| Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1897 - 824 sider
...113 US 27, speaking of the fourteenth amendment: 'Class legislation, discriminating against some and favoring others, is prohibited; but legislation which,...similarly situated, is not within the amendment.' " So in the present case the law acts equally upon all in the territory covered by the act. It denies... | |
| Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1907 - 832 sider
...consideration in the present case may be consistently said to be described by the language used; ie, "legislation which, in carrying out a public purpose, is limited in its application," but which " within the sphere of its operation affects alike all persons similarly situated." A different... | |
| 1885 - 544 sider
...favoring others, is prohibited by the fourteenth amendment to the Constitution of the United States; but legislation which, in carrying out a public purpose,...persons similarly situated, is not within the amendment. (3) Neither the fourteenth amendment, nor any other amendment to the Constitution of the United States,... | |
| 1890 - 548 sider
...discriminating against some and favoring others, is prohibited; but legislation which, in carrying ont a public purpose, is limited in its application, if...similarly situated, is not within the amendment.' It was accordingly held that a municipal ordinance prohibiting washing and ironing in public laundries... | |
| 1892 - 582 sider
...discrimination against some and favoring others, is prohibited, bnt legislation which, in carrying ont a public purpose, is limited in its application, if within the sphere of its operatton it affects alike all persons similarly situated, is not within the amendment." Missouri v.... | |
| Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, Joseph M. Tanner, George L. Nye, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, Alonzo Blair Irvine, Harmel L. Pratt, William S. Dalton, H. Arnold Rich - 1903 - 612 sider
...resources, and add to its wealth and prosperity. . . . Class legislation, discriminating against some and favoring others, is prohibited ; but legislation which,...application, if within the sphere of its operation it affects all persons similarly situated, is not within the amendment." And in Soon King v. Crowly, 113 US 703,... | |
| 1910 - 2132 sider
...27, 5 Sup. Ct. 357, 28 L, Ed. 923, it was said : "Class legislation, discriminating against some and favoring others, Is prohibited; but legislation which....application, If within the sphere of Its operation It affects all persons similarly situated, is not within the amendment." Such has been the consistent holding... | |
| 1893 - 1094 sider
...Connolly, speaking of the fourteenth amendment: ' Class legislation, discriminât-» ing against some'and favoring others, is pro-»hibited; but legislation...similarly situated, is not within the amendment.' 113 US 27, 32, 5 Sup. Ct. Rep. 357." If presidential electors are appointed by the legislatures, no... | |
| United States. Supreme Court - 1889 - 762 sider
...circumstances and conditions. " Class legislation," said the court, " discriminating against some and favoring others, is prohibited, but legislation which,...similarly situated, is not within the amendment." " In Soon Hing v. Crowley, 113 US 703, 709, an objection was taken to a similar ordinance of San Francisco,... | |
| 1899 - 1206 sider
...and those outside of such limits. The court said: "Class legislation, discriminating against some and favoring others, is prohibited, but legislation which,...application, if within the sphere of its operation It affects all persons similarly situated, is not within the amendment." In Railway Co. v. Haley, 25 Kan. 35,... | |
| |