Sidebilder
PDF
ePub

The revolt and

natist Circum-
cellions,
A. D. 345, &c.

While the flames of the Arian con

those who are styled heretics were massacred, par- | fused consternation over the unarmed provinces of ticularly at Cyzicus, and at Samosata. In Paphla- Africa. At first their depredations were coloured gonia, Bithynia, Galatia, and in many other pro- by the plea of necessity; but they soon exceeded vinces, towns and villages were laid waste, and the measure of subsistence, indulged without conutterly destroyed."s trol their intemperance and avarice, burnt the villages which they had pillaged, and reigned the licentious tyrants of the open country. The occupations of husbandry, and the administrations of justice, were interrupted; and as the Circumcellions pretended to restore the primitive equality of mankind, and to reform the abuses of civil society, they opened a secure asylum for the slaves and debtors, who flocked in crowds to their holy standard. When they were not resisted, they usually contented themselves with plunder, but the slightest opposition provoked them to acts of violence and murder; and some catholic priests, who had imprudently signalized their zeal, were tortured by the fanatics with the most refined and wanton barbarity. The spirit of the Circumcellions was not always exerted against their defenceless enemies; they engaged, and sometimes defeated, the troops of the province; and in the bloody action of Bagai, they attacked in the open field, but with unsuccessful valour, an advanced guard of the imperial cavalry. The Donatists who were taken in arms received, and they soon deserved, the same treatment which might have been shown to the wild beasts of the desert. The captives died, without a murmur, either by the sword, the axe, or the fire; and the measures of retaliation were multiplied in a rapid proportion, which aggravated the horrors of rebellion, and excluded the hope of mutual forgiveness. In the beginning of the present century, the example of the Circumcellions has been renewed in the persecution, the boldness, the crimes, and the enthusiasm of the Camisards; and if the fanatics of Languedoc surpassed those of Numidia, by their military achievements, the Africans maintained their fierce independence with more resolution and perseverance.*

fury of the Do- troversy consumed the vitals of the
empire, the African provinces were
infested by their peculiar enemies the
savage fanatics, who, under the name of Circum-
cellions, formed the strength and scandal of the
Donatist party. The severe execution of the laws
of Constantine had excited a spirit of discontent
and resistance ; the strenuous efforts of his son
Constans, to restore the unity of the church, exas-
perated the sentiments of mutual hatred, which had
first occasioned the separation; and the methods of
force and corruption employed by the two imperial
commissioners, Paul and Macarius, furnished the
schismatics with a specious contrast between the
maxims of the apostles and the conduct of their
pretended successors." The peasants who inhabited
the villages of Numidia and Mauritania, were a
ferocious race, who had been imperfectly reduced
under the authority of the Roman laws; who were
imperfectly converted to the christian faith; but
who were actuated by a blind and furious enthu-
siasm in the cause of their Donatist teachers. They
indignantly supported the exile of their bishops,
the demolition of their churches, and the interrup-
tion of their secret assemblies. The violence of the
officers of justice, who were usually sustained by a
military guard, was sometimes repelled with equal
violence; and the blood of some popular ecclesias-
tics, which had been shed in the quarrel, inflamed
their rude followers with an eager desire of re-
venging the death of these holy martyrs. By
their own cruelty and rashness, the ministers of
persecution sometimes provoked their fate; and the
guilt of an accidental tumult precipitated the cri-
minals into despair and rebellion. Driven from
their native villages, the Donatist peasants assem-
bled in formidable gangs on the edge of the Getu-
lian desert; and readily exchanged the habits of
labour for a life of idleness and rapine, which was
consecrated by the name of religion, and faintly
condemned by the doctors of the sect. The leaders
of the Circumcellions assumed the title of captains
of the saints; their principal weapon, as they were
indifferently provided with swords and spears, was
a huge and weighty club, which they termed an
Israelite; and the well-known sound of " Praise be
to God," which they used as their cry of war, dif-

Julian. Epistol. lii. p. 436. edit. Spanheim.

t See Optatus Milevitanus, (particularly iii. 4.) with the Donatist history, by M. Dupin, and the original pieces at the end of his edition. The numerous circumstances which Augustin has mentioned, of the fury of the Circumcellions against others, and against themselves, have been laboriously collected by Tillemont, Mem. Eccles. tom. vi. p. 147 -165; and he has often, though without design, exposed the injuries which had provoked those fanatics.

u It is amusing enough to observe the language of opposite parties, when they speak of the same men and things. Gratus, bishop of Carthage, begins the acclamations of an orthodox synod, "Gratias Deo omnipotenti et Christo Jesu...qui imperavit religiosissimo Constanti imperatori, ut votum gereret unitatis, et mitteret ministros sancti

suicides.

