Legislation to Revise and Recodify Federal Criminal Laws: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Criminal Justice of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, Ninety-fifth Congress, First and Second Sessions on H.R. 6869 ....U.S. Government Printing Office, 1978 - 2883 sider |
Inni boken
Resultat 1-5 av 100
Side 1981
... limited in the first instance . Mr. HALL . Judge , do you see any area that a sentencing commission would take into consideration in arriving at guidelines that a trial judge does not take into consideration today ? Judge TYLER . I ...
... limited in the first instance . Mr. HALL . Judge , do you see any area that a sentencing commission would take into consideration in arriving at guidelines that a trial judge does not take into consideration today ? Judge TYLER . I ...
Side 2005
... limited by the principle of just deserts . It's structured to make decisions more pre- dictable and more understandable . Within 6 months of the entry of any prisoner into the system , a hearing is conducted and the board either sets a ...
... limited by the principle of just deserts . It's structured to make decisions more pre- dictable and more understandable . Within 6 months of the entry of any prisoner into the system , a hearing is conducted and the board either sets a ...
Side 2008
... limited to primarily Parole Commission members and sentencing judges . They ought to be charged with and be responsible for listening to the other publics . Mr. HALL . Aren't you making it lopsided when you do that ? Don't you think the ...
... limited to primarily Parole Commission members and sentencing judges . They ought to be charged with and be responsible for listening to the other publics . Mr. HALL . Aren't you making it lopsided when you do that ? Don't you think the ...
Side 2010
... limited degree , incentives for inmates to resolve the problems which contributed to their criminality . Rehabilitation should not be a goal of sentencing reform . Punishment Punishment is an important goal of the criminal law and one ...
... limited degree , incentives for inmates to resolve the problems which contributed to their criminality . Rehabilitation should not be a goal of sentencing reform . Punishment Punishment is an important goal of the criminal law and one ...
Side 2012
... limited to single state judicial districts in relatively homogeneous metropolitan areas . And in all cass , the guidelines deal with dispositional and not durational issues . Moreover , no significant evaluation of the effectiveness of ...
... limited to single state judicial districts in relatively homogeneous metropolitan areas . And in all cass , the guidelines deal with dispositional and not durational issues . Moreover , no significant evaluation of the effectiveness of ...
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
affirmative defense alternative appeal appellate review applicable authority behavior bill Chairman Class E felony committed Committee conduct Congress conviction court crime criminal justice system criminal law culpability decision defendant determine discretion disparity district effect existing fact factors federal jurisdiction guilty hearing imposed incarceration individual inmate institution involved issue judicial Judiciary jury legislation limited medical parole ment mental Minnesota Corrections Board misdemeanor MULCRONE offense described officers parens patriae Parole Board Parole Commission penalty person plea bargaining Prepared statement present prison probation problem procedures programs proposed prosecution prosecutors psychiatric psychiatrists psychosurgery punishment question railroad police reasons reform rehabilitation restitution result rules Section 303 securities laws Senate Report Sentencing Commission sentencing guidelines sentencing provisions specific statute Subcommittee target release date tencing term of imprisonment testimony tion treatment trial U.S. attorneys U.S. Parole Commission United United States Code violation
Populære avsnitt
Side 2425 - And a statute which either forbids or requires the doing of an act in terms so vague that men of common intelligence must necessarily guess at its meaning and differ as to its application violates the first essential of due process of law.
Side 2135 - Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.
Side 2135 - Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defence.
Side 2310 - If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose...
Side 2175 - That principle is, that the sole end for which mankind are warranted, individually or collectively, in interfering with the liberty of action of any of their number, is self -protection. That the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others.
Side 2638 - An omitted fact is material if there is a substantial likelihood that a reasonable shareholder would consider it important in deciding how to vote.
Side 2135 - Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him.
Side 2222 - ... there exists an aggravating or mitigating circumstance of a kind, or to a degree, not adequately taken into consideration by the Sentencing Commission in formulating the guidelines that should result in a sentence different from that described.
Side 2175 - That the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others. His own good, either physical or moral, is not a sufficient warrant. He cannot rightfully be compelled to do or forbear because it will be better for him to do so, because it will make him happier, because, in the opinions of others, to do so would be wise or even right.
Side 2368 - mental illness' alone cannot justify a state's locking a person up against his will and keeping him indefinitely in simple custodial confinement.