risley v. Rumble, 144 N. E.
serve Act within title.-Washburn v. Forest 568.
Preserve Dist. of Cook County, 144 N. E. 836.
114(2) (Ind.) Title to act authorizing em
ployer to recover from person causing injury
245 (Mass.) Tax laws strictly construed
against taxing power.-Bingham v. Long, 144
N. E. 77.
Act 1887, Feb. 4, ch. 104, 24
Stat. 379.
882 Ch. 104....
882
Stat. 544. See Bank-
ruptcy Act.
1908, April 22, ch. 149, 35
668
721 1911, March 3, ch. 231, 36
Stat. 1087. See Judicial
Code.
JUDICIAL CODE.
Act 1911, March 3, ch. 231, 36
Stat. 1087.
§ 28.
|