Such disorders are the natural effects Their religions of religious tyranny; but the rage of the Donatists was inflamed by a frenzy of a very extraordinary kind; and which, if it really prevailed among them in so extravagant a degree, cannot surely be paralleled in any country or in any age. Many of these fanatics were possessed with the horror of life, and the desire of martyrdom; and they deemed it of little moment by what means, or by what hands, they perished, if their conduct was sanctified by the intention of devoting themselves to the glory of the true faith, and the hope of eter

operis famulos Dei Paulum et Macarium." Monument. Vet. ad Calcem Optati, p. 313. Ecce subito," (says the Donatist author of the Passion of Marculus)" de Constantis regis tyrannica domo...pollutum Macarianæ persecutionis murmur increpuit, et duobus bestiis ad Africam missis, eodem scilicet Macario et Paulo execrandum prorsus ac dirum ecclesiæ certamen indictum est; ut populus christianus ad unionem cum traditoribus faciendam, nudatis militum gladiis et draconum præsentibus signis, et tubarum vocibus cogeretur." Monument. p. 304.

The Histoire des Camisards, in 3 vols. 12mo. Villefranche, 1760, may be recommended as accurate and impartial. It requires some at tention to discover the religion of the author.

[ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

taphysical opinions of the Athanasians and the Arians, could not influence their moral character; and they were alike actuated by the intolerant spirit, which has been extracted from the pure and simple maxims of the gospel.

nal happiness. Sometimes they rudely disturbed the festivals, and profaned the temples, of paganism, with the design of exciting the most zealous of the idolaters to revenge the insulted honour of their gods. They sometimes forced their way into the courts of justice, and compelled the affrighted judge A modern writer, who, with a just Toleration of to give orders for their immediate execution. They confidence, has prefixed to his own his- paganism frequently stopped travellers on the public high-tory the honourable epithets of political and philoways, and obliged them to inflict the stroke of martyrdom, by the promise of a reward, if they consented, and by the threat of instant death, if they refused to grant so very singular a favour. When they were disappointed of every other resource, they announced the day on which, in the presence of their friends and brethren, they should cast themselves headlong from some lofty rock; and many precipices were shown, which had acquired fame by by the number of religious suicides. In the actions of these desperate enthusiasts, who were admired by one party as the martyrs of God, and abhorred by the other as the victims of Satan, an impartial philosopher may discover the influence and the last abuse of that inflexible spirit, which was originally derived from the character and principles of the Jewish nation.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors][ocr errors]

General character of the christian sect,

The simple narrative of the intestine divisions, which distracted the peace, A. D. 312-361. and dishonoured the triumph, of the church, will confirm the remark of a pagan historian, and justify the complaint of a venerable bishop. The experience of Ammianus had convinced him, that the enmity of the christians towards each other, surpassed the fury of savage beasts against man;2 and Gregory Nazianzen most pathetically laments, that the kingdom of heaven was converted, by discord, into the image of chaos, of a nocturnal tempest, and of hell itself. The fierce and partial writers of the times, ascribing all virtue to themselves, and imputing all guilt to their adversaries, have painted the battle of the angels and dæmons. Our calmer reason will reject such pure and perfect monsters of vice or sanctity, and will impute an equal, or at least an indiscriminate, measure of good and evil to the hostile sectaries, who assumed and bestowed the appellations of orthodox and heretics. They had been educated in the same religion, and the same civil society. Their hopes and fears in the present, or in a future, life, were balanced in proportion. On either side, the error might be innocent, the faith sincere, the practice meritorious or corrupt. Their passions were excited by similar objects; and they might alternately abuse the favour of the court, or of the people. The me

the same

[blocks in formation]

