The American Journal of International Law, Volum 10American Society of International Law, 1916 The American Journal of International Law has been published quarterly since 1907 and is considered the premier English-language scholarly journal in its field. It features scholarly articles and editorials, notes and comment by preeminent scholars on developments in international law and international relations, and reviews of contemporary developments. The Journal contains summaries of decisions by national and international courts and arbitral and other tribunals, and of contemporary U.S. practice in international law. Each issue lists recent publications in English and other languages, many of which are reviewed in depth. Throughout its history, and particularly during first sixty years, the Journal has published full-text primary materials of particular importance in the field of international law. The contents of the current issue of the Journal are available on the ASIL web site. |
Inni boken
Resultat 1-5 av 100
Side
... called inviolability of the mails ... 580 The case of Virginia against West Virginia .. 584 The von Igel case ... 592 Some adumbrations as to European peace . 594 Concerning prisoners of war . ... 600 The proposed amendments to the ...
... called inviolability of the mails ... 580 The case of Virginia against West Virginia .. 584 The von Igel case ... 592 Some adumbrations as to European peace . 594 Concerning prisoners of war . ... 600 The proposed amendments to the ...
Side 6
... called court would be merely a group of men seeking to impose their personal opinions upon the states coming before them . The lack of an adequate system of law to be applied has been the chief obstacle to the development of a system of ...
... called court would be merely a group of men seeking to impose their personal opinions upon the states coming before them . The lack of an adequate system of law to be applied has been the chief obstacle to the development of a system of ...
Side 34
... called to Article 12 of the treaty of 1785 which , like Article 13 of the treaty of 1799 , was continued in force by Article 12 of the treaty of 1828. This article reads as follows : If one of the contracting parties should be engaged ...
... called to Article 12 of the treaty of 1785 which , like Article 13 of the treaty of 1799 , was continued in force by Article 12 of the treaty of 1828. This article reads as follows : If one of the contracting parties should be engaged ...
Side 35
... called attention to the fact that the Government of the United States might not be satisfied with the amount , and that even if the prize court awarded an indemnity it would not be binding on the United States . It seemed more ...
... called attention to the fact that the Government of the United States might not be satisfied with the amount , and that even if the prize court awarded an indemnity it would not be binding on the United States . It seemed more ...
Side 54
... called Continental theory that a blockade is not effective unless maintained by a stationary squadron whose ships are anchored sufficiently near each other to subject to cross fire any vessel attempting to pass . The Declaration ...
... called Continental theory that a blockade is not effective unless maintained by a stationary squadron whose ships are anchored sufficiently near each other to subject to cross fire any vessel attempting to pass . The Declaration ...
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
The American Journal of International Law, Volum 7,Deler 1-2 James Brown Scott,George Grafton Wilson Uten tilgangsbegrensning - 1913 |
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
according American apply April Article August Austria-Hungary authority Belgium belligerent blockade Britain British capture cargo China Chinese Government citizens civilized claim Clunet condemnation Conference Congress Constitution contraband Court of Arbitration decision Declaration Declaration of London Declaration of Paris decree delegation diplomatic doctrine duties Edward Fry effect enforcement EUROPEAN existence fact force foreign France French gén Gulf of Fonseca Hague Convention high seas Honduras hostilities interest international law issued JAMES BROWN SCOTT Japanese judges judicial July jurisdiction Justice law of nations Lord Lordships ment merchant vessels Mexico military Monroe Policy naval negotiations neutral port Nicaragua obligation opinion Order in Council outbreak parties peace Permanent Court Porto Rico Powers practice present President principle prize court proclamation protection provisions purpose question ratification recognized regard relations Republic rule Russia Secretary seized seizure sovereignty territory Text tion Treaty Series tribunal United violation voyage
Populære avsnitt
Side 67 - Spain cedes to the United States the island of Porto Rico and other islands now under Spanish sovereignty in the West Indies, and the island of Guam in the Marianas or Ladrones.
Side 99 - The Contracting Powers agree not to have recourse to armed force for the recovery of contract debts claimed from the Government of one country by the Government of another country as being due to its nationals. This undertaking is, however, not applicable when the debtor State refuses or neglects to reply to an offer of arbitration, or, after accepting the offer, prevents any "Compromis" from being agreed on, or, after the arbitration, fails to submit to the award.
Side 834 - The jurisdiction of the nation, within its own territory, is necessarily exclusive and absolute; it is susceptible of no limitation, not imposed by itself.
Side 478 - But there is nothing in our laws, or in the law of nations, that forbids our citizens from sending armed vessels, as well as munitions of war, to foreign ports for sale. It is a commercial adventure which no nation is bound to prohibit, and which only exposes the persons engaged in it to the penalty of confiscation.
Side 560 - No principle of general law is more universally acknowledged, than the perfect equality of nations. Russia and Geneva have equal rights. It results from this equality, that no one can rightfully impose a rule on another. Each legislates for itself, but its legislation can operate on itself alone.
Side 6 - If a question of law to be decided is covered by a treaty in force between the belligerent captor and a Power which is itself, or whose subject or citizen is, a party to the proceedings, the court is governed by the provisions of the said treaty. In the absence of such provisions the court shall apply the rules of international law. If no generally recognized rule exists, the court shall give judgment in accordance with the general principles of justice and equity.
Side 576 - ... until the Government of that which deems itself aggrieved shall have maturely considered, in the spirit of peace and good neighborship, whether it would not be better that such difference should be settled by the arbitration of commissioners appointed on each side, or by that of a friendly nation.
Side 483 - A neutral Power is not bound to prevent the export or transit, for the use of either belligerent, of arms, ammunition, or, in general, of anything which could be of use to an army or fleet.
Side 97 - Chronic wrongdoing, or an impotence which results in a general loosening of the ties of civilized society, may in America, as elsewhere, ultimately require intervention by some civilized nation, and in the Western Hemisphere the adherence of the United States to the Monroe Doctrine may force the United States, however reluctantly, in flagrant cases of such wrongdoing or impotence, to the exercise of an international police power.
Side 542 - Our citizens have been always free to make, vend, and export arms. It is the constant occupation and livelihood of some of them. To suppress their callings, the only means perhaps of their subsistence, because a war exists in foreign and distant countries, in which we have no concern, would scarcely be expected. It would be hard in principle, and impossible in practice.