United States v. Bitter Root Development Co., 133 Fed. Rep. 274 United States v. Bitter Root Co., 200 U. S. 451 United States v. California & Oregon Land Co., 192 U. S. PAGE United States v. Perrin, 131 U. S. 55 United States v. Rickut, 188 U. S. 432 United States v. Rider, 163 U. S. 132 United States v. Saline Bank, 1 Peters, 100 452 351 355 United States v. Clark, 125 Fed. Rep. 774; S. C., 138 Fed. Rep. 294 607. United States v. Detroit Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 322 607, 609 United States v. Detroit Limber & Lumber Co., 124 Fed. Rep. 393; S. C., 67 C. C. A. 1 324, 329 United States v. Freeman, 3 How. 556 203 United States v. Freyberg, 32 336 United States v. Gillis, 95 U. S. 407 20 290 185 United States v. Joint Traffic 338 616 United States v. Lynch, 137 U.S. 280 United States v. Lynah, 188 U. S. 445 584, 593 United States v. More, 3 Cranch, 159 12 611 127 611 195 334 United States v. Southern Pacific Village of Carthage v. Frederick, 593 PAGE U. S. 148, 102 Virginia v. Rives, 100 U. S. 313 321 Winebrenner v. Forney, 189 Vreeland v. Town of Bergen, 34 164 223 Wagoner r. Evans, 170 U. S. 588 129 262 526 R. R., 72 Fed. Rep. 637 214, 215 Warner v. Grayson, 24 App. D. C. 55 Washington & Georgetown R. R. Co. r. District of Columbia, 146 U. S. 227 338 321 Watts and Sacks, In re, 190 U.S. 1 11, 12 194 183 335 315 419 Wedding . Meyler, 192 U. S. 573 635 216 Whitney v. Taylor, 158 U. S. 85 360| U. S. 514 Wilson v. Wall, 6 Wall. 83 216 Witherspoon v. Duncan, 4 Wall. 432 PAGE 613 338 262 Woodward r. Mutual Reserve Ry. Co., 180 Mass. 599 595, 599 102 488 180 U. S. 1 309 Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U. S. 45 83 Young v. Bryan, 6 Wheat. 146 347 612 TABLE OF STATUTES Arizona. (A.) STATUTES OF THE UNITED STATES. PAGE 82 526 1789, Sept. 24, 1 Stat. 73, c. 20 1815, Mar. 1, 6 Stat. 152, c. 70 143 1822, Mar. 30, 3 Stat. 659, c. 14 1827, Mar. 2, 4 Stat. 234, c. 51 526 1833, Mar. 2, 6 Stat. 538, c. 86 143 1844, June 10, 6 Stat. 912, c. 41 141, 142, 143 1851, Mar. 3, 9 Stat. 631, c. 41 355, 358 1864, June 3, 13 Stat. 99, c. 106 418 1866, July 25, 14 Stat. 232, c. 237 1866, July 27, 14 Stat. 292, c. 277 1875, Mar. 3, 18 Stat. 470, c. 137 1878, June 3, 20 Stat. 89, c. 151 141 71 213 323, 606 15 11 1884, July 5, 23.Stat. 552, c. 237 1885, Mar. 3, 23 Stat. 443, c. 355 1887, Feb. 4, 24 Stat. 379, c. 104 391, 398, 405, 537-551 1887, Mar. 3, 24 Stat. 552, c. 373 213, 221, 225, 226 1887, Mar. 3, 24 Stat. 556, c. 376 342 1888, Aug. 13, 25 Stat. 433, c. 866 82, 213 1890, July 2, 26 Stat. 209, c. 647 182, 185 1891, Mar. 3, 26 Stat. 826, c. 517 119 1891, Mar. 3, 26 Stat. 854, c. 539 100 1891, Mar. 3, 26 Stat. 1095, c. 561 608 1892, Aug. 4, 27 Stat. 348, c. 375 606 1894, Aug. 13, 28 Stat. 278, c. 280 199, 203, 315 CITED IN OPINIONS. Rev. Stat. 1887. § 2301.. § 3199. 3201.. Rev. Stat. 1901. PAGE 1896, Feb. 12, 29 Stat. 6, c. 18 342 1896, Mar. 2, 29 Stat. 42, c. 39 342, 352 1898, June 13, 30 Stat. 448, c. 448 490, 491 1898, July 1, 30 Stat. 544, c. 541 412, 419, 421, 534, 535 1900, Apr. 12, 31 Stat. 77, c. 191 106, 111 1900, May 12, 31 Stat. 177, c. 393 494, 495 1902, May 27, 32 Stat. 207, c. 887 15 1902, July 1, 32 Stat. 691, c. 1369 611 1903, Feb. 19, 32 Stat. 847, c. 708 381 1905, Feb. 24, 33 Stat. 811, c. 778 201, 204 § 2941. 