INFORMER. See Claims, 2-3.
INJUNCTION. See Jurisdiction, III, 1-2, 4; IV, 1; Public Utili-
ties, 4.
Restraint of Enforcement of State Statute. Insufficiency of alle-
gations of bill. Williams v. Miller, 599.
INSURANCE. See Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Act, 2–3.
INTEREST. See Taxation, 1.
See Conspiracy; Taxation, 1–9.
INTERSTATE COMMERCE. See Boiler Inspection Act; Fair
Labor Standards Act, 2, 4-6; Public Utilities, 2-4.
INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION. See Boiler Inspection
Act.
INVENTION. See Patents for Inventions.
JEOPARDY. See Constitutional Law, IV, 10; Criminal Law, 4.
JOHNSON ACT. See Public Utilities, 4.
JOINT TENANTS. See Bankruptcy, 3.
JUDGMENTS. See Constitutional Law, III; Divorce, 3-4.
JURISDICTION.
I. In General, p. 728.
II. Jurisdiction of this Court, p. 729.
III. Jurisdiction of Circuit Courts of Appeals, p. 731.
IV. Jurisdiction of District Courts, p. 731.
References to particular subjects under title Jurisdiction: Abate-
ment, I, 1; Aliens, I, 1; Amount in Controversy, IV, 2; Bankruptcy
Act, I, 8; III, 4; Certiorari, II, 20; Criminal Appeals, II, 21-22;
Divorce, I, 3; Eminent Domain, I, 7; Equally Divided Court,
II, 5; Federal Question, I, 4-8; II, 12-15; Final Judgment, II,
7-11; Habeas Corpus, I, 2; III, 3, 6; Injunction, III, 1-2, 4;
IV, 1; Jurisdictional Amount, IV, 2; Limitations, I, 6; Longshore-
men's Act, IV, 4; Mandamus, I, 1; Merchant Marine Act, I, 5;
Moot Question, II, 4-5; Patents for Inventions, I, 4; Record, II,
23; Rehearing, III, 5; Remand, III, 5; Remittitur, II, 8; Sub-
poena, I, 10; IV, 3.
1. Mandamus as appropriate remedy to compel District Court
to proceed to trial of suit erroneously abated because of enemy
alienage of plaintiff. Ex parte Kawato, 69.
2. Habeas Corpus. Judgment denying habeas corpus on sole
ground that application had not been made to state courts vacated
where writ has since been refused by State's highest court. Sharpe
v. Buchanan, 238.
3. Divorce. Jurisdiction of suit for divorce. Williams v. North
Carolina, 287.
4. Federal Question. Whether licensee estopped to challenge
validity of patent, where license involved price-fixing stipulation,
was federal question. Sola Electric Co. v. Jefferson Electric Co.,
173.
5. Id. Whether state court protected rights of parties to action
under § 33 of Merchant Marine Act was federal question. Garrett
v. Moore-McCormack Co., 239.
6. Id. When period of limitations begins to run against re-
ceiver's claim on assessment levied by Comptroller of Currency on
stockholders of national bank is federal question. Fisher v. Whiton,
217.
7. Id. Federal court in eminent domain proceedings follows local
law as to procedure but not as to substantive rights. U. S. v.
Miller, 369.
8. Id. Interpretation of Bankruptcy Act. Wragg v. Federal
Land Bank, 325.
9. Scope of Review. Appellate court may sustain judgment on
grounds not previously urged. Helvering v. Stuart, 154.
10. Enforcement of Subpoenas Duces Tecum of Secretary of
Labor under Walsh-Healey Public Contracts Act. Endicott John-
son Corp. v. Perkins, 501.
II. Jurisdiction of this Court.
1. Want of Jurisdiction. Dismissal for. Gurney v. Ferguson,
588; Peak v. California, 589; Reeves v. Williamson, 593; Donovan
v. Turner, 599.
2. Timeliness of Appeal. Dismissal of appeal not applied for in
time provided by law. Monks v. Lee, 590.
3. Moot Question. Affirmance of cause wherein question has
become moot. Royal Cadillac Service v. U. S., 595.
4. Id. Procedure where question here sought to be reviewed
becomes moot. Natural Milk Producers Assn. v. San Francisco, 423.
5. Equally Divided Court. Affirmance by. U. S. v. Consumers
Paper Co., 595.
6. Appellate Jurisdiction. Denial of habeas corpus by district
court for District of Columbia as reviewable on appeal to Court
of Appeals and here by certiorari. Ex parte Quirin, 1.
7. Review of State Courts. Finality of Judgment. Test of
finality of judgment of state court for purpose of review by this
Court. Dept. of Banking v. Pink, 264.
8. Id. Finality of judgment as affected by local practice of
entering judgment on remittitur of highest court of State. Id.
9. Id. Amendment of final judgment merely certifying that
federal question was presented and decided did not extend time
for petition for certiorari. Id.
10. Id. Appellate review afforded by Missouri law not exhausted
where no application made to division of state supreme court for
transfer of cause to court en banc. Osment v. Pitcairn, 587.
11. Id. Dismissal for want of final judgment. Cheltenham &
Abington Co. v. Commission, 588; Ex parte Davis, 592.
