A.

Acey v. Fernie, 7 Mees. & W. 151... Adams v. Storey, 1 Paine, 79, Fed. Cas. No. 66..

v. Tombigbee Mills, 78 Miss. 676, 29 So. 470..

v. Yazoo & M. Valley R. Co. 77 Miss. 194, 28 So. 956....89,

Adams Exp. Co. v. Ohio State Auditor,

165 U. S. 194, 41 L. ed. 683, 17 Sup. Ct. Rep. 305..

v. Ohio State Auditor, 165 U. S. 195, 41 L. ed. 683, 17 Sup. Ct. Rep. 305..

v. Ohio State Auditor, 166 U. S. 185, 41 L. ed. 965, 17 Sup. Ct. Rep. 604..

Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. United States, 175 U. S. 211, 44 L. ed. 136, 20 Sup. Ct. Rep.

96

Aerkfetz v. Humphreys, 145 U. S. 418, 36 L. ed. 758, 12 Sup. Ct. Rep. 835

Etna L. Ins. Co. v. Middleport, 124 U. S. 534, 31 L. ed. 537, 8 Sup. Ct. Rep. 625..

1118

91

90

234

91

1069

496

656

Ainsa v. New Mexico & A. R. Co. 175 U. S. 76, 44 L. ed. 78, 20 Sup. Ct. Rep. 28... .634, 735 v. United States, 161 U. S. 208, 40 L. ed. 673, 16 Sup. Ct. Rep. 544..697, 726, 727, 730, 731 v. United States, 184 U. S. 639, post, 727, 22 Sup. Ct. Rep. 507 Albright v. Teas, 106 U. S. 613, 27 L. ed. 295, 1 Sup. Ct. Rep. 550

701

55 Salt Co. v. Heidenheimer, 80 Tex. 344, 15 S. W. 1038 780 Sugar Ref. Co. v. Louisiana, 179 U. S. 89, 45 L. ed. 102, 21 Sup. Ct. Rep. 43..

Arkansas v. Kansas & T. Coal Co. 183 U. S. 185, 46 L. ed. 47, 22 Sup. Ct. Rep. 47.

v. Schlierholz, 179 U. S. 598, 45 L. ed. 335, 21 Sup. Ct. Rep. 229

v. Texas & T. Coal Co. 183 U. S. 185, post, 144, 22 Sup. Ct. Rep. 47

Armstrong v. Athens County Treasurer, 16 Pet. 281, 10 L. ed. 965

Arnold v. Arnold, 2 Myl. & C. 256. v. United States, 9 Cranch, 104, 3 L. ed. 671..

Arrowsmith v. Harmoning, 118 U. S. 194, 30 L. ed. 243, 6 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1023.

Asher v. Texas, 128 U. S. 129, 32 L. ed. 368, 2 Inters. Com. Rep. 241, 9 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1.

Aspdin. Austin, 5 Q. B. 671..

1259

667

548

1259

829

Avery v. Popper, 179 U. S. 305, 45 L. ed. 203, 21 Sup. Ct. Rep. 94. ..664, 666, 668 Ayers, Re, 123 U. S. 443, 31 L. ed. 216, 8 Sup. Ct. Rep. 164.....83, 962 Ayres v. Carver, 17 How. 591, 15 L. ed. 179.. .1092, 1093 Aztec Min. Co. v. Ripley, 151 U. S. 79, 38 L. ed. 80, 14 Sup. Ct. Rep. 236..

B.

Bachrack v. Norton, 132 U. S. 337, 33
L. ed. 377, 10 Sup. Ct.
Rep. 106

88 Backus v. Fort Street Union Depot 702 Co. 169 U. S. 557, 42 L. ed. 853, 18 Sup. Ct. Rep. 445. . 131 Bagley v. Peddie (1857) 16 N. Y. 469, 69 Am. Dec. 713, 5 Sandf. 192

...

1128

758

480

.381, 382

118

v. White, 92 U. S. 176, 23 L. ed. 480 Ballew v. United States, 160 U. S. 187, 40 L. ed. 388, 16 Sup. Ct. Rep. 263...

Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. Joy, 173 U. S. 226, 43 L. ed. 677, 19 Sup. Ct. Rep. 387.. Baltimore & Ô. S. W. R. Co. v. Voigt, 176 U. S. 498, 44 L. ed. 560, 20 Sup. Ct. Rep. 385 Baltimore & P. R. Co. v. Fifth Baptist Church, 137 U. S. 568. 34 L. ed. 784, 11 Sup. Ct. Rep. 185...

v. Grant, 98 U. S. 398, 25 L. ed. 231

247

718

193

779

748

701

702

(1814)

1 Price,

165..

701

v. Crocker, 138 Mass. 214.

566

V. Jackson, 8 Bligh, N. R. 15..

702

v. Hopkins, 130 U. S. 210, 32 L. ed. 908, 9 Sup. Ct. Rep. 503 ..799, 1177 Baltimore & S. R. Co. v. Nesbit, 10 How, 395, 13 L. ed. 469. Baltimore, The v. Rowland, 8 Wall. 378, 19 L. ed. 463.. Bangor v. Smith, 83 Me. 422, 13 L. R.

481

665

221

Bank of

Aurora v. United States, 7 Cranch,

877

382, 3 L. ed. 378..

Austin v. Ricker, 61 N. H. 97.

v. United States, 155 U. S. 417, 39 L. ed. 206, 15 Sup. Ct. Rep. 167

Avery, The (1814) 2 Gall. 308, Fed. Cas. No. 671..

