Sidebilder
PDF
ePub

13. Any person setting on additional workmen, without giving notice to his partner, forfeits the ore which such workmen may raise.

14. If he give notice, then he must give his partners their share of the ore, deducting expenses.

15. Recapitulation of what has been stated.

16. An ordinance of the government of New Spain, on the subject of the number of hands to be set on.

17. What ought to be done by a partner who shall have found ore in a mine theretofore unproductive, he having set on an additional number of hands on his own account.

18. If he shall not, by this means, find ore, he shall not be paid his expenses.

19. Ordinances of Peru, as to the number of workmen to be employed in a mine held in partnership, which does not return profit.

20. In New Spain, a partner who omits, during a period of four months, to contribute to the expenses of four workmen, forfeits his share.

21. Discord is the bane of mining partnerships: prudent regulations of the German partnerships.

22. The overseers are the cause of much discord amongst partners; but an interventor might be appointed.

23. Mode of dividing the works into regions.

24. The produce may be divided either in ore or in silver; and any one taking from the common stock is liable to a penalty.

25 and 26. Agreements amongst partners, to contribute in different proportions, are lawful.

27. What number of mines partners may lawfully hold.

28. Don Joseph Saenz's opinion on this point. The contrary conclusion come to.

29. Namely, that they may hold as many contiguous mines as there are partners, and then, after an interval of three pertenencias, as many more.

30 to 33. This opinion supported upon the letter of the ordinances, and by several considerations arising out of them.

34. A man may hold a mine in partnership with others, contiguous to one belonging to him in severalty.

35 and 36. The partnership is determined by renouncement, sale or forfeiture, under the penalties of the ordinance.

37. And likewise by the death of a partner; but the property is still held in common, and the shares remain distinct.

38 to 46. The partnership may be determined by an actual partition in measured varas; an opinion which is confirmed by the tenour of several of the ordinances of Peru, and by the expressions of those of the new code.

47. Whether the mine will conveniently admit of partition or not, is left to the judge to decide.

COMMENTARY.

1. Every occupation which offers a fair and honest profit, may be the subject of a partnership,† a kind of contract which is very often entered into, in reference to the working of mines, which, while they offer, on the one hand, great prospects of success, frequently, on the other hand, bring ruin

* A person appointed to watch specially over the interests of one or more of the partuers in a mining concern.-Trans.

+ Law 2, title 10, part 5. Law 5. L. 57, ff. pro. soc. Gutierrez, de juram. confirm.1. p. cap. 48, n. 7. Felicius, de societ. cap. 9, a n. 3, usque ad 22, princ. tit. Instit. de societ. et ibi Institutar.

on the parties concerned in working them. The reason of partnerships being so often entered into in reference to mines is, that a mine (as is commonly said) requires a mine, that is to say, demands a large capital, and the owners or discoverers not being always able to undertake the expense, call in the aid of others, to whom they cede a partial interest in the mines, to be enabled to work them and raise the ore. The transaction therefore, at its outset, involves a complete and gratuitous gift, which is however to be construed with reference to the partnership, the object of which is to carry on the work of the mine at the common expense. At other times, different parties enter into an agreement, to become partners in all the mines they may find in the course of their search. At other times, mine owners dispose of shares in their mines; and, finally, mines may be acquired and transferred for the purpose of being worked in common or in partnership, by every mode in which the right of property may be transferred, whether onerous or lucrative.

2. An entire mine consists of 12 bars; and although twice that number, or 24, are reckoned, in some mining districts, yet 12 is the more usual number in the principal districts, in analogy to the division of the inheritance into the parts of an As. These bars and the profits arising upon them, may be subdivided amongst a number of partners, according to the quantity of ore raised. Each partner therefore, contributes to the expenses, and receives the produce, in proportion to the number of bars belonging to him; the owner of six bars, in the proportion of one half; of three bars, in the proportion of one fourth; of two bars, in the proportion of one sixth, and so on, as in the division of the inheritance; so that a due proportion exists between the capital subscribed and the profit or loss, derived or sustained, agreeably to the rules of the civil law. But the partners are at liberty to enter into a variety of agreements amongst themselves, by virtue of which one partner may receive a larger share of the profits, or contribute less to the expenses, than another, as we shall explain by and by; in like manner as, in other cases of partnership, agreements introducing such inequalities are permitted.§

3. Having premised thus much, and proceeding to investigate the meaning of the ordinances which treat of partnership mines, we shall find that it is provided by the 21st ordinance of the new code (which agrees with the 20th of the old ordinances), that a person registering mines which are not wholly his own, is bound to declare what share or shares he holds in them,

* Agricola, de re metall. lib. 4, p. 60.

