Biddle v. Commonwealth (1825) 13
Serg. & R. 405..

Bigelow, Ex parte, 113 U. S. 328 (28:
1005)

805 | Briggs v. Spaulding, 141 U. S. 132 (35:
662)

603

.315, 946

Billon v. Hyde, 2 Ves. Sr. 330.
Birmingham v. Anderson, 48 Pa. 258. .
Black v. Black (mem.) 163 U. S. 678
(41: 318)

v. Elkhorn Min. Co. 163 U. S.
449 (41: 223)

1183.

.76, 322

v. Zacharie, 3 How.

483

(11:

690)

837

.Blagge v. Balch, 162 U. S.

439

(40:

1032) Blair v. St. Louis, H. & K. R. Co. 25 Fed. Rep. 684.

.246, 755

1092

v. Walker, 171 U. S. 466 (43:
243)

928

.744, 756

882 Brimmer v. Rebman, 138 U. S. 78 862) 3 Inters. Com. 485 428 Brine v. Hartford F. Ins. Co. 96 U. S. 964 627 (24: 858) Brinkerhoff v. Aloe, 146 U. S. 515 (36: 1068) Broadstreet v. Clark, D. & C. M. & St. P. R. Co. 65 Iowa, 670.... 1147 Broder v. Natoma Water & M. Co. 101 U. S. 274 (25:790) Bromley v. Goodere, 1 Atk. 75. .650, 653, 655 Bronson v. Schulten, 104 U. S. 417 (26: 800) 554 Brooks v. Martin [1863] 2 Wall. 70 (17: 732) .1124, 1128 .837, 1146 v. Stmr. Adirondack, 2 Fed. Rep. Blythe Co. v. Blythe (mem.) 172 U. S. 387 644 (43: 1183) Boardman, Re, 169 U. S. 39 (42: 653) Bock v. Perkins, 139 U. S. 628 (35: 314)

Blake v. McClung, 172 U. S. 239 (43:
432)

v. Williams, 6 Pick. 286, 17 Am.
Dec. 372..

Boese v. King, 78 N. Y. 471.

v. King, 108 U. S. 379 (27:760) Bogert v. Elizabeth, 27 N. J. Eq. 568.. Boggs v. Varner, 6 Watts & S. 473.. Bohall v. Dilla, 114 U. S. 47 (29: 61). Bolles v. Brimfield, 120 U. S. 759 (30:

786) Bondies v. Sherwood, 22 How. 214 (16: 238)

Booth v. Clark, 17 How. 322 (15:164) v. Commonwealth, 16 Gratt. 519 v. Hodgson [1796] 6 T. R. 405..

v. United States, 171 U. S. 631
(43: 312)

415 Browne v. Kennedy, 5 Harr. & J. 196,
837
9 Am. Dec. 503..
.958, 961
390 Buchanan v. Litchfield, 102 U. S. 278
(26: 138)
.1123, 1124 Bucher v. Cheshire R. Co. 125 U. S. 555
(31: 795)

Bors v. Preston [1884] 111 U. S. 252
(28: 419)
Boston Beer Co. v. Massachusetts, 97 U.
S. 25 (24: 989).

Bowden, Ex parte, 1 Deacon & C. 135..
Bowen v. Evans, 2 H. L. Cas. 257..
Bowman v. Chicago & N. W. R. Co. 125
U. S. 465 (31:700) 1 In-
ters. Com. Rep. 823..
Boyce's Exrs. v. Grundy, 3 Pet. 210
(7: 655)

Boyd v. Alabama, 94 U. S. 645 (24:
302)
Bradbury v. Sharp, W. N. [1891] 143
Bradford v. Tappan, 11 Pick. 76........
Bradley v. People [1866] 4 Wall. 459
(18: 433).

.349, 694, 697

1064

Bostwick v. Brinkerhoff, 106 U. S. 3 (27:73)

468

657

1110

613

57

Bunting v. Danville, 93 Va. 200.
Buras v. O'Brien, 42 La. Ann. 528.
Burfenning v. Chicago, St. P. M. & O.
R. Co. 163 U. S. 321 (41:
175)

379

909

91

1064

348, 576

907

840

Burke, Re, 76 Wis. 357.
Burlington Water Co. v. Woodward, 49
Iowa, 58.

766

350

California Nat. Bank v. Kennedy, 167

U. S. 362 (42: 198)..

Central Land Co. v. Laidley, 159 U. S.
112 (40:95)

.387, 391, 765, 768, 769
Central P. R. Co. v. Hunsaker, 27 Land
Dec. 297.

v. Nevada, 162 U. S. 512 (40:
1057)

..504, 559, 663, 1009, 1010, 1089 Central Transp. Co. v. Pullman's Pal

California Powder Works v. Davis, 151

U. S. 389 (38:206)... Callan v. Wilson [1888] 127 U. S. 540 (32: 223)

519

ace Car Co. 139 U. S. 24 (35:55)71, 633, 1010, 1089, 1090 v. Pullman's Palace Car Co. 171 .874, 879 U. S. 138 (Adv. S. 1897, ..759 897) 1089 459 Chaffee County v. Potter, 142 U. S. 355 (35: 1040) ...696, 697, 698 Chaffin v. Taylor, 116 U. S. 571 (29:728) Chancellor, The, 4 Ben. 153.

Calliope, The [1891] A. C. 11.
Calton v. Utah, 130 U. S. 83 (32: 870)
Comou v. United States, 171 U. S. 277

..

