Copyright 1883 by THE LAWYERS CO-OPERATIVE PUBLISHING CO. Copyright 1899 by WALTER MALINS ROSE. Copyright 1901 by THE LAWYERS CO-OPERATIVE PUBLISHING CO., and WALTER MALINS ROSE. Copyright Renewed 1911 by THE LAWYERS CO-OPERATIVE PUBLISHING CO. E. R. ANDREWS PRINTING COMPANY, ROCHESTER, N. Y. PREFACE TO SECOND EDITION. T HE first republication, nearly twenty years ago, of the United States Supreme Court Reports in the Lawyers' Edition, was an event of public importance. It has resulted, not merely in the increase, but in the literal multiplication, of the number of lawyers and judges who own and use this great series of decisions. It has, therefore, materially extended the influence of those decisions upon the general jurisprudence of the country. Now the inclusion of Rose's Notes obviously adds great value to these reports. At the end of each volume of reports, several of which are bound in every book of this set, will be found Rose's Notes for that volume. These volumes are separated by colored sheets. ! Bailey v. Dozier,. B. Baldwin et al. v. Payne et al..... Bank of Metropolis v. New England Bank,. 212 Marshall et al., Bush v...... Bank of the United States v. Moss et al... Barton et al., Gwin et al. v... Beall, Marshall v.... ........ ........ Bein et al. v. Heath,. .... Μ. 23 McMicken v. Webb et al.... 301 Marshall v. Beall,.. 292 70 284 31 Mason, Brashear v..... 92 7 Mathewson v. Clarke,... 122 • • 70 Merchants' Bank, N. J. Steam Nav. Co. v. 344 228 Moss et al., Bank of the United States v... 31 248 • ১ Dix et al., West River Bridge Company v. 507 Sheppard et al. v. Wilson, ........ Emerson, Hogg et al. v.. F. Forgay et al. v. Conrad,. G. Gaines et ux., Patterson v...... Gwin et al. v. Barton et al....... H. 550 301 190 206 301 • 209 301 41 163 • T. Harrison, Bowling v....... Heath, Bein et al. v.... Hodge et al., United States v.. Hogg et al. v. Emerson,.. .. Houston et al. v. City Bank of New Or 228 Villabolos et al. v. United States,........ 81 279 • leans, 292 .. Hundley, Sims v..... 1 West River Bridge Company v. Dix et al... 507 Wilson, Sheppard et al. v.... 260 I. 1 Y. Innerarity et al., Curtis et al. v.... 146 Yates et al., United States v........... 605 |