by Constantine,

sophical, accuses the timid prudence of Montesquieu, for neglecting to enumerate, among the causes of the decline of the empire, a law of Constantine, by which the exercise of the pagan worship was absolutely suppressed, and a considerable part of his subjects was left destitute of priests, of temples, and of any public religion. The zeal of the philosophic historian for the rights of mankind, has induced him to acquiesce in the ambiguous testimony of those ecclesiastics, who have too lightly ascribed to their favourite hero the merit of a general persecution. Instead of alleging this imaginary law, which would have blazed in the front of the imperial codes, we may safely appeal to the original epistle, which Constantine addressed to the followers of the ancient religion; at a time when he no longer disguised his conversion, nor dreaded the rivals of his throne. He invites and exhorts, in the most pressing terms, the subjects of the Roman empire to imitate the example of their master; but he declares, that those who still refuse to open their eyes to the celestial light, may freely enjoy their temples, and their fancied gods. A report, that the ceremonies of paganism were suppressed, is formally contradicted by the emperor himself, who wisely assigns, as the principle of his moderation, the invincible force of habit, of prejudice, and of superstition. Without violating the sanctity of his promise, without alarming the fears of the pagans, the artful monarch advanced, by slow and cautious steps, to undermine the irregular and decayed fabric of polytheism. The partial acts of severity which he occasionally exercised, though they were secretly prompted by a christian zeal, were coloured by the fairest pretences of justice and the public good; and while Constantine designed to ruin the foundations, he seemed to reform the abuses, of the ancient religion. After the example of the wisest of his predecessors, he condemned, under the most rigorous penalties, the occult and impious arts of divination; which excited the vain hopes, and sometimes the criminal attempts, of those who were discontented with their present condition. An ignominious silence was imposed on the oracles, which had been publicly convicted of fraud and

(1. i. c. 17.) and Sozomen (1. ii. c. 4, 5.) have represented the conduct of Constantine with a just regard to truth and history; which has been neglected by Theodoret (1. v. c. 21.) and Orosius, (vii. 28.) Tum deinde (says the latter) primus Constantinus justo ordine et pio vicem vertit edicto; siquidem statuit citra ullam hominum cædem, paganorum templa claudi.

d See Eusebius in Vit. Constantin. l. ii. c. 56. 60. In the sermon to the assembly of saints, which the emperor pronounced when he was mature in years and piety, he declares to the idolaters (c. xi.) that they are permitted to offer sacrifices, and to exercise every part of their religious worship.

falsehood; the effeminate priests of the Nile were abolished; and Constantine discharged the duties of a Roman censor, when he gave orders for the demolition of several temples of Phoenicia; in which every mode of prostitution was devoutly practised in the face of day, and to the honour of Venus. The imperial city of Constantinople was, in some measure, raised at the expense, and was adorned with the spoils, of the opulent temples of Greece and Asia; the sacred property was confiscated; the statues of gods and heroes were transported, with rude familiarity, among a people who considered them as objects, not of adoration, but of curiosity: the gold and silver were restored to circulation; and the magistrates, the bishops, and the eunuchs, improved the fortunate occasion of gratifying, at once, their zeal, their avarice, and their resentment. But these depredations were confined to a small part of the Roman world; and the provinces had been long since accustomed to endure the same sacrilegious rapine, from the tyranny of princes and proconsuls, who could not be suspected of any design to subvert the established religion.'

and his sons.

The sons of Constantine trod in the footsteps of their father, with more zeal, and with less discretion. The pretences of rapine and oppression were insensibly multiplied ;o every indulgence was shown to the illegal behaviour of the christians; every doubt was explained to the disadvantage of paganism; and the demolition of the temples was celebrated as one of the auspicious events of the reign of Constans and Constantius." The name of Constantius is prefixed to a concise law, which might have superseded the necessity of any future prohibitions. "It is our pleasure, that in all places, and in all cities, the temples be immediately shut, and carefully guarded, that none may have the power of offending. It is likewise our pleasure, that all our subjects should abstain from sacrifices. If any one should be guilty of such an act, let him feel the sword of vengeance, and after his execution, let his property be confiscated

e See Eusebius, in Vit. Constantin. 1. iii. c. 54-58, and 1. iv. c. 23-25. These acts of authority may be compared with the suppression of the Bacchanals, and the demolition of the temple of Isis, by the magistrates of pagan Rome.

