 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1896 - 776 sider
...the counsel thought them susceptible of, as evidenced by the language complained of. 8. An exception to the refusal of the court to direct a verdict in favor of the defendant on his motion, made at the close of the plaintiff's proofs, is waived by defendant's proceeding to... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1919 - 806 sider
...alleged errors in the charge of the court. We will first examine the assignment of error based upon the refusal of the court to direct a verdict in favor of the defendant upon the ground that at the time of the accident, plaintiff was acting without the scope of his employment... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1916 - 830 sider
...proposed satisfies us of the correctness of the ruling. The next group of assignments of error relates to the refusal of the court to direct a verdict in favor of the defendants: (a) Because of variance between the declaration and the proofs; and (6) on the ground... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1913 - 804 sider
...is as to defendant Thomas' liability under that statute; and this question is raised by exceptions to the refusal of the court to direct a verdict in favor of defendant Thomas, and in the court's refusal to charge the jury that defendant Thomas was not liable,... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1920 - 800 sider
...(after stating the facts) . The first assignment of error discussed in counsel's brief is based upon the refusal of the court to direct a verdict in favor of the respondent upon the ground that the testimony set forth in the information was not material to... | |
 | 1871 - 530 sider
...Ganson, for respondent. Ingalls, J. At the close of the evidence the defendant's counsel requested the court to direct a verdict In favor of the defendant, upon the ground that there was no proof of negligence on the part of the defendant, and that the evidence... | |
 | Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, Joseph M. Tanner, George L. Nye, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, Alonzo Blair Irvine, Harmel L. Pratt, William S. Dalton, H. Arnold Rich - 1910 - 688 sider
...K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Miller, 25 Tex. Civ. App. 460, 61 SW 978. 4. The next assignment of error relates to the refusal of the court to direct a verdict in favor of the defendant The appellant did not contend in the court below, nor has .it here contended, that it was entitled... | |
 | 1918 - 1228 sider
...HARRIS, J. (after stating the facts as above). The only error assigned by the defendant arises out of the refusal of the court to direct a verdict in favor of the defendant. This assignment of error is predicated upou the contention that there was no evidence to show that... | |
 | 1909 - 1164 sider
...evidence or dispute as to the essential facts above stated ; and, as we view the law, it was the duty of the court to direct a verdict In favor of the defendant when so requested by it Coffin v. Hutchinson, 22 Or. 554, 30 Рае. 424 ; Crawford v. Hutchineon,... | |
| |
Five were directed to the refusal of the court to direct a verdict in favor of the defendant upon five different issues. 