† Idem, ibid.

‡ L. si non fuerint, 29. ff. pro socio, §. 1, et 3: Instit. de societ.

Ex iisdem jurib. num. præced. et §. 2. Instit. de societ. et ibi DD. Felicius, de societat. d. c. 9. à n. 22. latissime, usque ad n. 41.

Law 5, tit. 13, book 6, Collection of Castile, cap. 20.

and if he hold them in partnership, then what share his partner or partners may hold. Here we must notice the distinction which is raised by these words, between mines held in common, and in partnership, as there may be a holding in common, without a partnership; although there can be no partnership without a holding in common. Thus in the instance of one and the same thing purchased by several persons jointly, or of an undivided inheri tance, and in several cases noticed in the laws, there is a holding in com mon, without a partnership; for the latter requires a special agreement or contract, which a holding in common does not, as it may arise from the very nature of certain acts performed. Our ordinance, therefore, in order to make mines held in common, and also those held in partnership, liable to the obligation of being registered, ordains first, that any person who shall hold mines which are not wholly his own, shall declare what his share is (and here it refers to mines held in common), and next, that if he shall hold them in partnership, he shall declare what the shares of his partners are. And, in consequence of this precept, it is the usual practice, at the time of presenting the petition of registry, to declare the names, and the bars or shares of the partners, before the justice; for the register being the basis of the title to the mine, and serving various ends, it ought to appear with certainty who the owners are, which we have seen when considering the other ordinances.†

4. Any partner who, in contravention of this precept, shall register the whole mine as his own, is subjected by the ordinance to the penalty of forfeiting the share or shares he may hold, in favor of the partner or partners whose shares he has omitted to set forth. A very reasonable and proper punishment, for the avaricious and fraudulent act of suppressing the right of another person, and appropriating to himself what is common to others with him; and for infringing the rules of the 20th ordinance, by registering as wholly his own, a mine which is only partially so. It is a very common practice of wicked and avaricious persons, to rob the poor and wretched individual who has discovered the vein, by thus depriving him of the share he is entitled to, merely because they know he is unable to defend his rights; and we have met with instances of this nefarious proceeding, in the case of mines of considerable richness. Although by the civil law, the action pro socio lies, to recover a share of the profit, and to establish the party's right, without going so far as to seek to make the party setting up a claim to his partner's interest,

• Felicius de societ. cap. 11, n. 2. "Et quia licet communio possit esse sine societate, tamen societas non posset esse sine communione. L. hæredes, §. non tantum, ff. fam. hercise. L. 31. ff. pro. soc. Ut sit pro socio actio societatem intercedere oportet ; nec enim sufficit rem esse communem, nisi societas intercedit : communiter autem res agi potest etiam citra societatem : ut puta cum non affectione societatis incidimus in communionem: ut evenit in re duobus legata: item si a duobus simul empta res sit: aut si hæreditas, vel donatio communiter nobis obvenit, aut sia duobus separatim emimus partes eorum, no socii faturi. Et L. 32, eod." Ex DD. pene innumeri apud eundem Felicium.

↑ Chap. 5, above, ordinances 17, 18 and 19.

[ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small]

obligatie of keeping the nine in word til të kur lule mnenel at mLE management té a nae bes

act in opposition to the primates, it deter mais noel d n kerus tive when open a malige më by viet ne ponders tento de te other partners, win of some vill se ilm Leg & Que vanz

own interest, or in my case if they do not d. st. ney and made me Pant of the omission upon themetires

6. To make mis penality amach, it is not Desert V: the time of giving possession talde me is sak tree extr

the 55th crimanse: for although the tide to the mine and the act of regis try are made complete by the giving possession, pit dhe te whin the shares of the other partners are to be declan i. is that of miking the regis try; such being the strict letter of the criance: When say person shall register," ko. Between the times of making registry and giving pos session, a great deal of ore may be raised, in fraud of the other part owners, for by the 36th oriinance, ore may be, and as experience proves, often is raised, before sinking the three estadis; and therefore the partner who contravenes the partnership rights, by working the mine on his own account alone, after making registry, will incur the penalty of the ordinance, even although the three estados are not sunk, nor the 90 days, within which they

* § 4, Inst. de societ. "hæreditatem solus lucri feceret, cogitur hoe lucrum communicare.” Law 12, tit. 10, part 5.

