The American Journal of International Law, Volum 10American Society of International Law, 1916 The American Journal of International Law has been published quarterly since 1907 and is considered the premier English-language scholarly journal in its field. It features scholarly articles and editorials, notes and comment by preeminent scholars on developments in international law and international relations, and reviews of contemporary developments. The Journal contains summaries of decisions by national and international courts and arbitral and other tribunals, and of contemporary U.S. practice in international law. Each issue lists recent publications in English and other languages, many of which are reviewed in depth. Throughout its history, and particularly during first sixty years, the Journal has published full-text primary materials of particular importance in the field of international law. The contents of the current issue of the Journal are available on the ASIL web site. |
Inni boken
Resultat 1-5 av 100
Side 5
... opinion behind it no punishment of any kind can be imposed for the violation of international law . For the formation of such a general opinion , however , questions of national conduct must be reduced to simple and definite form . Occa ...
... opinion behind it no punishment of any kind can be imposed for the violation of international law . For the formation of such a general opinion , however , questions of national conduct must be reduced to simple and definite form . Occa ...
Side 9
... for the enforcement of peace by arms or otherwise be estab- lished , or any general opinion of mankind for the maintenance of law be effective . Can any of these things be done ? Can the THE OUTLOOK FOR INTERNATIONAL LAW 9.
... for the enforcement of peace by arms or otherwise be estab- lished , or any general opinion of mankind for the maintenance of law be effective . Can any of these things be done ? Can the THE OUTLOOK FOR INTERNATIONAL LAW 9.
Side 10
... opinion of the world responding to the duty of preserving the law inviolate . If there be such an opinion it will be enforced . I shall not now inquire into the specific means of enforce- ment , but the means can be found . It is only ...
... opinion of the world responding to the duty of preserving the law inviolate . If there be such an opinion it will be enforced . I shall not now inquire into the specific means of enforce- ment , but the means can be found . It is only ...
Side 23
... opinion , re- marks that the authorities hardly sustain it as a rule of unqualified or universal obligation.47 The American publicist Dana 48 maintained that necessity would justify destruction , as , for example , where the vessel is ...
... opinion , re- marks that the authorities hardly sustain it as a rule of unqualified or universal obligation.47 The American publicist Dana 48 maintained that necessity would justify destruction , as , for example , where the vessel is ...
Side 25
... opinion of Holland ( quoted above ) , and of Lord Stowell in the case of the Felicity ( incorrectly it is believed ) in favor of the right of destruction in exceptional cases . 58 Count Tornielli of Italy sought to remove the necessity ...
... opinion of Holland ( quoted above ) , and of Lord Stowell in the case of the Felicity ( incorrectly it is believed ) in favor of the right of destruction in exceptional cases . 58 Count Tornielli of Italy sought to remove the necessity ...
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
The American Journal of International Law, Volum 7,Deler 1-2 James Brown Scott,George Grafton Wilson Uten tilgangsbegrensning - 1913 |
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
according American apply April Article August Austria-Hungary authority Belgium belligerent blockade Britain British capture cargo China Chinese Government citizens civilized claim Clunet condemnation Conference Congress Constitution contraband Court of Arbitration decision Declaration Declaration of London Declaration of Paris decree delegation diplomatic doctrine duties Edward Fry effect enforcement EUROPEAN existence fact force foreign France French gén Gulf of Fonseca Hague Convention high seas Honduras hostilities interest international law issued JAMES BROWN SCOTT Japanese judges judicial July jurisdiction Justice law of nations Lord Lordships ment merchant vessels Mexico military Monroe Policy naval negotiations neutral port Nicaragua obligation opinion Order in Council outbreak parties peace Permanent Court Porto Rico Powers practice present President principle prize court proclamation protection provisions purpose question ratification recognized regard relations Republic rule Russia Secretary seized seizure sovereignty territory Text tion Treaty Series tribunal United violation voyage
Populære avsnitt
Side 67 - Spain cedes to the United States the island of Porto Rico and other islands now under Spanish sovereignty in the West Indies, and the island of Guam in the Marianas or Ladrones.
Side 99 - The Contracting Powers agree not to have recourse to armed force for the recovery of contract debts claimed from the Government of one country by the Government of another country as being due to its nationals. This undertaking is, however, not applicable when the debtor State refuses or neglects to reply to an offer of arbitration, or, after accepting the offer, prevents any "Compromis" from being agreed on, or, after the arbitration, fails to submit to the award.
Side 834 - The jurisdiction of the nation, within its own territory, is necessarily exclusive and absolute; it is susceptible of no limitation, not imposed by itself.
Side 478 - But there is nothing in our laws, or in the law of nations, that forbids our citizens from sending armed vessels, as well as munitions of war, to foreign ports for sale. It is a commercial adventure which no nation is bound to prohibit, and which only exposes the persons engaged in it to the penalty of confiscation.
Side 560 - No principle of general law is more universally acknowledged, than the perfect equality of nations. Russia and Geneva have equal rights. It results from this equality, that no one can rightfully impose a rule on another. Each legislates for itself, but its legislation can operate on itself alone.
Side 6 - If a question of law to be decided is covered by a treaty in force between the belligerent captor and a Power which is itself, or whose subject or citizen is, a party to the proceedings, the court is governed by the provisions of the said treaty. In the absence of such provisions the court shall apply the rules of international law. If no generally recognized rule exists, the court shall give judgment in accordance with the general principles of justice and equity.
Side 576 - ... until the Government of that which deems itself aggrieved shall have maturely considered, in the spirit of peace and good neighborship, whether it would not be better that such difference should be settled by the arbitration of commissioners appointed on each side, or by that of a friendly nation.
Side 483 - A neutral Power is not bound to prevent the export or transit, for the use of either belligerent, of arms, ammunition, or, in general, of anything which could be of use to an army or fleet.
Side 97 - Chronic wrongdoing, or an impotence which results in a general loosening of the ties of civilized society, may in America, as elsewhere, ultimately require intervention by some civilized nation, and in the Western Hemisphere the adherence of the United States to the Monroe Doctrine may force the United States, however reluctantly, in flagrant cases of such wrongdoing or impotence, to the exercise of an international police power.
Side 542 - Our citizens have been always free to make, vend, and export arms. It is the constant occupation and livelihood of some of them. To suppress their callings, the only means perhaps of their subsistence, because a war exists in foreign and distant countries, in which we have no concern, would scarcely be expected. It would be hard in principle, and impossible in practice.