Legislation to Revise and Recodify Federal Criminal Laws: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Criminal Justice of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, Ninety-fifth Congress, First and Second Sessions on H.R. 6869 ....U.S. Government Printing Office, 1978 - 2883 sider |
Inni boken
Resultat 1-5 av 100
Side 2002
... more determinate . They also wanted to structure the discretion of the parole board to explicit rule- making . The legislature wanted to reduced disparity . They also wanted to increase due process afforded to persons 2002.
... more determinate . They also wanted to structure the discretion of the parole board to explicit rule- making . The legislature wanted to reduced disparity . They also wanted to increase due process afforded to persons 2002.
Side 2003
... increase due process afforded to persons before administrative bodies ; that is , to improve the adequacy of notice and to give them more access to information considered . They wanted to impose a punishment which was commensurate to ...
... increase due process afforded to persons before administrative bodies ; that is , to improve the adequacy of notice and to give them more access to information considered . They wanted to impose a punishment which was commensurate to ...
Side 2011
... increase , the range , or the differences among these value systems also increase , and this will contribute to increased disparity of decision - making . Third , federal judges are inexperienced in setting prison terms . In fact ...
... increase , the range , or the differences among these value systems also increase , and this will contribute to increased disparity of decision - making . Third , federal judges are inexperienced in setting prison terms . In fact ...
Side 2012
... increase in pris- on populations . Under S. 1437 the system is stripped of its ability to provide an internal check ... increased . IV . FEATURES OF THE CURRENT SYSTEM WHICH SHOULD BE RETAINED I believe there are three essential features ...
... increase in pris- on populations . Under S. 1437 the system is stripped of its ability to provide an internal check ... increased . IV . FEATURES OF THE CURRENT SYSTEM WHICH SHOULD BE RETAINED I believe there are three essential features ...
Side 2019
... Increased effectiveness of institutional planning Certain release dates facilitate inmate and staff planning for the use of in- stitutional programs and resources . If an inmate has an 18 - month lower limit re- lease date and a MAP ...
... Increased effectiveness of institutional planning Certain release dates facilitate inmate and staff planning for the use of in- stitutional programs and resources . If an inmate has an 18 - month lower limit re- lease date and a MAP ...
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
affirmative defense alternative appeal appellate review applicable authority behavior bill Chairman Class E felony committed Committee conduct Congress conviction court crime criminal justice system criminal law culpability decision defendant determine discretion disparity district effect existing fact factors federal jurisdiction guilty hearing imposed incarceration individual inmate institution involved issue judicial Judiciary jury legislation limited medical parole ment mental Minnesota Corrections Board misdemeanor MULCRONE offense described officers parens patriae Parole Board Parole Commission penalty person plea bargaining Prepared statement present prison probation problem procedures programs proposed prosecution prosecutors psychiatric psychiatrists psychosurgery punishment question railroad police reasons reform rehabilitation restitution result rules Section 303 securities laws Senate Report Sentencing Commission sentencing guidelines sentencing provisions specific statute Subcommittee target release date tencing term of imprisonment testimony tion treatment trial U.S. attorneys U.S. Parole Commission United United States Code violation
Populære avsnitt
Side 2425 - And a statute which either forbids or requires the doing of an act in terms so vague that men of common intelligence must necessarily guess at its meaning and differ as to its application violates the first essential of due process of law.
Side 2135 - Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.
Side 2135 - Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defence.
Side 2310 - If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose...
Side 2175 - That principle is, that the sole end for which mankind are warranted, individually or collectively, in interfering with the liberty of action of any of their number, is self -protection. That the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others.
Side 2638 - An omitted fact is material if there is a substantial likelihood that a reasonable shareholder would consider it important in deciding how to vote.
Side 2135 - Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him.
Side 2222 - ... there exists an aggravating or mitigating circumstance of a kind, or to a degree, not adequately taken into consideration by the Sentencing Commission in formulating the guidelines that should result in a sentence different from that described.
Side 2175 - That the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others. His own good, either physical or moral, is not a sufficient warrant. He cannot rightfully be compelled to do or forbear because it will be better for him to do so, because it will make him happier, because, in the opinions of others, to do so would be wise or even right.
Side 2368 - mental illness' alone cannot justify a state's locking a person up against his will and keeping him indefinitely in simple custodial confinement.