f Eusebius (in Vit. Constant. 1. iii. c. 54.) and Labanius (Orat. pro Templis, p. 9, 10. edit. Gothefred.) both mention the pious sacrilege of Constantine, which they viewed in very different lights. The latter expressly declares, that "he made use of the sacred money, but made no alteration in the legal worship; the temples indeed were impoverish. ed, but the sacred rites were performed there." Lardner's Jewish and Heathen Testimonies, vol. iv. p. 140.

g Ammianus (xxii. 4.) speaks of some court eunuchs who were spoliis templorum pasti. Libanius says (Orat. pro Templ. p. 23.) that the emperor often gare away a temple, like a dog, or a horse, or a slave, or a gold cup but the devout philosopher takes care to observe, that these sacrilegious favourites very seldom prospered.

h See Gothefred. Cod. Theodos. tom. vi. p. 262. Liban. Cfat. Parental. c. x. in Fabric. Bibl. Græc. tom. vii. p. 235.

i Placuit omnibus locis atque urbibus universis claudi protinus templa, et accessu vetitis omnibus licentiam delinquendi perditis abnegari. Volumus etiam cunctos a sacrificiis abstinere. Quod siquis aliquid forte hujusmodi perpetraverit, gladio sternatur: facultates etiam per. empti fisco decernimus vindicari: et similiter adfligi rectores provin ciarum si facinora vindicare neglexerint. Cod. Theodos. I. xvi. tit. x. leg. 4. Chronology has discovered some contradiction in the date of this extravagant law; the only one, perhaps, by which the negli gence of magistrates is punished by death and confiscation. M. de la Bastie (Mem. de l'Academie, tom. xv. p. 98.) conjectures, with a show of reason, that this was no more than the minutes of a law, the heads of an intended bill, which were found in Scriniis Memoriæ, among the papers of Constantius, and afterwards inserted, as a worthy model, in the Theodosian Code,

to the public use. We denounce the same penalties against the governors of the provinces, if they neglect to punish the criminals." But there is the strongest reason to believe, that this formidable edict was either composed without being published, or was published without being executed. The evidence of facts, and the monuments which are still extant of brass and marble, continue to prove the public exercise of the pagan worship during the whole reign of the sons of Constantine. In the east, as well as in the west, in cities, as well as in the country, a great number of temples were respected, or at least were spared; and the devout multitude still enjoyed the luxury of sacrifices, of festivals, and of processions, by the permission, or by the connivance, of the civil government. About four years after the supposed date of his bloody edict, Constantius visited the temples of Rome; and the decency of his behaviour is recommended by a pagan orator as an example worthy of the imitation of succeeding princes. "That emperor," says Symmachus, "suffered the privileges of the vestal virgins to remain inviolate; he bestowed the sacerdotal dignities on the nobles of Rome, granted the customary allowance to defray the expenses of the public rites and sacrifices; and, though he had embraced a different religion, he never attempted to deprive the empire of the sacred worship of antiquity.” The senate still presumed to consecrate, by solemn decrees, the divine memory of their sovereigns; and Constantine himself was associated, after his death, to those gods whom he had renounced and insulted during his life. The title, the ensigns, the prerogatives, of SOVEREIGN PONTIFF, which had been instituted by Numa, and assumed by Augustus, were accepted without hesitation, by seven christian emperors; who were invested with a more absolute authority over the religion which they had deserted, than over that which they professed.'

The divisions of christianity suspended the ruin of paganism; and the holy war against the infidels was less vigorously prosecuted by princes and

k Symmach. Epistol. x. 54.

The fourth Dissertation of M. de la Bastie, sur le Souverain Pontificat des Empereurs Romains, (in the Mem. de l'Acad. tom. xv. p. 75144.) is a very learned and judicious performance, which explains the state, and proves the toleration, of paganism from Constantine to Gratian. The assertion of Zosimus, that Gratian was the first who refused the pontifical robe, is confirmed beyond a doubt; and the murmurs of bigotry, on that subject, are almost silenced.