74 2938.. ...101, 102 1893, Apr. 13, Laws of 1893, p. 135, No. 86... 72 Revised Statutes. & 709... § 720. § 723. § 724. § 3220. 3477. 3698. 3701. 4197. § 5136. § 5209. § 5391. 5439. District of Columbia. Code, 233... (B.) STATUTES OF THE STATES AND TERRITORIES. Arkansas. .19, 411, 412, 580 .291, 292 349 74 18, 19 310 313, 315, 316 .492, 493 441 195 Statutes, Kirby's Digest, 1904, § 1790. 475 495 8 8 616 141 615 1893, Mar. 23, Stat. of 1893, p. 193, c. 168....90, 91, 92, 93 1899, Mar. 9, Stat. of 1899, p. 101, c. 85.. .90, 91 1905, Mar. 20, Stat. of 1905, p. 341, c. 314. . . . . . .91, 92, 93 xxiii TABLE OF STATUTES CITED. Minnesota. PAGE New Mexico. 1797, Dec. 23, Acts of 1797, 1798, Jan. 20, Acts of 1797, 1806, Jan. 25, Acts of 1805, 1808, Dec. 20, Acts of 1808, .50, 51 Oregon. .172, 175, 176 447 Civil Code. Arts. 1281, 1283.....107, 113 565 51 1899, Apr. 18, Laws of 1899, 143 143 143 143 Oregon (cont.). Great Britain. 1895, Feb. 21, Laws of 1895, 1878, Oct. 18, Laws of 1878, Porto Rico. 1903, Mar. 10, Laws of 1903, 1903, Mar. 12, Laws of 1903, Code, 1883. ..58, 64, 65 | Utah. 227 1903, Mar. 9, Laws of 1903, 228 1903, Feb. 2, Laws of 1903, 1903, Apr. 3, Laws of 1903, 10 Texas. 10 1849, Dec. 19, Acts of 1849, 1855, Dec. 19, Acts of 1855, 249 1897, Mar. 2, Laws of 1897, 1900, Feb. 19, Laws of 1900, PAGE 1901, Mar. 5, Laws of 1901, 153 (C.) FOREIGN STATUTES. 103 109 1710, 9 Anne, c. 20, § 5. . . . 11 1874, May 2, Laws of 1874, 30 30 1895, Feb. 22, Acts of 1895, 530 530 CASES ADJUDGED IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, AT OCTOBER TERM, 1905. UNITED STATES er rel. DRURY v. LEWIS, WARDEN OF THE COMMON JAIL. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 126. Argued December 12, 1905.--Decided January 2, 1906. An officer and an enlisted soldier in the military service of the United States were indicted for murder and manslaughter and held for trial in a state court for having killed a citizen of the State who was not in the service of the United States, the alleged crime having been committed within the State, on property not belonging to, or under the jurisdiction of, the United States. On a writ of habeas corpus from a Circuit Court of the United States it was contended that petitioners were seeking to arrest the deceased for felony under the laws of the United States and that he met his death while attempting to escape, and as therefore the homicide was committed by petitioners in the discharge of their duties, the state court was without jurisdiction. On the hearing there was a conflict of evidence as to whether deceased had surrendered or not, and it was conceded that if he were not a fleeing felon the ground for Federal interposition failed. Held, that VOL. 0C-1 (1) |
0 Anmeldelser Anmeldelsene blir ikke bekreftet, men Google ser etter falskt innhold og fjerner slikt innhold som avdekkes Skriv anmeldelse |