1196 Barbier v. Connolly, 113 U. S. 27, 28 L. ed. 923, 5 Sup. Ct. Rep. 357. ..107, 286, 689

1146 Bardes v. First Nat. Bank, 178 U. S. 524, 44 L. ed. 1175, 20 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1000.....149, 412, 416

759

Bardon v. Northern P. R. Co. 145 U.
S. 535, 36 L. ed. 806, 12
Sup. Ct. Rep. 856...
Barker v. Harvey, 181 U. S. 481, 45 L.
ed. 963, 21 Sup. Ct. Rep.
690

964

964

Birmingham & P. Mines Street R. Co.
v. Birmingham Street R.
Co. 79 Ala. 465, 58 Am.
Rep. 615

1135

.782, 784
487

Barney v. Winona & St. P. R. Co. 117

U. S. 228, 29 L. ed. 858, 6
Sup. Ct. Rep. 654..
Barrett v. Hopkins, 2 McCrary, 129,
7 Fed. 312..
Barry v. New York Mut. L. Ins. Co. 53
N. Y. 536..

Barton v. Barbour, 104 U. S. 126, 26
L. ed. 672..

v. Fisk, 30 N. Y. 171.

v. Glover, Holt, N. P. 43.
Baumgartel v. Providence Washington

Ins. Co. 136 N. Y. 547, 32
N. E. 990..

Behrens v. McKenzie, 23 Iowa, 342, 92
Am. Dec. 428..

668

856

668

64

380

v. National City Bank, 23 Wall.
307, 23 L. ed. 119..

1147

221

Beardsley Case, 15 App. Div. 251, 44
N. Y. Supp. 175..

849

v. People, 109 Ill. 504.
Blenheim, The, 2 W. Rob. 421.
Blood v. Crew Levick Co. 171 Pa. 328,
33 Atl. 344..

653

271

1244

Beaston v. Farmers Bank, 12 Pet.
135, 9 L. ed. 1030...

Blue-Jacket V. Johnson County, 3

128

Kan. 299

206

Beaver v. Taylor, 1 Wall. 637, 17 L.
ed. 601
Bedford Belt R. Co. v. McDonald, 17

Brecknock Nav. Co. v. Pritchard, 6 T.

R. 750 ..

Brennan v. Titusville, 153 U. S. 289, 38 L. ed. 719, 4 Inters. Com. Rep. 658, 14 Sup. Ct. Rep. 829

Briges v. Sperry, 95 U. S. 401, 24 L. ed. 390

Briggs v. North American & Mercantile Ins. Co. 53 N. Y. 446 Briley v. Beach, 22 Land Dec. 549... Brimmer v. Rebman, 138 U. S. 78, 34 L. ed. 862, 3 Inters. Com. Rep. 485, 11 Sup. Ct. Rep. 213..

Bristol v. Washington County, 177 U. S. 133, 44 L. ed. 701, 20 Sup. Ct. Rep. 585. Bronson's Case, 150 N. Y. 1, 34 L. R. A. 238, 44 N. E. 707.... Brooklyn, Re, 143 N. Y. 596, 26 L. R.

A. 270, 38 N. E. 983, aff'd in 166 U. S. 685, 41 L. ed. 1165, 17 Sup. Ct. Rep. 718 Brooks v. Adams, 11 Pick. 441... v. Burlington & S. W. R. Co. 102 U. S. 107, 26 L. ed. 91 v. Greathed, 1 Jac. & W. 176.. Browder v. M'Arthur, 7 Wheat. 58, 5 L. ed. 397. Brown v. Clarke, 4 How. 4, 11 L. ed. 850

v. Houston, 114 U. S. 623, 29
L. ed. 257, 5 Sup. Ct. Rep.
1091.....130, 132, 133, 134, 136

v. Keene, 8 Pet. 112, 8 L. ed.
885
v. Marion Nat. Bank, 169 U. S.
416, 42 L. ed. 801, 18 Sup.
Ct. Rep. 390.

v. Maryland, 12 Wheat. 419, 6
L. ed. 678....130-133, 137, 792
v. New Jersey, 175 U. S. 172, 44
L. ed. 119, 20 Sup. Ct. Rep.
77...
.175, 1259
v. Shannon, 20 How. 55, 15 L.
ed. 826

1055

C.

119

913

ters. Com. Rep. 153, 8 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1073..

312

v. San Pablo & T. R. Co. 149

v. Smart, 145 U. S. 454, 36 L. ed. 773, 12 Sup. Ct. Rep.

v. Southern P. Co. 157 U. S. 229, 39 L. ed. 683, 15 Sup. Ct. Rep. 591..

California P. R. Co. Re, 3 Sawy. 240,

516

1119

Fed. Cas. No. 2,315. California Powder Works v. Davis, 151 U. S. 393, 38 L. ed. 207, 14 Sup. Ct. Rep. 350.. 1259 Callahan v. Woodbridge, 171 Mass. 595, 51 N. E. 176......702, 704 Cameron v. M'Roberts, 3 Wheat. 591, 4 L. ed. 467. v. United States, 148 U. S. 301, 37 L. ed. 459, 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 595

Canada Southern R. Co. v. Interna

516

206

.189, 541

564

v. United States, 167 U. S. 104, 42 L. ed. 94, 17 Sup. Ct. Rep. 744..

Buchanan v. Litchfield, 102 U. S. 278,

26 L. ed. 138.