12. Federal Question. Dismissal for want of substantial federal
question. Clark v. Doyle, 590; General Motors Acceptance Corp.
v. Hulbert, 590; Morris Plan Bank v. Graves, 591; Southeastern
Greyhound Lines v. McCanless, 595; Coleman v. California, 596;
Roddenberry v. Florida, 600; Almer Co. v. Commissioner of Taxa-
tion, 605.
13. Id. Dismissal for want of properly presented federal ques-
tion. Tennessee Oil Co. v. McCanless, 588; Toye Bros. Co. v.
Cooperative Cab Co., 589.
14. Id. Dismissal because record failed to show that federal
question was properly preserved on appeal to highest state court.
Martin v. Struthers, 589.
15. Id. Non-federal ground adequate to support judgment.
Holley v. Lawrence, 518.
16. Local Law. Considerations of equity as requiring determi-
nation here of question of local law. Public Utilities Comm'n v.
United Fuel Gas Co., 456.
17. Id. Questions of local law; determination by Circuit Court
of Appeals. Helvering v. Stuart, 154.
18. Scope of Review. Ground for supporting judgment may be
considered though raised here for first time. Marshall v. Pletz, 383.
19. Id. Judgment may be sustained on grounds not previously
urged. Helvering v. Stuart, 154.
20. Id. Respondent in certiorari may urge in support of judg-
ment a ground rejected by District Court and not considered by
Circuit Court of Appeals. U. S. ex rel. Marcus v. Hess, 537.
21. Criminal Appeals. Direct Appeal. When judgment sustain-
ing demurrer to indictment not directly appealable. U. S. v. Wayne
Pump Co., 200.
22. Id. Amendatory Act of May 9, 1942, not retrospective in
operation; inapplicable to appeals for which, when taken, there
was no statutory authority. Id.
23. Insufficiency of Record. See Braverman v. U. S., 49.
III. Jurisdiction of Circuit Courts of Appeals.
1. Appeal. Interlocutory Injunction. Order as one granting in-
junction and appealable under Jud. Code § 129. Ettelson v. Metro-
politan Life Ins. Co., 188.
2. Id. Applicability of Jud. Code § 129 determined not by
terminology of order but by substantial effect. Id.
3. Habeas Corpus. Power of Circuit Court of Appeals to issue
writ as incident to pending appeal. Adams v. U. S. ex rel. McCann,
269.
4. Bankruptcy Act. Order vacating injunction against alleged
bankrupt prosecuting suit in state court, appealable. Albin v.
Cowing Joint Co., 211.
5. Petition for Rehearing. Power of Circuit Court of Appeals
to remand cause to District Court for settlement of proper bill of
exceptions. Miller v. U. S., 192.
6. U. S. Court of Appeals, D. C. Denial of habeas corpus by
District Court for District of Columbia as reviewable on appeal.
Ex parte Quirin, 1.
IV. Jurisdiction of District Courts.
1. Equity Jurisdiction. Suit to enjoin enforcement of California
Agricultural Prorate Act as within equity jurisdiction. Parker v.
Brown, 341.
2. Amount in Controversy. Suit as one "arising under law regu-
lating commerce" and maintainable without regard to amount in
controversy. Id.
3. Limits of Jurisdiction of District Court upon application
by Secretary of Labor for enforcement of subpoena duces tecum
under Walsh-Healey Public Contracts Act. Endicott Johnson Corp.
v. Perkins, 501.
4. Longshoremen's Act. Order of deputy commissioner dismiss-
ing claim because not filed within year after injury, not reviewable.
Marshall v. Pletz, 383.
JURISDICTIONAL AMOUNT. See Jurisdiction, IV, 2.
JURY. See Constitutional Law, I, 6–7; V.
JUST COMPENSATION. See Constitutional Law, IV, 7; Eminent
Domain, 1-2; Taxation, 1.
KNOWLEDGE. See Admiralty, 7.
LABOR RELATIONS. See Admiralty, 2-3; Antitrust Acts, 6;
Fair Labor Standards Act.
LAW OF WAR. See Constitutional Law, I, 3-6; War, 2-6.
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY. See Statutes, 3-4.
LICENSE. See Patents for Inventions, 4.
LIENS. See Constitutional Law, IV, 4-5.
1. Tax Liens. When lien for federal estate tax attaches; in-
terest of decedent as tenant by entirety; priority of unrecorded
lien over mortgage. Detroit Bank v. U. S., 329.
2. Id. Priority of federal tax lien over later state tax lien.
Michigan v. U. S., 338.
LIMITATION OF LIABILITY. See Admiralty, 7.
LIMITATIONS. See Admiralty, 5-6; Bankruptcy, 7; Banks; Ju-
risdiction, I, 6; Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Act, 1.
1. Offenses. Three-year limitation of R. S. § 1044 applicable to
prosecution for criminal contempt. Pendergast v. U. S., 412.
2. Id. When limitation begins to run against prosecution for
criminal contempt under Jud. Code § 268. Id.
LONGSHOREMEN'S & HARBOR WORKERS' ACT.
1. Claim. Timeliness. Claim as barred because not filed under
§ 13 (a) within year after injury. Marshall v. Pletz, 383.
2. Id. Tender of compensation by insurance carrier not within
exception allowing claim to be filed within year after date of last
"payment." Id.
3. Id. Furnishing of medical care to injured employee was not
"payment of compensation" within exception of § 13 (a). Id.
4. Id. Terms "payment" and "compensation" in § 13 (a) refer
to periodic money payments to be made by employer. Id.
|