m As I have freely anticipated the use of pagans and paganism, I shall now trace the singular revolutions of those celebrated words. 1. Hayn, in the Doric dialect, so familiar to the Italians, signifies a fountain; and the rural neighbourhood which frequented the same fountain, derived the common appellation of pagus and pagans, (Festus sub voce, and Servius ad Virgil. Georgic. ii. 382.) 2. By an easy ex. tension of the word, pagan and rural became almost synonymous, (Plio. Hist. Natur. xxviii. 5.) and the meaner rustics acquired that name, which has been corrupted into peasants in the modern languages of Europe. 3. The amazing increase of the military order introduced the necessity of a correlative term, (Hume's Essays, vol. i. p. 555.) and all the people who were not enlisted in the service of the prince were branded with the contemptuous epithets of pagans. (Tacit. Hist. iii. 24. 43. Juvenal. Satir. xvi. Tertullian de Pallio, c. 4.) 4. The christians were the soldiers of Christ; their adversaries who refused his sacrament, or military oath of baptism, might deserve the metaphorical name of pagans: and this popular reproach was introduced as early as the reign of Valentiniau (A. D. 365.) into imperial laws (Cod. Theodos, 1. xvi. tit. ii. leg. 18.) and theological writings. 5. Christianity gradually filled the cities of the empire; the old religion, in the time of Prudentius (advers. Symmachum, 1. i. ad fin.) and Orosius, (in Præfat. Hist.) retired and languished in obscure villages; and the word pagans, with its new signification, reverted to its primitive origin. 6. Since the worship of Jupiter and his family has expired, the vacant title of pagans has been

77.

CHAP. XXII.

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]
[blocks in formation]

bishops, who were more immediately alarmed by the | by his virtues; and they justly considered the friend guilt and danger of domestic rebellion. The extir- of the people as the enemy of the court. As long pation of idolatry" might have been justified by the as the fame of Julian was doubtful, the buffoons of established principles of intolerance: but the hostile the palace, who were skilled in the language of sects, which alternately reigned in the imperial satire, tried the efficacy of those arts which they had court, were mutually apprehensive of alienating, and so often practised with success. They easily disperhaps exasperating, the minds of a powerful, covered, that his simplicity was not exempt from though declining faction. Every motive of authority affectation: the ridiculous epithets of an hairy and fashion, of interest and reason, now militated on savage, of an ape invested with the purple, were the side of christianity; but two or three generations applied to the dress and person of the philosophic elapsed, before their victorious influence was uni- warrior; and his modest despatches were stigmatized versally felt. The religion which had so long and as the vain and elaborate fictions of a loquacious so lately been established in the Roman empire was Greek, a speculative soldier, who had studied the still revered by a numerous people, less attached art of war amidst the groves of the academy. The indeed to speculative opinion, than to ancient cus- voice of malicious folly was at length silenced by tom. The honours of the state and army were the shouts of victory; the conqueror of the Franks indifferently bestowed on all the subjects of Con- and Alemanni could no longer be painted as an obstantine and Constantius; and a considerable por-ject of contempt; and the monarch himself was tion of knowledge and wealth and valour was still engaged in the service of polytheism. The superstition of the senator and of the peasant, of the poet and the philosopher, was derived from very different causes, but they met with equal devotion in the temples of the gods. Their zeal was insensibly provoked by the insulting triumph of a proscribed sect; and their hopes were revived by the well-grounded confidence, that the presumptive heir of the empire, a young and valiant hero, who had delivered Gaul from the arms of the barbarians, had secretly embraced the religion of his ancestors.

CHAP. XXII.

Julian is declared emperor by the legions of Gaul.—
His march and success.-The death of Constantius.
-Civil administration of Julian.

The jealousy of Constantius against Julian.

WHILE the Romans languished under the ignominious tyranny of eunuchs and bishops, the praises of Julian were repeated with transport in every part of the empire, except in the palace of Constantius. The barbarians of Germany had felt, and still dreaded, the arms of the young Cæsar; his soldiers were the companions of his victory; the grateful provincials enjoyed the blessings of his reign; but the favourites, who had opposed his elevation, were offended

successively applied to all the idolaters and polytheists of the old and new world. 7. The Latin christians bestowed it, without scruple, on their mortal enemies the Mahometans; and the purest Unitarians were brauded with the unjust reproach of idolatry and paganism. See Gerard Vossius Etymologicon Lingua Latina, in his works, tom. i. p. 420. Godefroy's Commentary on the Theodosian Code, tom, vi. p. 250. and Ducange, mediæ et infimæ Latinitat. Glossar.

