Legislation to Revise and Recodify Federal Criminal Laws: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Criminal Justice of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, Ninety-fifth Congress, First and Second Sessions on H.R. 6869 ....U.S. Government Printing Office, 1978 - 2883 sider |
Inni boken
Resultat 1-5 av 100
Side 1974
... discretion to go outside the guidelines , which latter event would suject the particular sentence to appellate review in a duly constituted court of appeals . Accepting the major features of the proposal to be substantially these , I ...
... discretion to go outside the guidelines , which latter event would suject the particular sentence to appellate review in a duly constituted court of appeals . Accepting the major features of the proposal to be substantially these , I ...
Side 1975
... discretion not only to deal with individual cases but also to take into account accretions of statistics and knowledge that hopefully will be forthcoming in the years ahead . This last point leads to another intriguing and important ...
... discretion not only to deal with individual cases but also to take into account accretions of statistics and knowledge that hopefully will be forthcoming in the years ahead . This last point leads to another intriguing and important ...
Side 1977
... discretion from the U.S. dis- trict judges , who will have the liberty , if you will put it that way , of dealing within the guidelines which will not be , I think , simple state- ments of what a sentence should be in every kind of ...
... discretion from the U.S. dis- trict judges , who will have the liberty , if you will put it that way , of dealing within the guidelines which will not be , I think , simple state- ments of what a sentence should be in every kind of ...
Side 1989
... discretion in the imposition of prison terms and the granting of parole release through rule making . ( 3 ) Reducing disparity in the duration of imprisonments imposed on offenders for like criminal conduct . ( 4 ) Increasing due ...
... discretion in the imposition of prison terms and the granting of parole release through rule making . ( 3 ) Reducing disparity in the duration of imprisonments imposed on offenders for like criminal conduct . ( 4 ) Increasing due ...
Side 1992
... Discretion is structured by setting prison terms which are commensurate with the serious- ness of the offender's crime and past criminal record and minimize the disparity often associated with individuated sentences . The Board still ...
... Discretion is structured by setting prison terms which are commensurate with the serious- ness of the offender's crime and past criminal record and minimize the disparity often associated with individuated sentences . The Board still ...
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
affirmative defense alternative appeal appellate review applicable authority behavior bill Chairman Class E felony committed Committee conduct Congress conviction court crime criminal justice system criminal law culpability decision defendant determine discretion disparity district effect existing fact factors federal jurisdiction guilty hearing imposed incarceration individual inmate institution involved issue judicial Judiciary jury legislation limited medical parole ment mental Minnesota Corrections Board misdemeanor MULCRONE offense described officers parens patriae Parole Board Parole Commission penalty person plea bargaining Prepared statement present prison probation problem procedures programs proposed prosecution prosecutors psychiatric psychiatrists psychosurgery punishment question railroad police reasons reform rehabilitation restitution result rules Section 303 securities laws Senate Report Sentencing Commission sentencing guidelines sentencing provisions specific statute Subcommittee target release date tencing term of imprisonment testimony tion treatment trial U.S. attorneys U.S. Parole Commission United United States Code violation
Populære avsnitt
Side 2425 - And a statute which either forbids or requires the doing of an act in terms so vague that men of common intelligence must necessarily guess at its meaning and differ as to its application violates the first essential of due process of law.
Side 2135 - Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.
Side 2135 - Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defence.
Side 2310 - If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose...
Side 2175 - That principle is, that the sole end for which mankind are warranted, individually or collectively, in interfering with the liberty of action of any of their number, is self -protection. That the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others.
Side 2638 - An omitted fact is material if there is a substantial likelihood that a reasonable shareholder would consider it important in deciding how to vote.
Side 2135 - Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him.
Side 2222 - ... there exists an aggravating or mitigating circumstance of a kind, or to a degree, not adequately taken into consideration by the Sentencing Commission in formulating the guidelines that should result in a sentence different from that described.
Side 2175 - That the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others. His own good, either physical or moral, is not a sufficient warrant. He cannot rightfully be compelled to do or forbear because it will be better for him to do so, because it will make him happier, because, in the opinions of others, to do so would be wise or even right.
Side 2368 - mental illness' alone cannot justify a state's locking a person up against his will and keeping him indefinitely in simple custodial confinement.