↑ Cap. 27, de r. j. in 6, ❝ Scienti, et volenti, non fit injuria, neque dolus."'

Cap. 6. per tot.

must be sunk, expired, and although the possession has not been judicially made over to him, for the fraud and injury towards his partner are complete.

7. The latter, in prosecuting his action for the penalty, must prove the subsistence of the partnership, either by an instrument in writing, or by witnesses, or in some other of the legal modes by which an express or implied contract of partnership may be established; that is to say, if the partnership be an express one, it must be proved by instruments, confession or witnesses; and if an implied one, by acts from which a partnership can be inferred, according to the clear doctrine of the law and the authorities.* And, in a word, as the contracts by which the partial property in a partnership mine may be transferred, are of various descriptions, as we have explained above, that which is relied on in bringing the action for the penalty must be proved.

8. With respect to suits concerning the right of possession or property in mines, the order and method to be pursued are regulated by others of the ordinances, to which we refer, observing, in the mean time, with respect to the action pro socio, that proper regard should be had to the circumstances of the parties, and the miserable condition of the discoverers; who being the lawful owners of mines which Providence has permitted them to discover, are generally compelled to part with a share in them, in order to obtain some pecuniary assistance, or in consideration of the expenses being undertaken by some other party; and being sunk to the lowest scale of wretchedness, and often idiots, the consequence frequently is, that they are ousted altogether. As cases then, of this discription, afford many special circumstances in favour of these unfortunate persons, regard ought to be had to all the particular circumstances of the transaction, which being private, confidential and of difficult proof, demand the greatest discretion and tact in the judge.‡

* Felicius, de societ. cap. 10 et cap. 11, ubi plene de causa instrumentali societatis et quod expressa probatur verbis, consensu, stipulatione, vel pacto, tacita vero per actus sociales: sive sit generalis, sive particularis societas; et apud eum ex antiquis innumeris: juraque ad satietatem cumulat. Idem, cap. 11, n. 9. "Ubi adest conventio verbis declarata, opus non erit investigare conjecturas, quia id ex verbis, et conventione probabitur, et sic dictum, et sic conventum fuisse; et fuisse contractam societatem poterit probari per instrumentum, vel aliam scripturam super inde confectam." Et n. 11. "Poterit etiam probari per literas alicujus socii alteri socio scriptas, et ratio est, quia literæ alicujus, præsertim sigillatæ, probant, et præcipue contra scribentem. L. Publia, ff. deposit. L. cum de indebito, ff. de probat. Bald. in L. ult. Cod. si cert. petat. Mascard. conc. 626. Et quod scriptura privata probet societatem tradit Paris, Decianus Rubæus." Et n. 12. "Probatur etiam fuisse inductam communionem, et societatem, per testes, Ruin. cons. 92, lib. 1. Etiam si sint singulares deponentes de diversis actibus, cum Gabriel. Corn. Bald, et Alex. debent deponere de actibus socialibus." Et n. 13, " Probatur societas quando extrajudicialiter socii fassi fuerunt se esse socios." Hebia Bolanos, in Cur. lib. 1. Commercio terrestre, cap. 3, n. 2. Castillo, de usufr. cap. 3, Gratian. tom. 2, discep. cap. 336; et apud hos quam plures.

↑ Chap. 23, ordinances 63 and 64.

Super probatione in casibus difficilis probationis. Valenzuel. cons. 18. Vela, dissert. 38, a. n. 20, Solorz. Polit. lib. 3, cap. 26. Julio Clar. §. fin. quæst. 24. n. 19. Gomez, in L. 9. Taur. n.

« ForrigeFortsett »