Η In the pure language of Ionia and Athens, Ειδωλον and Λατρεία were ancient and familiar words. The former expressed a likeness, an apparition, (Homer. Odyss. xi. 601.) a representation, an image, created either by fancy or art. The latter denoted any sort of service or slavery. The Jews of Egypt, who translated the Hebrew Scriptures, restrained the use of these words (Exod. xx. 4, 5.) to the religious wor ship of an image. The peculiar idiom of the Hellenists, or Grecian Jews, has been adopted by the sacred and ecclesiastical writers; and the reproach of idolatry (EdwAoλarpeta,) has stigmatized that visible and abject mode of superstition, which some sects of christianity should not hastily impute to the polytheists of Greece and Rome.

a Omnes qui plus poterant in palatio, adulandi professores jam docti, recte consulta, prospereque completa vertebant in deridiculum: talia

b

meanly ambitious of stealing from his lieutenant
the honourable reward of his labours. In the letters
crowned with laurel, which, according to ancient
custom, were addressed to the provinces, the name
of Julian was omitted. "Constantius had made his
dispositions in person; he had signalized his valour
in the foremost ranks; his military conduct had
secured the victory; and the captive king of the
barbarians was presented to him on the field of
battle," from which he was at that time distant above
forty days' journey. So extravagant a fable was
incapable, however, of deceiving the public credu-
lity, or even of satisfying the pride of the emperor
himself. Secretly conscious that the applause and
favour of the Romans accompanied the rising for-
tunes of Julian, his discontented mind was prepared
to receive the subtle poison of those artful syco-
phants, who coloured their mischievous designs with
the fairest appearances of truth and candour. In-
stead of depreciating the merits of Julian, they
acknowledged, and even exaggerated, his popular
fame, superior talents, and important services. But
they darkly insinuated, that the virtues of the Cæsar
might instantly be converted into the most dangerous
crimes, if the inconstant multitude should prefer
their inclinations to their duty; or if the general of
a victorious army should be tempted from his alle-
giance by the hopes of revenge, and independent
greatness. The personal fears of Con- Fears and envy of
stantius were interpreted by his council Constantius.
as a laudable anxiety for the public safety; whilst

c

sine modo strepentes insulse; in odium venit cum victoriis suis; capella, non homo; ut hirsutum Julianum carpentes, appellantesque lo quacem talpam, et purpuratam simiam, et litterionem Græcum; et his congruentia plurima atque vernacula principi resonantes, audire hæc taliaque gestienti, virtutes ejus obruere verbis impudentibus conabantur, et segnem incessentes et timidum et umbratilem, gestaque secus verbis comptioribus exornantem. Ammianus, xvii. II.

b Ammian. xvi. 12. The orator Themistius (iv. p. 56, 57.) believed whatever was contained in the imperial letters, which were addressed to the senate of Constantinople. Aurelius Victor, who published his Abridgment in the last year of Constantius, ascribes the German victories to the wisdom of the emperor, and the fortune of the Cæsar. Yet the historian, soon afterwards, was indebted to the favour or es teem of Julian for the honour of a brass statue; and the important offices of consular of the second Pannonia, and præfect of the city.

Ammian. xxi. 10.

e Callido nocendi artificio, accusatoriam diritatem laudum titulis peragebant.... Hæ voces fuerunt ad inflammanda odia probris omnibus potentiores. See Mamertin. in Actione Gratiarum in vet. Panegyr.

xi. 5, 6.

in private, and perhaps in his own breast, he disguised, under the less odious appellation of fear, the sentiments of hatred and envy, which he had secretly conceived for the inimitable virtues of Julian.

The legions of

to march into the east,

friends. The apprehensions of the Gauls were derived from the knowledge of the impending and inevitable danger. As soon as the provinces were exhausted of their military strength, the Germans would violate a treaty which had been imposed on their fears; and notwithstanding the abilities and valour of Julian, the general of a nominal army, to whom the public calamities would be imputed, must find himself, after a vain resistance, either a prisoner in the camp of the barbarians, or a criminal in the palace of Constantius. If Julian complied with the orders which he had received, he subscribed his own destruction, and that of a people who deserved his affection. But a positive refusal was an act of rebellion, and a declaration of war.