(43: 163) .169, 1093 Campbell v. Arnold, 1 Johns. 511.. 422 v. Innes, 4 Barn. & Ald. 426.... 1126 v. United States, 107 U. S. 407 (27:592)

..618, 619

Canada Shipping Co. v. British Shipowners' Mut. P. Asso. L. R. 23 Q. B. Div. 342.

Canajoharie Nat. Bank v. Diefendorf,

123 N. Y. 191, 10 L. R. A.
676..

Canal Street, Re, 11 Wend. 156.

383

804

Chapman v. Esgar, 1 Smale & G. 575.
Steam
v. Royal Netherlands
Navigation Co. L. R. 4 Prob.
Div. 157

653

807

.240

Chappell v. Bradshaw, 128 U. S. 132
(32: 369)

526

359

138

887

495

448

316

417

Cannon v. Pratt, 99 U. S. 619 (25:446)
Canova, The, L. R. 1 Adm. & Eccl. 54..
Capital Bank v. Cadiz Bank, 172 U. S.
425 (43: 502)..

Charleston & S. Bridge Co. v. Kanawha
County Ct. 41 W. Va. 658..
Chase v. Jefferson, 1 Houst. (Del.) 257
v. Smith [1830] 4 Cranch, C. C.
90

832

129

v. United States, 155 U. S. 489 (39: 234) .557, 575 Cheaney v. Hooser, 9 B. Mon. 330 [1848] Cheely v. Clayton, 110 U. S. 702 (28:298) Chemical Nat. Bank v. Armstrong, 16 U. S. App. 465....642, 644, 653 Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, 5 Pet. 1 (8:25) v. Southern K. R. Co. 135 U. S. 641 (34: 295) . . .708, 861, 1055 Chesapeake & P. Teleph. Co. v. Baltimore & O. Teleg. Co. 66 Md. 399, 59 Am. Rep. 167..... 1167 Chetwood, Re, 165 U. S. 443 243 (41 :782)

Carey v. Houston & T. C. R. Co. 150 U.
S. 170 (37: 1041), 161 U. S.
115 (40: 638) ....816, 1183
Cargo ex Woosung, The, L. R. 1 Prob.
Div. 260..
Carib Prince, The, 170 U. S. 655 (42:
1181)
Carleton v. Franconia Iron & S. Co.
99 Mass. 216.

Carmichael v. Liverpool Sailing Ship-
owners' Mut. I. Asso. L. R.
19 Q. B. Div. 242.
Carnig v. Carr. 167 Mass. 544, 35 L. R.
A. 512.
Carper v. Fitzgerald, 121 U. S. 87 (30:
882)

417

758 Chicago v. Sheldon, 9 Wall. 50
594)

1055

.96, 926 (19:

1064

243

595

404

v. Taylor, 125 U. S. 161
638)
Chicago & A. R. Co. v. Goodwin, 111
Ill. 273, 53 Am. Rep. 622..
v. Union Rolling Mill Co. 109
U. S. 702 (27: 1081)......

(31:

379

163

112

California Nat. Bank v. Kennedy, 167

U. S. 362 (42: 198)

1147

87

383

765

Carter v. Greenhow, 114 U. S. 322 (29:
204)
Castillo v. McConnico, 168 U. S. 674
(42: 622)
Catlin v. Wilcox Silver-Plate Co. 123
Ind. 477, 8 L. R. A. 62. .838, 840
Central Bank of Brooklyn v. Hammett,
50 N. Y. 158.
Central Land Co. v. Laidley, 159 U. S.
112 (40: 95) ..

927

...387, 391, 765, 768, 769
Central P. R. Co. v. Hunsaker, 27 Land
Dec. 297
1116

v. Nevada, 162 U. S. 512 (40:
1057)

..504, 559, 663, 1009, 1010, 1089 Central Transp. Co. v. Pullman's Pal

California Powder Works v. Davis, 151

U. S. 389 (38:206). Callan v. Wilson [1888] 127 U. S. 540 (32: 223)

.

519

.759

567

ace Car Co. 139 U. S. 24 (35: 55)71, 633, 1010, 1089, 1090 v. Pullman's Palace Car Co. 171 .874, 879 U. S. 138 (Adv. S. 1897, 897) 459 Chaffee County v. Potter, 142 (35: 1040) Chaffin v. Taylor, 116 U. S. 728) Chancellor, The, 4 Ben. 153. Chapman v. Esgar, 1 Smale & G. 575. v. Royal Netherlands Navigation Co. L. R. 4 Prob. Div. 157. .

.169, 1093

422

Calliope, The [1891] A. C. 11
Calton v. Utah, 130 U. S. 83 (32: 870)
Comou v. United States, 171 U. S. 277
(43: 163)
Campbell v. Arnold, 1 Johns. 511.
v. Innes, 4 Barn. & Ald. 426.. 1126
v. United States, 107 U. S. 407
(27:592)
.618, 619

Canada Shipping Co. v. British Ship-
owners' Mut. P. Asso. L. R.
23 Q. B. Div. 342.

Canajoharie Nat. Bank v. Diefendorf,

123 N. Y. 191, 10 L. R. A.
676

Canal Street, Re, 11 Wend. 156.

1089

U. S. 355
.696, 697, 698

571 (29:

.240

Chappell v. Bradshaw, 128 U. S. 132
(32: 369)

526

495

359