Sidebilder
PDF
ePub
[blocks in formation]
[graphic]
[blocks in formation]

A-28286. United States v. T. C.

A-28393. Merwin E. Liss, Cum

Middleswart et al. June 9, 1960..

berland and Allegheny

232

A-28288. Boyd L. Hulse v.

[blocks in formation]

William H. Griggs. May

[blocks in formation]

A-28397.

Snowden.

A-28484. Genia Ben Ezra et al.

241

H. Shuler,

[blocks in formation]

Walter Y. Wentz. June

[blocks in formation]

A-28299. Richard L. Oelschlae

ger. June 27, 1960______

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

A-28448. J. Edwin Swapp Estate, Preston J. Swapp, Administrator. Aug. 2,

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

A-28334. Frederick J. Zillig v.

Vernon M. Milburn.

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

A-28544.

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]
[graphic]

CUMULATIVE INDEX TO SUITS FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW OF DEPARTMENTAL DECISIONS PUBLISHED IN INTERIOR DECISIONS

The table below sets out in alphabetical order, arranged according to the last name of the first party named in the Department's decision, all the departmental decisions published in the Interior Decisions, beginning with volume 61, judicial review of which was sought by one of the parties concerned. The name of the action is listed as it appears on the court docket in each court. Where the decision of the court has been published, the citation is given; if not, the docket number and date of final action taken by the court is set out. If the court issued an opinion in a nonreported case, that fact is indicated; otherwise no opinion was written. Unless otherwise indicated, all suits were commenced in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and, if appealed, were appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Finally, if judicial review resulted in a further departmental decision, the departmental decision is cited.

Max Barash, The Texas Company, 63 I.D. 51 (1956)

Max Barash v. Douglas McKay, Civil Action No. 939-56. Judgment for defendant, June 13, 1957; reversed and remanded, 256 F. 2d 714 (1958); judgment for plaintiff, December 18, 1958, U.S. Dist. Ct. D.C., 66 I.D. 11 (1959).

The California Company, 66 I.D. 65 (1959)

The California Company v. Fred A. Seaton, Civil Action No. 980-59. Judgment for defendant, October 24, 1960 (opinion). Appeal pending.

Columbian Carbon Company, Merwin E. Liss, 63 I.D. 166 (1956)

Merwin E. Liss v. Fred A. Seaton, Civil Action No. 3233-56. Judgment for defendant, January 9, 1958. Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution, September 18, 1958, D.C. Cir. No. 14,647.

John C. DeArmas, Jr., P. A. McKenna, 63 I.D. 82 (1956)

Patrick A. McKenna v. Clarence A. Davis, Civil Action No. 2125-56. Judgment for defendant, June 20, 1957; aff'd, 259 F. 2d 780 (1958); cert. denied, 358 U.S. 835 (1958).

John J. Farrelly et al., 62 I.D. 1 (1955)

John J. Farrelly and The Fifty-One Oil Co. v. Douglas McKay, Civil Action No. 3037-55. Judgment for plaintiff, October 11, 1955; no appeal.

Franco Western Oil Company et al., 65 I.D. 316, 427 (1958)

Raymond J. Hansen v. Fred A. Seaton, Civil Action No. 2810-59. Judgment for plaintiff, August 2, 1960 (opinion). No appeal taken.

Nelson A. Gerttula, 64 I.D. 225 (1957)

Nelson A. Gerttula v. Fred A. Seaton, Civil Action No. 685–60. Suit pending.

Raymond J. Hansen et al., 67 I.D. 362 (1960)

Duncan Miller v. Fred A. Seaton, Civil Action No. 3470-60. Suit pending. Robert Schulein v. Fred A. Seaton, Civil Action No. 4131-60. Suit pending.. Max L. Krueger, Vaughan B. Connelly, 65 I.D. 185 (1958)

Max L. Krueger v. Fred A. Seaton, Civil Action No. 3106-58. Complaint. dismissed by plaintiff, June 22, 1959.

Wade McNeil et al., 64 I.D. 423 (1957)

Wade McNeil v. Fred A. Seaton, Civil Action No. 648-58. Judgment for defendant, June 5, 1959 (opinion); reversed, 281 F. 2d 931 (1960). Salvatore Megna, Guardian, Philip T. Garigan, 65 I.D. 33 (1958)

Salvatore Megna, Guardian, etc. v. Fred A. Seaton, Civil Action No. 468–58. Judgment for plaintiff, November 16, 1959; motion for reconsideration. denied, December 2, 1959; no appeal.

Duncan Miller, Louise Cuccia, 66 I.D. 388 (1959)

Louise Cuccia and Shell Oil Company v. Fred A. Seaton, Civil Action No.. 562-60. Suit pending.

Henry S. Morgan et al., 65 I.D. 369 (1958)

Henry S. Morgan v. Fred A. Seaton, Civil Action No. 3248–59. Oral judgment for defendant, December 16, 1960 (order not yet entered).

Richard L. Oelschlaeger, 67 I.D. 237 (1960)

Richard L. Oelschlaeger v. Fred A. Seaton, Civil Action No. 4181-60. Suit pending.

C. W. Parcell et al., 61 I.D. 444 (1954)

C. W. Parcell et al. v. Fred A. Seaton et al., Civil Action No. 2261-55. Judgment for defendants June 12, 1957 (opinion); no appeal.

Phillips Petroleum Company, 61 I.D. 93 (1953)

Phillips Petroleum Company v. Douglas McKay, Civil Action No. 5024-53.. Judgment for defendant, July 11, 1955 (opinion); no appeal.

Richfield Oil Corporation, 62 I.D. 269 (1955)

Richfield Oil Corporation v. Fred A. Seaton, Civil Action No. 3820-55.. Dismissed without prejudice, March 6, 1958.

« ForrigeFortsett »