The apparent tranquillity of Gaul, Gaul are ordered and the imminent danger of the eastern provinces, offered a specious pretence A. D. 360. April, for the design which was artfully concerted by the imperial ministers. They resolved to disarm the Cæsar; to recall those faithful troops who guarded his person and dignity; and to employ, in a distant war against the Persian monarch, the hardy veterans who had vanquished, on the banks of the Rhine, the fiercest nations of Germany. While Julian used the laborious hours of his winterquarters at Paris in the administration of power, which, in his hands, was the exercise of virtue, he was surprised by the hasty arrival of a tribune and a notary, with positive orders from the emperor, which they were directed to execute, and he was commanded not to oppose. Constantius signified his pleasure, that four entire legions, the Celta, and Petulants, the Heruli, and the Batavians, should be separated from the standard of Julian, under which they had acquired their fame and discipline; that in each of the remaining bands three hundred of the bravest youths should be selected; and that this numerous detachment, the strength of the Gallic army, should instantly begin their march, and exert their utmost diligence to arrive, before the opening of the campaign, on the frontiers of Persia.d The Cæsar foresaw and lamented the consequences of this fatal mandate. Most of the auxiliaries, who engaged their voluntary service, had stipulated, that they should never be obliged to pass the Alps. The public faith of Rome, and the personal honour of Julian, had been pledged for the observance of this condition. Such an act of treachery and oppression would destroy the confidence, and excite the resentment, of the independent warriors of Germany, who considered truth as the noblest of their virtues, and freedom as the most valuable of their possessions. The legionaries, who enjoyed the title and privileges of Romans, were enlisted for the general defence of the republic; but those mercenary troops heard with cold indifference the antiquated names of the republic and of Rome. Attached, either from birth or long habit, to the climate and manners of Gaul, they loved and admired Julian; they despised, and perhaps hated, the emperor; they dreaded the labo-dience was the virtue of the most eminent subject, rious march, the Persian arrows, and the burning deserts of Asia. They claimed as their own the country which they had saved; and excused their want of spirit, by pleading the sacred and more immediate duty of protecting their families and

d The minute interval, which may be interposed, between the hyeme adulta and the primo vere of Ammianus, (xx. 1. 4.) instead of allowing a sufficient space for a march of three thousand miles, would render the orders of Constantius as extravagant as they were unjust. The troops of Gaul could not have reached Syria till the end of autumn. The memory of Ammianus must have been inaccurate, and his language incorrect.

The inexorable jealousy of the emperor, the peremptory, and perhaps insidious, nature of his commands, left not any room for a fair apology, or candid interpretation; and the dependant station of the Cæsar scarcely allowed him to pause or to deliberate. Solitude increased the perplexity of Julian; he could no longer apply to the faithful counsels of Sallust, who had been removed from his office by the judicious malice of the eunuchs: he could not even enforce his representations by the concurrence of the ministers, who would have been afraid, or ashamed, to approve the ruin of Gaul. The moment had been chosen, when Lupicinus, the general of the cavalry, was despatched into Britain, to repulse the inroads of the Scots and Picts; and Florentius was occupied at Vienna by the assessment of the tribute. The latter, a crafty and corrupt statesman, declining to assume a responsible part on this dangerous occasion, eluded the pressing and repeated invitations of Julian, who represented to him, that in every important measure, the presence of the præfect was indispensable in the council of the prince. In the meanwhile the Cæsar was oppressed by the rude and importunate solicitations of the imperial messengers, who presumed to suggest, that if he expected the return of his ministers, he would charge himself with the guilt of the delay, and reserve for them the merit of the execution. Unable to resist, unwilling to comply, Julian expressed, in the most serious terms, his wish, and even his intention, of resigning the purple, which he could not preserve with honour, but which he could not abdicate with safety.

After a painful conflict, Julian was Their discoucompelled to acknowledge, that obe

tents.

and that the sovereign alone was entitled to judge of the public welfare. He issued the necessary orders for carrying into execution the commands of Constantius; a part of the troops began their march for the Alps; and the detachments from the several

e Ammianus xx. 1. The valour of Lupicinus, and his military skill, are acknowledged by the historian, who, in his affected language, ac cuses the general of exalting the horns of his pride, bellowing in a tragic tone, and exciting a doubt whether he was more cruel or avari cious. The danger from the Scots and Picts was so serious, that Juliza himself had some thoughts of passing over into the island.

12

« ForrigeFortsett »